VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Vision:
The vision of Polk Life and Learning Center will be to provide on on-going safe environment that promotes excellence and quality education to meet the needs of a diverse community of learners.
Mission:
The mission of Polk Life and Learning Center is to provide a safe, student-centered environment to enable every individual to reach his or her potential, with commitment to best practices and in partnership with our parents and community.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Polk Life and Learning Center is an exceptional student educational center, built in 1975, which serves students with varying exceptionalities including 80% InD (Intellectual Disabilities), 9% Autistic, 1% OHI (Other Health Impaired), and 10% EBD (Emotional/Behaviorally Disabled) students, from ages 3 through 21, and grades Pre-k through 12, in a separate day school setting. Many of our students are placed here due to severe behavior difficulties, which constitute a danger to self or others. Others are placed because they evidence medical fragility and/or are so low functioning that they cannot benefit from regular education participation. Students are placed at Polk Life and Learning Center through staffing committee decisions, from elementary and secondary schools in Bartow, Mulberry, South Lakeland, Fort Meade, Frostproof, Lake Wales, and surrounding areas. Students are allowed to return to home schools when behaviors are improved. All students are following either regular Sunshine State Standards or Sunshine State Standards for Special Diploma. The small campus and limited enrollment allows the staff to share responsibility and be knowledgeable about all students in an educational setting which allows for individual attention and flexibility with constant supervision. Class sizes range from 5-12 students, with para-educators assisting the teachers in each classroom with at least 3:1 ratio of staff. Total number of students at Polk Life and Learning will range from 70-90 students for 09-10 School Year.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Polk Life and Learning Center has been a PBS Model school continuously, since 05-06 school year. We successfully implement a school wide behavior system which has resulted in reduction of office referrals and suspensions from 193 to 68 from 08-09 school year. We have weekly behavior professional development for all staff at PLLC.
Three of our classroom teachers have attended Learning Focused training and are beginning to adapt implementation for their ESE classrooms.
All classrooms are equipped with Smartboards, projectors and at least two student computers.
All 12 teachers are certified and highly qualified. All 20 paraprofessionals are qualified for Title I requirements.
One teacher has had extensive training for transition and serves as our coordinator for middle-high school jobs and work experience for our students who qualify. We provide work sites both on campus and off campus.
All students have IEPs for 100% of the school day.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Percentage of students below grade level in Reading was 71% as compared to 56% in 08, and due in part to the changes in Florida Alternate Assessment for 08-09.
Percentage of students below grade level in Math was 64% and remained the same as 08, with no decrease.
Due to the nature of our school, the combinations of behaviors and severe needs in a classroom are not stable.
Student Demographics
In 08-09, Polk Life and Learning Center served a multiethnic population, including 46% White, 25%Black, 25% Hispanic, 1.3% Asian and 1.6% Multicultural students. 100% were SWD. 0% were ELL. 78.95% were on Free or Reduced lunch. End of year total enrollment was 76 students.
Student Attendance Rates
Student attendance rates were 84.81% for 06-07, 82.99% for 07-08, and 84.77% for 08-09. This was well below the district rates of 94.10%, 94.32% and 94.56%, in part due to the medical fragility of our students, including surgeries, hospital stays, home therapy and illnesses.
Student Mobility
Mobility Rate is 35.21% for 07-08 and 34.88% for 08-09. District definition of Mobility Rate:The enrollment or withdrawal of a student at any time during the school year not including the first 15 days of school divided by the total number of students who attended the school during that year after the 15th day.
Student Suspension Rates
06-07 In school suspensions 110, out of school suspensions 14, 07-08 In school suspensions 166, out of school suspensions 27, 08-09 In school suspensions 62, out of school suspensions 6. The suspension rates have decreased significantly during 08-09.
Student Retention Rates
70% of 12th graders were retained because the IDEA law allows ESE students to remain in school through their 21st year. No other students were retained.
Class Size
All classrooms are multi-graded ESE classrooms with a teacher and 1-2 paraprofessionals, resulting in a 3 students to 1 adult ratio. Classes include less than 12 students per classroom.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Students are placed in our centers by staffing committees who determine individual needs. District has three geographic areas for the three ESE learning centers.
Partnerships and Grants
Our community partners are: The UPS Store, Kiwanis Club of Bartow, Republican Women’s Club in Lakeland, Bartow Chamber of Commerce and Auburndale Civitan Club. Business partners participating with our students in the work experience program are Publix Supermarket in Bartow and Polk County School Board district office.
We have received grants of $1950 from Auburndale Civitan Club for physical education equipment, $500 from Kiwanis for our school prom, and $500 from Republican Women’s Club in Lakeland for positive behavior support incentives. We received a Shining Star technology grant for $4500 for Smartboards and projectors.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Jean O'Dell
|
BA Music Education, Eastern Nazarene College; MS Ed Leadership, Nova Southeastern University; 30+ hours resulting in Florida certification of Mental Retardation K-12 through 2010.
Completed requirements for administration including the Quality Symposium Leadership Seminars and interim principal program.
|
16
|
16
|
Led school to Model School for Positive Behavior Supports status for three consecutive years, 05-08. 08-09 pending.
Failed to reach AYP 08-09 and for past three years, due to needs of students who are significantly below grade level and have severe emotional and intellectual disabilities.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
AIF
|
Kathleen Milburn
|
Pd. D. Special Education
|
|
|
Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades, FCAT, and AYP information along with the associated school year)
29 years teaching experience in public school, university and college (most recently Florida Southern, where she led the Special Education Department for several years.) She has worked the last two years in Professional Development for Polk County, serving as Sr. Coordinator for Learning Support.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Administration participates and supports district sponsored job fairs and the recruitment process. Applicants are required to have Exceptional Student Education certification, and if applicable, the appropriate certification in academics. prior to interviewing at the school. Professional development and support are provided to teachers to facilitate achievement of highly qualified status. 100% of our teachers are highly qualified and certified to teach in their area. One teacher is completing the reading endorsement. Retention of teachers at Polk Life and Learning Center is not a problem. Most have been here for several years, being replaced because of retirement. Teachers are close knit and supported by small group interaction on regular basis.
|
Principal
|
August 2009
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 12 | 8 | 8 | 50 | 34 | 8 | 100 | 92 | 0 | 25 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
William Wolfe
|
Sheila Gibson
|
Both are teaching 9-12 EMH/TMH students. Mr. Wolfe has extensive training in transition.
|
Meet as frequently as needed (minimum 1X week).
Collaborate for ideas for lessons and documentation.
Share resources and knowledge about student behavior.
|
|
Kathleen Milburn
|
Struggling teachers
|
Expert assistance with reading and LFS strategies.
|
One on one chats with AIF and Principal.
Assistance with lesson plans and teaching strategies.
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part A, funds school-wide services to Polk Life and Learning Center. The Title I funds provide supplemental instructional resources and interventions for students with academic achievement needs. Title I, Part A, support provides after-school and summer instructional programs, supplemental instructional materials, resource teachers, technology for students, professional development for the staff, and resources for parents.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Migrant students enrolled in Polk Life and Learning Center will be assisted by the school and by the District Migrant Education Program (MEP). Students will be prioritized by the MEP for supplemental services based on need and migrant status. MEP Teacher Advocates, assigned to schools with high percentages of migrant students, monitor the progress of these high need students and provide or coordinate supplemental academic support. Migrant Home-School Liaisons identify and recruit migrant students and their families for the MEP. They provide support to both students and parents in locating services necessary to ensure the academic success of these students whose education has been interrupted by numerous moves.
Title I, Part D
Title I, Part D provides Transition Facilitators to assist students with transition from Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) facilities back into their zoned school. The Transition Facilitators communicate with the Guidance Counselors at schools to facilitate the transfer of records and appropriate placement.
Title II
Professional development resources are available to Title I schools through Title II funds. In addition, School Technology Services provide technical support, technology training, and licenses for software programs and web-based access via Title II-D funds. Funds available to Polk Life and Learning Center are used to purchase training and technology, as needed.
Title III
Title III provides supplemental resources for English Language Learners (ELL) and their teachers in Title I schools, as well as professional learning opportunities for school staff.
Title X- Homeless
The Hearth program, funded through Title X, provides support for identified homeless students. Title I provides support for this program, and many activities implemented by the Hearth program are carried out in cooperation with the Migrant Education Program (MEP) funded through Title I, Part C.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
SAI unit(s) provided to Polk Life and Learning Center enhance student achievement by teaching reading/LFS
Violence Prevention Programs
Title IV provides violence and drug prevention programs in schools in order to promote a safe school environment. Examples of violence prevention programs include anti-bullying, gang awareness, gun awareness, etc..
Nutrition Programs
This school is a location for a summer feeding program for the community.
Housing Programs
N/A
Head Start
Head Start is not located on our campus. Resources are provided to the program to assist in the transition of students from pre-k to kindergarten. Head Start teachers may participate in professional learning opportunities offered to school staff, and they are involved in Professional Learning Community activities with kindergarten teachers. Parents of Head Start students are invited to participate in parent workshops and activities provided by the school.
Adult Education
N/A
Career and Technical Education
Cooperative agreements in place with community agencies allow us to provide for support for technical education for some students, as appropriate.
Job Training
Students have opportunity, as appropriate, to work at on-campus and off-campus sites for Career Experience credit, a few hours per week.
Other
N/A
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
InD Team
|
Nancy Wolfe, Team Leader
|
Bi-Weekly or as needed
|
Tuesday 7:30am
|
Collaborate on documentation/portfolios
Curriculum/Unit Planning
Individual student needs
|
|
EBD Team
|
Norma Hage, Team Leader
|
Bi-Weekly or as needed
|
tuesday 7:30am
|
Collaborate on documentation/portfolios Curriculum/Unit Planning Individual student needs
|
|
All Inclusive Teacher Meetings
|
Jean O’Dell
Principal
|
Weekly
|
2:15pm
|
Learning Focused training, curriculum issues and assistance, Positive Behavior Supports
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
A few pre-school InD students are placed at Polk Life and Learning through a staffing decision during the school year. Their needs for instruction are determined at an ESE staffing. When they enter K, they are assessed with FKLRS.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
Courses are chosen based upon need of credits. Students are involved in goals and interests at their transition staffing at age 14 and above. Functional life and work readiness skills are taught to our students. Academic and career planning choices are limited at PLLC. Students are encouraged to access their home schools when appropriate. Students discuss future goals at their transition staffing at age 14 and above. Employability skills are emphasized at our school throughout the campus. Students are placed in Career Preparation and Career Experience courses in middle and high school to prepare them for work. Throughout their transition years, discussions take place regarding preparation for their adult lives. Some will access programs located on college campuses, some will work at businesses in the area and some will access day programs for further community experiences.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In grades 3-10, 29% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 FCAT/FAA Reading Test.
|
By Spring, 2010 in grades 3-10, 37% of the students will achieve mastery for reading on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Reading Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Teachers will determine levels and areas of deficiency of each individual student on their class list.
2. Implement FAIR/Brigance assessments to monitor student progress.
3.Teachers will use Learning Focused Lesson Plans for all academic standards/Access Points.
4.Teachers of InD students will begin to implement Unique Learning interactive/PCI Environmental Print curriculum for reading.
5. Boardmaker visual strategies and schedules will provide students with assistance in communication and learning.
6. Students will be provided with appropriate technology devices including assistive devices, augmentative devices, computers, projectors, and Smartboards.
|
1.Principal and AIF (Reading)
2. Principal and AIF (Reading)
3.Principal and AIF (Reading)
4. AIF (Reading)
and InD Teachers
5. Speech Therapist, Teachers
6.Speech Therapist and Network Manager
|
1. Principal and AIF (Reading) will examine data with teacher.
2. Review data to ensure that teachers are assessing students according to the schedule.
3. Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Principal.
4. Progress monitoring data will be reviewed by teachers and AIF (Reading)
.
5. Observation
6. Observation
|
1.Report of data from teachers
2. Reports of assessments from teachers.
3.Classroom walkthroughs and submissions of lesson plans to principal will determine LFS Lesson plan application.
4. Review of data of SWD students using Unique Learning/PCI Environmental Print curriculum
5. Collaboration with Speech Therapist.
6. Collaboration with Teachers, Speech Therapist and Network Manager
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
By Spring, 2010 in grades 3-10, 37% of the students will achieve mastery for reading on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Reading Test.
|
1. Effective Implementation of Learning Focused strategies, adapted to needs of SWD students.
2.Effective use of Smartboards and other technology, including communication tools.
3.Use of Unique Learning/PCI Environmental Print curriculum
|
1.AIF (Reading)
2.Technology Coaches and Speech Therapist
3.Principal and AIF (Reading)
|
1.Throughout the year- August 2009 – March 2010
2.As needed throughout year.
3.August – November 2009
|
1.Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
2.Observation of appropriate use.
3.Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
|
1.Principal, AIF (Reading)
2.Principal, AIF (Reading)
3.Principal, AIF (Reading)
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
Kathleen Milburn, AIF, will ensure the responsibility of teaching reading for every teacher in the content areas. She will have professional chats as she observes in walkthroughs and assists with lesson plans.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Unique Learning |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| PCI Environmental Print |
ISEIA funds (district) |
$1,500.00 |
| Total: $2,500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Access for all students to Education City.com. |
Instructional budget |
$300.00 |
| 2.Assistive and ugmentative equipment, as needed |
IDEIA funds |
$1,000.00 |
|
3.Computers for student use
|
Technology funds |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $2,300.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| 1.Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| 2.PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| Total: $1,250.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $6,050.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In grades 3-10, 36% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 FCAT/FAA Math Test.
|
By Spring 2010 in grades 3-10, 43% of the students will achieve mastery for math on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Math Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Teachers will determine levels and areas of deficiency of each individual student on their class list.
2. Implement FAIR/Brigance assessments to monitor student progress.
3.Teachers will use Learning Focused Lesson Plans for all academic standards/Access Points.
4.Teachers of InD students will begin to implement Unique Learning curriculum for math.
5. Students will be provided with appropriate technology devices including assistive devices, augmentative devices, computers, projectors, and Smartboards.
|
1. Principal
2. Principal
3.Principal
4. InD Teachers
5.Speech Therapist and Network Manager
|
1. Principal will examine data with teacher.
2. Review data to ensure that teachers are assessing students according to the schedule.
3. Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Principal.
4. Progress monitoring data will be reviewed by teachers.
6. Observation
|
1. Report of data from teachers
2. Reports of assessments from teachers.
3.Classroom walkthroughs and submissions of lesson plans to principal will determine LFS Lesson plan application.
4. Review of math data of SWD students using Unique Learning curriculum/assessment and Brigance.
6. Collaboration with Teachers, Speech Therapist and Network Manager
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
By Spring 2010 in grades 3-10, 43% of the students will achieve mastery for math on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Math Test.
|
1.Effective Implementation of Learning Focused strategies, adapted to needs of SWD students.
2.Effective use of Smartboards and other technology, including communication tools.
3.Use of Unique Learning and Touch Math curriculum for Math
|
1.Principal
2.Technology Coaches and Speech Therapist
3.Principal
|
1.Throughout the year- August 2009 – March 2010
2.As needed throughout year.
3.August – November 2009
|
1.Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
2.Observation of appropriate use.
3.Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
|
1.Principal
2.Principal
3.Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Unique Learning |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Touch Math |
IDEIA funds |
$500.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Access for all students to Education City.com. |
Instructional budget |
$500.00 |
| Computers for student use |
Technology funds |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| Total: $1,250.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $4,250.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In grades 3-10, 29% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 FCAT/FAA Science Test.
|
By Spring 2010 in grades 3-10, 36% of the students will achieve mastery for science on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Science Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Effective Implementation of Learning Focused strategies, adapted to needs of SWD students.
2.Teachers of InD students will begin to implement Unique Learning curriculum for science.
3. Agriculture, including horticulture, landscaping, conservation, recycling, fish farming, animal feeding and care.
|
1. Principal
2. InD Teachers
3. Teachers
|
1. Throughout the year- August 2009 – March 2010
2. Progress monitoring data will be reviewed by teachers.
3.Classroom walk-throughs
|
1. Principal
1. Throughout the year- August 2009 – March 2010
1. Lesson Plans
Classroom walk-throughs
2. InD Teachers 2. Progress monitoring data will be reviewed by teachers. 2. Review of science data of SWD students using Unique Learning curriculum and assessment.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
By Spring 2010 in grades 3-10, 36% of the students will achieve mastery for science
on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Science Test.
|
1. Effective Implementation of Learning Focused strategies, adapted to needs of SWD students.
2. Use of Unique Learning curriculum for Science.
|
1. Principal
2. Principal
|
1.Through-
out the year- August 2009 – March 2010
2. August – November 2009
|
1. Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
2. Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
|
1. Principal
2. Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Unique Learning |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Science hands-on equipment/instructional materials such as: microscope, magnifying glass, and Science Weekly magazine. |
Instructional budget |
$500.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Commuication tools and assistive technology |
IDEIA funds (District) |
$2,000.00 |
| Total: $2,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| Total: $1,250.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $4,750.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In grades 3-10, 20% of students achieved mastery on the 2009 FCAT/FAA Writing Test.
|
By Spring 2010 in grades 3-10, 28% of the students will achieve mastery for writing on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Writing Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.Teachers will use Learning Focused Lesson Plans for all academic standards/Access Points.
2.Teachers of InD students will begin to implement Unique Learning interactive/PCI Environmental Print curriculum for Writing.
3.Students will be provided with appropriate technology devices including assistive devices, augmentative devices, computers, projectors, and Smartboards.
|
1.Principal and AIF (Reading)
2.AIF (Reading)
and InD Teachers
3.Speech Therapist and Network Manger
|
1.Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Principal.
2.Progress monitoring data will be reviewed by teachers and Reading Coach.
3. Observation
|
1.Classroom walkthroughs and submissions of lesson plans to principal will determine LFS Lesson plan application.
2.Review of data of SWD students using Unique Learning/PCI Environmental Print curriculum
3.Collaboration with Teachers, Speech Therapist and Network Manager
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
By Spring 2010 in grades 3-10, 28% of the students will achieve mastery for writing on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Writing Test.
By Spring 2010 in grades 3-10, 28% of the students will achieve mastery for writing on the 2010 FCAT/FAA Writing Test.
|
1. Effective Implementation of Learning Focused strategies, adapted to needs of SWD students.
2. Use of Unique Learning curriculum for Writing.
|
1.Principal, AIF (Reading)
2.Principal, AIF (Reading)
|
1.Through-
out the year- August 2009 – March 2010
2.August – November 2009
|
1.Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
2.Lesson Plans
Classroom Walk-throughs
|
1.Principal, AIF (Reading)
2.Principal, AIF (Reading)
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Unique Learning |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| PCI Environmental Print |
IDEIA funds (District) |
$500.00 |
| Total: $1,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Assistive and augmentative equipment, as needed
|
IDEIA funds (District) |
$500.00 |
| Computers for student use |
Technology funds |
$500.00 |
| Total: $1,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| Total: $750.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $2,750.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
School Parent survey indicated lack of understanding for many of our parents who speak language other than English.
|
By the end of May 2010, 15% of the PLLC Staff will achieve mastery of at least 20 basic conversational phrases or words in Spanish.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1.Spanish-speaking para will be available to interpret for parents.
2.Classes will be available to staff to learn basic conversational Spanish.
|
1.Principal
2.Principal
|
1.Log of para when interpreting.
2.Oral evaluation of at least 15% of staff with use of basic conversational
Spanish .
|
1.09-10 Parent Survey
2.Oral evaluation.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
By the end of May 2010, 15% of the PLLC Staff will achieve mastery of at least 20 basic conversational phrases or words in Spanish.
|
Basic Spanish lessons
|
Basic Spanish lessons
|
Sept. 09 – April 10
|
Attendance log monitoring
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Rosetta Stone for Spanish, level 1, 2, 3 for staff use |
Title I |
$1,100.00 |
| Spanish texts, dictionaries and materials |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| Total: $1,600.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $1,600.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
School Safety and Discipline Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
67% of students placed at Polk Life and Learning have severe behavior challenges.
|
On average, 80% of students placed at Polk Life and Learning due to serious behavior problems will successfully complete each week without an office referral.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. PLLC will continue to implement Positive Behavior Support strategies.
2.School wide Discipline Plan
3.Weekly behavior training for staff
4. Crisis Prevention Institute training for all teachers and support staff.
|
1.Principal, PBS Team
2. Principal, PBS Team
3. Principal, PBS Team
4.Principal, CPI Trainer
|
1.PBS monthly team meetings
2 PBS monthly team meetings
3. PBS monthly team meetings
4. PBS monthly team meetings
|
1.# of office referrals for 09-10 school year
2. .# of office referrals for 09-10 school year.
3. Staff evaluation sheets at end of year.
4. Roster of certified staff.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
On average, 80% of students placed at Polk Life and Learning due to serious behavior problems will successfully complete each week without an office referral.
|
Weekly behavior training for all staff, including once a month CPI training for teachers.
|
Principal , PBS Coach
and CPI trainer
|
August 09-May 10
|
Observation, Classroom Walkthroughs
Professional chats with whole staff, small groups
|
Principal
PBS Coach
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Incentives,. materials for implementation of Positive Behavior Supports (PBS). |
PBS funds |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $1,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Materials for Behavior Training for staff and bus personnel |
PBS funds |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $1,500.00 |
|
| End of School Safety and Discipline Goal |
|
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Unique Learning |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Reading |
PCI Environmental Print |
ISEIA funds (district) |
$1,500.00 |
| Mathematics |
Unique Learning |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Touch Math |
IDEIA funds |
$500.00 |
| Writing |
Unique Learning |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| Writing |
PCI Environmental Print |
IDEIA funds (District) |
$500.00 |
| Science |
Unique Learning |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Science |
Science hands-on equipment/instructional materials such as: microscope, magnifying glass, and Science Weekly magazine. |
Instructional budget |
$500.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Rosetta Stone for Spanish, level 1, 2, 3 for staff use |
Title I |
$1,100.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Spanish texts, dictionaries and materials |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| School Safety and Discipline |
Incentives,. materials for implementation of Positive Behavior Supports (PBS). |
PBS funds |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $9,100.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Access for all students to Education City.com. |
Instructional budget |
$300.00 |
| Reading |
2.Assistive and ugmentative equipment, as needed |
IDEIA funds |
$1,000.00 |
| Reading |
3.Computers for student use
|
Technology funds |
$1,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Access for all students to Education City.com. |
Instructional budget |
$500.00 |
| Mathematics |
Computers for student use |
Technology funds |
$1,000.00 |
| Writing |
Assistive and augmentative equipment, as needed
|
IDEIA funds (District) |
$500.00 |
| Writing |
Computers for student use |
Technology funds |
$500.00 |
| Science |
Commuication tools and assistive technology |
IDEIA funds (District) |
$2,000.00 |
| Total: $6,800.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
1.Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Reading |
2.PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| Mathematics |
Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| Writing |
Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$500.00 |
| Writing |
PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| Science |
Learning Focused Strategies PD |
Title I |
$1,000.00 |
| Science |
PD 360 |
Title II |
$250.00 |
| School Safety and Discipline |
Materials for Behavior Training for staff and bus personnel |
PBS funds |
$500.00 |
| Total: $5,000.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $20,900.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/11/2009 6:20:23 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
No funds allocated this year.
|
0
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
SAC will assist in the preparation and evaluation of the School Improvement Plan with the purpose of meeting the school vision, mission and curriculum objectives. The council is responsible for input and advisement on any issues that are of school concern. The SAC is the sole body responsible for final decision making at the school relating to implementation of the provisions of Sections 1001.42 (16) and 1008.345, f.s. (School Improvement). The SAC will not be responsible for any fund allocation in this plan but the ongoing support will help us to continue to be successful.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Jean O’Dell ,
Principal
|
|
2)
Tabikah Jamieson,
Teacher
|
|
3)
Mike Patel,
Business Member
|
|
4)
Jean Marie McBroom,
Parent
|
|
5)
Marcella Best,
Parent
|
|
6)
Dorothy Haywood,
Parent
|
|
7)
Beatriz Zamora,
Parent
|
|
8)
Tammy Nottingham,
Parent
|
|
9)
Jerald Payan,
Community Member
|
|
10)
William Hage,
Community Member
|
|
11)
Teri Bronson,
Community Member
|
|
12)
Paul Puckett,
Community Member
|
|
13)
Concepcion Scharar,
School Support Personnel
|
|
14)
Mary Parrish,
School Support Personnel
|
|
15)
Francia Doble,
School Support Personnel
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found