VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

Dundee Ridge Middle School is a school of excellence based on the dedication of staff members seeking to move all students to academic success.

Dundee Ridge Middle School is a school of excellence that values diverse cultures and individual uniqueness. We are committed to preparing all students for the challenges of tomorrow: by fostering a safe, self-motivating, creative and relevant learning environment enhanced by higher standards of achievement from a professional staff dedicated to continual growth and development.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Brief History and Background of the School: Dundee Ridge Middle School was opened in the fall of 1999 and serves six major communities in rural, northeast Polk County. The facility is a ten-building school stretched on forty-two acres that was built in 1999. DRMS shares parking area with Polk County Parks department, therefore there are no fences or gates that secure the perimeter of the school. Each building houses a specific discipline or grade level. The student population at DRMS is approximately 825 students in all. The ethnic subgroups of the student population include: 47% Hispanic, 25% White, 26% black, and 2% other. The educational status subgroups of the student population include: 76% Regular Education, 15% Exceptional Student Education (disabilities including EMH, TMH, EH, and SLD) 4.4% Exceptional Student Education (Gifted) and 9.4% LEP. We are currently a Title I school. Our socio-economic status of 76% of our students receiving free/ reduced lunch qualifies us a Title 1 school.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

Unique School Strengths for Next Year: Teacher retention was high for this school year. The school only has nine new teachers. Seven of the nine teachers taught last year at previous schools. In addition, in the 2009-2010 school year DRMS will be a full inclusion school for all grade levels with the exception of students who are in self-contained ESE classes. At the close of the 2008-2009 school year the school was rezoned. Our student population will be at 825 for the 2009-2010 school year.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year: No common planning for subject area teachers. However, all teachers agreed to meet bi-weekly in Professional Learning Communities to talk about student achievement and exemplary teaching. Students are 95% bussed which inhibits after school activity.


Student Demographics

Student Demographics: White – 26.14%, Black – 27.44%, Hispanic- 41.33%, Asian - .86%, Indian- .86%, Multiracial- 3.36%, SWD – 113.81%, ELL – 7.85%, Free/reduced lunch – 79.64%. Total Enrollment – 1159.


Student Attendance Rates

Student Attendance Rates:2006-2007 – 92.01%; 2007-2008 – 94.39%; 2008-2009 - 93.88%


Student Mobility

Student Mobility:2007-2008 – 39.09%; 2008-2009 - 37.29%


Student Suspension Rates

Student Suspension Rates: 2006-2007 – ISS Actions/Days – 652/1539; OSS Actions/Days – 387/1193; 2007-2008 – ISS Actions/Days – 1171/2148; OSS Actions/Days – 596/1729; 2008-2009 – ISS Actions/Days – 997/1581; OSS Actions/Days – 513/1722


Student Retention Rates

Student Retention Rates: 2006-2007 – 6th gr.- 4.61%, 7th gr. – 6.27, 8th gr. – 0.80%; 2007-2008 – 6th gr. – 2.76%, 7th gr. – 1.87%, 8th gr. – 0.56%. 2008-2009 6th gr. – 0.79%; 7th gr. – 1.61%, 8th gr. – 0.74%


Class Size

Class Size: 2006- 2007 – school average class size – 20.35; 2007-2008 – 19.65


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern: Dundee Elem 2008-2009 school grade – C; AYP – No; Sandhill Elem school grade - A; AYP – Yes.


Partnerships and Grants

Partnerships and Grants: HELIOS grant, Progress Energy, and State Farm, Wachovia, and Heart of Florida


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Kathryn Blackburn BA-Elem,Ed
M.Ed
EdD
9 8 Kathryn was at DRMS last year and the school received a C. Only one area of AYP was made and the school was at 65%.
Assis Principal Stacy Gideons BS – Phys Ed
M. Ed
8 3 Stacy was at DRMS last year. The school grade was a C and it received 65% criteria met for AYP
Assis Principal Damien Jones BA-Bus. Ed
M.Ed
1 1 Damien was at DRMS last year. The school grade was a C and it received 65% met criteria for AYP.

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
Reading LuBertha DePrimo B.A. Music Therapy
M.E. in Reading
8 3 Lubertha was at DRMS last year. The school grade was a C and it received 65% met criteria for AYP.
Math Shronda Jones B.S. Acctg
M.Ed
9 3 Shronda was at DRMS last year. The school grade was a C and it received 65% met criteria for AYP
Lang.Arts Kerri Collins B.S. in Phys.Ed 5 3 Kerri was at DRMS last year. The school grade was a C and it received 65% met criteria for AYP
Multi-Teacher Trainer Mary White B.A. Art Ed
M.E. Curriculum
5 3 Mary was at DRMS last year. The school grade was a C and it received 65% met criteria for AYP

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1. Attend recruitment job fairs Principal/APC We have a full staff
2. Offer safe/orderly work environment Administrative Staff on-going
3. Flexible work conditions with administrative support Principal on-going
4. Maintain specific guidelines for policies/procedures Principal on-going


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
Tracy Bostic English 6-12 7th Lang. Arts ESOL PD Plan
Shalunda Coleman Mid. Int. Curr.5-9 7th grade Math ESOL PD Plan/State Cert. Plan
Alma Cruz PE K-12 6-7 PE ESOL PD Plan
Clarise Framstead ESE/M IC/K-6 VE –Self Cont.6-8 ESOL PD Plan
Darnel Jones English 6-12 8th grade LA ESOL PD Plan
Jessica Judkins English 6-12 8th grade Reading ESOL PD Plan
Susan Kaye MIC 5-9 7th grade Reading ESOL PD Plan/Reading Endorsement
Aldena Lampkin Reading 6-12 7th grade Reading ESOL PD Plan
Christina Rios MIC/PE K-12 ESOL/7th PE ESOL PD Plan
Deborah Williams ESE/MIC/K-6 VE-Self Cont.6-8 Reading Endorsement Plan


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
464631513269115080


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
Lubertha DePrimo New Teachers New to school/district/curriculum meetings/observation/modeling
Mary White Struggling teachers In need of additional support meetings/observation/modeling



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A

Title I, Part A, funds school-wide services to Dundee Ridge Middle School. The Title I funds provide supplemental instructional resources and interventions for students with academic achievement needs. Title I, Part A, support provides after school/summer instructional programs, supplemental instructional materials, resources teachers, technology for students, professional development for the staff, and resources for the parents.


Title I, Part C- Migrant

Title I, Part C- Migrant
Migrant students enrolled in Dundee Ridge Middle School will be assisted by the school and by the District Migrant Education Program (MEP). Students will be prioritized by the MEP for supplemental services based on need and migrant status. MEP Teacher Advocates, assigned to schools with high percentages of migrant students, monitor the progress of these high need students and provide or coordinate supplemental academic support. Migrant Home – School Liaisons identify and recruit migrant students and their families for the MEP. They provide support to both students and parents in locating services necessary to ensure the academic success of these students whose education has been interrupted by numerous moves


Title I, Part D

Title I, Part D
Title I, Part D, provides Transition Facilitators to assist students with transition from Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) facilities back into their zoned schools. The Transition Facilitators communicate with the Guidance Counselors at schools to facilitate the transfer of records and appropriate placement


Title II

Title II

Professional development resources are available to Title I schools through Title II funds. In addition, School Technology Services provide technical support, technology training, and licenses for software programs and web-based access via Title II – D funds. Funds available to Dundee Ridge Middle School are used to purchase technology based professional development software


Title III

Title III

Title III provides supplemental resources for English Language Learners (ELL) and their teachers in Title I schools, as well as professional learning opportunities for school staff


Title X- Homeless

Title X- Homeless

The Hearth program, funded through Title X, provides support for identified homeless students. Title I provides support for this program, and many activities implemented by the Hearth program are carried out in coordination with the Migrant Education Program (MEP) funded through Title I, Part C.


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

SAI unit(s) provided to Dundee Ridge Middle School enhance student achievement by providing professional development and additional support to enhance exemplary teaching.


Violence Prevention Programs

Violence Prevention Programs

Title IV provides violence and drug prevention programs in schools in order to promote a safe school environment. Examples of violence prevention programs include anti-bullying, gang awareness, gun awareness, etc


Nutrition Programs

Nutrition Programs

This school is a location for a summer feeding program for the community


Housing Programs

NA


Head Start

Head Start

Head Start is not located on our campus. Resources are provided to the program to assist in the transition of students from Pre-K to Kindergarten. Head Start teachers may participate in professional learning opportunities offered to school staff, and they are involved in Professional Learning Community activities with kindergarten teachers


Adult Education

NA


Career and Technical Education

NA


Job Training

NA


Other


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.
Principal, Dr. Blackburn, Assistant Principal, Damien Jones, and Dean,Teddy Brown,Provide a common vision for the use of data-based decision-making, ensures that the school-based team is implementing RtI, conducts assessment of RtI skills of school staff, ensures implementation of intervention support and documentation, ensures adequate professional development to support RtI implementation, and communicates with parents regarding school-based RtI plans and activities.
Select General Education Teachers, Leadership Team Members, Christina Rios, Kelly McCann, Rebecka Sare, Eddie Congdon, Ken Cooper, Katie Mixon. All Leadership Team Members have taking the RTI modules and have submitted a certificate for their personal file. Provide information about core instruction, participates
in student data collection, delivers Tier 1 instruction/intervention, collaborates with other staff to implement Tier 2
interventions, and integrates Tier 1 materials/instruction with Tier 2/3 activities.
Exceptional Student Education (ESE) Teachers, Hattie McDowell,Thaina Morris, Kitty Karus,Stephanie White,AnthonyStevens, Bobbie Smith-Powell, Clarise Framstead, Wendy Stewman: Participate in student data collection, integrates core instructional activities/materials into Tier 3 instruction, and collaborates with general education teachers through such activities as coteaching.
Instructional Coach(es) Reading/Math/Science, Lubertha DePrimo, Shondra Jones, and Kerri Collins:
Develops, leads, and evaluates school core content standards/ programs; identifies and analyzes existing literature on
scientifically based curriculum/behavior assessment and intervention approaches.
Identifies systematic patterns of student need while working with district personnel to identify appropriate, evidence-based
intervention strategies; assists with whole school screening programs that provide early intervening services for children to
be considered “at risk;” assists in the design and implementation for progress monitoring, data collection, and data analysis;
participates in the design and delivery of professional development; and provides support for assessment and
implementation monitoring.
Reading Instructional Specialist, Mary White: Provides guidance on K-12 reading plan; facilitates and supports data collection activities; assists in data analysis; provides professional development and technical assistance to teachers regarding databased
instructional planning; supports the implementation of Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 intervention plans.
School Psychologist: Participates in collection, interpretation, and analysis of data; facilitates development of intervention
plans; provides support for intervention fidelity and documentation; provides professional development and technical
assistance for problem-solving activities including data collection, data analysis, intervention planning, and program
evaluation; facilitates data-based decision making activities.
Technology Specialist: Develops or brokers technology necessary to manage and display data; provides professional
development and technical support to teachers and staff regarding data management and display.
Speech Language Pathologist: Educates the team in the role language plays in curriculum, assessment, and instruction,
as a basis for appropriate program design; assists in the selection of screening measures; and helps identify systemic
patterns of student need with respect to language skills
Student Services Personnel: Provides quality services and expertise on issues ranging from program design to
assessment and intervention with individual students. In addition to providing interventions, school social workers continue
to link child-serving and community agencies to the schools and families to support the child's academic, emotional,
behavioral, and social success.


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

• Explain when the team will meet and what the focus of the meetings will be.
The Leadership Team will focus meetings around one question: How do we develop and maintain a problem-solving system
to bring out the best in our schools, our teachers, and in our students?
The team meets once a week to engage in the following activities:
Review universal screening data and link to instructional decisions; review progress monitoring data at the grade level and
classroom level to identify students who are meeting/exceeding benchmarks, at moderate risk or at high risk for not meeting
benchmarks. Based on the above information, the team will identify professional development and resources. The team will
also collaborate regularly, problem solve, share effective practices, evaluate implementation, make decisions, and practice
new processes and skills. The team will also facilitate the process of building consensus, increasing infrastructure, and
making decisions about implementation.
Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the
school improvement plan.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

The RtI Leadership Team met with the School Advisory Council (SAC) and principal to help develop the SIP. The team
provided data on: Tier 1, 2, and 3 targets; academic and social/emotional areas that needed to be addressed; helped set
clear expectations for instruction (Rigor, Relevance, Relationship); facilitated the development of a systemic approach to
teaching (Gradual Release, Essential Questions, Activating Strategies, Teaching Strategies, Extending, Refining, and
Summarizing); and aligned processes and procedures




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.
Baseline data: Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN), Assessment and Information Management System
(AIMS web), Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT)
Progress Monitoring: PMRN, AIMS web, Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM), FCAT Simulation
Midyear: Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR), Diagnostic Assessment for Reading (DAR).
End of year: FAIR, AIMS web, FCAT
Frequency of Data Days: twice a month for data analysis


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.
Professional development will be provided during teachers’ common planning time and small sessions will occur throughout
the year. Two PD sessions entitled: “RtI: Problem Solving Model: Building Consensus Implementing and Sustaining
Problem-Solving/RtI” and “RtI: Challenges to Implementation Data-based Decision-making, and Supporting and Evaluating
Interventions” will take place in mid-August and was completed by the Leadership Team in November.
The RtI team will also evaluate additional staff PD needs during the weekly RtI Leadership Team meetings



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?



Strengths: 94% of 8th grade students are at or above grade level according to the statewide writing assessment. The strongest area across all grade levels in reading is in the area of Words and Phrases.

Weaknesses: Across the board, students are performing below state standards in reading, math, and science on all strands tested. Of particular concern are the low science scores on the strand of Life and Environmental science, with only 38% of the students meeting state assessment standards. In reading, the lowest strand is Reference and Research for 6th and 7th grade and Comparison for 8th grade. In math, 6th grade is lowest in the areas of Number Sense and Measurement, 7th grade is the lowest in Geometry, and 8th grade is the weak in Measurement.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

The district has created curriculum maps that are accompanied by a course timeline. The course timeline is the starting point for each school’s Instructional Focus Calendar. The school based IFCs were created in August 2009 using 2009 FCAT results. Subject area teachers will be responsible for determining the instructional focus of whole group lessons, and small group/differentiated instruction. The county wide curriculum maps and needs assessments were used to select each benchmark and duration of instruction. Administration will ensure IFCs are followed by continuous classroom visitation, evaluating lesson plans, monitoring teacher data, and conducting meetings with teachers. Additional assistance by administration and resource teachers will be provided for teachers struggling to implement IFCs.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Reading- Reference and Research was the least proficient strand and will be given priority focus.
Writing- Expository writing was weaker and will be given a priority focus.
Math- Measurement was the least proficient strand and will be given priority focus.
Science- Life and Environmental Science was the least proficient strand and will be given priority focus


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

Monthly subject area meetings will use the disaggregated FCAT data, data from FAIR, and other progress monitoring tools to identify student needs and provide appropriated interventions.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

The school offers the students elective classes in the areas of agriculture, computers, music, and graphic design. The guidance department provides all students with career and educational planning options through their Social Studies classes. The school participates in the Junior Achievement program, where volunteers from State Farm teach the students about career and educational options


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

The guidance counselors assist the students in the selection of elective classes and explain how each elective class could facilitate their skills and interests. The guidance department also offers the students computer-based career planning and interest surveys during the course of the school year.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


Aligned and prioritized curriculum maps and timelines are used in all core areas. Grade level teachers meet monthly to review the Instructional Focus Calendars. The high yield teaching strategies of summarizing and vocabulary in context are used school wide across all subject areas. Each subject area also has representation in the school Leadership Team, which meets weekly to align school policies and procedures.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

Subject area resource teachers develop lessons and model them for the instructional teachers. Teachers are then monitored and feedback is provided on the delivery of the lessons.
Instructional focus lessons are developed through collaborative planning with the district curriculum maps as a timeline. The lessons are delivered by following the sequence of the LFS format


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

The lessons are monitored by administration and are revised based on biweekly professional learning community sessions and administrative feedback. The results of mini-assessments will guide further revisions or refinements of the instructional focus lessons. Classroom walk-through will be used to monitor the quality and effectiveness of the lessons




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention. FAIR, Read 180, Fast Forward, Voyager, 100 Book Challenge, Compass Odyssey, Reading Assistant, AR
Reading – Achievement thresholds will be set for each grade level and subject area. Students not reaching the threshold will be targeted for additional support as well as monitoring. Formative benchmark assessments are consistency used; school-wide and in all core areas. They are given frequently and are used for monitoring student progress, as well as for planning and instruction.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

Mini-assessments are conducted at the completion of focus lessons for ongoing assessment along with Pre/post tests; diagnostic tests; specific concept based tests


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

The administrators and the leadership team address data, student work, instruction and curriculum. The administrators and the leadership team schedule coaching and monitoring visits to classrooms on a regular basis. In addition,ongoing assessment will be administered according to the completion date of the concept according to the curriculum map timeline.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

Data analysis will take place during biweekly meetings of professional learning communities scheduled by subject area. The administration and the leadership team representatives will meet with the teachers to discuss assessment results and student progress. Every two weeks, subject area teachers will have a working lunch session with the principal to review assessment results and student achievement progress. Strategies will be discussed and implemented to adjust to student needs for success.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

The Leadership Team will develop the implementation plan, and they will select two high yield exemplary teaching practices that will be school wide. A professional development calendar will be developed to support the strategies. Professional development opportunities will be offered weekly for summarizing and teaching vocabulary in context. Administrators will conduct walk-through observations and provide feedback and additional professional development if necessary to support exemplary teaching. Teachers will be supported by observing other teachers who have mastered the skills, have Resource Teachers model in the classrooms, and one-on-one sessions with APC, Resource Teachers, or Principal.The Administrative team will monitor the implementation plan and adjust according to teacher needs.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


Core – resource teacher pull students out for intensive interventions
Supplemental – skill-based learning incorporated into elective classes
Intensive – provided for reading and math classes; inclusion teachers in the classroom, 90 minute block classes, computer based instruction, hands-on learning, and small group instruction.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Extended learning opportunities include extended time for math and reading, summer school, accelerating and previewing, re-teaching, use of FCAT Explorer, and school wide high-yield strategies.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

Professional development needs are identified by teacher requests, data analysis, and suggestions by the leadership team.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

Students who are targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions are students who score at either Level 1 or Level 2 on state FCAT testing results, as well as some additional ESE students and students who are considered at-risk in AYP categories


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

Ongoing progress monitoring, mini-assessments, formative assessments, student data chats, and FAIR. In addition, teacher collaboration with on-going communication about student progress will take place bi-weekly


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

Alternative instructional delivery methods for acceleration and enrichment activities include a gifted student program, previewing for ESE and at-risk students and additional elective opportunities to allow students the opportunity to grow as a member of the community.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

Students are identified for enrichment strategies by FCAT results, parent,students,and teacher recommendations.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
Reading and Language Arts grades 6,7,8 Principal bi-weekly Lunch(30) plus period before or after=1 hour,20 min. Focus will include plan for tracking AYP students,lesson plan analysis, AYP student data, and develop units
Math and Science grades 6,7,8 Principal bi-weekly Lunch(30) plus period before or after=1 hour,20 min. Focus will include plan for tracking AYP students,lesson plan analysis, AYP student data, and develop units
Social Studies and Electives grades 6,7,8 Principal bi-weekly Lunch(30) plus period before or after=1 hour,20 min. Focus will include plan for tracking AYP students,lesson plan analysis, AYP student data, and develop units


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition

NA


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.

NA



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

No Other Goals were submitted for this school

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/11/2009 10:21:50 AM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


The SAC will be reviewing the School Improvement Plan. They will helping to make the decisions to steer the school to move student achievement.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Kathryn Blackburn,   Principal
2)  Melanie Mendez,   SAC Chair
3)  Irma Castillo,   Teacher
4)  Anel Rivera,   Teacher
5)  Dan McClain,   Business Member
6)  Lori Booher,   Parent
7)  Valarie Kowlessar,   Parent
8)  Lula McKnight,   Parent
9)  Solomon Kowlessar,   Parent
10)  Rick Johnson,   Community Member
11)  Edward Bland,   Community Member
12)  Jerry Denny,   School Support Personnel
13)  Shronda Jones,   School Support Personnel
14)  Diana Chaidez,   School Support Personnel
15)  Maureen English,   School Support Personnel
16)  Susan Leath,   School Support Personnel
17)  Luz Osorio,   School Support Personnel
18)  Susan Westerman,   School Support Personnel
 

AYP DATA

2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk DUNDEE RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL 1981
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 1157
Math: 1157  
2008-2009
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N
TOTAL4  98  98  44  40  94         NA  59  56  N 60  60  N 44  46 
WHITE  98  98  52  47  92         NA  51  48  N 53  53  N 47  50 
BLACK  98  98  37  37          NA  60  63  N 62  63  N 39  46 
HISPANIC  98  97  43  38  93         NA  63  57  N 64  62  N 44  43 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  98  98  42  40  94         NA  60  58  N 61  60  N 42  46 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  97  97  18  16  87   93      NA  84  82  N 81  84  N 25  31 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  97  96  26  19  74   89      NA  82  74  N 82  81  N 16  21 

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk DUNDEE RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL 1981
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 1183
Math: 1183  
2007-2008
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  98  41  40  89   94      NA  60  59  N 62  60  N 42  53 
WHITE  99  99  49  47  90   92      NA  49  51  N 53  53  N 46  55 
BLACK  99  99  40  38  93         NA  63  60  N 67  62  N 43  52 
HISPANIC  98  98  37  36  87   93      NA  66  63  N 65  64  N 39  52 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  98  40  39  88   94      NA  62  60  N 64  61  N 42  53 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  99  98  16  19  70   87      NA  92  84  N 91  81  Y 30  45  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  96  96  18  18  74   74      NA  89  82  N 90  82  N 27  34 

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk DUNDEE RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL 1981
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 1120
Math: 1120  
2006-2007
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  40  38  89   89      NA  65  60  NA 68  62  NA 44  NA  56  NA 
WHITE  100  100  51  47  93   90      NA  57  49  NA 59  53  NA 44  NA  59  NA 
BLACK  100  100  37  33  88   93      NA  75  63  NA 80  67  NA 46  NA  55  NA 
HISPANIC  99  99  34  35  87   87      NA  66  66  NA 69  65  NA 42  NA  55  NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  99  38  36  89   88      NA  67  62  NA 71  64  NA 43  NA  55  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  100  99      NA      NA  88  92  NA 89  91  NA 38  NA  43  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  98  98  11  10  69   74      NA  87  89  NA 88  90  NA 30  NA  45  NA 


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Polk School District
DUNDEE RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 48%  45%  98%  20%  211   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 59%  62%      121  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 68% (YES)  69% (YES)      137  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         469   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Polk School District
    DUNDEE RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 47%  46%  96%  20%  209   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 59%  66%      125  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 72% (YES)  70% (YES)      142  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         476   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Polk School District
    DUNDEE RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 48%  46%  81%  15%  190   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 61%  64%      125  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 69% (YES)  67% (YES)      136  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         451   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested