VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
C.O.A.S.T. will provide an educational choice to students and their parents that is characterized by:
1. The intensive study of the Arts and Sciences, in continuous progression and at the highest standards of achievement.
2. A structured environment resulting from a specific code of conduct with diligent attention to character development.
3. The infusion of technology into all subject areas, expanding the student’s world beyond classroom boundaries.
4. Dynamic, integrated core curriculum designed to include the study and appreciation of Wakulla County’s unique ecosystem.
5. Shared responsibility among students, parents, and teachers in the operation of the school.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Located in the historic rural town of St. Marks, Wakulla’s Charter School of the Arts, Sciences, and Technology (COAST) has successfully completed its tenth term in 2008-09. Principal Susan Flournoy led efforts to stabilize student enrollment at 117 students and improve student achievement. Through the Continuous Improvement Model (CIM), introduced at the end of the 2003-04 school year, the faculty of COAST led students in overall academic achievement to achieve an A for the 2008-09 school grade. As of the first week of the 2009-10 school year, COAST's enrollment has reached 140 students.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
A Pre-K program was continued in the 2008-09 school year through the assistance of Arbor Education and Training and will be offered again for the 2009-10 school year. The six full time classroom teachers instructing students have been expanded to eight in the following grade groupings: PreK4-K, 1, 2, 3-4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. The Middle School team has expanded again, with not only seventh and eighth grades being separated into individual grade classes, but sixth grade as well, having been separated from fifth. A science lab and full time science teacher, math teacher, and language arts/reading teacher will continue their employments for the 2009-10 school year. Instruction is self-contained in grades K-5 with students receiving additional instruction in Art, Music, and P.E. daily. A full time Title I Resource teacher is part of the faculty and manages interim assessment in addition to reading and math remediation for grades 1-6.
COAST served 30 exceptional students in an inclusion model during the 2008-09 school year. We are fortunate to have an ESE teacher, who is also a licensed speech pathologist, to provide ongoing and consistent services under the Exceptional Student Education program. He provides in-class, individual and small group assistance to ESE students on regular curriculum assignments daily. Additionally, the services of a gifted teacher were provided under consult on a monthly basis for the enrolled gifted students; differentiated instruction in the classroom also helped to accommodate those students who were gifted.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
COAST is at a disadvantage in facilities and/or space, and with the budget cuts, the school was not able to expand to comfortably accommodate the growth of the student population for the 2009-10 school year.
Student Demographics
At the end of the 2008-09 school year, there were a total of 117 students enrolled at COAST. Students who qualified for free or reduced price breakfast and lunches were at approximately 76%, an increase of 17% over the previous year. Beginning the 2009-10 school year, COAST is proud to have 140 students enrolled. Less than 34% of the student population is Leon County residents, approximately 65% is Wakulla County residents, and 2% of our students are from Gadsden County. The minority percentage is at 12%.
Student Attendance Rates
Students absent 21+ days totaled 21.5% in 2007-08 with 26 students out of 121 being absent 21+ days. In the 2008-09 school year, COAST was able to enter the district policy of truancy court referrals. This procedure will continue in the 2009-10 school year with the expectation of improved student attendance.
Student Mobility
COAST Charter School had 99% stability in 2007-08 having 104 students at the October FTE count, and 103 students at the February FTE count.
Student Suspension Rates
COAST’s suspension rate for 2008-09 was 3%. As of the beginning of the 2009-10 school year, COAST has implemented the PBS, or Positive Behavior Support, program with the expectation of decreased suspension rates; the program is implemented to prevent the escalating of classroom disruptions.
Student Retention Rates
COAST retained 5% of students in 2008-09, compared to 0% in 2007-08. Under school improvement funding, the after school remediation program implemented during the 2008-09 will be continued in the 2009-10 school year with the expectation of obtaining the 0% retention rate of 2007-08.
Class Size
In the 2008-09 school year, COAST was in compliance with Class-Size Reduction. During 2009-10, the compliance will continue and all legal requirements will be met.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
There is no feeder pattern for COAST, with it being a School of Choice and serving students from within the district, other districts, other counties, and previously home-schooled students. Students come to COAST with an array of educational backgrounds. Therefore no patterns are evident. The goal for COAST is to take a child from where they are, academically, and try to find a point of success or proficiency.
