VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
MISSION - Traviss Career Center educates and prepares students for success in a changing workplace.
VISION - We see Traviss Career Center continuing to grow in technical quality promoting continued education for the staff so that they may stay current with the latest technical advances, evaluating and revising curriculum so that it reflects the rapidly changing needs of the business world, and providing training and job placement for the growing workforce of Polk County to meet the needs of local business and industry. As the Florida State Board of Education legislates changes to promote articulation among high schools, technical centers and community colleges, we see Traviss maintaining a vital role providing world class technical education for our community.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Brief History and Background of the School
Traviss Career Center opened on September 28, 1964, as Polk Vocational Center with World War II barracks at Bartow Air Base serving as the first classrooms. The first director, Maynard A. Traviss, opened the school with nine programs. Enrollment included 350 high school students and 30 full-time adult students. The first class completed in June, 1965. Two years later, the School Board of Polk County purchased sixty acres off County Road 540 and built a new physical plant for the Center. The Center includes five main wings. The Center lies adjacent to Polk State College and the University of South Florida Lakeland campus, about one quarter mile east of the intersection of State Road 540 and U.S. Highway 98. The school has undergone several name changes over the years but has continued to honor our first Director. (1982¬-Maynard A. Traviss Vocational Technical Center: 1996-Traviss Technical Center). Now known as Traviss Career Center the school continues to serve both secondary and postsecondary students.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Brief History and Background of the School
Traviss Career Center opened on September 28, 1964, as Polk Vocational Center with World War II barracks at Bartow Air Base serving as the first classrooms. The first director, Maynard A. Traviss, opened the school with nine programs. Enrollment included 350 high school students and 30 full-time adult students. The first class completed in June, 1965. Two years later, the School Board of Polk County purchased sixty acres off County Road 540 and built a new physical plant for the Center. The Center includes five main wings. The Center lies adjacent to Polk State College and the University of South Florida Lakeland campus, about one quarter mile east of the intersection of State Road 540 and U.S. Highway 98. The school has undergone several name changes over the years but has continued to honor our first Director. (1982¬-Maynard A. Traviss Vocational Technical Center: 1996-Traviss Technical Center). Now known as Traviss Career Center the school continues to serve both secondary and postsecondary students.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Our weaknesses range from funding shortfalls, through students prior experiences, to the age of our facility and the requirements for continuous upkeep. As the economy weakens the workload at the school increases but budget shortfalls do not allow needed improvements in technology or instructor training and certification in field. Many of our facilities were built in the late sixties and only through continued maintenance have they been sufficient for the training courses offered. Because we receive students from throughout the county there is no direct feeder system through which we get students. This affects our FCAT scores because we have only one or two opportunities to evaluate and remediate students who have failed at other venues.
Student Demographics
Student Demographics
TCC is one of only 33 campuses in Florida to offer a unique opportunity for our secondary students. Secondary students are able to complete their high school education as they obtain certification in a career field. We offer over 40 excellent, unique, and valued programs for all of our students to engage in. This variety runs from Administrative Assistant through Licensed Practical Nurse to Welder. Our graduates go to work in the local economy, often before graduation, and will be the employee who repairs your car, arranges your hair, submits your medical insurance claim, or installs your new central air conditioner. Our students have built houses (during their junior and senior years) and worked in many different business offices. We are unique in that you will find both secondary and post¬secondary students engaged in the same course of study, sharing space and equipment without concern for which is which. We are not a secondary school, nor are we a post-secondary school; we offer a career path to all students. In terms of ethnicity we serve a diverse population (18% Hispanic, 5% Black, 76% White, and 2% American Indian, Asian, and multiethnic). 23% are Students with Disabilities, 33% are economically disadvantaged, 22.7% of 12th grade and 19.5% of 11th grade are ESE; and 10.9% of 12th grade and 14.6% of 11th grade are ESOL.
Student Attendance Rates
For 2006-2007 – 86.81% For 2007-2008 – 87.96% For 2008-2009 – 92.43%
Student Mobility
For 2007-2008 – 73.62% For 2008-2009 - 68.12%
Student Suspension Rates
For 2007-2008 - OSS Days – 144, OSS Actions – 71, ISS Days – 2 , ISS Actions – 1:
For 2008-2009 – OSS Days – 323, OSS Actions – 105, ISS Days – 4, ISS Actions - 2
Student Retention Rates
2006/07 11th grade – 0% 12th grade – 57 % -
2007/08 11th grade – 0% 12th grade – 28.57%
Retention data for 2008-2009 is not available
Class Size
Class size varies with the vocational program and the academic class as well. Due to this years influx of High School students we are currently at peak in many of our classes. This crowding is ameliorated by careful scheduling of both High School and Adult populations.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Due to the fact that Traviss is open to any adult or High School (11th and 12th grade) students in the county there is no feeder pattern.
Partnerships and Grants
Traviss’ Business Partners continue to provide input into the curriculum as well as to provide equipment, small grants, and employment experiences (externships) as well as employment both while the student is enrolled and after graduation.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Dr. Wayne Dickens
|
BA, M.Ed Ed.D
|
1
|
9
|
N/A
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Mr. Alan Harrell
|
Rank II AVD, BA, M. Ed
|
2
|
2
|
N/A
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
| No data submitted |
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
| No data submitted |
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
| No data submitted |
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 6 | 0 | 16.6 | 33.3 | 49.8 | 33.3 | 100 | 16.6 | 0 | 16.6 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Patty Gabrick
|
None as yet
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Doris Scott
|
None as yet
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Kent Williston
|
None as yet
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
N/A
Title I, Part C- Migrant
N/A
Title I, Part D
N/A
Title II
N/A
Title III
N/A
Title X- Homeless
N/A
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
N/A
Violence Prevention Programs
N/A
Nutrition Programs
N/A
Housing Programs
N/A
Head Start
N/A
Adult Education
Traviss offers a wide variety of adult education classes ranging from short (12 hr) courses in Microsoft Office subjects through Licensed Practical Nursing to Welding. Funding is availble from a wide variety of agencies including Farm Workers and Vocational Rehabilitation.
Career and Technical Education
Traviss offers a wide variety of adult education classes ranging from short (12 hr) courses in Microsoft Office subjects through Licensed Practical Nursing to Welding. Funding is availble from a wide variety of agencies including Farm Workers and Vocational Rehabilitation.
Job Training
Traviss offers a wide variety of adult education classes ranging from short (12 hr) courses in Microsoft Office subjects through Licensed Practical Nursing to Welding. Funding is availble from a wide variety of agencies including Farm Workers and Vocational Rehabilitation.
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
| No data submitted |
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
N/A
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
As a Career Center Traviss is unique in that all of our students are being prepared so that on completion of their programs they are ready to enter the work force. This has the obvious advantage of also preparing the students to enter postsecondary education. It is not unusual to hear that a former student is seeking their Bachelor’s or even Master’s degree and many of our nursing graduates go on to seek their RN. By preparing the student to succeed in the workforce we provide them with the skills to succeed in college. Through the encouragement of our instructors they learn the benefits of lifelong learning. This school is not included in the referenced “High School Feedback Report.”
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Students enroll at Traviss as 11th or 12th graders. Since the FCAT Reading is administered in the 10th grade, students entering Traviss without a passing FCAT score will be given the FCAT retake. A significant percentage of our entering students each year have not passed the Reading FCA
|
Students are evaluated on entering TCC and provided remediation on an individual basis.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Remediation
2. Standard curricula
3. Retesting
|
. Instructor
|
FCAT
|
FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Because students enroll at Traviss during their 11th and 12th years and the math FCAT is given during the 10th grade all of our students who were not successful are give retake exams. Each year we suffer through the difficulty of students who may or may not have had the standard courses and thus require intensive remediation.
|
Our objective is to provide each student with the tools and assistance to achieve success.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.Evaluation
2.Remediation
3.Retesting
|
Instructor
|
Retesting
|
FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The Science FCAT is so new as to give s no history on which to base our student needs. Successful completion by those who have taken the Science FCAT and been unsuccessful.
|
Students will improve their scores on the FCAT Science test and 50 %will achieve at least Level 3.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Provide scientific readings that mirror FCAT selections. 3)
2. use higher level questionings that are indicative of those seen on the FCAT.
3. Collect, graph, and interpret available scientific data.
|
Instructor
|
1. Practice tests similar in content and format to the FCAT Science test.
2. Graded Exams FCAT
|
FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Students at TCC are not tested using the Writing FCAT but certain students test using the Writing Skills GED subtest (TCDD students).
|
Improve test scores on the GED Writing Subtest
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.Retesting
2.Standard Curricula
3.Retesting
|
Instructor
|
GED Writing Subtest
|
GED Writing Subtest
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Research has shown that parental (family) involvement contributes markedly to student success.
|
Parent involvement at AIP conferences will increase by 2 % in the 2009/10 school year. Parent volunteers will increase by 2 % in the 2009/10 school year.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.Invitations
2. SemiAnnual Open Houses
|
Director
|
Student survey
|
Student survey
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
| No data submitted |
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The School Advisory Council meets two to four times per year to review a wide variety of school data. The members are apprised by the Director of the school of activities and the outcome of the educational process. They actively assist in development of the School Improvement Plan and its approval. Members of the SAC also review the programs offered by the school and make recommendations as to their inception, continuance, and closure.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Dr. Wayne Dickens,
Principal
|
|
2)
Marshall McNeely,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Doris Scott,
Teacher
|
|
4)
Patricia Gabrick,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Sandy Bell,
Business Member
|
|
6)
William Futch,
Business Member
|
|
7)
Jim Traviss,
Business Member
|
|
8)
Frank Woxman,
Business Member
|
|
9)
Herb Hernandez,
Business Member
|
|
10)
Kathy Hunt,
Business Member
|
|
11)
Susan Dillon,
Business Member
|
|
12)
Carole Reeder,
Business Member
|
|
13)
Jean Dansby,
Parent
|
|
14)
Leah Loban,
Parent
|
|
15)
Dorothy Wentz,
Parent
|
|
16)
Al Miller,
Community Member
|
|
17)
Angie Strickland,
Community Member
|
|
18)
Hazel Sellers,
Community Member
|
|
19)
Joyce Bently,
School Support Personnel
|
|
20)
Chong Dame,
School Support Personnel
|
|
21)
Larry Hill,
School Support Personnel
|
|
22)
June Minerva,
School Support Personnel
|
|
23)
Alan Harrell,
Assistant Principal
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found