VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Our Children’s Academy is a Charter School started in 2006. OCA serves students two years old through fifth grade who have a variety of special needs and have been identified for services through Exceptional Student Education and have a physician’s prescription for occupational, physical and/or speech language therapy. We currently serve 87 students.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Our Children’s Academy is a Charter School started in 2006. OCA serves students two years old through fifth grade who have a variety of special needs and have been identified for services through Exceptional Student Education and have a physician’s prescription for occupational, physical and/or speech language therapy.
Our Children’s Academy is dedicated to facilitating each child’s maximum independence, communicatitve abilities and academic skills, by using innovative programs that combine an educational and medical model.
Our Children’s Academy is dedicated to facilitating each child’s maximum independence, communicatitve abilities and academic skills, by using innovative programs that combine an educational and medical model. All student’s at OCA are served in the “Separate Day School” model due to the severity of their disabilities and their need for continuous care, education and safety. Most student’s are assessed using Alternate Assessments. Last year, 2 student’s took the FCAT. This year we project 3 will take the FCAT. All others are assessed using Brigance, COR or Florida Alternate Assessment based on their age and demonstrated cognitive ability.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
OCA has a diverse population of students and staff. Staff is committed to the education and well being of the children. There is an intense focus and therapy services in order to meet the individual needs of the students.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Due to the fact that we are a Separate Day School with only ESE students, our children have limited interaction/exposure to typically developing students. Because of the severity of our student’s disabilities, performance on State/District wide assessments is not always a true measure of growth/progress.
Student Demographics
White- 64% Black- 12% Hispanic 16% Asian-0% Indian- 1% Multi- 7% SWD- 82; 100% ELL- 0% FRL-65% EOY 83
Student Attendance Rates
06-07- 83% 07-08- 82% 08-09- 86%
Student Mobility
07-08 52%
08-09 41%
“The enrollment or withdrawal of a student at any time during the school year not including the first 15 days of school divided by the total number of students who attended the school during that year after the 15th day
Student Suspension Rates
06-07- 0 07-08- 0 08-09- 0
Student Retention Rates
06-07-0% 07-08-0% 08-09 1st-0% 2nd-0% 3rd -0% 4th -100% (1 student)
Class Size
06-07- PreK-3rd grade- 14; 4th-5th grade- 0 07-08- PreK-3rd grade -16; 4th-5th grade- 0
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
NA
Partnerships and Grants
Lake Wales YMCA, Lake Wales Care Center, Mountain Lake Community, 1st Baptist Church of Lake Wales, High Point Church, Our Children’s Rehab Center, Polk Education Foundation grant, Progress Energy Math/Science Grant, various ongoing applications for local grants.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Sharon McManus
|
Master of Science Speech/Language Pathology
|
4
|
30
|
NA
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Dot Kirkland
|
Master of Arts Speech/Language Pathology
|
4
|
20
|
NA
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
| No data submitted |
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Local Media
|
Principal
|
ongoing
|
|
|
Networking
|
Principal
|
ongoing
|
|
|
Continuing education/training
|
Principal
|
ongoing
|
|
|
Internal Staff Survey
|
Principal
|
ongoing
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
A Guerra
|
El ed k-6
|
k-5
|
is taking ESE test
|
|
Paraprofessionals
|
varies
|
k-5
|
w/i a year
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 7 | 58 | 28 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Ellynne Draper
|
1st year teachers
|
1st year teachers
|
weekly meetings
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part A, funds school-wide services to Our Children’s Academy. The Title I funds provide supplemental instructional resources and interventions for students with academic achievement needs. Title I, Part A, support provides after-school and summer instructional programs, supplemental instructional materials, resource teachers, technology for students, professional development for the staff, and resources for parents.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Migrant students enrolled in Our Children’s Academy will be assisted by the school and by the District Migrant Education Program (MEP). Students will be prioritized by the MEP for supplemental services based on need and migrant status. MEP Teacher Advocates, assigned to schools with high percentages of migrant students, monitor the progress of these high need students and provide or coordinate supplemental academic support. Migrant Home-School Liaisons identify and recruit migrant students and their families for the MEP. They provide support to both students and parents in locating services necessary to ensure the academic success of these students whose education has been interrupted by numerous moves.
Title I, Part D
Title I, Part D, provides Transition Facilitators to assist students with transition from Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) facilities back into their zoned school. The Transition Facilitators communicate with the Guidance Counselors at schools to facilitate the transfer of records and appropriate placement.
Title II
Professional development resources are available to Title I schools through Title II funds. In addition, School Technology Services provide technical support, technology training, and licenses for software programs and web-based access via Title II-D funds. Funds available to Our Children’s Academy are used to purchase inservice training and resource material.
Title III
Title III provides supplemental resources for English Language Learners (ELL) and their teachers in Title I schools, as well as professional learning opportunities for school staff.
Title X- Homeless
The Hearth program, funded through Title X, provides support for identified homeless students. Title I provides support for this program, and many activities implemented by the Hearth program are carried out in cooperation with the Migrant Education Program (MEP) funded through Title I, Part C.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
SAI unit(s) provided to Our Children’s Academy enhance student achievement by providing inservice to staff and resource materials.
Violence Prevention Programs
Title IV provides violence and drug prevention programs in schools in order to promote a safe school environment. Examples of violence prevention programs include anti-bullying, gang awareness, gun awareness, etc.
Nutrition Programs
This school is a location for a summer feeding program for the community
Housing Programs
NA
Head Start
Head Start is not located on our campus. Resources are provided to area preschools to assist in the transition of students from pre-k to kindergarten. We also house a Pre-K program on campus.
Adult Education
NA
Career and Technical Education
NA
Job Training
NA
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
PreK
|
Ellynne Draper
|
Weekly
|
Fridays
|
student achievement/curriculum
|
|
Elementary
|
Ellynne Draper
|
Weekly
|
M-Kindergarten, Tuesday-Participatory; Wed-Supportive; Thursday-Independent
|
student achievement/curriculum
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
OCA’s preschool program begins at age 2 and ends when children transition to elementary school. Students are referred to local elementary programs if appropriate and as determined at their IEP meeting. If the team determines the child needs a less restrictive setting, a transition meeting is held with the receiving school. If the child needs the level of services provided at OCA, they may continue at OCA.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
NA
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Students at OCA have not done particularly well on standardized assessments in the area of reading
|
50% of students in grades 3-5 in FCAT or the FAA will demonstrate proficiency
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Provide intense instruction in reading through Voyager, FCAT Coach.
2. Child specific reading intervention
|
1. Principal
|
Checklist
|
Performance on FAA/FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Reading Proficiency
|
reading
|
Teaching Staff
|
11/09
|
PLC
|
Principal
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 08-09 data, students had difficulty performing at the proficient level in math.
|
Annually, 25% of students in grades 3-5 will demonstrate proficiency as measured by FCAT or Florida Alternate Assessment will demonstrate proficiency of FAA or FCAT in Math.(08-09 school year there were 2 students eligible to take FCAT, neither scored proficient)
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Provide intense instruction in math through Saxon, FCAT Math Coach.
2. Child specific math intervention based on classroom assessments.
3. Encourage parent involvement
|
1. Principal
2.Principal
3.Principal
|
1. Checklist
2.Assessment log/chart
3. Resource guide for home use
|
see action step
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Students in the severly impaired category did not make expected progress.
|
65% of Pre-K and Participatory K-2 students who complete pre and post assessments increase a minimum of ¼ of a level annually as documented by the Childhood Observation Record
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Provide intense instruction in math with hands on materials.
2. Child specific math interventions based on classroom assessments.
3.Encourage parent involvement
|
Principal
|
1. Checklist
2.Assessment log/chart
3. Resource guide for home use
|
See action step
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Math
|
Math
|
Teaching Staff
|
11/09
|
PLC/math workshop
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
School survey indicated a desire by parents for more communication.
|
Increase parent satisfaction with communication to at least 90% as measured by Parent Satisfaction Survey.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Send home daily reports in PreK
2.Send home weekly reports in K-5
3. Encourage parent involvement in meetings
|
1. Classroom teacher/ PIF
2. Classroom teacher/PIF
3. PIF
|
1. Checklist
2.Checklist
3.Attendance log
|
see action plan
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Parent Communication
|
increase communication
|
Lead Teacher
|
ongoing
|
PLC/grade level meetings
|
Lead teacher
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Profeesional & Technical services |
Title I |
$7,015.00 |
| Parent Resource Materials |
Title I |
$72.00 |
| Consultant |
Title I |
$113.00 |
| Total: $7,200.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $7,200.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Parental Involvement |
Profeesional & Technical services |
Title I |
$7,015.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Parent Resource Materials |
Title I |
$72.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Consultant |
Title I |
$113.00 |
| Total: $7,200.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $7,200.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
| No data submitted |
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
Will discuss school progress and plan for community involvement
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Sharon McManus,
Principal
|
|
2)
Ellynne Draper,
Teacher
|
|
3)
Mary Margaret Cain,
Parent
|
|
4)
Dory Loyd,
Parent
|
|
5)
Barb Sunderhaus,
Parent
|
|
6)
Diana Harris,
Parent
|
|
7)
Karen Holman,
Community Member
|
|
8)
Dot Kirkland,
Assistant Principal
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found