Partnerships and Grants
In addition to the Florida Education Finance Program, federal Title I and Title I School Improvement Grant funds, the school received financial support from the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the National School Lunch Program. COAST’s PTO contributes a small amount of funding to the school’s fundraising budget as well.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Susan Flournoy
|
B.S. in Early Childhood Development &
FL's Teachers Certification
|
8
|
7
|
•2003-04; school grade of C; AYP not met but 93% of criteria satisfied; 59% of students made learning gains in Math and 61% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2004-05; school grade of A; AYP not met but 97% of criteria satisfied; 81% of students made learning gains in Math and 70% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2005-06; school grade of C; AYP not me but 97% of criteria satisfied; 67% of students made learning gains in Math and 50% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2006-07; school grade of B; AYP not met but 95% of criteria satisfied; 61% of students made learning gains in Math and 59% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2007-08; school grade of B; AYP not met but 92% of criteria satisfied; 71% of students made learning gains in Math and 61% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2008-09; school grade of A; AYP not met but 87% of criteria satisfied; 67% of students made learning gains in Math and 63% of students made learning gains in Reading
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
| No data submitted |
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
1. COAST hires only highly qualified teachers. The school has a unique setting and attracts a high caliber of personnel.
|
Principal
|
N/A
|
Ongoing Strategy
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 10 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 100 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Jane Young
|
Laura Taff
|
Mrs. Young’s previous experience in the 3-4 class and CET certification.
|
Weekly meetings, review of lessons, in-class observations, CIM, curriculum review, and Gradequick training.
|
|
Karen Johnson
|
Nancy Forinash
|
Mrs. Johnson’s previous experience in the 1st grade class and CET certification.
|
Weekly meetings, review of lessons, in-class observations, CIM, curriculum review, and Gradequick training.
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Federal, state and local funds are all utilized towards the common goal of improving student achievement at COAST. Title I funds are used to pay for the salary of a full time resource teacher for reading and math grades 1-6. Inclusion and small group remediation are implemented daily to students identified as in need. Additional Title I funds are used as restricted by law for data driven professional development and increasing parent involvement, all moving towards the ultimate goal of improved student achievement. FEFP funds are budgeted with priorities of maintaining quality teachers and staff and curriculum needs for achieving higher performance from individual students. Additional Title I funds have been set aside under NCLB for supplemental education services for the purpose of meeting AYP.
COAST is a Correction 1 school and has not met AYP. COAST is considered a SINI, or School In Need of Improvement. Despite not making AYP, learning gains are significant and COAST has raised the school grade from a B to an A. IDEA funds are used for a full time ESE/Speech teacher who serves the 30% of students with special needs on a daily basis.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part D
Title II
Title III
Title X- Homeless
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
To supplement academic instruction, COAST will continue the After School Tutoring program that was implemented during the 2008-09 school year. The program will begin September 15, 2009 and end March 4, 2010, excepting school holidays. Three days a week, one and a half hours a day, grades 1-6 will receive additional small group instruction using a research-based remediation program. The program is for students who scored below the 58th percentile on Stanford or whose FCAT achievement level was a 1 or a low 2.
Violence Prevention Programs
Effective the first day of the 2009-10 school year, COAST will be fully implementing the Positive Behavior Support system (PBS) throughout the entire school. This system of positive reinforcement of good behaviors will be used as a violence prevention program, to try to stop violent behavior before it starts. We believe that if we “Catch Them Being Good,” the number of disciplinary problems and incidents of violence will be reduced.
Nutrition Programs
Under the National School Lunch Program, student nutrition has always been a priority at COAST. With a full breakfast and lunch program, the 76% economically disadvantaged students are served daily nutritious meals and are versed in lifelong, sound nutrition practices.
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
CIM Team
|
Jane Young & Karen Johnson
|
Once a year
|
Beginning of School Year
|
To teach new teachers and give a re-fresher course to returning teachers, about creating their FOCUS calendars and lesson timelines based on the CIM.
|
|
Middle-School Team
|
Karen Connon
|
Approximately once a week
|
End of the Week
|
Student data analysis; to discuss any students in need of intervention, whether it’s instructional or disciplinary.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
Local area preschools and day cares are offered spring field trips to COAST and, individually, can be included in Spend the Day in Kindergarten at COAST. COAST has implemented its own Pre-K program with support from Arbor Education and the State Of Florida. Pre-K is combined with Kindergarten in a full school day program. There is no further charge to parents for this four year old program. Transportation is provided with the regular bus routes. Pre-K students transitioned easily into the Kindergarten routines after completing their first year at COAST.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
White Economically Disadvantaged
|
Achieve Grade-Level Proficiency
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
After School Remediation
|
After School tutor/teacher
|
Interim Assessment
|
FAIR and teacher-created assessment
|
| 2 |
In-School Remediation
|
Title I Resource Teacher
|
Interim Assessment
|
FAIR and teacher-created assessment
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Differentiated Instruction/ Accountability
|
Reading
|
District, Administrative, and Peer
|
Ongoing
|
Interim Assessments
|
Administrator and Title I Resource Teacher
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
Cross-curriculum planning, scaffolding, data analysis, and extended planning to support the HQ reading teacher for grades 6-8.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| After School remediation using Kaleidoscope |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$21,000.00 |
| After School remediation using Kaleidoscope |
Title I – Part A |
$39,500.00 |
| Total: $60,500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Student computer stations, document cameras, projectors, and smartboards |
IDEA |
$13,585.00 |
| Student computer stations, document cameras, projectors, and smartboards |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$8,000.00 |
| Total: $21,585.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| District- and School-based training for CIM and RtI |
Title I – Part A |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Increase Kaleidoscope levels |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$2,000.00 |
| Total: $2,000.00 |
| Final Total: $84,585.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Economically Disadvantaged
|
Improve students making learning gains and improve lower quartile learning gains
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
After School Remediation
|
After School Tutors/Teachers
|
Interim Assessment
|
GMADE and teacher-created assessment
|
| 2 |
In-School Remediation
|
Title I Resource Teacher
|
Interim Assessment
|
GMADE and teacher-created assessment
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Improve lower quartile and learning gains
|
Math
|
District, Administrator, Peers and Consultant
|
Ongoiong
|
Interim Assessments
|
District, Administrator, Title I Resource Teacher, and Math Consultant
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Consultant |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| GMADE |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$3,400.00 |
| Total: $3,400.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Consultant |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Textbook publisher math kits |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$2,000.00 |
| Total: $2,000.00 |
| Final Total: $5,400.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
COAST student Science proficiency percentage increased 8% to reach 54% in 2009.
|
N/A
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
COAST student Writing proficiency percentage increased 14% to reach 89% in 2009.
|
N/A
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Parent Notification of Events and Educational Opportunities for their Students
|
Improve parent involvement by increasing amount and frequency of event notification
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Flyers, Letters home multiple times before an activity/event
|
Title I Resource Teacher
|
Sign-in sheets at every school function to show parent attendance
|
Brief Survey
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Parent Resource Center Updates, Family Dinners, and Family Make-N-Takes |
Title I – Part A |
$620.00 |
| Total: $620.00 |
| Final Total: $620.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
After School remediation using Kaleidoscope |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$21,000.00 |
| Reading |
After School remediation using Kaleidoscope |
Title I – Part A |
$39,500.00 |
| Mathematics |
Consultant |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $60,500.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Student computer stations, document cameras, projectors, and smartboards |
IDEA |
$13,585.00 |
| Reading |
Student computer stations, document cameras, projectors, and smartboards |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$8,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
GMADE |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$3,400.00 |
| Total: $24,985.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
District- and School-based training for CIM and RtI |
Title I – Part A |
$500.00 |
| Mathematics |
Consultant |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Increase Kaleidoscope levels |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$2,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Textbook publisher math kits |
Title I School Improvement Grant |
$2,000.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Parent Resource Center Updates, Family Dinners, and Family Make-N-Takes |
Title I – Part A |
$620.00 |
| Total: $4,620.00 |
| Final Total: $90,605.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 8/28/2009 2:25:34 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
| No data submitted |
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The School Advisory Council is involved in the following activities:
1. Assist in reviewing School Improvement Plan and Budget
2. Oversee/Approve spending of school improvement funds to be used for special programs
3. Review mid-year reports
4. Assist principal with overall guidance of school
5. Respond to concerns of the school community
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Susan Flournoy,
Principal
|
|
2)
Lesley Gerrell,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Hallie Anderson,
Student
|
|
4)
Foster Anderson,
Student
|
|
5)
Judy Richards,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Jane Young,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Paulette Anderson,
Parent
|
|
8)
Sarah Lloyd,
Parent
|
|
9)
Laura Bentley,
Parent
|
|
10)
Kevin Clewis,
Parent
|
|
11)
Lakisha Gavin,
Parent
|
|
12)
Alan Wittmier,
Community Member
|
|
13)
Dr. Dave McOuat,
School Support Personnel
|
|
14)
Addie Allen,
School Support Personnel
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Wakulla School District WAKULLA COAST CHARTER SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
68%
|
62%
|
89%
|
54%
|
273
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
63% |
67% |
|
|
130 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
63% (YES) |
68% (YES) |
|
|
131
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Wakulla School District WAKULLA COAST CHARTER SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
68%
|
56%
|
75%
|
46%
|
245
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
61% |
71% |
|
|
132 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
60% (YES) |
73% (YES) |
|
|
133
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
510 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
B |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Wakulla School District WAKULLA COAST CHARTER SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
63%
|
63%
|
87%
|
59%
|
272
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
59% |
61% |
|
|
120 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
58% (YES) |
63% (YES) |
|
|
121
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
513 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
B |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |