VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

VISION: Fort Meade Middle Senior High School team will join the community and parents to assist all students in becoming academically and socially successful by preparing them with critical thinking and decision making skills.

MISSION: To create a community of empowerment for educating all students in an environment of accountability, respect, and trust to ensure the academic and social success of all students.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Fort Meade Middle Senior High School is located on a 100 acre site of land on Edgewood Drive in Fort Meade, Florida. It consists of twelve buildings on property bordered by the Peace River. The bounds are beautifully landscaped with irrigated lawns. The current Fort Meade High School was constructed in 1967, at which time students in grades eight through twelve were serviced. Over the years, many additions have been made to the original structure to accommodate the expansion of the school program. In 1998, the new middle school addition, serving students in grades six through eight was completed. The current combined high school and middle school facility is located on Edgewood Drive, just off U.S. Highway 17, in the heart of central Florida, Polk County. Fort Meade is considered to be the geographic center of the state.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

Fort Meade Middle Senior High School earned a total of 478 accountability points on the 2009 FCAT which demonstrates increases on the eight accountability areas and we maintained a “C”. Fort Meade Middle Senior High School enters the 2009-2010 school year with a determination to increase our grade and achieve Adequate Yearly Progress. Also, our writing scores were above the district’s


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

Because of budget cuts we have experienced loss of teaching units which affected our vocational department and put some limits there. We are a combination school therefore we have teachers who teach at both levels. When we lose a middle level teacher in an area it usually means the high school teacher must teach both levels; therefore generating scheduling issues. Based upon our scores, we are looking forward to receiving reading and math academic coaches.

With the turmoil of the unsure economy we continue to lose students to other schools with families moving trying to find employment. As a result, our student population continues to decline.


Student Demographics

Fort Meade Middle Senior High School serves students consisting of a total of 674 Caucasian, Hispanic, and Black students in an economically disadvantaged community. 46.39% White, 33.73% are Hispanic, 1.91% multi-racial, .1 % American Indian, .29% Asian, and 17.53% black. There are 19% Students with Disabilities (SWD), 5.60% English Language Learners (ELL), and nearly 64.51% free and reduced lunch.


Student Attendance Rates



Fort Meade Middle Senior High School had an increase in attendance for the last three school years. 2006-07 91.62% - 2007-08 92.00% 2008-09 92.57%


Student Mobility

The enrollment or withdrawal of a student at any time during the school year not including the first 15 days of school divided by the total number of students who attended the school during that year after the 15th day.

Students enrolled or withdrawn after the 15th day:
2007-08 206/766 students = 26.89%.
2008-09 168/751 students = 22.37%.


Student Suspension Rates


2006-07 Out of school days 1388: Action 466; In School Suspension Days 973, Action 480
2007-08 Out of school days 829: Action 306; In School Suspension Days 752, Action539
2008-09 Out of school days 553: Action182; In School Suspension Days 161, Action 334


Student Retention Rates


2008-09
Grade 6 - 5.38% Grade 10 - 03.33%
Grade 7 - 2.78% Grade 11 - 13.79%
Grade 8 - 9.71% Grade 12 - 01.96%
Grade 9 - 2.08%


Class Size



Our school averages for the past two years were as follows:
2006-07 – 15.28
2007-08 – 15.47


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern



Lewis Anna Woodbury is the only school that feeds into Fort Meade Middle Senior High School. Their 2009 school grade was an “A” and they met 90% of criteria for Adequate Yearly Progress. LAW is a Title I school.


Partnerships and Grants

A matching grant was acquired through the Polk Education Foundation and the community business partners which is providing resources for materials and supplies for tutoring that greatly enhance our curriculum.

A grant was secured through AT&T and Polk Education Foundation for the purpose of preparing students to take exams (FCAT, ACT, and SAT. This was achieved through an after school program. Academic materials and supplies were purchased to enhance this program.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Arthur A. Martinez BA Leisure Services, Florida State; Master of Educational Leadership Nova University Principal Certification State of Florida 2 11 Principal of Fort Meade Middle Senior High School 2008-09:
Grade: C, Reading Mastery: 46%, Math mastery; 48%; Science mastery 30%;AYP 72%, F&R lunch, ELL and SWD did not make AYP in math. F&R lunch, ELL, and SWD did not make AYP in reading.
Assis Principal Vera Cannon BA Elementary Education University of South Florida Master Educational Leadership University of South Florida Principal Certification State of Florida 13 16 AP of Fort Meade Middle Senior High School in 2008-2009:
Grade: C, Reading Mastery: 46%, Math mastery; 48%; Science mastery 30%;AYP 72%, F&R lunch, ELL and SWD did not make AYP in math. F&R lunch, ELL, and SWD did not make AYP in reading.
2007-2008
Grade: C, Reading Mastery: 41%, Math mastery; 51%; Science mastery 25%; AYP 67%; F&R lunch, ELL and SWD did not make AYP in math. F&R lunch, ELL, and SWD did not make AYP in reading.
Assis Principal Kyle Windham BS Math Lee University Master Educational Leadership University of South Florida 1 2 AP of Fort Meade Middle Senior High School in 2008-2009:
Grade: C, Reading Mastery: 46%, Math mastery; 48%; Science mastery 30%;AYP 72%, F&R lunch, ELL and SWD did not make AYP in math. F&R lunch, ELL, and SWD did not make AYP in reading.
Assis Principal Reggie Polite BS Physical Education Albany State Master Educational Leadership Nova University 5 5 2009:
Grade: C, Reading Mastery: 46%, Math mastery; 48%; Science mastery 30%;AYP 72%, F&R lunch, ELL and SWD did not make AYP in math. F&R lunch, ELL, and SWD did not make AYP in reading.
2007-2008
Grade: C, Reading Mastery: 41%, Math mastery; 51%; Science mastery 25%; AYP 67%; F&R lunch, ELL and SWD did not make AYP in math. F&R lunch, ELL, and SWD did not make AYP in reading.

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
Reading Delora Conley Professional Educator's:
English 9-12
Reading 9-12
French 9-12
12 3 2008-09:Grade C. Reading Mastery 46%, Learning Gains: 62% Lowest 25% Gains: 68%
No subgroup made AYP in reading.
2007-08: Grade C.
Reading Mastery 41%,
Learning Gains: 49%
Lowest 25% Gains: 55%
No subgroup made AYP in reading.

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1.Principal will schedule routine meetings with new teachers. 2. Partner new teacher with experienced teacher. 1. Principal 2. Assistant Principal
1. Ongoing 2. Ongoing


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
No data submitted


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
0000000000


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
No data submitted



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A



A summer program and after school tutoring are provided to students needing extra remediation.


Title I, Part C- Migrant

Parents and students receive services and support through the migrant advocate. To assure student needs are met, the advocate coordinates with Title I and other programs. Fort Meade Middle Senior High School provides parents an annual meeting where school personnel explain the rights of parents. Additionally, meetings are offered at different times and the school provides a variety of services to make attendance convenient for parents.


Title I, Part D



Funds are received at the district to support the Educational Alternative Outreach program.


Title II


Supplemental funds are received at the district level to improve basic education programs. Implementing new technology in classrooms will increase instructional strategies to students and new instructional software will enhance literacy and math skills of struggling students.


Title III


The district provides services for education materials and ELL district support services to improve the education of immigrants and English Language Learners. Fort Meade Middle Senior High School houses materials that are available to parents that can be borrowed to be used at home to increased student achievement, parent involvement, and to encourage students’ love of reading.


Title X- Homeless



District persons work with closely with the school’s guidance counselors in providing resources for students identified as homeless.


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)



After school tutoring will be provided for all Level 1 and 2 students.


Violence Prevention Programs



The school participates in the district’s non-violence and anti-drug program that incorporates community services.


Nutrition Programs



Fort Meade Middle Senior High School provides a breakfast and lunch program for students daily.


Housing Programs



N/A


Head Start



N/A


Adult Education




N/A


Career and Technical Education




N/A


Job Training




N/A


Other




N/A


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Principal: Provides a common vision for the use of data-based decision making, models the Problem Solving Process; supervises the development of a strong infrastructure for implementation of PS/RtI; ensures that the school-based team is implementing PS/RtI; conducts assessment of PS/RtI skills of school staff; ensures implementation of intervention support and documentation; ensures and participates in adequate professional learning to support PS/RtI implementation; develops a culture of expectation with the school staff for the implementation of PS/RtI schoolwide; ensures resources are assigned to those areas in most need; and communicates with parents regarding school-based PS/RtI plans and activities.
Academic Intervention Facilitator: Develops, leads, and evaluates school core content standards/programs; identifies and analyzes existing literature on scientifically based curriculum/behavior assessment and intervention approaches. Identifies systematic patterns of student need while working with district personnel to identify appropriate, evidence-based intervention strategies; assists with whole school screening programs that provide early intervening services for children to be considered “at risk,” assists in the design and implementation for progress monitoring, data collection, and data analysis, participates in the design and delivery of professional development and provides support for assessment and implementation monitoring.
General Education Teachers: Provides information about core instruction, collects student data, delivers instruction/intervention (Tier 1), collaborates with other staff to implement Tier 2/3 interventions, and integrates Tier 1 materials/instruction with Tier 2/3 activities.
Exceptional Student Education Teachers: Participates in student data collection, integrates core instructional activities/materials /instruction in tiered interventions; collaborates with general education teachers.
Technology Specialist: Develops or brokers technology necessary to manage and display data, provides professional development and technical support to teachers and staff regarding data management and graphic display.
Guidance Counselor: Quality services and expertise will be provided on issues ranging from program design to assessment and intervention with individual students. Or school’s social worker connects schools and families to community agencies within the community. This connection helps promote the academic behavior, emotional and social success of each student within the school setting.


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

The team meets once a month to engage in the following:
Review data and instructional decisions; review progress monitoring data to identify students who are meeting/exceeding benchmarks, at moderate risk or at high risk for not meeting benchmarks. Based on this information, the team will identify professional development and resources. The team will collaborate routinely, problem solve, share effective practices, evaluate implementation, make decisions, and practice new processes and skills.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

The RTI Leadership Team met with the principal to help develop the SIP. The team provided data on: Tier 1, 2, and 3 targets: academic and social/emotional areas that needed to be addressed; help set clear expectations for instruction (Rigor, Relevance, Relationship); facilitated the development of a systemic approach to teaching (Gradual Release, Essential Questions, Activating Strategies, Teaching Strategies, Extending, Refining, and Summarizing); and aligned processes and procedures.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Baseline data is gathered through August and September. FAIR data is processed through the Progress monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN). Sixth through Tenth Grade instructional data is gathered from the previous year’s FCAT scores.
Progress Monitoring is gathered mid-year and toward the end of the year, FAIR data is processed twice more through the PMRN. Other Progress Monitoring data is collected as needed for classroom or student progress. This information may be obtained by probes, Quick Reads, Fluency checks, etc.
End of Year Data is gathered through FAIR and FCAT.
Data is discussed and analyzed at least monthly at the PS/RtI Leadership Team meetings.


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

Professional development will be provided during teachers’ planning period and small sessions will occur during throughout the year. PS/RtI Overview will be provided in August/September.
Problem Solving Model: Building Consensus Implementing and sustaining Problem-Solving/RtI
RtI:Challenges to Implementation Data-based Decision-making, and Supporting and Evaluating Interventions-these will be provided throughout the year.

Additional staff professional development will be evaluated by the RtI team during the routine Leadership Team meetings.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


Strengths: 96% of students meet standards in writing. Students scoring below average in math and reading continue to increase.

Weaknesses: Across all grade levels, the lowest content area in math is measurement. Grade 6 and 7 scored well in algebraic thinking while grade 8 scored lower. Grade 10 scored well in data analysis while grade 9 scored lower. In grades 6-9 students in levels 3-5 increased and students in grade 10 in levels 3-5 decreased.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

• July 2009 Build the IFC. Revisit and update in October and January, 2010. Use data from disaggregated data from pre-test given in September and December mid-term.
• Information used for IFC – 2009 FCAT results will be used when developing the IFCs. Utilize data results from the September Pre-Test and December Mid-Term Test.
• Teacher utilization - Teachers will be required to construct lessons for the whole group and small groups that include differentiated instruction.
• Benchmarks – Assessment of students’ strengths and weaknesses will indicate the benchmarks to be selected. Teachers will select students’ class work, other assessments, and data results to determine this.
• Time element for benchmark – The amount of instruction allocated for the benchmark will be dictated by the IFC and the allotment of time given to assure all students exposure to each benchmark by the time of FCAT testing. Each student must be guaranteed by the IFC that teachers provide instruction on the benchmarks, each student has practice time, then the students can practice the skill, the skill can be assessed, then the skill can be re-taught as necessary as indicated by the students’ progress either whole group or small group setting.
• Assurance of use – Administration will execute a schedule for making classroom visits, monitoring teacher data, scheduling meetings with teachers to insure the calendar is being utilized and implemented effectively, and evaluating lesson plans. Assign coaches to teachers who are having difficulty implementing the IFC.
• Assistance provided - Teachers who have difficulty implementing the IFC will be given additional opportunities to attend professional development sessions. A mentor will be assigned to any teacher having difficulty with the IFC. These individuals will have the opportunity to observe successful teachers. The reading coach/math coach and the department chair will also be able to assist those needing help. The teacher will participate in Professional Learning Communities and use this time to gain the support of colleagues during weekly team meeting.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?


Reading: Words and Phrases and Reference and Research were the least proficient and will be given priority focus.
Math: Measurement was the least proficient and will be given priority focus.
Science: Physical and Chemical Science and Earth and Space Science were the least proficient and will be given priority focus.


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?



Disaggregation of FCAT data and monthly data PLCs (grade level/department/team) will use data from FAIR and other progress monitoring tools to identify student needs and provide appropriated interventions.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

• Course offerings pertaining to future employment/job skill training:
Students are offered elective courses in career study, business, technology, and art. Several of these focus on job skills and offer internships for the students.
• Initiatives related to content and students’ everyday experiences:
Focus: Teachers and students need to inquire from each other the reason for learning to assure learning is relevant. Appropriate reading materials are provided to teachers based on high interest content.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

• Selection of classes
Students are introduced to next year’s curriculum and exposed to the course selection by the guidance counselors.
• Selection of electives
Students meet with the elective teachers to determine what classes they will select. Registration forms are sent home for parent signatures for final course selection.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


• Middle School
Teams will meet monthly and determine the areas of students’ strengths and weaknesses demonstrated by assessments and class work. Create lesson plans including differentiated instruction providing lessons for students at above mastery, at mastery, and below mastery.
• High School
Departments will meet monthly and determine the areas of students’ strengths and weaknesses demonstrated by assessments and class work. Create lesson plans including differentiated instruction providing lessons for students at above mastery, at mastery, and below mastery.
• Meeting Times
Monthly meetings will take place for each Professional Learning Community to share best practices and resources.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

• Development of Lessons
Instructional coaches provide focus lessons for subject area based on students’ area of need.
• Determination of lessons to be used
Instructional coaches select focus lesson, align it with benchmark and standards for the subject area that is annually assessed on the FCAT.
• Assign time to teach lesson
Focus lesson will be 5-10 minutes and will be taught at the beginning of the class period.
• Responsible for teaching lesson
Content area teachers, reading, math, and science will teach the focus lesson that correlates with their subject area.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

• Needed revisions
Revisions will be based on the mini-assessments of students’ mastery on the focus lessons. Based on this information we will determine if the lessons need to be revised and/ or re-taught.
• Lesson Effectiveness
By analyzing data results from focus lessons intermittently throughout the year, teachers and administrators will ensure the effectiveness of the focus lessons. Whole group instruction that includes skills and benchmarks will also produce proficiency of skills and benchmarks.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


• Assessment to determine comprehension
Routine/regular mini-assessments based on the focus lessons will be given.
• Number of items per benchmark
Ten questions for each benchmark will be used for assessing.
• Frequency of administration
Tests will be given each month.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

• Determining mastery - Rationale for this decision
80% will be set for mastery. To insure a student has mastered the benchmark mastery is set higher than a traditional score set for passing.
• Using results to redirect focus lessons and IFCs
It can be determined from the assessment results the instructional focus of whole group lessons. In order to re-teach the questions students missed most frequently, an analysis of the assessment can be done.
• Differentiating instruction
Teachers can use assessment results to provide instruction to students in three categories: enrichment and advanced students earning 80-100%, students needing additional instruction and practice-students earning 50-70%, and struggling students earning less than 50%.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?


• Differentiating students at mastery levels
Many opportunities will be provided to students who are at and above mastery level to enhance or enrich current skills. Various hands-on activities, projects, and/or supplemental lessons will reinforce the skill and maintain the level of proficiency/mastery.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

• Meeting times-assessment data by content area/grade level
Weekly meetings will be established and will alternate between grade level and content area. This will be on-going during the year.
• Facilitation and documentation of meeting
Facilitator of meeting can be either the coach, team leader, or the department chairperson. One of the teachers will be designated as the recorder to record notes from the meeting to submit, along with the agenda to the administration. A representative from administration will attend meetings.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

• Role and Involvement of Principal in the teaching and learning process
Administration will meet with teachers during team meetings/department meetings and will discuss student progress and assessment results. Use various components to diagnose student needs. Look at data, lesson plans, and student sample work. Determine if proper instruction, assessment, and differentiation has occurred and if individual student need has been met. The process of teaching, assessing, re-teaching, and re-assessing can be determined using Progress Monitoring logs.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.



Opportunities are provided to assist all students interested in improving their academic performance. Tutoring is available in Reading and Math two afternoons each week from 2:30 – 3:05. The Nova Net lab is used for a credit recovery program.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Structuring instruction and materials for re-teaching
• Utilize resources including FCAT Explorer and state adopted textbooks for intensive instruction. Also strategies will be used that are suggested and shared during the Learning Community meetings. Teachers will focus on different methods to provide instruction to students in the areas that are not mastered. Teachers will also be able to use strategies and resources obtained from workshops and/or professional development. Tutoring sessions will be available after school to those students who consistently demonstrate need in skills.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?


Aligning Professional Development and Instructional Strategies
Observation of classrooms (delivery of instruction and classroom management), student performance (data analysis), and teacher surveys (preference for training based on need) will give indication of the area professional development is required.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

• Targeting students (L1 and L2 FCAT Reading)
Using appropriate tools, students demonstrating difficulty academically will receive instruction and intervention both supplemental and intensive. Progress monitoring and observation will be two important tools used during this process.
• Other services to students not making mastery
A tutoring program is provided after school for students who consistently demonstrate academic difficulty. Assistance is also available during the regular school day.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

• Measuring effectiveness of the interventions (Progress monitoring – PMRN/FAIR)
A meeting will be necessary with all parties that provided strategies and interventions to evaluate the effectiveness and determine factors that hindered the progress. Resolve strategies to be discontinued and add alternative interventions.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.



Challenging the advanced students
Students need to be scheduled in the honors classes, AP classes, and gifted classes who exceed the mastery level. Elective classes they enroll in include foreign language and art.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

• Placing students in higher level courses
Several areas are considered when placing a student in a higher level academic course. Assessment results, specific course results, and FCAT results are good indicators for placement. Consideration is also given for teacher recommendation
• Input in the process
Conferences are held with stakeholders including parent, teacher, instructional coach, guidance, and administration to discuss expectation of the student, the course, and parental involvement.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
Helios Arthur Martinez Monthly 1st Tuesday After school Data analysis Collaborative study of transition strategies
9th Grade Academy Carmen Gobble Weekly Wednesday AM Data analysis Common assessments and FCIM mini assessment results. Lesson plans. Parent/student conferences
PLC #1 Misty Beynon Monthly 1st Tuesday after school Data analysis of common assessments and FCIM mini assessments results
PLC #2 Erin Crosby Monthly 1st Tuesday after school Data analysis of common assessments and FCIM mini assessments results
PLC #3 Karen Gibson Monthly 1st Tuesday after school Data analysis of common assessments and FCIM mini assessments results
PLC #4 Phyllis Harris Monthly 1st Tuesday after school Data analysis of common assessments and FCIM mini assessments results
PLC #5 Debra Shirley Monthly 1st Tuesday after school Data analysis of common assessments and FCIM mini assessments results
PLC #6 Elspeth Belflower Monthly 1st Tuesday after school Data analysis of common assessments and FCIM mini assessments results


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition




N/A


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.



Many of the graduates from Fort Meade Middle Senior High School preparing for college have completed at least one level 3 course and/or participated in the dual enrollment program. Students at Fort Meade Middle Senior High School will be encouraged to participate in AP courses. We will invite teachers to share information about these courses and provide opportunities for students to meet with guidance counselors to acquire information about postsecondary plans. Information will be provided to students regarding requirements for eligibility for Bright Future. Teachers will need to meet to discuss graduation requirements, Bright Futures requirements, review students’ portfolios, and intervene as necessary.



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

No Other Goals were submitted for this school

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/11/2009 5:48:06 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


School Advisory Councils (SACS) were created by the Florida Legislature to assure continuous progress of Florida’s eight educational goals in each school. The purpose of the council is to develop, monitor, and evaluate results of the School Improvement Plan and assist in preparing the school’s annual budget. The SAC operates within the policies of the School Board and the parameters established by the state legislature. The council membership reflects the ethnic, racial and economic community served by the school. Our SAC meets on a Wednesday at least eight times a year. Throughout the school year, the council revisits the School Improvement Plan, noting progress or discrepancies in strategies written. The council is kept up-to-date with new legislation or district policies that affect the school.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Arthur Martinez,   Principal
2)  Megan Graves,   Student
3)  Antwan Jenkins,   Student
4)  Diane Conley,   Teacher
5)  Rebecca Wiggins,   Teacher
6)  Howie Stoughton,   Business Member
7)  Beverly Graves,   Parent
8)  Sally McCumber,   Parent
9)  Lorenzo McCutchen,   Parent
10)  Priscilla Perry,   Parent
11)  Clinton P. Cornelius, Chair,   Community Member
12)  Lesha Hall,   Community Member
13)  Debra Sivadasan,   Community Member
14)  Ed Flood,   Community Member
15)  Eva Weaver,   School Support Personnel
16)  Dialis Mangual,   School Support Personnel
17)  Oralia Mendez,   School Support Personnel
18)  Vera Cannon,   Assistant Principal
 

AYP DATA

2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk FORT MEADE MIDDLE/SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 0791
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 494
Math: 494  
2008-2009
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  40  42  89     72  74  66  60  N 56  58  N 39  43 
WHITE  100  99  48  52  93     86  74  54  52  N 44  48  N 46  52 
BLACK  99  100  17  24  81   94      NA  85  83  N 80  76  N 15  24 
HISPANIC  99  99  38  35  89   90  66  71  72  62  Y 61  65  N 38  NA  37 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  99  34  34  87   94  63  69  74  66  Y 63  66  N 33  NA  34 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  100  100    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  98  98  10  11  61   85      NA  93  90  N 84  89  N 14 

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk FORT MEADE MIDDLE/SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 0791
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 501
Math: 501  
2007-2008
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N
TOTAL4  100  99  34  44    89  58  72  73  66  NA 62  56  NA 34  NA  57  NA 
WHITE  100  99  46  56    93  62  86  60  54  NA 52  44  NA 44  NA  67  NA 
BLACK  100  100  15  20    81      NA  91  85  NA 82  80  NA 20  NA  51  NA 
HISPANIC  99  99  28  39  91   89      NA  81  72  NA 64  61  NA 29  NA  48  NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  100  99  26  37  94   87  54  63  79  74  NA 69  63  NA 28  NA  53  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  99  99    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  99  99  16  88   61      NA    93  NA 86  84  NA 12  NA  43  NA 

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk FORT MEADE MIDDLE/SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 0791
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 522
Math: 522  
2006-2007
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  27  38  86     70  58  74  73  NA 64  62  NA 34  NA  56  NA 
WHITE  99  99  40  48      79  62  65  60  NA 56  52  NA 38  NA  56  NA 
BLACK  99  98  18  79     71  50  NA  86  91  NA 80  82  NA 27  NA  55  NA 
HISPANIC  100  100  19  36  78   91  47  59  NA  81  81  NA 63  64  NA 35  NA  58  NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  100  99  21  31  79   94  64  54  81  79  NA 71  69  NA 31  NA  53  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  100  100    NA    NA      NA    30  NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  99  98    14  63   88  10  17  NA      NA 86  86  NA 30  NA  49  NA 


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

School District

2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 0%  0%    Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 0%  0%        3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? % (0)  % (0)      Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake       If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded
    Points Earned          
    Percent Tested = 0%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade           Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    School District

    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 0%  0%    Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 0%  0%        3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? % (0)  % (0)      Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake       If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded
    Points Earned          
    Percent Tested = 0%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade           Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    School District

    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 0%  0%    Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 0%  0%        3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? % (0)  % (0)      Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    % of 11th and 12th graders meeting the graduation requirement on the FCAT retake       If 50% of 11th and 12th graders meet the graduation requirement on the retake in both reading and math, ten bonus points are awarded
    Points Earned          
    Percent Tested = 0%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade           Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested