VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Mission Statement:
All Pine Forest students will graduate ready for college, career and life beyond.
School Core Beliefs:
1. All students will learn grade level and course standards.
2. All students will enroll in a program of study that will prepare
them for further study and a career.
3. All students will set goals and seek meaning and purpose in learning.
4. All students will establish a personal connection to the school.
5. All students will exceed high expectations by embracing a rigorous
course of study.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Pine Forest High School was first established in 1975 as a comprehensive high school. Our high school serves students in the southwest area of Escambia County, Florida. Population at Pine Forest has ranged from a high of approximately 2,000 students to a low of approximately 1,700 students. The current population is approximately 1,900 students for the 2009-2010 school year. The opening of West Florida High School of Advance Technology, a magnet school, next door to Pine Forest in August 2001 has caused a reduction of approximately 100 students per year.
The majority of Pine Forest is housed under one main roof, with the school having an additional 12 portable classrooms. In addition, Pine Forest has two modular buildings that serve as freshmen center classrooms for our 9th grade population. Since 2004 Pine Forest has had several additions and renovations which has included physical education, 600 modular building, and practice facilities. In the fall of 2006, renovations to the 400 and 500 wings were completed. These renovations gave these areas permanent walls and doors, something that we have not had since the school was originally built.
At the close of the 2006-2007 school year, the Escambia County School District closed Woodham High School. The majority of students at Woodham were redistricted to Pine Forest High School. The attendance zone from which Pine Forest draws its students is what could be termed as a "blue collar" community. The primary feeder middle schools for Pine Forest and their school grades are : Bellview Middle School (C) and Woodham Middle School (C).
Pine Forest High School has many innovative academies and programs to prepare students for post-secondary careers and opportunities.
These include:
- Culinary Arts Academy
- Design Services Academy
- Early Childhood Academy
- New Media Academy (New 2009-2010)
- Home Builders Academy (New 2009-2010)
Pine Forest also offers Graphic Arts, Drafting, Web Design, ESE On the Job Training, BCE, and DCT.
School and Community Partners include:
- Coca Cola
- Baptist Hospital
- Beef O Brady's
- Florida Restaurant Association
- US Armed Forces
- Pensacola Junior College
- Gulf Power
- Cox Communication
- Florida State University
Pine Forest is a SACS/CAS accredited public school. The Escambia County School District completed the SACS District Accreditation process in January 2007. Pine Forest High School is in compliance with all seven SAC standards.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Pine Forest High School unique school strengths for the 2009-2010 school year are as follows:
We have 5 academies on campus that prepare our students for the 21st century workforce: Culinary Arts, Design Services, Construction Trade (HBA), Early Childhood Education, and New Media.
We have a freshmen center designated for our true incoming 9th graders to help build a strong academic foundation with content, structure, and culture.
We are the only high school in Escambia County participating in the Teachers Teach, Students Learn Academy that is lead by Dr. Robin Largue and the University of West Florida Institute for Innovative Community Learning.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Pine Forest High School was required to make a 4.5% cut in our school budget for the 2009-2010 school year. These cuts included eliminating one of our two media specialists, 15% cuts across the board for department budgets, and 20% cuts across the board for regular operations.
Student Demographics
Pine Forest High School serves a multi-ethnic school population that consists of 1950 students from predominantly middle to low socio economic community. 44% of the students are black, 40% of students are white, 5% of students are hispanic, 3% of students are asian/pacific, and 1% of students are classified as other. Additionally, 16% of students are Students with Disabilities (SWD) and 4% of students are gifted. 64% of students at Pine Forest are on free or reduced lunch.
Student Attendance Rates
Pine Forest attendance rates for the past 5 school years are as follows:
03-04: 90.4%
04-05: 90.3%
05-06: 90.6%
06-07: 91.1%
07-08: 92.2%
Pine Forest High School has shown a 1.6% increase in the number of students that have been in attendance over the past 3 years.
Student Mobility
Pine Forest High School's mobility rate for the 08-09 school was 89.9%.
Student Suspension Rates
Pine Forest suspension rates for the past 3 school years are as follows:
2006-2007: out of school suspensions 796; 2007-2008 out of school suspensions 1,261; and 2008-2009 out of school suspensions 1,647.
06-07 suspension numbers reflect pre-consolidation with Woodham High School. 07-08 numbers reflect the first year of the consolidation with Woodham High School.
Student Retention Rates
Pine Forest retention rates for the past 3 school years are as follows:
06-07: 15.4%
07-08: 16.3%
08-09: 15.0%
Pine Forest experienced a increase in the number of retained students from the 06-07 school year to the 07-08 school year. This increase was due to the transition of students from Woodham High School to Pine Forest High School. A 1.3% drop in retained students occurred from the 07-08 school year to the 08-09 school year.
Class Size
Class Size figures for Pine Forest High School:
2008-2009 (Survey 3- February)
Pine Forest - Grade 9-12= 18.52:1
District- Grade 9-12= 18.31:1
2007-2008 (Survey 3 February)
Pine Forest - Grade 9-12= 20.18:1
District- Grade 9-12=19.40:1
2006-2007 (Survey 3 February)
Pine Forest - Grade 9-12= 21.31:1
District - Grade 9-12= 20.39
Pine Forest High School's average class size meets the required class size reduction figure of 25:1
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Pine Forest High School has 2 main feeder schools:
Woodham Middle School- School Grade 08-09:(C) and 08-09 AYP: 77%
Bellview Middle School- School Grade 08-09: (C) and 08-09 AYP: 74%
Partnerships and Grants
Pine Forest High School is proud of our community partners:
Coca Cola
Baptist Hospital
Andrews Institute
Dr. Juliet DeCampos
Beef O Brady's
Pensacola Junior College
University of West Florida
Florida Restaurant Association
Johnson Wales University
Florida State University
US Armed Forces
Cox Communication
Gulf Power
Energy Services of Pensacola
Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Frank Murphy
|
BS-Elementary Education- Livingston University;
MS- Educational Leadership- University of West Florida; Principal Certification - State of Florida
|
2
|
8
|
2009 Principal at Pine Forest High School;
2009
School Grade: C
2009 AYP: 72%
2008 Assistant Principal at Escambia High School;2008 School Grade: D
2008 AYP: 74%
2007 Assitant Principal at Escambia High School; 2007 School Grade C; 2007 AYP: 82%
2006 Assistant Principal at Escambia High School; 2006 School Grade C: 2006 AYP: 82%
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Dr. Nettie Linton
|
BS- Elementary Education- University of West Florida; MS- Elementary Education & Reading Phd- Higher Education- Florida State University; Principal Certification- State of Florida
|
10
|
12
|
2009 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School; School Grade: C 2009 AYP: 72% 2008 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School;2008 School Grade: D 2008 AYP: 69% 2007 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School; 2007 School Grade: D 2007 AYP: 72% 2006 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School; 2006 School Grade: C 2006 AYP: 74%
|
|
Assis Principal
|
David Williams
|
BS-Physical Education-University of Alabama; MS- Educational Leadership -University of West Florida; Principal Certification-State of Florida
|
7
|
11
|
2009 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School; School Grade C AYP: 72% 2008 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School; 2008 School Grade: D 2008 AYP:69% 2007 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School; 2007 School Grade: C 2007 AYP: 72% 2006 Assistant Principal at Pine Forest High School; 2006 School Grade: C 2006 AYP: 74%
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Reading
|
Verkishia Palmer
|
BS- Health Science- University of Florida; MS- Public Health- University of Florida; Ed.S.- University of West Florida
|
2
|
2
|
2009 School Grade: C 2009 AYP: 72%; Lowest Quartile Showing learning gains 48%; Reading Proficiency 34%; 2008 School Grade: D 2008 AYP: 69%; Lowest Quartile showing learning gains: 38%; Proficiency 34%
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Assign Mentors to annual contract teachers.
|
Principal and Assistant Principal of Curriculum and Instruction
|
On-going
|
|
|
Participating in the Teachers Teach, Students Learn Academy under the direction of Dr. Robin Largue and the University of West Florida's Institute for Innovative Community Learning
|
Principal, Assistant Principal of Curriculum, and Dr. Robnin Largue
|
August 09-October 09
|
|
|
Partcipating with the University of West Florida and Pensacola Junior College in hosting student teachers to work with current staff
|
District Level staff, Principal, and Assistant Principal of Curriculum and Instruction
|
On-going
|
|
|
College Campus Job Fairs and Recruitment Fairs
|
Principal and District Staff
|
On-going
|
|
|
30- and 90-day meetings with new teachers- Studer Training
|
Principal
|
First 30 days and First 90 days
|
|
|
Rounding
|
Principal
|
On-going
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Almony, Holly
|
English and Reading
|
Reading
|
Assigned a mentor at Pine Forest High School and is assisted by the district instructional coach that is provided by the Director of Secondary Education; Currently completing masters in Reading at the University of West Florida
|
|
Gordon, Jessica
|
Social Science and Reading
|
Reading
|
Assigned a mentor at Pine Forest High School and is assisted by the district instructional coach that is provided by the Director of Secondary Education; Completing the Reading endorsement program provided by the State of Florida
|
|
Havlina, Glenn
|
Social Science, English, and Reading
|
Reading
|
Assigned a mentor at Pine Forest High School and is assisted by the district instructional coach that is provided by the Director of Secondary Education; Completing the Reading endorsement program provided by the State of Florida
|
|
Shannon, Esi
|
English and Reading
|
Reading
|
Assigned a mentor at Pine Forest High School and is assisted by the district instructional coach that is provided by the Director of Secondary Education; Completing the Reading endorsement program provided by the State of Florida
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 109 | 3 | 19 | 29 | 45 | 41 | 95 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Lance, Jeff
|
Mayes, Olivia
|
Mr. Lance is the department chairperson for Foreing Language. He also teaches the same language as the mentee and has completed the required coursework to mentor annual teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Lance, Jeff
|
Trew, Elcianna
|
Mr. Lance is the department chairperson for Foreing Language. He also teaches the same language as the mentee and has completed the required coursework to mentor annual teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Morgan, Tracy
|
Almony, Holly
|
Mrs. Morgan is an experienced reading teacher who has been in the Escambia County School District for several years. She is currently teaching the same program and grade level as the mentee. Mrs. Morgan has completed the required coursework to mentor annual teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Morgan, Tracy
|
McGowan, Anne
|
Mrs. Morgan is an experienced reading teacher who has been in the Escambia County School District for several years. She is currently teaching the same program and grade level as the mentee. Mrs. Morgan has completed the required coursework to mentor annual teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Wheeler, Amy
|
Shannon, Esi
|
Ms. Wheeler is an experienced reading teacher who has been in the Escambia County School District for several years. She is currently teaching the same program and grade level as the mentee. Ms. Wheeler has completed the required coursework to mentor annual teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Wheeler, Amy
|
Havlina, Glenn
|
Ms. Wheeler is an experienced reading teacher who has been in the Escambia County School District for several years. She is currently teaching the same program and grade level as the mentee. Ms. Wheeler has completed the required coursework to mentor annual teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Palmer, Virkeisha
|
Malekovic, Lisa
|
Mrs. Palmer is the Reading Coach for Pine Forest High School and has been for the past 2 years. Mrs. Palmer has completed the required coursework to mentor annual contract teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Sue, Janney
|
Hawkins
|
Mrs. Sue is the department chairperson for Mathematics. She also has taught the same courses as the mentee and has completed the required coursework to mentor annual teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Gilliland, Kathy
|
Scott, Jeremy
|
Mrs. Gilliland is the department chairperson and is very familiar with the courses that Mr. Scott is assigned to for the 09-10 school year. She has completed the required coursework to mentor annual contract teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Barry, Rachel
|
Trahan, Jenny
|
Mrs. Barry is an experienced science classroom teacher and teaches the same course as Mrs. Trahan. She has completed the required coursework to mentor annual contract teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Jenkins, Kathy
|
Lupton, Dana
|
Mrs. Jenkins is an experienced science classroom teacher and has a great deal of experience with the mentee's intructional responsibility. She has completed the required coursework to mentor annual contract teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
|
Turner, Kevin
|
Lupton, Peter
|
Mr. Turner is an experienced science classroom teacher and has a great deal of experience with the mentee's instructional responsibility. He has completed the required coursework to mentor annual contract teachers.
|
Common planning, classroom walkthroughs, and modeling classroom instruction. In addition, all annual contract teachers will be assisted by district level instructional coaches who are provided by the Director of Secondary Education.
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Pine Forest High School received Title I money for the 2009-2010 school year. The following is what the Title I funds are budgeted for:
2 Classroom Teachers- (One of which is a In-School-Suspension Teacher)
1 Guidance Counselor- (Responsible for attendance and mental health counseling)
Professional Development Activities
Parent Literacy Nights
Equipment/Supplies/Software
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Services for migrant children are provided by the district level Title 1 office.
Title I, Part D
Services to neglected and delinquent students are provided by various district-operated programs. These services are overseen by the district level Title 1 office.
Title II
Professional development is offered at both the school and district level.
Pine Forest High School faculty members will participate in professional development activities that are scheduled for every 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month. Teachers participated in a school-wide survey at the close of the 08-09 school year to express interest in areas of professional development. The data was analyzed by the Professional Development Team and a calendar of events was organized during summer planning. Professional development activities will include technology, cross curriculum instruction, behavior management strategies, and other opportunities for improved classroom efficiency and delivery.
Title III
Services for English Language Learners are provided as required by law. Several ESOL centers are provided at various key locations in the district . Teachers who serve ELL identified students have ESOL endorsement on their teaching certificate.
Title X- Homeless
The school works with the district's Homeless Coordinator to provide resources (clothing, school supplies, and social services referrals) for students identified as homeless under the McKinney-Vento Act to eliminate barriers for a free and appropriate education. This program is overseen by the district level Title I Office.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
SAI monies were reduced and/or eliminated from our school budget.
Violence Prevention Programs
The school offers a non-violence and anti-drug program to students that incorporates guest speakers, counseling, and classroom discussion. Red Ribbon Week is held in October with school-wide activities and guest speakers. Through our school's Behavior Management Plan, we will provide training for faculty, staff and students regarding bullying. We are also developing a Positive Behavior Management Plan.
Nutrition Programs
Our school is committed to offering nutritional choices in its cafeteria. This includes salad bar, à la carte items, and self-serve options. Our school is also slated to be a Healthier Generation Alliance School this year. The school follows the district's nutrition program for summer feeding at select sites.
Housing Programs
This is offered at the district level.
Head Start
This program is offered at the district level and several Head Start programs are housed at various elementary schools in the district.
Adult Education
Pine Forest High School offers Community Education programs in the evenings and summer. Core curriculum courses and GED programs are offered for credit recovery as well as adult education opportunities.
Career and Technical Education
Culinary Arts Academy: The Culinary Arts Program is a School-to-Work program, The Pro-Start curriculum was written by and is supported by the Education Foundation of the National Restaurant and Lodging Association. Students develop skills in career and job opportunities, basic food preparation, personal productivity, safety and sanitary work procedures, commercial tools and equipment, nutrition and work ethics. Students will acquire skills for a wide range of food service careers that include but are not limited to Executive Chef, Restaurant Manager, Teacher, Research/Nutritional Chef, Food Editor/Stylist, Sales/Marketing, Director of Facilities Designer, Food Purchasing Director, and Banquet/Catering Director. Students are also offered the opportunity to qualify for Bright Futures/Gold Seal scholarships. Additionally, students who successfully complete the program will test for PROSTART industry certification including Safe Staff, Serve Safe Food Handler Certification, and the National ProStart Certificate of Achievement. To further enhance the Culinary Arts Program, Pine Forest High School culinary students particpate in the On the Job (OJT) portion of the course. Students gain valuable experiences and education in the field of food service from mentors.
Design Services Academy: The Design Services Academy at Pine Forest High School will prepare students for a career in the area of Design Services. Students who complete the academy program will be ready to enter a University Interior Design program. Students who successfully complete the program are eligible for Gold Seal/Bright Futures scholarships.
The Design Services Academy students will be on their way to post-secondary accelerated learning opportunities and national certification opportunities in the area of interior design. This four-year Family and Consumer Science program consists of a Design Services core curriculum with an academic emphasis on related math curriculum.
The career focus of Interior Designer appears on the Statewide Targeted Occupations List and the Regional Targeted Occupations List, and is listed as a high skill, high wage career. Related Design Services such as Fashion Design, Environmental Design, Residential, and Commercial Design will also be studied.
Early Childhood Education Academy: The mission of the Early Childhood Education Academy at Pine Forest High School focuses on broad, transferable skills and stresses understanding and demonstration of the following elements of the Early Childhood Industry: planning; management; finance; technical and production skills; underlying principles of technology, labor, community, health, safety, and environmental issues; and developmentally appropriate practices for children from birth through age eight.
New Media Academy: The mission of the New Media Academy at Pine Forest High School is to prepare graduates for entry-level positions in the multimedia industry and/or to continue their postsecondary education. Students learn to incorporate graphics, sound, video, animation, text, and still images to produce fine art, marketing presentations, digital design, and Web publishing. Students who successfully complete the program may be eligible for Gold Seal/Bright Futures scholarship.
Home Builders Association (HBA) of West Florida Green Construction Trade Academy: This academy focuses on broad, transferable skills and stresses the understanding of all aspects of the building construction industry as well as demostrating such elements of the industry as planning, management, finance, technical and production skills, underlying principles of technology, labor issues, community issues, health issues, safety issues, and environmental issues. The academy utilizes the National Center of Construction Education and Research (NCCER) curriculum to prepare each student to enter into a career path within the architecture and construction career cluster and an opportunity to earn related industry certifications. Students who successfully complete the program may be eligible for Gold Seal/Bright Futures scholarships.
This academy will provide a unique opportunity for students to take George Stone Technical Center Dual Enrollment courses in the 11th and 12th grade at Pine Forest High School, as part of the academy course sequence, without having to leave the campus.
Job Training
Pine Forest High School offers several programs designed around job training opportunities for students. They are as follows:
DCT
BCE
OJT
Culinary Arts Academy
Early Childhood Education Academy
School to work opportunities
Other
Not Applicable
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Leadership Team: composed of teachers representing all core subjects, VoTech, Reading, and school administrators.
|
Mary Exum and Jeanette Gibson
|
During the school year: monthly; During summer planning: 3 to 4 meetings
|
Monthly meeting during Tuesday's zero-hour planning; Summer scheduled as needed; periodic district workshops are scheduled per SREB calendar.
|
Plan the focus and implementation of data-driven school improvement goals
|
|
Literacy Team: composed of teachers representing the core subjects and Reading.
|
Esi Shannon, Amy Wheeler
|
Monthly, with summer planning scheduled as needed.
|
Meetings held during zero-hour planning once a month; periodic district workshops are scheduled per SREB calendar
|
Develop and assist teachers in the integration of literacy strategies across the curriculum.
|
|
Numeracy Team: composed of teachers representing core subjects, and VoTech.
|
Jeff Lamont
|
monthly, with summer planning scheduled as needed
|
Meetings held during zero-hour planning once a month;
periodic district workshops are scheduled per SREB calendar
|
Develop and assist teachers in the integration of numeracy strategies across the curriculum.
|
|
Data Team: composed of teachers trained specifically for accessing and analyzing school and student data.
|
Jeff Lamont
|
Monthly
|
Meetings held during zero-hour planning once a month.
|
Collect and evaluate student data and train other teachers to identify areas of student weaknesses. This data is used to develop remediation for the targeted areas.
|
Technology Learning Groups:
the 1st group is composed of 8 teachers across the curriculum, the 2nd group is composed of 8 science teachers.
|
Group 1-Kathy Gilliland Group 2-Kathy Jenkins
|
Monthly
|
Meetings held during zero-hour planning once a month.
|
These technology groups were established to provide classroom teachers with the technology training and equipment to create a technologically-rich classroom experience for their students and themselves. The goal is to provide opportunities for real world work experiences and technological expertise for students.
|
|
10th Grade Reading/English teachers
|
Holly Riffell and Amy Wheeler
|
Bi-weekly
|
Meetings held during zero-hour planning twice a month.
|
Language Arts and Reading teachers plan integration of reading and writing skills into the 10th grade English and Reading classes. Students have a team of teachers that plan interdisciplinary projects and provide cohesive student instruction on writing and literacy skills.
|
|
Integrated Science II Teachers district-wide
|
Rachel Barry
|
5 times per academic year and breakout sessions during pre-school inservice
|
Scheduled according to the district planning calendar for science inservice
|
This team of teachers plans and coordinates the remediation of students identified as weak in the areas reflected in the 17 annually assessed benchmarks tested on FCAT Science.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
Pine Forest High School implemented the following strategies as a result of the 2007 High School Feedback Report (the data listed below the strategies):
Pine Forest High School targets seniors who are predicted to have difficulty with the college entrance placement test in Mathematics by placing them in a "Math for College Readiness" class.
Pine Forest will also utilized community school classes and Ed Options for grade recovery and college preparedness.
1. Number of 2007 high school graduates with standard diploma or GED: 241
2. Percent of 207 graduates who scored at level 3 or better on the 10th grade FCAT in:
Math 68%
Reading 38%
Both Math/Reading 35%
3. Percent of 2007 graduates who completed a college prep curriculum: 33%
4. Percent of 2007 graduates enrolled in Algebra I or equivalent in a FL public school prior to 9th grade: 27%
5. Percent of 2007 graduates who complete at least one level 3 high school math course: 30%
6. Percent of 2007 graduates who complete at least one dual enrollment math course: 7%
7. Percent of 2007 graduates who completed at least one level 3 high school science course: 54%
8. Percent of 2007 graduates who completed at least one dual enrollment science: 2%
9. Percent of students who took PSAT or PLAN two years prior to graduation year:
PSAT NA
PLAN 78%
10. Percent of 2007 graduates who took SAT or ACT:
SAT 10%
ACT 42%
11. Percent of 2007 graduates who took the SAT/ACT/CPT and scored at or above college-level cut scores:
Math (SAT) 70%
Verbal (SAT) 74%
Math (ACT) 53%
Reading (ACT) 68%
English (ACT) 68%
Math (CPT) 44%
Reading (CPT) 54%
Writing (CPT) 65%
12. Percent of 2007 graduates who were eligible for the maximum Bright Future award:
FL Academic Scholars 3%
FL Medallion Scholars 20%
FL Gold Seal Vocational NA
13. Percent of 2007 graduates who completed at least on AP, IB, AICE, or Dual Enrollment course: 52%
14. Percent of 2007 graduates enrolled in a Florida public postsecondary institution in Fall 2007: 45%
15. Percent of 2007 graduates found enrolled in Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida (ICUF) in Fall 2007: .414%
16. Percent of 2007 graduates found enrolled in an out-of state public or private institution in Fall 2007: 5%
17. Percent of 2007 graduates:
at a community college in Florida during Fall 2007 32%
at a state university in Florida during Fall 2007 12%
at a technical education center in Florida during Fall 2007 .41%
18. Percent of 2007 graduates enrolled in college credit courses in Fall 2007 at a FL public postsecondary institution earning a GPA 2.0: 62%
19. Percent of graduates enrolled in college credit courses at Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida (ICUF) earning a GPA above 2.0: NA
20. Of graduates enrolled in Math course in Florida in Fall, the percent who successfully completed the course:
Remedial Math (non-college credit) 45%
Intermediate Algebra (for elective credit only) 75%
Entry-level Math (for math credit) 65%
Advance Math 55%
21. Of the graduates enrolled in an English course in Florida in Fall, the percent who successfully completed the course:
Remedial Reading or Writing: 78%
Freshmen Comp I or II 67%
Other College-level English 84%
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In grades 9 and 10, 34% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading Test.
|
In grades 9 and 10 39% of the students will achieve mastery for reading on the 2010 FCAT Reading Test
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school will implement the new FAIR assessment, three times a year, to monitor student progress.
|
Principal and Literacy Coach
|
Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
Data meetings looking at printouts of the FAIR assessment.
|
| 2 |
Include content related higher-order and essential questions in lesson plans.
|
Principal and Literacy Team
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs, during department meetings, and submitted weekly to the principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough log and focused walkthroughs to determine frequency of higher order questions.
|
| 3 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Reading and Language Arts classes based on cross-curriculum collaboration.
|
Literacy Coach and Department Chairpersons
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC's upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through FAIR assessments.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In grades 9 and 10, 48% of students achieved learning gains on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading Test.
|
In grades 9 and 10, 51% of students will achieve learning gains on the 2010 administration of the FCAT Reading Test
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students Achievement Chats will be conducted with all students on the FCAT and following the FAIR Assessments
|
Principal, Literacy Coach and Department Chairperson
|
Administrators will review log for Student Achievement Chats during walkthroughs
|
Administrators will randomly ask students how they performed on their most recent assessment to determine if data chats are successful.
|
| 2 |
Content-Area teachers will explicitly infuse literacy skills in lesson plans and instructional delivery
|
Principal, Literacy Coach, Content-Area Teachers, and Literacy Team members
|
When visiting content area classrooms, administrators will focus their attention on the frequency of explicitly teaching of literacy skills using content.
|
FAIR assessments will be disaggregated to content area teachers to determine the effectiveness of small group instruction in all contents
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In grades 9 and 10 48% of the lowest 25% of students made learning gains on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading test.
|
In grades 9 and 10, 51% of students will achieve learning gains on the 2010 administration of the FCAT Reading test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students Achievement Chats will be conducted with all students on the FCAT and following the FAIR Assessment
|
Principal, Literacy Coach, and Department Chairpersons
|
Administrators will review logs for student Achievement Chats during walkthroughs.
|
Administrators will randomly ask students how they performed on their most recent assessment to determined if data chats are successful.
|
| 2 |
Content-Area teachers will explicitly infuse literacy skills in lesson plans and instructional delivery.
|
Principal, Literacy Coach, Content-Area Teachers, and Literacy Team members
|
When visiting content area classrooms, administrators will focus their attention on the frequency of explicitly teaching of literacy skills using content.
|
FAIR assessments will be disaggerated to content area teachers to determine the effectiveness of small group instruction in all contents.
|
| 3 |
Attendance will be monitored
|
Principal and Guidance Counselors
|
Administrators will monitor attendance regularly to identify students with attendance issues.
|
Administrators will check attendance via report cards to determine intervention effectiveness.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
In grades 9 and 10, 34% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading Test.
|
CRISS strategies
|
D. Henderson
|
End of 1st semester 2009
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
|
In grades 9 and 10, 34% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading Test.
|
Cross curriculum reading training increasing rigor in Science and History
|
Reading Coach and Literacy Team
|
Throughout the 2009-2010 school year
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
|
In grades 9 and 10, 51% of students will achieve learning gains on the 2010 administration of the FCAT Reading Test
|
Common planning and lesson planning to review best practices and collaborative instruction through core classes
|
Reading Coach and Literacy Team
|
Throughout the 2009-2010 school year
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
|
In grades 9 and 10, 51% of students will achieve learning gains on the 2010 administration of the FCAT Reading Test
|
CRISS strategies
|
D. Henderson
|
End of 1st semester 2009
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
|
In grades 9 and 10, 51% of students will achieve learning gains on the 2010 administration of the FCAT Reading Test
|
Cross curriculum reading training on how to diagnosis and increase areas of weaknesses.
|
Reading Coach and Literacy Team
|
Throughout the 2009-2010 school year
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
|
In grades 9 and 10 48% of the lowest 25% of students made learning gains on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading test.
|
Common planning and lesson planning to review best practices and collaborative instruction through core classes
|
Reading Coach and Literacy Team
|
Throughout the 2009-2010 school year
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
|
In grades 9 and 10 48% of the lowest 25% of students made learning gains on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading test.
|
CRISS strategies
|
D. Henderson
|
End of 1st semester 2009
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
|
In grades 9 and 10 48% of the lowest 25% of students made learning gains on the 2009 administration of the FCAT Reading test.
|
Cross curriculum reading training on how to diagnosis and increase areas of weaknesses.
|
Reading Coach and Literacy Team
|
Throughout the 2009-2010 schoo year
|
FCAT Reading Data from spring 2010 assessment and FCAT simulations in September and Decemeber
|
Principal
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
The Reading Coach along with the Leadership Team will describe the strategies to encourage and ensure all teachers in all content areas are using literacy strategies. The Reading Coach will meet monthly with each department to share ideas, answer questions, and review lesson plans that contain reading strategies. The administration will also enforce and oversee that the strategies are being taught by conducting frequent classroom walkthroughs and observations.
The Literacy Team, which is made up of teachers of all disciplines, will serve as a resource for those teachers who are unsure of how to utilize the strategies within their content areas. The Literacy team will provide the instructors with helpful materials that may be modified and utilized within classes. The Literacy Team will also promote literacy throughout the school with various activities, challenges, and prizes to involve the student body, parents, faculty, and staff.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Read 180 and Plugged Into Reading |
District |
$65,000.00 |
| Total: $65,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $65,000.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
61% of Pine Forest High School 9th and 10th graders scored proficient on math standards
|
Pine Forest 9th and 10th graders will show a 2% increase on the proficency level on FCAT math during the 2010 spring assessment.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Standardize whiteboards including objectives, essential questions, date, lesson objective, and bell ringer.
|
Principal and Department Chair
|
Classroom walkthroughs
|
Reports generated by classroom walkthroughs
|
| 2 |
Daily bell ringers
|
Principal and Department Chair
|
Review of bell ringer results: target weak areas
|
Classroom assessments and mini assessements
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
69% of Pine Forest High School 9th and 10th graders showed learning gains in math on the 2009 FCAT assessment.
|
Pine Forest High School 9th and 10th graders will increase learning gains in math by 1% to 70% on the 2010 FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Standardize whiteboards including objectives, essential questions, date, lesson objective, and bell ringer.
|
Principal and Department Chair
|
Classroom walkthroughs
|
Classroom walkthrough reports
|
| 2 |
Daily bell ringers
|
Principal and Department Chair
|
Review bell ringer results and target weak areas
|
Data analysis from bell ringers and mini assessments
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
60% of Pine Forest High School 9th and 10th grade students who are in the lowest quartile made learning gains in math on the 2009 FCAT.
|
The percent of Pine Forest High School 9th and 10th grade students who are in the lowest quartile who will make learning gains in math will rise 1% to 61% for the 2010 FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Standardize whiteboards including objectives, essential questions, date, lesson objective, and bell ringer.
|
Principal and Department Chair
|
Classroom walkthroughs
|
Classroom wallkthrough reports
|
| 2 |
Daily bell ringers
|
Principal and Department Chair
|
Review of bell ringer results and target weak areas
|
Results from the bell ringers and mini assessments
|
| 3 |
Monitor lowest quartile every 4 weeks with a Excel shreadsheet
|
Principal and Data Team
|
Monitor reports provided by teachers
|
2010 spring FCAT assessment data.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Pine Forest 9th and 10th graders will show a 2% increase on the proficency level in math on the 2010 FCAT.
|
Increase Math Rigor through Career and Technical intergration
|
Math Leadership Team
|
May 2010
|
Team surveys and collabrative lesson planning and sharing of best practices
|
Math Leadership Team and Principal
|
|
Pine Forest 9th and 10th graders will show a 2% increase on the proficency level in math on the 2010 FCAT.
|
Increase math rigor through AP and Dual Enrollment
|
Principal and AP for Curriculum
|
May 2010
|
Review informaton from teachers participating in AP Summer Institutes
|
Principal
|
|
Pine Forest High School 9th and 10th graders will increase learning gains in math by 1% to 70% on the 2010 spring assessment.
|
Increase Math Rigor through Career and Technical intergration
|
Math Leadership Team
|
May 2010
|
Team surveys and collabrative lesson planning and sharing of best practices
|
Math Leadership Team and Principal
|
|
Pine Forest High School 9th and 10th graders will increase learning gains in math by 1% to 70% on the 2010 spring assessment.
|
Infusing math across the curriculum
|
Math Leadership Team
|
May 2010
|
Teacher surveys and learning community feedback
|
Math Leadership Team and Principal
|
|
Pine Forest students in the 9th and 10th grade who fall within our lowest 25% will show an increase in learning gains of 1% on the 2010 FCAT math assessment.
|
CRISS Strategies
|
D. Henderson
|
December 2009
|
Teacher surveys and classroom walk throughs
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Intensive Math |
District |
$200.00 |
| Total: $200.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $200.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 2009 FCAT Science data, 32% of students tested scored level 3 or higher.
|
Given instruction and remediation on the Sunshine State Standards in Science, 34% of students tested will score at level 3 or higher on the FCAT Science Assessment.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Provide hands-on lab experiments once per week, for a minimum of 9 lab days per quarter
|
Principal and Science Department Chairperson
|
The increased lab schedule will be documented in weekly lesson plans and scheduled labs will be observed by the administration during weekly rounding through the science department.
|
Data from the 2010 FCAT Science assessment.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 2009 FCAT Science data, 32% of students tested scored level 3 or higher.
|
Increase the number of students scoring a 4 or 5 on FCAT Science.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Provide real-world lab activities and have students utilize a common lab report format.
|
Principal, Science Department Chairperson, and Team Leaders
|
Grade level teams will meet every two weeks to review student performance on the targeted benchmarks.
|
Data from the 2010 FCAT Science assessment.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 2009 FCAT Science data, 32% of students tested scored level 3 or higher.
|
In an effort to incorporate technology into the science curriculum, all science teachers will use available technology from TLG equipment and the new laptop floating lab station to allow students to use hands-on technology, and cooperative learning to perform research and create class presentations.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Use computers and box light projectors to make presentations in class.
2. Use the floating laptop lab to allow whole class access to computer research and resources for practice, reinforcement, and presentation development.
|
Principal or his designees,
Science Department Chairperson,
Team Leaders
|
Weekly Lesson Plans will document the use of technology.
The floating laptop lab will have a record of the teachers that utilize it for class research.
Student generated presentations will be used to verify the use of technology.
|
Documentation provided by lesson plans, administrative observations during rounding, and documentation provided to the department chair by the laptop use log.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Given instruction and remediation on the Sunshine State Standards in Science, 34% of students tested will score at level 3 or higher on the FCAT Science Assessment
|
Professional Learning Community established for Integrated Science II, the remedial course that addresses the 11th grade Science FCAT
|
District Science Supervisor
|
Two training dates are for the week of Sept. 8-11. Remaining sessions will be scheduled during the school year
|
The district science supervisor will conduct rounding observations to determine the effectiveness of the training provided. Meetings will be used to review data and student performance to ensure lesson plans and pacing guidelines are being followed.
|
Principal, District Science Supervisor, Science Department Chairperson
|
|
Given instruction and remediation on the Sunshine State Standards in Science, 34% of students tested will score at level 3 or higher on the FCAT Science Assessment
|
Biology teachers will participate in a Professional Learning Group to offer support and resources to teachers teaching 10th grade biology.
|
District Science Supervisor
|
Workshops are scheduled to provide in-service for biology teachers this year.
|
District Science Supervisor will observe during rounding visits to the school throughout the year. The in-service days will be used to provide additional support and to review the pacing guide for biology to make adjustments where necessary.
|
Principal, District Science Supervisor, Science Department Chairperson
|
|
Given instruction and remediation on the Sunshine State Standards in Science, 34% of students tested will score at level 3 or higher on the FCAT Science Assessment
|
Ninth grade science teachers are participating in the Teachers Teach, Students Learn Academy, offered by the Institute for Innovative Community Learning.
|
Dr. Robin Largue, Director of the IICL.
|
Initial training was completed the week prior to pre-school. Implementation and additional training is on-going this year.
|
Dr. Robin Largue, Principal Murphy, and Team Leader will monitor the progress towards implementing teacher goals, and lesson objectives, as outlined on individual 30 day plan documents.
|
Dr. Robin Largue, Principal, Team Leader
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Lab supplies and materials |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $1,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $1,000.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
On the 2009 administration of the FCAT Writing Test, 88% of the 10th grade scored 3.5 or above.
|
On the 2010 administration of the FCAT Writing Test, 90% of the 10th grade will score 3.5 or above.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students will be explicitly taught the skills for a 5-paragraph essay in English class
|
Principal and 3 10th grade level English teachers
|
A school-wide method of keeping data throughout the year and charting growth for individual students and as a school.
Percentage of students making adequate progress toward the school's goal will be determined monthly
|
Monitoring progress from beginning of the year through mid-year with simulation tests.
Scored samples between those tests will occur every two weeks.
|
| 2 |
Students will write no fewer than 8 timed writings in addition to a progressive essay, a research paper, a history paper, and a science paper
|
Principal and 3 10th grade level English teachers
|
A school-wide method of keeping data throughout the year and charting growth for individual students and as a school.
Percentage of students making adequate progress toward the school's goal will be determined monthly.
|
Monitoring progress from beginning of the year through mid-year with simulation tests.
Scored samples between those tests will occur every two weeks.
|
| 3 |
Students will learn to revise their essays through grammar, development, and organization rubrics rubrics.
|
Principal and 3 10th grade level English teachers
|
A school-wide method of keeping data throughout the year and charting growth for individual students and as a school.
Percentage of students making adequate progress toward the school's goal will be determined monthly.
|
Monitoring progress from beginning of the year through mid-year from simulation tests.
Scored samples between those tests will occur every two weeks.
|
| 4 |
Students will write short and extended responses in support of the FCAT Reads test.
|
Principal and 3 10th grade level English teachers
|
A school-wide method of keeping data throughout the year and charting growth for individual students and as a school.
Percentage of students making adequate progress toward the school's goal will be determined monthly.
|
Monitoring progress from beginning of the year through mid-year from simulation tests.
Scored samples between those tests will occur every two weeks.
|
| 5 |
A minimum of 25 responses will be written in English class
|
Principal and 3 10th grade level English teachers
|
A school-wide method of keeping data throughout the year and charting growth for individual students and as a school.
Percentage of students making adequate progress toward the school's goal will be determined monthly.
|
Monitoring progress from beginning of the year through mid-year from simulation tests.
Scored samples between those tests will occur every two weeks.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
On the 2010 administration of the FCAT Writing Test, 90% of 10th graders will score 3.5 or above.
|
Teaching the use of organization, word choice, voice, and revision strategies
|
10th Grade English Chair
|
August 2009
|
Modeling lessons, departmental grading, and classroom wallkthrough
|
Principal and 10th grade English teachers
|
|
On the 2010 administration of the FCAT Writing Test, 90% of 10th graders will score 3.5 or above.
|
Teaching grading and writing of short and long responses
|
Kevin Smith; DOE
|
August 2009
|
School grading for cross-curriculum teachers and practice writing assignments
|
Principal and 10th grade English teachers
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| 4 Box lights |
2 mill |
$1,500.00 |
| 4 Laptop |
2 mill |
$2,000.00 |
| 4 Document Cameras |
2 mill |
$1,400.00 |
| Total: $4,900.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $4,900.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Pine Forest High School had less than 130 parents participate in the PTSA organization during the 2008-2009 school year.
|
Increase participation through parent literacy, college and career nights, and senior parent night.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Provide resources for parents through parent literacy nights to assist their student in an effort to improve their reading scores
|
Literacy Team and Reading Coach
|
Parent surveys and data from the number of parents participating in the event.
|
Data from FCAT simulations and 2010 FCAT scores.
|
| 2 |
Provide resources through parent information nights to review college and career opportunities for students in the 11th and 12th grade.
|
Guidance department and Career Specialist
|
Parent surveys and data from the number of parents participating in the event.
|
Parent survey
|
| 3 |
Provide information to parents about graduation and other senior year opportunities.
|
Senior class sponsor, guidance counselor, and other school staff.
|
Parent surveys and data from the number of parents participating in the event.
|
Parent and student survey
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading materials and supplies to assist parents at home |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Refreshments and other resources |
Title I |
$1,500.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Final Total: $2,000.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
Employee Wellness Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
During the 2008-2009 school year, 23% of Pine Foreat Faculty and Staff participated in the Wellness Assessment provided by Baptist Hospital
|
By the close of the 2009-2010 school year 60% of Pine Forest Faculty and Staff members will have participated in the Wellness Appraisal.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Kick off activities to promote the wellness assessment at a designated faculty meeting to promote a healthy lifestyle for all faculty and staff members.
|
Cyndee Palacios
|
Faculty and Staff Survey and review of data acquired from the wellness assessment.
|
Assessment Data and Survey Monkey
|
| 2 |
Provide literature to faculty and staff with information about locations for improved wellness activities and events throughout the Greater Pensacola Area
|
Cyndee Palacios
|
Faculty and Staff Survey
|
Assessment Data and Survey Monkey
|
| 3 |
Provide incentatives to promote wellness and healthy living
|
Cyndee Palacios
|
Faculty and Staff Survey
|
Assessment Data and Survey Monkey
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
By the close of the 2009-2010 school year 60% of Pine Forest Faculty and Staff members will have participated in the Wellness Appraisal.
|
Increase participation in the wellness appraisal and the importance of a healthy lifestyle in designated faculty meetings and learning community meetings.
|
Cyndee Palacios
|
June 2010
|
Review of participation data acquired from the wellness assessment
|
Cyndee Palacios
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| None |
None |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| None |
None |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Literature from areas fitness centers |
None |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Refreshments for interest meeting |
General Fund |
$100.00 |
| Total: $100.00 |
| Final Total: $100.00 |
|
| End of Employee Wellness Goal |
|
Student Wellness Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
During the 2008-2009 school year students participated in:
Powder Puff Football
Homecoming activities/entertainments
Football, basketball, weightlifting, tennis, golf, swimming, soccer, track and cross country teams
ROTC offers a competitive drill team
The Marching Band performs at all football games and practices daily.
|
Increase student participation and awareness to living a healthier lifestyle through diet and exercise.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Provide an array of intramural type activities for students to participate. (Powder Puff, Volley Buff, Relay for Life Walk-a-Thons, 3 on 3 basketball and other activities)
|
Physical Education Department Head and Student Government Association
|
Student survey
|
Data student participation numbers throughout the 2009-2010 school year.
|
| 2 |
Provide literature and other materials for educating students on the importance of living a healthier lifestyle
|
Physical Education Department Head and Student Government Association
|
Student survey
|
Data student participation numbers throughout the 2009-2010 school year.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Increase student participation and awareness to living a healthier lifestyle through diet and exercise.
|
Providing support for staff to address issues as they relate to promoting a healthier lifestyle through exercise and diet for students
|
Physical Education Department Head and Student Government Association
|
May 2010
|
Student survery and interest level in activities and events provided
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Awards and recognition materials |
Clubs and organizations |
$100.00 |
| Total: $100.00 |
| Final Total: $100.00 |
|
| End of Student Wellness Goal |
|
Discipline Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Out-of-School Suspensions: Of the 1269 students receiving a discipline referral during the 2008-2009 school year, 659 students were suspended. 28% of all discipline referrals resulted in an out-of-school suspension.
|
Decrease the number of out-of-school suspensions for the 2009-2010 school year by 2%.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Implementation of a In-School-Suspension class
|
Assistant Principal of Operations, deans, and ISS teacher
|
Collect and analyze suspension data quarterly. Compare with 2008-2009 data.
|
Frequency count of suspensions
|
| 2 |
Refer students to the counselor for interventions
|
Deans
|
Collect and analyze suspension data monthly of students meeting with counselor
|
Frequency count of suspensions for students receiving counseling.
|
| 3 |
Place students on Behavior Contract. Increase communication with parents. Parents will be informed of the contract and the action steps and will also be encouraged to participate in a review of the student's records at semester break
|
Deans
|
Collect and analyze data monthly. Review of student records at semester.
|
Frequency count of suspension for students on contract.
|
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Attendance: Average daily attendance in 2008-2009 was 92.2%
|
Improve school-wide attendance by 1%
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Promote regular attendance with incentive program and improved communication with parents
|
Principal
|
Create billboard for students to view progress toward achieving extracurricular events; regularly communicate with parents with Connect Ed, parent newsletters, and updates to school-website.
|
Achievement rate of extracurricular events, review parent input via emails, parent newsletters, and PTSA meetings.
|
| 2 |
Conduct a child study meeting for students exceeding 5 days absent in a 30 day period or 10 days absent in a 90 day period
|
Guidance
|
Collect weekly and monthly data for attendance and investigate reports from teachers on students with excessive absences
|
Review weekly and monthly data for students with excessive absences and follow district procedures.
|
| 3 |
Request the visiting teacher meet with students who exceed 15 days absent in a 90 day period
|
Guidance and Deans
|
Collect weekly and monthly data for students referred to the visiting teacher.
|
Review weekly and montly data for students referred to the visiting teacher and follow district procedures.
|
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Bullying
|
Create awareness for Bullying Prevention
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Train students in Bullying Prevention
|
Deans
|
Present grade-level presentations to all English classes, post announcements, use Closed Circuit TV
|
Evaluate data from students reporting incidences of bullying to school staff.
|
| 2 |
Train school staff in Bullying Prevention
|
Safe Schools Department of Escambia County
|
Bullying Prevention Safe Schools Training course via internet
|
Successful completion rate of staff trained in the Bullying Prevention
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Decrease the number of out-of-school suspensions for the 2009-2010 school year by 2%.
|
Behavior Management Plan
|
Deans
|
May 2010
|
Data analysis of referrals and frequency of dean's office visits by students
|
Behavior Management Team
|
|
Create awareness for Bullying Prevention
|
Bullying Prevention
|
Deans and district staff
|
May 2010
|
Data analysis of referrals and reported incidences of bullying
|
Deans and AP of Operations
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| In School Suspension Credit Recovery Program |
Title I |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| In School Suspension Teacher |
Title I |
$40,000.00 |
| Intervention Guidance Counselor |
Title I |
$50,026.00 |
| Total: $90,026.00 |
| Final Total: $90,026.00 |
|
| End of Discipline Goal |
|
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Read 180 and Plugged Into Reading |
District |
$65,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Intensive Math |
District |
$200.00 |
| Science |
Lab supplies and materials |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Reading materials and supplies to assist parents at home |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| Employee Wellness |
None |
None |
$0.00 |
| Total: $66,700.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Writing |
4 Box lights |
2 mill |
$1,500.00 |
| Writing |
4 Laptop |
2 mill |
$2,000.00 |
| Writing |
4 Document Cameras |
2 mill |
$1,400.00 |
| Employee Wellness |
None |
None |
$0.00 |
| Discipline |
In School Suspension Credit Recovery Program |
Title I |
$0.00 |
| Total: $4,900.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Employee Wellness |
Literature from areas fitness centers |
None |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Parental Involvement |
Refreshments and other resources |
Title I |
$1,500.00 |
| Employee Wellness |
Refreshments for interest meeting |
General Fund |
$100.00 |
| Student Wellness |
Awards and recognition materials |
Clubs and organizations |
$100.00 |
| Discipline |
In School Suspension Teacher |
Title I |
$40,000.00 |
| Discipline |
Intervention Guidance Counselor |
Title I |
$50,026.00 |
| Total: $91,726.00 |
| Final Total: $163,326.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/4/2009 2:55:54 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
Funds have not been designated at this point of the school year.
|
0
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The Pine Forest High School School Advisory Council will participate in the following activities:
- Review the School Improvement Plan
- Review goals and objectives of Pine Forest High School
- Monitor the school's progress through the 2009-2010 school year
- Develop and approve a budget for the 2009-2010
- Act on recommendations brought before the committee
- Address school-related strengths and weaknesses
- Promote Pine Forest High School within the community and beyond.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Frank Murphy,
Principal
|
|
2)
Kebbie Hollingsworth,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Teighlor Maxwell,
Student
|
|
4)
Marissa Lusz,
Student
|
|
5)
T'Kara Mullins,
Student
|
|
6)
A'Dajean Johnson,
Student
|
|
7)
Kalli Castleberry,
Student
|
|
8)
Barbara Hogan,
Teacher
|
|
9)
Virkeisha Palmer,
Teacher
|
|
10)
John Volheim,
Parent
|
|
11)
Deanna Neal,
Parent
|
|
12)
Pat Watson,
Parent
|
|
13)
Yvonne Morris,
Parent
|
|
14)
Jeremy Lewis,
Community Member
|
|
15)
Aisha Adkinson,
School Support Personnel
|
|
16)
Chandra Calhoun,
School Support Personnel
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Escambia School District PINE FOREST HIGH SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
34%
|
61%
|
88%
|
32%
|
215
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
46% |
69% |
|
|
115 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
48% (NO) |
60% (YES) |
|
|
108
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
| Percent Tested = 98% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
C |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Escambia School District PINE FOREST HIGH SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
34%
|
56%
|
86%
|
36%
|
212
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
46% |
73% |
|
|
119 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
38% (NO) |
74% (YES) |
|
|
112
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
443 |
|
| Percent Tested = 97% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Escambia School District PINE FOREST HIGH SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
30%
|
53%
|
89%
|
41%
|
213
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
43% |
69% |
|
|
112 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
43% (NO) |
71% (YES) |
|
|
114
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
| Percent Tested = 98% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |