VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

C.O.A.S.T. will provide an educational choice to students and their parents that is characterized by:
1. The intensive study of the Arts and Sciences, in continuous progression and at the highest standards of achievement.
2. A structured environment resulting from a specific code of conduct with diligent attention to character development.
3. The infusion of technology into all subject areas, expanding the student’s world beyond classroom boundaries.
4. Dynamic, integrated core curriculum designed to include the study and appreciation of Wakulla County’s unique ecosystem.
5. Shared responsibility among students, parents, and teachers in the operation of the school.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Located in the historic rural town of St. Marks, Wakulla’s Charter School of the Arts, Sciences, and Technology (COAST) has successfully completed its tenth term in 2008-09. Principal Susan Flournoy led efforts to stabilize student enrollment at 117 students and improve student achievement. Through the Continuous Improvement Model (CIM), introduced at the end of the 2003-04 school year, the faculty of COAST led students in overall academic achievement to achieve an A for the 2008-09 school grade. As of the first week of the 2009-10 school year, COAST's enrollment has reached 140 students.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

A Pre-K program was continued in the 2008-09 school year through the assistance of Arbor Education and Training and will be offered again for the 2009-10 school year. The six full time classroom teachers instructing students have been expanded to eight in the following grade groupings: PreK4-K, 1, 2, 3-4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. The Middle School team has expanded again, with not only seventh and eighth grades being separated into individual grade classes, but sixth grade as well, having been separated from fifth. A science lab and full time science teacher, math teacher, and language arts/reading teacher will continue their employments for the 2009-10 school year. Instruction is self-contained in grades K-5 with students receiving additional instruction in Art, Music, and P.E. daily. A full time Title I Resource teacher is part of the faculty and manages interim assessment in addition to reading and math remediation for grades 1-6.

COAST served 30 exceptional students in an inclusion model during the 2008-09 school year. We are fortunate to have an ESE teacher, who is also a licensed speech pathologist, to provide ongoing and consistent services under the Exceptional Student Education program. He provides in-class, individual and small group assistance to ESE students on regular curriculum assignments daily. Additionally, the services of a gifted teacher were provided under consult on a monthly basis for the enrolled gifted students; differentiated instruction in the classroom also helped to accommodate those students who were gifted.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

COAST is at a disadvantage in facilities and/or space, and with the budget cuts, the school was not able to expand to comfortably accommodate the growth of the student population for the 2009-10 school year.


Student Demographics

At the end of the 2008-09 school year, there were a total of 117 students enrolled at COAST. Students who qualified for free or reduced price breakfast and lunches were at approximately 76%, an increase of 17% over the previous year. Beginning the 2009-10 school year, COAST is proud to have 140 students enrolled. Less than 34% of the student population is Leon County residents, approximately 65% is Wakulla County residents, and 2% of our students are from Gadsden County. The minority percentage is at 12%.


Student Attendance Rates

Students absent 21+ days totaled 21.5% in 2007-08 with 26 students out of 121 being absent 21+ days. In the 2008-09 school year, COAST was able to enter the district policy of truancy court referrals. This procedure will continue in the 2009-10 school year with the expectation of improved student attendance.


Student Mobility

COAST Charter School had 99% stability in 2007-08 having 104 students at the October FTE count, and 103 students at the February FTE count.


Student Suspension Rates

COAST’s suspension rate for 2008-09 was 3%. As of the beginning of the 2009-10 school year, COAST has implemented the PBS, or Positive Behavior Support, program with the expectation of decreased suspension rates; the program is implemented to prevent the escalating of classroom disruptions.


Student Retention Rates

COAST retained 5% of students in 2008-09, compared to 0% in 2007-08. Under school improvement funding, the after school remediation program implemented during the 2008-09 will be continued in the 2009-10 school year with the expectation of obtaining the 0% retention rate of 2007-08.


Class Size

In the 2008-09 school year, COAST was in compliance with Class-Size Reduction. During 2009-10, the compliance will continue and all legal requirements will be met.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

There is no feeder pattern for COAST, with it being a School of Choice and serving students from within the district, other districts, other counties, and previously home-schooled students. Students come to COAST with an array of educational backgrounds. Therefore no patterns are evident. The goal for COAST is to take a child from where they are, academically, and try to find a point of success or proficiency.


Partnerships and Grants

In addition to the Florida Education Finance Program, federal Title I and Title I School Improvement Grant funds, the school received financial support from the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the National School Lunch Program. COAST’s PTO contributes a small amount of funding to the school’s fundraising budget as well.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Susan Flournoy B.S. in Early Childhood Development &
FL's Teachers Certification
8 7 •2003-04; school grade of C; AYP not met but 93% of criteria satisfied; 59% of students made learning gains in Math and 61% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2004-05; school grade of A; AYP not met but 97% of criteria satisfied; 81% of students made learning gains in Math and 70% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2005-06; school grade of C; AYP not me but 97% of criteria satisfied; 67% of students made learning gains in Math and 50% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2006-07; school grade of B; AYP not met but 95% of criteria satisfied; 61% of students made learning gains in Math and 59% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2007-08; school grade of B; AYP not met but 92% of criteria satisfied; 71% of students made learning gains in Math and 61% of students made learning gains in Reading
•2008-09; school grade of A; AYP not met but 87% of criteria satisfied; 67% of students made learning gains in Math and 63% of students made learning gains in Reading

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
No data submitted

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1. COAST hires only highly qualified teachers. The school has a unique setting and attracts a high caliber of personnel. Principal N/A Ongoing Strategy


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
N/A N/A N/A N/A


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
10204020206010010010


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
Jane Young Laura Taff Mrs. Young’s previous experience in the 3-4 class and CET certification. Weekly meetings, review of lessons, in-class observations, CIM, curriculum review, and Gradequick training.
Karen Johnson Nancy Forinash Mrs. Johnson’s previous experience in the 1st grade class and CET certification. Weekly meetings, review of lessons, in-class observations, CIM, curriculum review, and Gradequick training.



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A

Federal, state and local funds are all utilized towards the common goal of improving student achievement at COAST. Title I funds are used to pay for the salary of a full time resource teacher for reading and math grades 1-6. Inclusion and small group remediation are implemented daily to students identified as in need. Additional Title I funds are used as restricted by law for data driven professional development and increasing parent involvement, all moving towards the ultimate goal of improved student achievement. FEFP funds are budgeted with priorities of maintaining quality teachers and staff and curriculum needs for achieving higher performance from individual students. Additional Title I funds have been set aside under NCLB for supplemental education services for the purpose of meeting AYP.

COAST is a Correction 1 school and has not met AYP. COAST is considered a SINI, or School In Need of Improvement. Despite not making AYP, learning gains are significant and COAST has raised the school grade from a B to an A. IDEA funds are used for a full time ESE/Speech teacher who serves the 30% of students with special needs on a daily basis.


Title I, Part C- Migrant


Title I, Part D


Title II


Title III


Title X- Homeless


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

To supplement academic instruction, COAST will continue the After School Tutoring program that was implemented during the 2008-09 school year. The program will begin September 15, 2009 and end March 4, 2010, excepting school holidays. Three days a week, one and a half hours a day, grades 1-6 will receive additional small group instruction using a research-based remediation program. The program is for students who scored below the 58th percentile on Stanford or whose FCAT achievement level was a 1 or a low 2.


Violence Prevention Programs

Effective the first day of the 2009-10 school year, COAST will be fully implementing the Positive Behavior Support system (PBS) throughout the entire school. This system of positive reinforcement of good behaviors will be used as a violence prevention program, to try to stop violent behavior before it starts. We believe that if we “Catch Them Being Good,” the number of disciplinary problems and incidents of violence will be reduced.


Nutrition Programs

Under the National School Lunch Program, student nutrition has always been a priority at COAST. With a full breakfast and lunch program, the 76% economically disadvantaged students are served daily nutritious meals and are versed in lifelong, sound nutrition practices.


Housing Programs


Head Start


Adult Education


Career and Technical Education


Job Training


Other


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Principal, Susan Flournoy; Title I Resource Teacher, Lesley Gerrell; ESE/Speech Teacher, Marc Richter; and the teacher signing up the student for a meeting.


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

The COAST RtI Leadership Team, or Intervention Support Team (IST), will have a sign-up sheet for teachers to use to request an IST meeting for a student they believe requires more intense intervention in addition to what classroom teachers can provide. Before signing a student up, the teacher must have completed their RtI packet with fidelity. Their RtI packets include a checklist of every step they must complete before an IST meeting, such as in-class interventions. When their packet is complete, the teacher may sign a student up for an IST meeting. Once signed up, a meeting date and time are set up, the teacher is notified, and the parent is notified and invited to attend the meeting.

During the meeting, one of the IST will keep a tracking folder for every student. The tracking folder will contain all paperwork and notes pertaining to that particular student’s interventions and progress monitoring. If after all interventions have been completed with fidelity and the student has not reached their benchmark, that student will be considered for ESE services.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

COAST’s IST will mentor regular teachers and special area teachers with strategic interventions and accountability as outlined in the school improvement plan.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

FAIR (Florida Assessment for Instruction in Reading) will be administered three times during the year. All grade K-8 students will take the Broad Screen and the Broad Diagnostic Inventory, with targeted students being assessed with the Targeted Diagnostic Inventory. All data is entered in the PMRN (Progress Monitoring Reporting Network). Disaggregated data reports are then available to administrators, teachers, and coaches to use in planning for instruction. Ongoing progress monitoring is utilized for Tier II and Tier III students between the assessment windows. This is also part of FAIR. Teacher-created interim math assessments and GMADE will be given to all students grade K-8 three times a year to monitor their progress. Riverdeep, FOCUS, FCAT Explorer, and Dashboard will also be used to progress monitor the Tier II and Tier III students.


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

COAST will participate in the district RtI training for administrators and staff, as well as ongoing training by the COAST IST. According to the district training requirements, all personnel are required to complete a five-hour online RtI module. School-based RtI district team members will work with faculties to orient them to the district and school plans. A teacher packet has been created and is available to all teachers on the district website. Ongoing training will occur throughout the school year with some utilization of early release days. In addition, the school IST will serve as a training forum for teachers who are working with Tier II and Tier III students.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


COAST’s FCAT Writing scores increased 14% to reach 89% proficiency. In Reading, the school’s percentage stayed at 68% proficiency of students reading at or above grade level. However, the percentage of students making a year’s worth of progress increased 2% to reach 63% proficiency, and the percentage of struggling students making a year’s worth of progress increased 3% to reach 63% proficiency. AYP was not met in Reading, with White, Economically Disadvantaged being the subgroup we need to work on. In Math, the school’s percentage of students performing at or above grade level increased 6% to total 62% proficiency. This appears to be a direct correlation to the hiring of a Math consultant who trained teachers to use various methods when teaching math. AYP was not met in Math either, with Economically Disadvantaged students being the subgroup we need to work on. In addition, COAST’s proficiency of students performing at or above grade level in the Science portion of FCAT increased 8% to reach 54% proficiency.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

COAST faculty and staff work together for improved student performance under Florida's Continuous Improvement Model (CIM). COAST adopted the CIM model in June 2004 and received training through the Department of Education. As this model has continued to prove effective since its adoption, the CIM model will continue to be used for the 2009-2010 school year. This improvement model is followed school-wide and crosses all curriculum.

The CIM model is founded on research from two major sources: the Effective Schools Project and TQM (Total Quality Management), a business management philosophy. Of the ten original correlates from the Effective Schools Project, five are integrated into the CIM: strong instructional leadership, high expectations for student achievement, instructional focus on reading, writing and mathematics, a safe and orderly climate and frequent assessment. CIM calls for the alignment of curriculum standards to teaching strategies, as well as alignment of student assessment to staff development.

To ensure the alignment of curriculum standards to teaching strategies, teachers, including special area teachers (Art, Music, and P.E.) create focus calendars and weighted curriculum timelines for the year after their annual CIM Review/Refresher course that is presented to new and returning faculty and staff each year during the pre-school work week. Two members of the faculty that completed the original CIM training have developed COAST’s CIM Review/Refresher course. All teachers receive professional development credit for this mandatory annual workshop. Additionally, teachers administer frequent local classroom assessments on an ongoing basis.

The Total Quality Management business model enables COAST to become more data driven, to become process oriented, and to identify customers and products. Basically, the CIM model utilizes Mary Barksdale’s “8 Steps to Student Success”:

Step 1 Break down data
Step 2 Develop Instructional Timeline
Step 3 Utilize appropriate Instructional Focus Lessons
Step 4 Conduct continuous Assessment
Step 5 Provide tutorials
Step 6 Provide enrichment
Step 7 Continue Maintaining
Step 8 Monitor the project

COAST has instituted a heightened professional accountability system via lesson plan highlights and extended teacher planning time to implement school wide focus calendars. COAST has strong instructional leadership, high expectations for student achievement, and instructional focus on reading, writing, science, and mathematics in a safe/orderly climate, and with frequent assessments. The mid-year report indicates that teachers are focused on the necessary instruction to assure student proficiency in reading, math, and writing.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

The COAST academic curriculum is aligned to the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS). Instruction and assessment are conducted through a systematic process. Students scoring Level 1 on the 2009 FCAT and those scoring below 56% on Stanford are considered in need of intervention. Those students needing intervention, according to RtI standards, will receive additional instruction in reading and/or math from the Title I Resource Teacher. SRA/McGraw-Hill’s Kaleidoscope will be the curriculum of the additional instruction students’ receive. Kaleidoscope is a progressive, step-by-step program that breaks down reading into easier to learn steps, helping diagnose what components of reading a student is having trouble mastering. The Title I Resource Teacher has been trained in Kaleidoscope and all its components in order to further professional development and to better instruct students needing additional, more intense instruction than the classroom can offer.


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

A school wide math pre, interim, and post assessment was developed during the 2008-09 school year by the faculty and will continue to be administered during the 2009-10 school year. New this year, the Florida Assessment for Instruction in Reading (FAIR) will be given to determine all students’ progress in reading. There will be a pre, interim, and post assessment for progress monitoring purposes. FAIR data will also be used should a student need an IST meeting.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

School-wide planning is ongoing throughout the year with special area and regular classroom teachers meeting frequently to coordinate cross-curriculum planning. School-wide FOCUS Calendars are implemented for certain benchmarks.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

Career Education and Planning will be taught as required to all 8th Grade students. Additionally, special visitors from various career fields are brought in for school-wide assemblies for all grade levels.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


According to CIM, teachers plan and implement and are monitored by the administrator’s classroom walk-throughs.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

Focus lessons are developed and delivered according to the CIM model, through extended planning.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

Focus lessons are revised and monitored according to classroom achievement and extensive planning with co-teachers and administrator.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


FAIR, GMADE, and teacher-created math interim assessments.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

Resource teacher and regular classroom teacher analyze data and determine differentiated instruction and interventions.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

According to the FAIR implementation, GMADE, and the teacher-created assessment, focus calendars are changed as needed.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

The Title I Resource and ESE teachers will review interim data three to four times a year and advise teachers of needed modifications.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

The Principal will conduct classroom walk-throughs, and lesson plan and focus calendar review. The leadership team will provide ongoing data analysis.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


The researched-based curriculum being used for intensive instruction and interventions is Kaleidoscope, Levels A-F. Open Court is the core curriculum for the classes. Kaleidoscope will be used in the remediation given by the Title I Resource Teacher while Open Court will be used in in-class differentiated instruction and/or small groups.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

The supplemental and intensive instruction are structured to first assess the areas in need of intervention, then the student is re-taught the non-mastered skills in a step-by-step progressive manner that breaks down the problem into smaller, more manageable, and more focused steps.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

Based on FCAT and Stanford scores, COAST will determine the areas that need improvement and make sure teachers receive professional development to strengthen those area scores. COAST determines the professional development that will better the instruction strategies for all students and that which will give both teachers and students a more diverse understanding of the area in need of improvement.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

Students scoring a Level 1 on FCAT Reading or Math, students scoring below 60% on Stanford, and students whose teachers believe them to be in need of more intensive instruction/intervention than is possible in the classroom.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

The effectiveness of the interventions will be measured through FAIR, teacher-created interim assessments, GMADE, Riverdeep, and FCAT Explorer.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

Differentiated instruction, small group learning, and an After-School enrichment program.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

Students are identified for enrichment strategies based on their FCAT scores, in-class assessments, and if they are labeled as “Gifted.”




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
CIM Team Jane Young & Karen Johnson Once a year Beginning of School Year To teach new teachers and give a re-fresher course to returning teachers, about creating their FOCUS calendars and lesson timelines based on the CIM.
Middle-School Team Karen Connon Approximately once a week End of the Week Student data analysis; to discuss any students in need of intervention, whether it’s instructional or disciplinary.


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition

Local area preschools and day cares are offered spring field trips to COAST and, individually, can be included in Spend the Day in Kindergarten at COAST. COAST has implemented its own Pre-K program with support from Arbor Education and the State Of Florida. Pre-K is combined with Kindergarten in a full school day program. There is no further charge to parents for this four year old program. Transportation is provided with the regular bus routes. Pre-K students transitioned easily into the Kindergarten routines after completing their first year at COAST.


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

No Other Goals were submitted for this school

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 8/28/2009 2:25:34 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


The School Advisory Council is involved in the following activities:
1. Assist in reviewing School Improvement Plan and Budget
2. Oversee/Approve spending of school improvement funds to be used for special programs
3. Review mid-year reports
4. Assist principal with overall guidance of school
5. Respond to concerns of the school community


SAC Members

Members
1)  Susan Flournoy,   Principal
2)  Lesley Gerrell,   SAC Chair
3)  Hallie Anderson,   Student
4)  Foster Anderson,   Student
5)  Judy Richards,   Teacher
6)  Jane Young,   Teacher
7)  Paulette Anderson,   Parent
8)  Sarah Lloyd,   Parent
9)  Laura Bentley,   Parent
10)  Kevin Clewis,   Parent
11)  Lakisha Gavin,   Parent
12)  Alan Wittmier,   Community Member
13)  Dr. Dave McOuat,   School Support Personnel
14)  Addie Allen,   School Support Personnel
 

AYP DATA

No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Wakulla School District
WAKULLA COAST CHARTER SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 68%  62%  89%  54%  273   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 63%  67%      130  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 63% (YES)  68% (YES)      131  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         534   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Wakulla School District
    WAKULLA COAST CHARTER SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 68%  56%  75%  46%  245   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 61%  71%      132  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 60% (YES)  73% (YES)      133  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         510   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         B  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Wakulla School District
    WAKULLA COAST CHARTER SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 63%  63%  87%  59%  272   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 59%  61%      120  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 58% (YES)  63% (YES)      121  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         513   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         B  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested