VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Vision:
The vision of our school is to provide opportunities for students to achieve both cooperatively and individually. We believe it is our responsibility to prepare all students to reach their highest potential and become productive citizens.
Mission:
The mission at Palmetto Elementary is to provide each student a diverse education in a safe and supportive environment that encourages self-discipline, motivation, and excellence in learning.
Belief Statements:
At Palmetto Elementary we believe that all students can and will learn. We believe that instruction should be differentiated to meet the needs of all students and that teachers and administration must be committed to providing our students with a quality education.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Palmetto Elementary was established and opened our doors in June of 2007. The school is built near protected land in Poinciana; therefore there is no room for expansion. The school’s capacity is 825 students, and 644 students are currently enrolled. Palmetto’s campus includes 5 buildings with 48 classrooms. An Art and Music suite is located on-site, where we are building our chorus and searching for artists for Art Club.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Teachers and parents working as partners in their child’s education.
Boys of Color
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Unsure of how the FAIR assessment will work and being uncertain on what we are using for on-going assessments to find our baselines.
Student Demographics
Our students are zoned to us from Poinciana. Palmetto Elementary, statewide, is a Title I school with 86% of our students receiving free and reduced lunch. The student population is 10.7% White, 24.2% African American, 59% Hispanic, 3% Asian, 1.1 Indian, and 4.6 Multi-racial. Palmetto has a population of 90% minority.
Student Attendance Rates
At Palmetto Elementary we have an attendance rate of 92.54%.
Student Mobility
For the 07-08 school year our mobility rate was 46.20% and for the 08-09 school year our mobility rate was 36.31%.
Student Suspension Rates
At Palmetto Elementary we try very hard to take care of discipline issues in the classroom. Palmetto is a Positive Behavioral School with a suspension rate of 30%.
Student Retention Rates
Retentions as of 7-14-2009 11:55 AM UNOFFICIAL RETENTION DATA UNVERIFIED FOR USE IN SCHOOL SIP PLAN ONLY Grade Retained (UNOFFICIAL) Enrolled at EOY 0809 Percent Retained (UNOFFICIAL)
1702 Palmetto Elementary 01 1 95 1.05
1702 Palmetto Elementary 02 2 90 2.22
1702 Palmetto Elementary 03 17 116 14.66
1702 Palmetto Elementary 04 0 100 0.00
1702 Palmetto Elementary 05 0 82 0.00
1702 Palmetto Elementary KG 4 113 3.54
Class Size
Class Size
Our average class size is 18 students K-3 and 22 students for 4th and 5th grade.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
School# SchoolName DA09 School 'Grade 2009 AYP 2009 %AYP 2009 DA08 School Grade 2008 AYP 2008 %AYP 2008
1611 LAUREL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A YES 100 D NO 72
1702 Lake Marion Creek ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C No 82 A YES 100
Partnerships and Grants
For the 09-10 school year we have some teachers that are participating in the McRel Vocabulary study. Also, we were chosen for the PASOC Boys of Color grant from the Kellogg’s Foundation. This grant allows for us to provide cafés and other great activities for the parents of boys of color. This grant was started to help eliminate boys of color from dropping out of school.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Luis P. Alvarez
|
Master's in Administration and Supervision
|
2
|
21
|
07-08 Palmetto Elementary earned an A with 92% of Adequately Yearly Progress
08-09 Palmetto Elementary earned an A with 100% of Adequately Yearly Progress
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Jennifer Blackburn
|
Master’s in Educational Leadership and a Bachelor’s of Science in Elementary Education
|
2
|
2
|
07-08 Palmetto Elementary earned an A with 92% of Adequately Yearly Progress
08-09 Palmetto Elementary earned an A with 100% of Adequately Yearly Progress
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Math
|
Ted Eldridge
|
BA Elementary Education
|
2
|
2
|
07-08 A/92%;08-09 A/100%
|
|
Writing
|
Francina Mainer
|
BA Elementary Education
|
2
|
2
|
07-08 A/92%; 08-09 A/100%
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
| No data submitted |
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
| No data submitted |
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 50 | 1 | 54 | 7 | 22 | 18 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 18 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Miriam Rodriguez
|
Maria Moreno
|
Both teachers are Spanish Dual Language
|
Meet weekly/monthly to discuss progress or concerns, observations
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Services are provided to ensure students requiring additional remediation are assisted through after-school programs or summer school. The district coordinates with Title II and Title III in ensuring staff development needs are provided.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
NA
Title I, Part D
District receives funds to support the Educational Alternative Outreach program. Services are coordinated with district Drop-out Prevention programs.
Title II
District receives supplemental funds for improving basic education programs through the purchase of small equipment to supplement education programs. New technology in classrooms will increase the instructional strategies provided to students and new instructional software will enhance literacy and math skills of struggling students. Funds from the district are used to purchase Odyssey licenses and provide professional development for Odyssey.
Title III
Services are provided through the district for education materials and ELL district support services to improve the education of immigrant and English Language Learners.
Title X- Homeless
District Homeless Social Worker provides resources (clothing, school supplies, social services referrals) for students identified as homeless under the McKinney-Vento Act to eliminate barriers for a free and appropriate education.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
SAI funds will be coordinated with Title I funds to provide summer school for Level 1 readers. SAI funds will be used to expand the summer program to all Level 2 students.
Violence Prevention Programs
The school offers a non-violence and anti-drug program to students that incorporate field trips, community service, drug tests, and counseling.
Nutrition Programs
NA
Housing Programs
NA
Head Start
Head Start was just incorporated into Palmetto Elementary.
Adult Education
NA
Career and Technical Education
NA
Job Training
NA
Other
NA
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
RtI
|
Amanda Leach
|
Once a month
|
TBA
|
Behavior
|
|
Discovery Educator
|
Jillian Gay
|
TBA
|
TBA
|
Enrichment
|
|
Positive Academic Success Boys of Color
|
Lilly Darity
|
Once a month
|
TBA
|
Males in grades K-3
|
|
Dual Language
|
Robynn Hamrick
|
Once a month
|
TBA
|
Meet with parents to go over curriculm
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
In April, Pre-K goes to Kindergarten to observe lessons and centers once a week. Additionally, Kindergarten Round-up allows for parents to receive information regarding Kindergarten as well to meet and greet teachers.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on our needs assessment of Annual Yearly Progress 56% of our black students made AYP on the 2009 FCAT.
|
Based on the administration of the 2010 FCAT 62% of our black students will make annual yearly progress.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.The school will implement FAIR assessments to monitor student progress. Teachers will also adhere to the focus calendar and present mini-lessons.
|
1.The school will implement FAIR assessments to monitor student progress. Teachers will also adhere to the focus calendar and present mini-lessons.
|
1.Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
1 .FAIR Assessments results and FCAT results.
|
| 2 |
2.Learning Focused strategies will be implemented.
|
2.Principal and Assistant Principal.
|
2.Lesson Plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to the Assistant Principal.
|
2. Classroom walkthroughs by principal, assistant principal and reading coach.
|
| 3 |
3.District Curriculum Maps will be utilized.
|
3.Principal and Assistant Principal
|
3.Lesson Plan Reviews and walk-thrus
|
3.Monitoring of lesson plans and walk throughs by administration.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on a needs assessment of AYP status 48% of our ELL students made yearly progress on the 2009 FCAT.
|
Based on the Annual Yearly Progress of our ELL students 54% will make AYP.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.FAIR assessments will be utilized to monitor student progress. Teachers will also adhere to the focus calendar and present mini-lessons.
|
1.Academic Instructional Facilitator, Principal and Leadership Team.
|
1.Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
1.Individual and group results on FAIR Tests
|
| 2 |
2.LFS strategies will be utilized.
|
2.Principal and Assistant Principal.
|
2.Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to the Assistant Principal.
|
2.Lesson Plan reviews and the monitoring of on-going progress monitoring.
|
| 3 |
3.Curriculum Maps will be utilized.
|
3.Principal and Assistant Principal.
|
3.Administrative Observations
|
3.Monitoring of lesson plans and walk throughs.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on SAT results 31% of our first grade students were ranked in the 1st to 50th percentile.
|
Based on the 2010 SAT results 74% of our 1st. grade students will be ranked above the 50th percentile.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school will implement FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
1.AIF Facilitator, Principal and Leadership Team.
|
1.Review of the FAIR data to ensure teachers are assessing according to the created schedule.
|
1.FAIR assessments and progress on the SBAR, SAT 10 and on-going progress monitoring.
|
| 2 |
Learning Focused strategies will be implemented.
|
2.AIF Facilitator, Principal, Assistant Principal and Leadership Team.
|
2.Lesson Plans will be reviewed during classroom walk throughs and submitted to the AP.
|
2.Classroom walk throughs by administration and the AIF.
|
| 3 |
Curriculum Maps will be utilized.
|
3.AIF Facilitator, Principal, Assistant Principal, Leadership Team.
|
3.Lesson plans will be reviewed by the AP to monitor pacing.
|
3.Classroom walk throughs by administration.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on SAT results 54% of our second grade students ranked in the 1st to 50th percentile.
|
Based on the 2010 SAT 51% of our 2nd grade students will be ranked above the 59th percentile.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.The school will implement FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
1.AIF Facilitator, Principal, Assistant Principal and Leadership Team.
|
1.Review of the FAIR data to ensure teachers are assessing according to the created schedule.
|
1.FAIR assessments and progress on the SBAR.
|
| 2 |
2.Learning Focused Strategies will be implemented.
|
2.AIF Facilitator, Principal, Assistant Principal and Leadership Team.
|
2.Lesson Plans will be reviewed during classroom walk throughs and submitted to the AP.
|
2. Classroom walk throughs by administration, AIF and Leadership Team.
|
| 3 |
3.Curriculum Maps will be utilized.
|
3.AIF Facilitator, Principal , AP and Leadership Team.
|
3.Lesson plans will be reviewed by the Assistant Principal to monitor pacing.
|
3.Classroom walk throughs by administration.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
On the administration of the 2010 FCAT 62% of our black students and 54% of our EEL students in grades 3 to 5 will achieve progress based on Annual Yearly Progress.
|
Effective implementation of K-12 strategies, LFS strategies and the district instructional Focused Calendar.
|
AIF facilitator, administration.
|
June 2010
|
Lesson Plans and Classroom visits.
|
AIF facilitator and administration.
|
|
On the administration of the 2010 SAT 71% of our 1st.graders and 54% of our 2nd graders will make progress.
|
Effective implementation of K-12 strategies, LFS strategies and the district instructional focused calendar.
|
AIF facilitator, administration.
|
June 2010
|
Lesson Plans and classroom visits.
|
AIF facilitator and administration.
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Trophies Practice Books
AIF Facilitator
FAIR
ESOL Para./teacher
|
1702ITEXT
1702IFLEX
District
State
District
|
$6,780.80 |
| Trophies Practice Books
AIF Facilitator
FAIR
ESOL Paraprofessionals
ESOL Teacher
|
1702ITEXT
1702IFLEX
District
State
District
|
$2,413.51 |
| Total: $9,194.31 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Fast Forward
FAIR
Odyssey
Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras)
|
District
State
District
District and school-based funding
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Trophies
AIF Facilitator
FAIR
ESOL Paraprofessionals
ESOL Teacher
|
District
State
District
District and school-based funding
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $9,194.31 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on the needs assessment 67% of our black students made annual yearly progress on the administration of the 2009 FCAT in grades 3 to 5.
|
In grades 3 to 5 73% of our black students will make annual yearly progress on the 2010 FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.Continue the use of the Acaletics Program to increase higher order thinking skills.
|
1.Principal, AP and Math Resource Teacher. Mike Bell consultant.
|
1.Analysisof acaletics test data and data from IDEAS..
Walkthroughs and talks with students. Grouping for math.
|
1.Acalectic test data,data from IDEAS, and walk-thru observations.
|
| 2 |
2.Utilize FCAT explorer past test to further expose students to FCAT formatted test questions.
|
2. Principal, AP, Math Resource, Acaletics Consultants.
|
2.Grade level teams will review results of text tests, Acaletics data,
|
2.FCAT Explorer Reports
|
| 3 |
3. By using LFS strategies, teachers will be using activating teaching and summarizing strategies.
|
3. Math Resource teacher, Principal, AP.
|
3. Test data from IDEAS and analysis of Acaletics test results.
|
Acaletics test data, data from IDEAS, Iunit tests and report card grades.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on the needs assessment 65% of our ELL students made AYP progress on the 2009 FCAT.
|
In grades 3 to 5 71% of our ELL students will make AYP progress on the 2010 FCAT
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.Continued use of Acaletics Math Program.
|
1.Math Resource teacher, Acaletics consultants, Principal, AP
|
1.Periodic math assessments, walk throughs and grade summaries.
|
1.Periodic tests review. Daily tests and report card grades.
|
| 2 |
2.ESOL Paraprofessional /teacher assistance will be provided to assist our lowest 25%.
|
2.Use of Title I and ESOL Paras/teacher and math Resource teacher.
|
2.Acalectics assessments and weekly math meetings.
|
2.Feedback from paraprofessionals and teachers during weekly meetings.
|
| 3 |
3.Departmentalization in grades 4th through 5th will continue in math and 3rd grade will begin this year.
|
3.Math resource teacher and teachers will meet weekly to discuss students progress.
|
Weekly math meetings to share progress of students. Sharing strategies and interventions utilized.
|
3. Math teachers will meet weekly to determine progress of individual students.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on the administration of the 2009 SAT test 50% of our 1st grade students and 59% of our second grade students scored in the 1st o 50th percentile.
|
On the administration of the 2010 SAT 56% of our first grade students and 64% of our second grade students will score above the 50th percentile.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
By using LFS strategies teachers will be using activating teaching and summarizing strategies.
|
Math resource teacher, Principal and AP.
|
Lesson Plans, walk throughs and analysis of test data.
|
Weekly meetings with teachers and paraprofessionals.
|
| 2 |
Implement the Acalectics math club to increase higher order thinking using work problems.
|
Math resource teacher, Principal and AP.
|
Lesson Plans, walk thrus and analysis of test data.
|
Weekly meetings with teachers and paraprofessionals.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
In first grade 56% of our first grade students and 64% of our second grade students will score above the 50th percentile on the 2010 SAT in math.
|
Successful implementation of the instructional Focus calendar, Acaletics,math club and utilization of LFS strategies.
|
Math resource teacher, Principal and AP.
|
June 2010
|
Monitoring of lessons modeling of math club strategies by resource teacher and classroom visits by administration.
|
Math resource teacher, Principal and AP.
|
|
In grades 3 to 5 73% of our black students, 71% of our ELL students, students will make AYP progress.
|
Successful implementation of the instructional Focus calendar, Acaletics,math club and utilization of LFS strategies.
|
Math resource, Principal and AP.
|
June 2010
|
Monitoring of lessons modeling of math club strategies by resource teacher and classroom visits by administration
|
Math resource teacher, Principal and AP.
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Acaletics Math Club
Math Practice Books
Math Resource Teacher
ESOL teacher
|
Title I
1702IFLEX
Title I
District
|
$58,469.50 |
| Acaletics Math Club
Math Resource Teacher
ESOL para/teacher
|
See Above |
$0.00 |
| Total: $58,469.50 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District and school-based funding |
$0.00 |
| Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District |
$0.00 |
| Acaletics |
See Above |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $58,469.50 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
Based on 2009, FCAT
Science data, 37% of
students achieved
level three and above.
|
Given instruction
based on the
Sunshine State
Standards, 43% of
students will score
at level three or
above on the 2010
FCAT Science
Assessment.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Utilize hands-on
Laboratory and real world science
experiments one
time per week.
|
Principal and
Leadership Team
|
The created lab
schedule will be
implemented with
fidelity and monitored
by the Principal and AP.
|
Improvement on
science mini assessments.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
Given instruction based on the
Sunshine State Standards,
43% of students will score at
level three or above on the
2010 FCAT Science
Assessment.
|
Florida’s
Continuous
Improvement
Model Training
|
AIF and AP
|
August
2010
|
Common planning
minutes will be
reviewed to ensure
data trends are
discussed and lesson
plans are developed
|
Principal,
Leadership Team
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| 1 Science Lab |
Purchased from years previous. |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District and school-based funding |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Acaletics for Science |
Title I |
$11,775.00 |
| Total: $11,775.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $11,775.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
On the 2009
administration of the
FCAT Writing Test,
93% of the students in
4th grade scored level
3.5 or above in writing.
|
On the 2010
administration of
the FCAT Writing
Test, 94% of the
4th grade students
will achieve a 3.5
or above.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Students will use
the writing process
daily during their writing block.
.
|
1. Assistant Principal,
4th Grade teachers and Writing Resource
|
1.After evaluating IDEAS data, a school wide consistent method of
saving student work
will be established.
Teachers will save writing samples on a monthly basis.
|
1. Progress between
the Pretest Prompt
and Mid-year Prompt.
|
| 2 |
2.Timed Practice
|
2.Writing Resource
|
2. Twice a month all 4th graders
|
gress between
the Pretest Prompt
and Mid-year Prompt
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
On the 2010
administration of
the FCAT Writing
Test, 94% of the
4th grade students
will achieve a 3.5
or above.
|
Mentor Text
|
F. Mainer
|
Oct. 09
|
Observations/Lesson Plans
|
F. Mainer/AP
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Writing Resource |
Title I |
$56,855.00 |
| Total: $56,855.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District and school-based funding |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Mentor Text |
Bought in previous years |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $56,855.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
By May 2010, 75% of parents will participate in decisions regarding their children’s educational documentation as evidenced by attendance at parent trainings, meetings or conferences.
|
Palmetto Elementary School will include a school family compact that will be distributed to parents with the back to school information packet. (signed compacts returned will be kept on file at the school)
Increase parental involvement by 5% during the 2009-2010 school year.
Palmetto Elementary School parents will be involved in decisions about how Title I funds are to be allocated and documentation retained to support this requirement.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Compacts will be sent home in the Wednesday Folders.
|
1. Lola Holmberg
|
1. Checklist
|
1. Observation
|
| 2 |
2. During SAC meetings we will discuss with our community what is in the best interest of out students.
|
2. Principal
|
2. Checklist
|
2. Survey
|
| 3 |
3. Inform parents using Connect-Ed phone system.
|
3. Program Facilitator
|
3. Parent follow-up through phone communication; sign-in sheets.
|
3. Sign in sheets parent survey.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Conduct a Title I Open House Meeting to encourage parent participation.
|
An annual public meeting will be held in the Lunchroom (AM & PM) to inform all stakeholders included staff, parents, business partners, and community members of the Palmetto’s participation in the Title I school wide program.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. The public meeting will be held on September 23rd in the AM and PM
|
1. Lola Holmberg and Principal
|
1. Sign In Sheet
|
1. Survey
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Conduct a Title I Open House Meeting to encourage parent participation.
|
FCAT Workshops will be scheduled each month in the areas of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Monthly newsletters (school-wide and grade level), along with homework, will be added to our school website.
Muffins with Moms, Donuts with Dads, and Goodies with Grandparents will be done to bring in guardians and give them strategies to use at home with their children.
Dual Language Nights will be provided once a month for teachers and parents to see how the program is working and the benefits they are receiving from the program.
Family Night will be provided once a month for parents to come and relax with their child.
Celebrate different cultures and heritages.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. All workshops have been scheduled.
|
1. Lola Holmberg and Principal
|
1. Sign-In Sheets
|
1. Survey
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Trophies Practice Books
AIF Facilitator
FAIR
ESOL Para./teacher
|
1702ITEXT
1702IFLEX
District
State
District
|
$6,780.80 |
| Reading |
Trophies Practice Books
AIF Facilitator
FAIR
ESOL Paraprofessionals
ESOL Teacher
|
1702ITEXT
1702IFLEX
District
State
District
|
$2,413.51 |
| Mathematics |
Acaletics Math Club
Math Practice Books
Math Resource Teacher
ESOL teacher
|
Title I
1702IFLEX
Title I
District
|
$58,469.50 |
| Mathematics |
Acaletics Math Club
Math Resource Teacher
ESOL para/teacher
|
See Above |
$0.00 |
| Writing |
Writing Resource |
Title I |
$56,855.00 |
| Science |
1 Science Lab |
Purchased from years previous. |
$0.00 |
| Total: $124,518.81 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Fast Forward
FAIR
Odyssey
Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras)
|
District
State
District
District and school-based funding
|
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District and school-based funding |
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District |
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Acaletics |
See Above |
$0.00 |
| Writing |
Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District and school-based funding |
$0.00 |
| Science |
Technology enriched classrooms (SMART interactive whiteboards, Lightspeed Audio enhancement systems, Mounted LCD projectors, Document cameras) |
District and school-based funding |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Trophies
AIF Facilitator
FAIR
ESOL Paraprofessionals
ESOL Teacher
|
District
State
District
District and school-based funding
|
$0.00 |
| Writing |
Mentor Text |
Bought in previous years |
$0.00 |
| Science |
Acaletics for Science |
Title I |
$11,775.00 |
| Total: $11,775.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $136,293.81 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
| No data submitted |
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
1. To review and approve the SIP.
2. Community Partnership
3. Create a business/class sponsorship.
4. Advise and approve school based purchases.
5. They also advise and approve school functions.
SAC Members
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Polk School District PALMETTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
71%
|
80%
|
91%
|
37%
|
279
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
69% |
73% |
|
|
142 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
68% (YES) |
74% (YES) |
|
|
142
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
563 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Polk School District PALMETTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
63%
|
67%
|
76%
|
32%
|
238
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
63% |
83% |
|
|
146 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
67% (YES) |
79% (YES) |
|
|
146
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
No Data Found