VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

The vision for Lake Gibson High School is to have learning for all students as the chief priority. All decisions of the school will have learning as the primary focus. The curriculum and instructional practices will incorporate various learning activities to accommodate different learning styles. The school will function as a learning organization and promote opportunities for all stakeholders - students, teachers, administrators, parents and community - by working together as a community of learners. In the safe and physically comfortable environment, academic challenges will stimulate individual student performance. In the future, Lake Gibson High School will continue its great tradition of leading students towards a successful adult life by instilling in them a sense of purpose and a love of learning.

The mission of Lake Gibson High School is to challenge all students to (believe and) achieve their fullest potential and to prepare them to make informed life decisions. Simply put: Believe, Achieve, Succeed.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Lake Gibson High School campus is located on a landscaped 30-acre site in the suburban-rural north area of Lakeland. Campus doors opened in 1977 under principal James Booth. A growing community has led to a variety of additions since its doors first opened. The campus currently supports 5 buildings that serve the academic focus, 17 portable classrooms, an Agricultural Science land lab, 5 structures for athletic support, 2 practice fields, and 3 parking lots. Both students and staff have a strong sense of pride in the facilities.

Lake Gibson Senior High reviews data collected from and about students, parents, and staff members to evaluate the school’s needs for improvement and areas of success. Parents, students, and staff members complete the county supported Annual Survey of Attitudes each spring and the results are returned at the end of the school year. Parents and community members are invited to share concerns and participate in decision-making through involvement/membership in the School Advisory Council (SAC), individual meetings, letters, and emails. Students are encouraged to participate in decision-making through involvement in Student Council and serving as student representatives on the School Advisory Council and the Student Concerns Committee. Students, represented by Student Government, meet with the principal to share areas of student concerns, ideas for improvement, and volunteering services to existing programs. Staff members collaborate in decision-making through service on the School Advisory Council (representatives are elected by the staff), the Student Concerns committee, the Safety Committee and the district’s spring survey.

Mr. Ralph Gilchrest III currently serves as the principal of Lake Gibson Senior High School.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

Lake Gibson Senior High School has a variety of unique strengths that will promote school success. Lake Gibson Senior High School offers its students a wide range of technological options to help increase achievement. The school is also offering more Advanced Placement coursework than ever before.

Lake Gibson Senior High School’s Freshman Academy is providing rewards for academic success in the form of “Brave Bucks”. Students can use these “Brave Bucks” to purchase rewards at specific times throughout the year.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

A major weakness is a growing population of students attending on affidavit due to their families being homeless. Lake Gibson Senior High School must provide a quality education for these students as well as the general population.


Student Demographics

2008 – 2009
White 63.51%
Black 19.22%
Hispanic 13.70%
Asian 1.3%
Indian .38%
Multi 1.89%
SWD 219
ELL 71
F/R Lunch 815
EOY Enrollment 1847


Student Attendance Rates

2007-2008
Attendance Rate 94.12
2008-2009
Attendance Rate 93.81


Student Mobility

2007-2008

Students enrolled after day, 15 or withdrawn after day 15 and before EOY = 636

Students enrolled on or after day 16 = 2438

"Mobility" percent = 26.09

2008-2009

Students enrolled after day, 15 or withdrawn after day 15 and before EOY = 489

Students enrolled on or after day 16 = 2153

"Mobility" percent = 22.71


Student Suspension Rates

2006-2007
OSS Days (1512) OSS Actions (372) ISS Days (26) ISS Actions (14)

2007-2008
OSS Days (2743) OSS Actions (1655) ISS Days (65) ISS Actions (36)

2008-2009
OSS Days (1951) OSS Actions (786) ISS(826) Days ISS Actions (1643)


Student Retention Rates

2006-2007

9th Grade, 2 Retained, 556 Enrolled, .36 Retention %age
10th Grade, 0 Retained, 528 Enrolled, 0.00 Retention %age
11th Grade, 46 Retained, 478 Enrolled, 9.62 Retention %age
12th Grade, 20 Retained, 414 Enrolled, 4.83 Retention %age

2007-2008

9th Grade, 2 Retained, 601 Enrolled, .33 Retention %age
10th Grade, 19 Retained, 527 Enrolled, 3.61 Retention %age
11th Grade, 32 Retained, 483 Enrolled, 6.63 Retention %age
12th Grade, 13 Retained, 436 Enrolled, 2.98 Retention %age

2008-2009

9th Grade, 18 Retained, 482 Enrolled, 3.73 Retention %age
10th Grade, 37 Retained, 517 Enrolled, 7.16 Retention %age
11th Grade, 33 Retained, 419 Enrolled, 7.88 Retention %age
12th Grade, 18 Retained, 429 Enrolled, 4.20 Retention %age


Class Size

The class size at Lake Gibson Senior High School during the 2006-2007 year was 23.75. The class size at Lake Gibson Senior High School during the 2007-2008 school year was 24.44.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

Crystal Lake Middle School (Correct II)
School Grade C
AYP 2009 No
AYP % 74

Kathleen Middle School (Correct I)
School Grade B
AYP 2009 No
AYP % 87

Lake Gibson Middle School (Correct II)
School Grade B
AYP 2009 No
AYP % 72

Lawton Chiles Middle Academy
School Grade A
AYP Yes
AYP % 100

Rochelle School of the Arts
School Grade A
AYP 2009 No
AYP % 97

Sleepy Hill Middle School (Correct II)
School Grade C
AYP 2009 No
AYP % 72


Partnerships and Grants

Academy of Business & Technology
Grants-AIM, AT&T Succeed
Partnerships-City of Lakeland, Fed EX, Mid Florida Credit Union

Finance Academy
Grants- Citi Group Scholarship
Partnerships – City of Lakeland, Mid Florida Credit Union, Wachovia Bank, Junior Achievement


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Mr. Ralph Gilchrest Masters Educational Leadership 17 25 2006-2007 “B” 2007-2008 “B” 2008-2009 “C”
Assis Principal Debbie Donahay Masters Educational Leadership 22 14 2006-2007 “B” 2007-2008 “B” 2008-2009 “C”
Assis Principal Tami Dawson Masters Educational Leadership 7 7 2006-2007 “B” 2007-2008 “B” 2008-2009 “C”

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
Academic Intervention Facilitator Jennifer Dibble B.S. English Education

Eng 6-12
Math 5-9
ESOL and Reading Endorsements
5 2 2007-2008 “B” 2008-2009 “B”

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
PEC Process Jennifer Dibble End of 2010
District Highly Qualified List Ralph Gilchrest Ongoing


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
Dan Morse MG Integrated Cur. 5-9
Eng 6-12
English Reading Endorsement
Jamie Hamilton MG Integrated Cur. 5-9 Social Studies Reading Endorsement, ACE
Sara Whitaker MG Integrated Cur. 5-9

Social Science 6-12
Reading Reading Endorsement
Michelle Manchester Eng 6-12 Reading Reading Endorsement
Lisa Reynolds MG Integrated Cur. 5-9

Eng 6-12
Reading Reading Endorsement, ACE


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
1082.735.131.438.828.795.313.87.448.1


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
No data submitted



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A


Title I, Part C- Migrant


Title I, Part D


Title II


Title III


Title X- Homeless


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)


Violence Prevention Programs


Nutrition Programs


Housing Programs


Head Start


Adult Education


Career and Technical Education


Job Training


Other


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

The school-based RtI Leadership Team include: Debbie Coffman, Tim Stine, Alain Douge, Tami Dawson, Jennifer Dibble, Shari Keener


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

The school-based RtI Leadership Team will function based on county directives. The team will meet regularly to strategize ways to identify the problems (ex. low FCAT scores within subgroups of the school population), determine the contributing factors to the problem (ex. inadequate exposure to FCAT skills), identify appropriate interventions (ex. mandatory reading/writing curriculum across content areas), and monitor progress (ex. adoption and implementation of interventions guided by continuous data evaluation).


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

The school-based RtI Leadership Team provides support to struggling students in the regular classroom by requiring early intervention of additional academic and behavioral support.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Data obtained from FAIR reports, FCAT results, discipline data, attendance and grade reports will be used by faculty and administration to analyze student intervention. Genesis and the IDEAS programs will also be used by faculty and administrators to analyze student intervention.


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

The Leadership Team will train staff through Professional Learning Communities (PLC’s) on a regular basis.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


After analyzing the 2009 FCAT by grade level, subject area, and cluster/strands, our school mathematics results can be viewed as a strength. Seventy-four percent of students scored at or above grade level in the math portion of the FCAT test.

After analyzing the 2009 FCAT by grade level, subject area, and cluster/strands, our school writing results can be viewed as a strength. 80% of students scored at or above grade level in the written portion of the FCAT test.


After analyzing the 2009 FCAT by grade level, subject area, and cluster/strands, our school reading results can be viewed as a weakness. 41% of students scored at or above grade level in the reading portion of the FCAT test.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

The district will provide a Focus Calendar for implementing and monitoring focus lessons. County curriculum maps are available for reading, English, mathematics, and science for teachers across content areas. PLC’s assist in providing strategies in these areas to all teachers.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Reading-Reference and Research
Math-Geometry and Spatial
Science-Physical & Chemical


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

With the use of IDEAS, teachers will target individual student needs, strengths, and weaknesses of the clusters/strands.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

Teachers are required to meet in Professional Learning Communities (PLC) across the curriculum, and subject areas, to implement relevant reading and writing strategies.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

Lake Gibson Senior High School allows students to major in their area of interest. Students meet with a college career counselor, school guidance counselors and participate in college presentations as well as career opportunities. A wide range of electives are available to students, including advanced placement courses in various subjects.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


Teachers utilize Learning Focus Solution (LFS) strategies in implanting county curriculum maps based on new generation sunshine state standards.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

The district will provide Continuous Improvement Model (CIM) focus lessons to be delivered by teachers. PLC’s provide strategies to teachers in all content areas.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

Data will assist in the revision of monitoring focus lessons.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


Lake Gibson will use: FAIR, CIM, ongoing teacher-made assessments, and end-of-year exams to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/ intervention.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

Remediation and or enrichment will be based on student performance of assessments. Passage of or improvement in FAIR, ongoing teacher-made assessments, and end-of-year exams will identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

The district will provide a focus calendar which will target ongoing assessments and maintenance of benchmark mastery.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

The teams will review progress monitoring data to identify the required instructional medications that are needed to increase student achievement using: CIM, FAIR, Write Scores and Data Day. Departments and PLC’s will meet monthly to review progress monitoring data.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

The Principal and Leadership Team will conduct: walkthrough’s, data “chats” with teachers, and lead PLC teams.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


Students are placed in prescriptive reading programs based on fluency. Math students are placed in settings based on FCAT level. Low to average students are given additional instructional time for remediation in both subjects.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Using data to drive instruction, some programs use adaptive branching technology. This includes Fast ForWord for reading.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

Professional development needs are based on data and state directives. Staff are provided with PLC’s monthly and on an as needed basis which present various teaching strategies and classroom management skills.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

Students that will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/ interventions are FCAT level 1,2 and low 3’s.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

The effectiveness of the interventions will be measured throughout the year by analyzing data from progress monitoring tools such as teacher-made assessments, observations, and FAIR performance.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

FCAT level 4 or 5 students are placed into Advanced Placement courses where reading strategies are used.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

Students that are identified as FCAT level 4 or 5 are candidates for AP courses.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
Cross-Curricular Jennifer Dibble Twice a month Bi Montly Instructional Strategies
Grade Level Jennifer Dibble Once a month Monthly Cross Curricular
Subject Area Jennifer Dibble Once a month Monthly Content Specific


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.

We will offer students a variety of rigorous and relevant courses that are designed to help students prepare for the future. Courses include: Career Education, Technical Education, dual enrollment and Advanced Placement. Students are also offered actual work experience through internships.

For incoming 9th grade students, we are providing a “freshmen academy” where students will have accommodations made for them as they adjust to the postsecondary level. These accommodations include increased parental involvement, the “Braves Bucks” reward system for academic achievement, and before and after school time with teachers for remediation and makeup work sessions.



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/10/2009 2:46:39 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


The school advisory council works collaboratively with the principal and staff to develop the annual School Improvement Plan. The council will be meeting the third Tuesday morning of each month at the high school and is comprised of the principal and an appropriately balanced team of people with parents, teachers, students, administrators, support staff, business and community members that mirrors the ethnic, racial and economic makeup of the school community.


SAC Members

 

AYP DATA

2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk LAKE GIBSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1762
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 997
Math: 995  
2008-2009
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  38  68  89   91  73  77  63  62  N 32  32  NA 38  70  NA 
WHITE  99  99  43  75  90   92  78  80  57  57  N 25  25  NA 44  77  NA 
BLACK  99  99  26  52  88   93  62  72  75  74  N 46  48  N 25  50 
HISPANIC  100  99  31  58  90   84  64  66  75  69  N 42  42  N 30  60 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  100  99  31  62  85   89  62  63  72  69  N 40  38  N 32  63 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  100  100    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  97  97  20  30  59   58  51  41  88  80  N 69  70  N   NA  29 

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk LAKE GIBSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1762
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 1140
Math: 1140  
2007-2008
School Grade1:
B   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  37  68  94   89  73  73  65  63  NA 34  32  NA 41  NA  81  NA 
WHITE  99  100  43  75    90  79  78  58  57  NA 27  25  NA 47  NA  85  NA 
BLACK  100  100  25  54  89   88  63  62  82  75  NA 55  46  NA 29  NA  73  NA 
HISPANIC  99  99  25  58  85   90  55  64  76  75  NA 39  42  NA 31  NA  75  NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  99  28  60  90   85  64  62  74  72  NA 42  40  NA 32  NA  75  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  98  98    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  97  98  12  31  67   59  39  51  93  88  NA 77  69  NA 13  NA  57  NA 

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk LAKE GIBSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1762
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 1092
Math: 1092  
2006-2007
School Grade1:
B   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  35  66  84   94  79  73  68  65  NA 38  34  NA 47  NA  79  NA 
WHITE  99  99  42  73  89     82  79  62  58  NA 30  27  NA 52  NA  83  NA 
BLACK  100  100  18  45  71   89  71  63  87  82  NA 63  55  NA 32  NA  67  NA 
HISPANIC  97  97  24  61  69   85  74  55  74  76  NA 54  39  NA 40  NA  73  NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA  70  54  NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA    50  NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  98  98  26  58  71   90  66  64  79  74  NA 51  42  NA 42  NA  71  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  99  99    NA    NA      NA  50  33  NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  99  99  23  47   67  42  39  92  93  NA 77  77  NA 28  NA  55  NA 


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Polk School District
LAKE GIBSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 41%  74%  80%  37%  232   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 50%  78%      128  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 49% (NO)  71% (YES)      120  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake 47%  58%      If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded
    Points Earned         480   
    Percent Tested = 98%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Polk School District
    LAKE GIBSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 41%  73%  79%  42%  235   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 50%  82%      132  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 46% (NO)  75% (YES)      121  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake 50%  62%      10  If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded
    Points Earned         498   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         B  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Polk School District
    LAKE GIBSON SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 40%  73%  89%  34%  236   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 52%  77%      129  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 53% (YES)  70% (YES)      123  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake 53%  57%      10  If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded
    Points Earned         498   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         B  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested