VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Vision:
Gause Academy stakeholders will have a strong sense of purpose for our school. Education improves our society, makes technological advances possible and allows personal success in our daily lives.
Mission:
The mission of Gause Academy of Leadership and Applied Technology
is to provide a nurturing environment in which students are given the opportunity to reach his or her maximum potential in academics, social skills, leadership, and employability skills which will make them a full high school graduate and a productive member of society.
Belief Statements:
1. We will demonstrate fair and impartial treatment while displaying care, concern and respect for each member of our school community.
2. We will have a strong, consistent and progressive method of fostering positive behavior that will ensure a safe and orderly learning environment.
3. We will integrate the basic skills of reading, writing and mathematics into all phases of our academic and vocational curriculum.
4. We will foster strong cooperation among leadership, staff, parents, students and community. As a strong team we will strive to develop continuous improvement in our learning environment.
5. We will come together as a team to use all the resources available to ensure social growth, learning and personal success.
6. We will practice, courtesy, honesty and teamwork while delivering professional, efficient educational services.
7. We will strive toward mastery of the essential curriculum as well as recognize and celebrate progress, excellence and achievement.
8. We believe that innovation and creativity will drive the process of meeting the needs of our students, their families and our community at large.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Gause Academy is an alternative school, grades 6 through 12, within the Polk County School System that focuses on a unique and specific approach to education. Curriculum offerings, internal organization, teaching methods and educational philosophy are what make a school more or less desirable for different students and their families. Therefore our school has evolved into a “hybrid” taking some of the best elements of a school of choice, magnet school, vo-tech center, dropout prevention center and combined selected traits to deliver services to “under achieving” students for the purpose of dropout prevention.
Gause Academy has several themes within the program model; "leadership in business" is the single most important. We feel that all productive work is honorable and worthwhile, whether it be the duties of a president of a large corporation or a worker at the local hamburger palace. At Gause, we encourage the work habits, work attitude, communication skills and personal integrity that it takes to be a leader in the workplace, no matter the place or level of employment. These attributes are defined and put to practical use throughout the curriculum under the heading of employability skills. These skills are taught, re-taught, evaluated by every instructor and emphasized by every administrator. We intend for graduates of Gause to have the skills to be the managers, executives, and owners of business in our next century of progress.
Within the Academy of Leadership at grades 6 - 12, there are certain occupational career clusters available to our students to choose from.
1. Communications and Technical Occupations (HS) - represent careers and individual course work in business, graphic arts, and electronics technology.
2. Manufacturing, Industry and Service Occupations (HS) - represent careers and individual course work in construction, transportation and culinary arts.
3. Career Education (MS) - is a series of introductory courses open to middle school students only. During each year a student will experience two of the career categories, one semester each, thereby having completed exposure to all areas by ninth grade, where they can choose one or more areas of concentration.
All students who graduate from Gause Academy will receive a standard high school diploma as available at any of the other high schools in Polk County. Graduates will be able to attend two or four year colleges, technical schools, trade schools, armed services or go directly into the work force with saleable skills, knowledge and leadership style.
Gause Academy is a serious program and we expect our students to be serious about their education. All students are welcomed to apply but we will screen applications looking for students with: 1. No major or continuous discipline problems in the past school year, 2. An average, or lower than proficient score on the FCAT or equivalent exams, 3. A student who is underachieving in school or in danger of dropping out because of age and past retentions. Students with these qualifications will have first preference.
The physical campus is comprised of one main building that houses all vocational programs, many of the high school academic programs including general use areas such as media, cafeteria, and administration. A second building houses all of the middle school academic classrooms. Four portables in the rear of the campus house a Headstart program of 70 – 80 students. An additional five portables on the east and west wings of the school have some selected high school classrooms to include a physical education classroom, math and ESE. Physical education activities take place outside on a P.E. blacktop west of the main building and on adjacent land east of the campus on the grounds of the City of Bartow’s Westside Community Center. Expansion and improvements are needed in at least three of the vocational classrooms, as well a multi-purpose room for the improvement of the physical education curriculum. All of these improvements are scheduled in Polk County’s list of building projects.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Student Capacity in Grades 6 -12 – 320 students
Gause Academy feeder schools include all elementary, middle, and high schools located in the western half of the county. These include Fort Meade Middle/High School, Bartow High School, Mulberry High School, George Jenkins High School, Lakeland High School, Kathleen High School, Lake Gibson High School, Tenoroc High School and all the middle and elementary schools that feed into those systems.
The premise of this program is that a smaller, well-structured learning environment will promote student achievement where it has been absent before. The key strengths include more teacher/ pupil interaction, immediate feedback, high teacher expectations, renewed parent involvement, teacher modeling and multiple – wide range opportunities for practice and application.
One of our basic beliefs is that a student planning immediate career entry upon graduation should be no less prepared than a student planning to attend college. In fact, a student who goes directly into the work force needs more preparation. He must have saleable skills now, to be able to get a good job. A college bound student still has more time to develop these skills. At Gause, our students develop hands on skills as well as academic and technical skills that students at other schools would not normally be exposed to. We use our comprehensive vocational program and schoolwide employability skills program to create a work atmosphere that entices students to stay engaged in learning.
Since most students in the Gause population are in need of intense remedial instruction, smaller class size is important. Gause is staffed on a 15:1 student ratio. Most classes range in size from 15-18 students with the exception of P.E. where size ranges around 30 students.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Our strength in purpose and mission actually becomes our very weakness in academic performance. Because we search out the lowest performers in most school populations, test scores at our school represent the lowest 25% of our feeder schools. 70% of our students scored at Level 1 in reading during the 08-09 testing season. Returning a student to “academic health” is not a short range task but is a two to three year commitment that first must start by establishing a firm foundation in developing valid relationships with our students then moving on to the rigor and relevance of secondary education. Our mantra states that “They do not care what you have to say until they know that you care!” Many students who have failed in the standard academic system are not motivated by a grade on a paper, in fact they refuse to try in that system because it has failed them or they have repeatedly failed in it. Rather, they will respond by trying to achieve or work for a person (teacher) who has convinced them that they are interested in them and have their best interests at heart. Much later in the process does that idea of achievement become internalized sufficiently, that self satisfaction and progress equal high grades.
Student Demographics
White – 55.8%
Black - 30.2% Economically Disadvantaged – 70%
Hispanic – 13.1 %
Other - 1% LEP – 3%
Migrant – 1%
Male – 57.3%
Female – 42.7%
Student Attendance Rates
Average Attendance Rate
2006-2007 – 87.45 %
2007-2008 – 87.34%
2008-2009 – 89.60%
Student Mobility
Mobiity Rate is determined by the percentage of students withdrawn before day 15 of the school year or after the 15th day and before the end of the year as compared to students who are enrolled after day 16.
2007-2008 - 66.67 %
2008-2009 - 62.97 %
Student Suspension Rates
Student Suspension Rates
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
Alternative Placement 0% 1% 1%
ISS 1% 1% 1%
OSS short term 27% 23% 27%
OSS long term 3% 4% 3%
Student Retention Rates
Grade 6 – 27.2% Grade 9 – 31.2%
Grade 7 – 8.3% Grade 10 -16.0%
Grade 8 – 18.1% Grade 11 –23.0%
Grade 12 – 0.0%
Class Size
2006-2007 2007-2008
Middle school – 17.22 students/class 17.85 students/class
High School – 14.6 students/class 15.32 students/class
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
The academic performance of our feeder schools is a non issue since we only search out the bottom 25% of their population. That part of their population is the most likely in danger of dropping out. We are therefore serving a very select part of any school’s population not an overall representation.
For the purposes of this report the major high schools that refer students and their feeder patterns are listed.
Title
School Name Grad AYP 09AYP % DA 08 DA 09 Typ
31 LAKELAND SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL B NO 82 PREVENT II CORRECT I
51 SOUTHWEST MIDDLE SCHOOL A NO 69 CORRECT II
1501CRYSTAL LAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL C NO 74 PREVENT II CORRECT II SW
61CARLTN PALMORE ELEM SCHOOL A NO 87 CORRECT I
101 CRYSTAL LAKE ELEM SCHOOL C NO 90 CORRECT II CORRECT I SW
231 SOUTHWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL B NO 92 PREVENT I SW
9206 LAKELAND TEEN PARENT PROG NO 85 CORRECT I
9225 PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS NO 85 CORRECT I
1051 TENOROC HIGH SCHOOL D NO 72 PREVENT II
91 COMBEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C NO 72 CORRECT II CORRECT II SW
901 BARTOW SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL B NO 82 CORRECT I
931 BARTOW MIDDLE SCHOOL C NO 72 CORRECT II
932 COMPASS MIDDLE CHARTER IMPROVING NO 95 CORRECT I SW
961 FLORAL AVENUE ELEM SCHOOL A NO 90 PREVENT I CORRECT I SW
981 GIBBONS STREET ELEM SCHOOL B NO 97 PREVENT I CORRECT I SW
1041 ALTURAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A NO 90 PREVENT I SW
1731 PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL B NO 92 PREVENT I CORRECT I SW
1751 JAMES E STEPHENS ELEM B NO 87 PREVENT I CORRECT I SW
1131 MULBERRY SR HIGH SCHOOL C NO 90 CORRECT I
1161 MULBERRY MIDDLE SCHOOL B NO 77 CORRECT II
1141 PURCELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C NO 79 PREVENT I PREVENT II SW
1151 KINGSFORD ELEM SCHOOL B NO 77 CORRECT II CORRECT II SW
181 MEDULLA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C NO 82 CORRECT I
1181 KATHLEEN SR HIGH SCHOOL D NO 62 CORRECT II
1191 KATHLEEN MIDDLE SCHOOL B NO 87 PREVENT I CORRECT I SW
1971 SLEEPY HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL C NO 72 PREVENT II CORRECT II SW
1671 MCKEEL ACAD OF TECHNOLOGY A NO 92 CORRECT I
1221 KATHLEEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A NO 95 PREVENT I SW
1231 GRIFFIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A NO 97 PREVENT I CORRECT I SW
1241 JESSE KEEN ELEM SCHOOL A NO 92 CORRECT I CORRECT I SW
1251 WINSTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C NO 74 CORRECT I CORRECT II SW
1271 SLEEPY HILL ELEM SCHOOL C NO 90 PREVENT I SW
201 N LAKELAND ELEM SCHOOL A NO 79 CORRECT I CORRECT II SW
1821 JAMES W.SIKES ELEM SCHOOL A NO 90 CORRECT I
1851 DR. NE ROBERTS ELEM SCHOOL B NO 95 PREVENT I SW
1901 SOCRUM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C NO 90 PREVENT I PREVENT I SW
1762 LAKE GIBSON SR HIGH SCHOOL C NO 74 CORRECT II
1761 LAKE GIBSON MIDDLE SCHOOL B NO 72 CORRECT II
1451 EDGAR L. PADGETT ELEM B NO 85 PREVENT I CORRECT I SW
1841 CLEM CHURCHWELL ELEM C NO 79 PREVENT I CORRECT II SW
1881 WENDELL WATSON ELEM SCHOOL A NO 97 PREVENT I
1931 GEORGE W. JENKINS SR HIGH C NO 74 CORRECT II
1771 LAKELAND HIGHLANDS MIDDLE A NO 92 CORRECT I
1681 SCOTT LAKE ELEM SCHOOL A NO 92 PREVENT I
1991 LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL C NO 72 PREVENT II CORRECT II
Partnerships and Grants
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Robert S. Grocki
|
B. S. Ind Arts Education
M. S Curr Development
Certification Admin/ Superv
Principal Endorsement
|
21
|
22
|
2009 – School Improv Rating of Declining
AYP – 74%
2008 – School Improv Rating of Maintaining
AYP – 79%
2007 – School Improv Rating of
P
AYP – 74%
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Joseph Viscusi
|
A.A. Liberal Arts
B.A. Political Science
M.S. Voc and Adult Educ
Certification in Ed Leadership
|
5
|
5
|
2009 – School Improv Rating of Declining
AYP – 74%
2008 – School Improv Rating of Maintaining
AYP – 79%
2007 – School Improv Rating of
P
AYP - 74%
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Reading
|
Kimberly Morrison
|
BS Educ
MA Educ
|
|
1
|
2009 – School Improv Rating of Improving
AYP – 62%
2008 – No Grade
AYP – 85%
|
|
Math
|
Francine Knopp
|
BS Educ
MA EdLead
Cert 1-6 Elem
6-12 Math
Gifted
|
|
|
2009 - C, AYP 69%
2008 - C, AYP 67%
2007 - C, AYP 62%
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
1. Treat all staff as highly trained professionals and respected partners
|
Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
2. Deliver a clear mission/vision expectation to all staff
|
Leadership Team
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
3. Partner new inexperienced teachers with veteran staff
|
Principal
|
August 2009
Ongoing
|
|
|
4. Assign mentors to new teachers
|
Principal
|
August 2009
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Caron Harper
|
Lang Arts 6-12
|
Lang Arts
|
Up to date on hours necessary for ESOL endorsement
|
|
Lee Wulf
|
Automotive
|
Automotive
|
ESOL to be completed
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 21 | 0 | 14 | 45 | 41 | 23 | 100 | 14 | 14 | 96 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Kimberly Morris
|
Peter Cordero
|
Reading Instructor/ Reading Coach
|
Planning
|
|
Terry Monies
|
Jessica Martinez
|
Middle School Instructors
|
Planning
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part D
Title II
Title III
Title X- Homeless
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Violence Prevention Programs
Nutrition Programs
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
CASI Standard 1
Vision and Purpose
|
Denise Davis
Mamie Moore
Todd Nessa
Brandy Brandimore
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Complete Standard 1 of SAR report for re-accreditation
|
CASI Standard 2
Governance and
Leadership
|
Kim Motta
Cynthia Worthington
Jernitha Oliver
Chet Carver
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Complete Standard 2 of SAR report for re-accreditation
|
CASI Standard 3
Teaching and Learning
|
Terrie Monies
Calvin Collins
Jessica Martinez
Lee Wulf
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Complete Standard 3 of SAR report for re-accreditation
|
CASI Standard 4
Documenting and Using Results
|
Pam Hoffman
Brenda Rossier
Eula Gibson
Mike Megahee
Steve Hartsfield
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Complete Standard 4 of SAR report for re-accreditation
|
CASI Standard 5
Resources and Support Systems
|
Maggie Williams
Judy Cole
Vernon Forsett
Peter Cordero
Read Coach
Sasso/ Keosell
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Complete Standard 5 of SAR report for re-accreditation
|
CASI Standard 6
Stakeholder Communication and Relationships
|
Melissa Konkol
Caron Harper
Robert Pellek
Roger Olive
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Complete Standard 6 of SAR report for re-accreditation
|
CASI Standard 7
Commitment to Continuous Improvement
|
Kristen Storms
Teresa Roberts
Tina Brennan
Diane Joiner
Charlotte Sutton
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Complete Standard 7 of SAR report for re-accreditation
|
|
Steering Committee
|
Joe Viscusi
Edythe HoChan
Paul Taylor
|
Twice monthly
|
M-T or W of every other week
Complete by 1/25/2010
|
Review all sections of SAR Report
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
Gause Academy is a dropout prevention program for underachieving students, who have slipped through the cracks of our larger academic institutions. The program takes a long range approach (2-3 years) to try and reverse the dropout cycle, coupled with a strong occupational plan to move its students toward full high school graduation. Understanding that “every” student attending Gause is a potential dropout, the school’s dropout rate is not any worse than most other high schools in the area. In 2008-09 all students who started their senior year as well as several who started their junior year at Gause Academy, completed their education. The lower grades are not isolated from these graduation conversations. It is even more immediate that those students realize that because of their past educational practices they may very well be looking at being a 22 year old graduate. Most middle school students do not look that far ahead but we make it a practice to have them contemplate that inevitability if they do not begin to improve learning.
Students are fully advised through their vocational courses as well as sessions with our guidance department as to their options upon graduation. Further education and training are emphasized throughout the process. If students decide to enter the work force directly they have a strong understanding of what is expected from potential employers. They have a strong understanding of what it takes to be successful on the job and they have saleable skills developed in high school to offer potential employers. The graduating classes of 2000 through 2004 were part of a survey funded by the district following graduates of those particular years. During those years, Gause Academy consistently had one of the highest rates of full time employment for their graduates, across the district.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
As a group, almost all students at Gause Academy are poor readers. This is reflected in test scores and class grades prior to admittance to Gause. There are not significant sub-groups identified within Gause Academy. Because of our smaller size, typical demographic categories do not have enough numbers to be recorded. State reports have N/A in most sub group reporting areas. The students at Gause are a relatively homogeneous group when looking at performance. Over 70% fell within scoring ranges for Level 1 in reading.
There are some general characteristics of the student body that staff will need to keep in mind while executing this plan. 1. At least 35%-40% of the student body at Gause Academy (across all grade levels) in any given year will be new to the school, 2. In general, students are “detached” from the school environment when they first come to Gause, they do not relate to the typical activities that are going on in their home schools, 3. Students are not usually motivated by grades but rather respond and produce because of positive personal interactions with teachers and staff, 4. When pressured for change to quickly, these students tend to “cut and run”. With Gause being a school that is the choice of the student, there could be many “flight” casualties unless we proceed carefully, monitoring student demeanor and progress.
Programs already in place at Gause will need to help keep the students engaged and motivated in the coming each school year. Response to active/ interesting vocational classes, the employability skills environment, 12th grade “visits with administration”, student recognition, and monitoring attendance closely are elements of a student’s participation to be watched closely.
Gause Academy has again been modified to a single school with grades 6-12 on the same physical site, the 08-09 year was to determine the baseline for our AYP and Improvement Rating data including an elementary unit. For 08-09 an elementary component was merged but after one year (08-09) the elementary grades were dropped. The following is 08-09 data for both schools which helps establish direction for setting 09-10 objectives. The Academy’s improvement rating indicated 32% made learning gains in Reading. AYP reports show that 16% in Total, 23% in White and 13% in Economically Disadvanted scored at Achievement Level 3 or higher.
|
By Spring 2010, at least 37% of Survey 2 and 3 (Oct. and Feb. FTE) students will make Learning Gains in Reading as evidenced by the School Grade Report – Alternative Rating.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students will gain more “background knowledge” in
reading through creative, powerful instruction in the content area as well as intensive reading.
(background knowledge)
|
Principal, Reading AIF
|
Mini assessments administered quarterly
|
FAIR, Fast Forward, Compass, FCAT
|
| 2 |
Students will expand “vocabulary and comprehension” in reading through embedded instruction within the content areas and strategies for learning and performance.
(vocabulary and comprehension)
|
Principal, Reading AIF
|
Mini assessments administered quarterly
|
FAIR, Fast Forward, Compass, FCAT
|
| 3 |
Students will experience a text rich environment in all content areas so that they can develop thinking about text more effectively. (capacity/endurance and higher level thinking)
|
Principal, Reading AIF
|
Mini assessments administered quarterly
|
FAIR, Fast Forward, Compass, FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Improve student reading scores
|
Reading in Content area. CAR-PD training
|
Reading Coach
|
May 2010
|
Observations, Lesson Plans
|
Principal
Assistant Principal
Teachers
|
|
Continuity across the curriculum
|
Use of LFS Lesson Plan Template
|
Reading Coach
|
August 2009
|
Lesson Plans
|
Principal
Assistant Principal
Teachers
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
CAR-PD training and endorsement. Move to a standardized LFS lesson plan and monitoring plans. Classroom observations.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Compass, FastForward |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Compass, Fast Forward |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| CAR-PD endorsement |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| LFS Lesson Plan Template |
District |
$0.00 |
| LFS Flipchart Set |
Operating Budget |
$1,500.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Final Total: $1,500.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
The majority of students at Gause Academy do not perform well on standardized tests in mathematics. Academically, the students’ skill levels are behind that of their peers. As a result, 2009 FCAT scores show 48% are currently meeting the standard of making gains. In looking at the data we find that although Gause students are behind in math skill development and are stigmatized into thinking they are “not good in math”; they actually are very talented in this area. Many students turn out to be very concrete sequential in their thinking as observed by their positive performance in related vocational classes. What they have fallen behind in is their “classroom instruction” prior to coming to Gause Academy as exhibited by the number of failed classes in their transcripts. They have not been effectively exposed to more advanced mathematical concepts or have rejected such exposure. In 10th grade when high school students are being tested in mathematics for achievement, they need exposure and instruction to at least Algebra and Geometry at the high school level for success. Because Gause students have been retained, as a group, they generally have no more than Algebra 1A behind them and maybe part of Algebra 1B by testing time. As they progress through 10th, 11th and 12th grades taking FCAT retakes or alternate exams such as ACT and at the same time receive the needed instruction, mathematics is usually the first area of achievement that they pass.
Gause Academy has been modified to a single school with grades 6-12 on the same physical site, the 08-09 year was to determine the baseline for our AYP and Improvement Rating data. For 08-09 an elementary component was merged but after one year (08-09) the elementary grades were dropped. The following is 08-09 data for both schools which helps establish direction for setting 09-10 objectives. The Academy’s improvement rating indicated 48% made learning gains in Math. AYP reports show that 21% in Total, 28% in White, 11% in Black and 18% in Economically Disadvanted scored at Achievement Level 3 or higher.
|
By Spring 2009, 53% of Survey 2 and 3 (Oct. and Feb. FTE) students will make Learning Gains in Math as evidenced by the School Grade Report – Alternative Rating.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
All 8th grade students are required to take Math 3 or algebra as their regular math course
|
Guidance
|
Schedules, SSR reports
|
Grades, Compass mini assessments
|
| 2 |
Students will be exposed to an increase in math vocabulary and understand how to use using reading strategies in the classroom content for Math
|
Principal, Math AIF
|
LFS lesson plans, observations
|
Mini assessments
|
| 3 |
All high school students will be scheduled in the next highest level math course as determined by their previous year’s success in math
|
Guidance
|
Schedules, SSR reports
|
Grades, Compass mini assessments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Improve Math scores
|
Math Vocabulary
|
Math Coach
|
May 2010
|
Observation
FCIM
|
Math Coach, Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Compass
FCAT Explorer
|
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Compass FCAT Explorer |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Students who attend Gause Academy are generally trailing their peers in all academic skill areas. This is reflected in standardized test scores. Characteristics of the student body include a disinterest in school and a lack of desire to be successful academically. Their intrinsic motivation is to be socially accepted and vocationally competent. It is important that any school improvement goals keep this in mind.
|
By Spring of 2010, 10% of 8th and 11th grade students will be at Achievement Level three or above in Science as evidenced by the School Grade report.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Utilize hands-on
laboratory
experiments as specified in curriculum maps
using science stations.
|
Science teachers
|
Lab schedule will be
implemented with
fidelity according to curriculum map plan and monitored by the Principal.
Mini Assessments
|
Improvement on
the science mini assessments
|
| 2 |
Provide real world science
experiences and
engaging activities.
|
Science teachers
|
Integrate concepts with vocational curriculum where possible.
|
Improvement on
the science mini assessments
|
| 3 |
Articles read in Science World Magazine
|
Teachers
|
Reflect on real world applications
|
Improvement on
the science mini assessments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
Given instruction based on the
Sunshine State Standards,
10% of 8th and 11th students will score at level three or above on the 2010 FCAT Science Assessment.
|
Florida’s
Continuous
Improvement
Model Training
PD360 topics
|
Principal through use of PD360
|
May 2010
|
Data from PD360
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Science World Magazine
|
Operating Budget |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| PD360 |
District License |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $500.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The students at Gause Academy are assessed for FCAT preparedness by using a combination of previous FCAT scores, diagnostic reading tests, FCAT Explorer and in-class writing assignments. In 2008-2009, 77% of 8th and 10th graders showed improved performance in the state requirements for writing.For the 2008-2009 the school will establish a new baseline for the combined grades of 8th and 10th thus excluding grade 4.
|
By Spring of 2010, the 8th and 10th Grade students scoring Achievement Level 3.0 or higher will increase by 1% in Writing as evidenced by the AYP Report.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students will use
the writing process
daily; all writing will
be dated, and
recorded in a
journal, notebook,
or work folder for
monitoring of
growth across time.
|
Teachers,
Reading Coach
|
Authors Packet
|
Progress between
Beginning Prompts
and year end Prompts.
|
| 2 |
The revision and
editing process will
be reviewed and seen in student
writing drafts.
|
Teacher
|
Teachers will
monitor revision and
editing process by
reviewing student
drafts.
|
Progress between
Beginning Prompts
and year end Prompts.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
On the 2010
administration of the FCAT Writing Test, 82% of the 8th and 11thgrade students will achieve a 3.0 or
above.
|
PD360 related topics
|
Principal
Reading Coach
|
May 2010
|
PD360 Data
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| PD360 |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
32% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 FCAT Reading Exam
|
By Spring 2010, at least 37% of Survey 2 and 3 (Oct. and Feb. FTE) students will make Learning Gains in Reading as evidenced by the School Grade Report – Alternative Rating
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Encourage families to increase SACS involvement through monthly newsletters and school information
|
Principal
|
SACS attendance
|
SACS attendance and minutes
|
| 2 |
Encourage parent participation in conferences, programs and open houses through increased phone/ internet contact with teachers
|
Assistant Principal
|
Ancedital remarks on genesis referrals
Instructing parents how to contact teachers via e-mail
|
Referral paper copies
Grade2 access request forms
|
| 3 |
. Increase parent involvement in daily student assignments through more positive teacher phone contact
|
Atttendance Para
|
Use of ConnectED calling system
Use of School Messenger calling system
|
Daily activity print outs
Daily activity printouts
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
48% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 FCAT Mathematics Exam
|
By Spring 2010, at least 53% of Survey 2 and 3 (Oct. and Feb. FTE) students will make Learning Gains in Math as evidenced by the School Grade Report – Alternative Rating
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
. Encourage families to increase SACS involvement through monthly newsletters and school information
|
Principal
|
SACS attendance
|
SACS attendance and minutes
|
| 2 |
Encourage parent participation in conferences, programs and open houses through increased phone/ internet contact with teachers
|
Assistant Principal
|
Ancedital remarks on genesis referrals
Instructing parents how to contact teachers via e-mail
|
Referral paper copies
Grade2 access request forms
|
| 3 |
Increase parent involvement in daily student assignments through more positive teacher phone contact
|
Atttendance Para
|
Use of ConnectED calling system
Use of School Messenger calling system
|
Daily activity print outs
Daily activity printouts
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
By Spring 2010, at least 37% of Survey 2 and 3 (Oct. and Feb. FTE) students will make Learning Gains in Reading as evidenced by the School Grade Report – Alternative Rating.
|
Use of ConnectED Technology by teachers and attendance para
|
Network Manager
|
9/2009
|
Inservice Attendance Sheets
|
Principal
|
|
By Spring 2010, at least 53% of Survey 2 and 3 (Oct. and Feb. FTE) students will make Learning Gains in Math as evidenced by the School Grade Report – Alternative Rating
|
Use of ConnectED Technology by teachers and attendance para
|
Network Manager
|
9/2009
|
Inservice Attendance Sheets
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| E-mail, ConnectEd, School Messenger |
District Provided |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| e-mail, ConnectEd, school messenger technology |
SchoolResource |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
Vocational and Career Instruction Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Students need to improve overall grades through a well developed work ethic
|
All students to be enrolled in and successfully complete at least one period of a vocational subject.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Integrate academic skills within the vocational course frameworks
|
Vocational Teachers,Principal
|
Classroom walk through
Lesson Plans
|
Improved grades and GPA
|
| 2 |
Teach a broad or common range of employability skills that cross any particular vocational area
|
Vocational Teachers, Principal
|
Classroom walk through
Lesson Plans
|
Improved grades and GPA
|
| 3 |
Follow up occupational instruction with “hands on” activities, guest speakers, field trips to reinforce importance of learning
|
Vocational Teachers
|
Classroom walk through
Lesson Plans
|
Improved grades and GPA
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
By Spring 2010, at least 37% of Survey 2 and 3 (Oct. and Feb. FTE) students will make Learning Gains in Reading as evidenced by the School Grade Report – Alternative Rating.
|
CAR-PD
|
Reading Coach
|
5/2010
|
In-service records
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Car-PD inservice classes |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Vocational and Career Instruction Goal |
|
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Compass, FastForward |
District |
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Compass
FCAT Explorer
|
District |
$0.00 |
| Science |
Science World Magazine
|
Operating Budget |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Compass, Fast Forward |
District |
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Compass FCAT Explorer |
District |
$0.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
E-mail, ConnectEd, School Messenger |
District Provided |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
CAR-PD endorsement |
District |
$0.00 |
| Writing |
PD360 |
District |
$0.00 |
| Science |
PD360 |
District License |
$0.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
e-mail, ConnectEd, school messenger technology |
SchoolResource |
$0.00 |
| Vocational and Career Instruction |
Car-PD inservice classes |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
LFS Lesson Plan Template |
District |
$0.00 |
| Reading |
LFS Flipchart Set |
Operating Budget |
$1,500.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Final Total: $2,000.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/11/2009 9:32:46 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
Technology Needs
|
1685
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
Roles and Responsibilities of SAC Members
Members
• Determine School Improvement Priorities
• Publicize the School Improvement Plan
• Support School Improvement Plan implementation
• Evaluate the School Improvement Plan
• Assist in decision making process and approval of expenditures of District Lottery Funds and School Recognition Funds, as well as review School Budget
Chair
• Schedules SAC meetings
• Sets Agenda with Principal
• Sends Meeting Notice, including agenda, 2 weeks prior to meeting
• Facilitates meeting
• Determines strategy for making plans available
Principal – is a SAC member
• Keep up to date with legislation
governing School Advisory Councils
• Facilitates election process stated in by-laws
• Provides testing, behavior, discipline and attendance data to the SAC
• Seeks input from staff and the SAC on School Improvement Plan, School Budget, Lottery Money, and School Recognition Funds
• Leads revision, implementation, and evaluation of the School Improvement Plan
School Advisory Council
Election of Members
Florida Statute 1001.452 requires the election of School Advisory Council members who represent teachers, education support staff, students and parents.
• 51% or more of the SAC are family and community members, not employees of the school
• Percents must reflect the racial, ethnic, and economic diversity of your school community
• Principals are required members of their school’s School Advisory Council
• Career center and high school advisory councils shall include students, and middle and junior high school advisory councils may include students
• Technical adult education centers are not required to include parents
They must be “elected by their respective peer groups at the school in a fair and equitable manner” as follows:
• Teachers elect teachers
• Education support staff must elect education support employees
• Students elect students
• Parents elect parents
• Parents are elected at any school function by parents provided notice has been given that the election will take place
No election is required for community members. They are appointed by the school principal with SAC input.
The principal is responsible for ensuring that the elections take place and the composition of the SAC complies with the law. If the election process does not yield a SAC that reflects the racial, ethnic, and economic diversity of the student population at the school, the principal may appoint additional members to achieve the appropriate representation.
Each year the School Board reviews and approves the membership rosters of all School Advisory Councils. All members should be able to explain the process by which, and date upon which they were elected. Approved SAC Membership rosters are posted on the school board website.
Election Process
1. The principal will inform the school and community that nominations to the school’s advisory council are invited. Include parents of upcoming students.
2. The invitation for nomination must clearly note a deadline, membership categories and the process (time, date, event) by which the vote shall be taken.
3. After elections have taken place, the principal shall submit the list of members to the School Board, which includes name and ethnic/racial category.
4. Documentation of the nomination and election process will be maintained at the school as a public record. Once Council membership is approved by the School Board, a copy of the approved form is posted on the school board website.
5. Vacancies in any membership category during the year may be filled by principal appointment. The principal will inform the Community Involvement Office of any replaced members.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Robert Grocki,
Principal
|
|
2)
Jade Greenwood,
Student
|
|
3)
Terry Monies,
Teacher
|
|
4)
Vernon Forsett,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Judith Cole,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Cynthia Worthington,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Latangela Goodson,
Parent
|
|
8)
Katie Cox,
Parent
|
|
9)
John Cox,
Parent
|
|
10)
Cliff Lewis,
Community Member
|
|
11)
Ernie Cooper,
Community Member
|
|
12)
Edythe HoChan,
School Support Personnel
|
|
13)
Kristen Storms,
School Support Personnel
|
|
14)
Jernetha Oliver,
School Support Personnel
|
|
15)
Gloria Macias,
School Support Personnel
|
|
16)
Beatrice Mitchell,
School Support Personnel
|
|
17)
Joseph Viscusi,
Assistant Principal
|
AYP DATA
| 2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Polk GAUSE ACADEMY OF LEADERSHIP 1491 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
|
Read: 255 Math: 255
|
2008-2009 School Grade1: |
|
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). |
This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). |
This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students? |
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? |
68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by 1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? |
Percent of Students below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4
|
98 |
Y |
97 |
Y |
16 |
N |
21 |
N |
80
|
77 |
N |
41 |
67 |
Y |
85 |
84 |
N |
82 |
79 |
N |
26 |
N |
32 |
N |
| WHITE
|
98 |
Y |
97 |
Y |
23 |
N |
28 |
N |
77
|
86 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
80 |
77 |
N |
77 |
72 |
N |
31 |
N |
36 |
N |
| BLACK
|
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
6 |
N |
11 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
94 |
N |
93 |
89 |
N |
13 |
N |
25 |
N |
| HISPANIC
|
97 |
Y |
95 |
Y |
12 |
N |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
88 |
NA |
|
|
NA |
29 |
N |
|
|
| ASIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
|
98 |
Y |
98 |
Y |
13 |
N |
18 |
N |
80
|
77 |
N |
|
|
NA |
87 |
87 |
N |
82 |
82 |
N |
25 |
N |
28 |
N |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
|
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| 2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Polk GAUSE ACADEMY OF LEADERSHIP 1491 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
|
Read: 208 Math: 208
|
2007-2008 School Grade1: |
|
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). |
This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). |
This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students? |
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? |
62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by 1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? |
Percent of Students below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4
|
99 |
Y |
98 |
Y |
15 |
N |
18 |
N |
73
|
80 |
Y |
34 |
41 |
Y |
90 |
85 |
N |
87 |
82 |
N |
19 |
N |
36 |
N |
| WHITE
|
99 |
Y |
98 |
Y |
20 |
N |
23 |
N |
77
|
77 |
N |
|
|
NA |
87 |
80 |
N |
81 |
77 |
N |
23 |
N |
39 |
N |
| BLACK
|
98 |
Y |
97 |
Y |
|
N |
7 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
N |
|
93 |
N |
9 |
N |
27 |
N |
| HISPANIC
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ASIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
|
99 |
Y |
98 |
Y |
13 |
N |
18 |
N |
72
|
80 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
92 |
87 |
N |
89 |
82 |
N |
16 |
N |
36 |
N |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| 2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Polk GAUSE ACADEMY OF LEADERSHIP 1491 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
|
Read: 223 Math: 222
|
2006-2007 School Grade1: |
P
|
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). |
This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). |
This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students? |
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by 1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? |
Percent of Students below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2005 |
2006 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4
|
98 |
Y |
97 |
Y |
10 |
N |
13 |
N |
79
|
73 |
N |
43 |
34 |
N |
87 |
90 |
NA |
88 |
87 |
NA |
28 |
NA |
48 |
NA |
| WHITE
|
98 |
Y |
97 |
Y |
13 |
N |
19 |
N |
|
|
NA |
57 |
44 |
NA |
85 |
87 |
NA |
84 |
81 |
NA |
29 |
NA |
53 |
NA |
| BLACK
|
100 |
Y |
98 |
Y |
|
N |
|
N |
|
|
NA |
15 |
18 |
NA |
89 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
22 |
NA |
44 |
NA |
| HISPANIC
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
50 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ASIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
|
97 |
Y |
96 |
Y |
8 |
N |
11 |
N |
84
|
72 |
N |
47 |
|
NA |
88 |
92 |
NA |
91 |
89 |
NA |
29 |
NA |
50 |
NA |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
50 |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
School District 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
0%
|
0%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
0% |
0% |
|
|
|
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
% (0) |
% (0) |
|
|
0
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake |
% |
% |
|
|
|
If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded |
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
| Percent Tested = 0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
School District 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
0%
|
0%
|
%
|
%
|
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
0% |
0% |
|
|
|
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
% (0) |
% (0) |
|
|
0
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake |
% |
% |
|
|
|
If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded |
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
| Percent Tested = 0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Polk School District GAUSE ACADEMY OF LEADERSHIP 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
9%
|
15%
|
47%
|
3%
|
74
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
27% |
42% |
|
|
69 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
36% (NO) |
47% (NO) |
|
|
83
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake |
33% |
33% |
|
|
0 |
If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded |
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
| Percent Tested = 97% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
P |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |