VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

Vision: The Boone Middle School team joins the parents and community in delivering rigorous and relevant curriculum and assisting all students regardless of background to achieve success in middle school, high school, post-secondary options and throughout their life.

Mission: Boone Middle School believes learning is for ALL and ALL students can learn. We are responsible for doing whatever it takes to help our students perform at or above grade level and learn the social and academic skills needed to succeed in our ever-changing society.

This mission statement states the belief that every stakeholder(student, parent, teacher, administrator, support staff member, and community member) will do their best for the success of the student to reach their highest potential both academically and socially.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Boone Middle School is a culturally diverse middle school located in the "Heart of Florida" in Haines City in the northeast section of Polk County. Haines City is a rural area but the population is expanding rapidly due to the increase in the housing market in the greater Haines City area, particularly around Interstate 4 and U.S. Highway 27. Many of the parents of our students work in Kissimmee and Orlando in the retail, hotel and tourism industries but choose to live in Haines City because of the availability of low cost housing and the small town atmosphere. The campus was constructed in 1958 and was originally known as Haines City Junior High. In 1986 the school became a middle school and was named after a prominent citizen who was a member of the Polk County School Board named Shelley S. Boone. The brick buildings will be joined by new brick construction this year as a new administration building, Media Center, classrooms, and new agriculture building will be built along with many remodeling projects to modernize the school and create a better learning environment. Portable classrooms will not be used this year for students which will be much safer due to the inclement weather experienced in Central Florida from time to time. The landscaping at the front of the school has been upgraded with the addition of many new plants and trees creating a very nice first impression. The school's Beautification Committee which includes students, staff, and community members will continue throughout the year to help maintain the grounds and add new plants for the enjoyment of all.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

Under the leadership of the new principal and the assistant principals the Professional Learning Communities of Boone Middle have renewed confidence that AYP will be achieved this year. A school grade of B was narrowly missed last year by only 34 points. Boone Middle is the only middle school in Polk County to implement the Pre-Advanced Placement (Pre-AP) Program. Partnering with Ridge Community High School and the College Board, this program includes 150 students who are thriving in a rigorous, innovative program to prepare them for high school and college. Taught by highly qualified teachers in all content areas, the students apply for entry and must meet established criteria to ensure their success with the advanced curriculum. To aid in behavioral modification, The Positive Behavior Support system, now referred to as Response to Instruction/Intervention, was put in place and the students and staff responded well to the encouragement and praise for good behavior. All staff is focused on increasing achievement and becoming an exemplary school.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

Many of our students come from economically disadvantaged families. Many of our students come from a home where English is not their first language. Our student population dropped by about 150 causing the loss of teaching units and funding. The layout of Boone’s campus poses challenges to maintain a safe and orderly environment.


Student Demographics

Student Demographics
Our student population is 24.42% white, 20.42% black, 52.4% Hispanic, 0.21% Asian, 0.32% American Indian and other multi-racial students are 2.2%. We have approximately 50 students who have been identified as migrant. Our student population numbers 765 as of August 11, 2009 and consists of 14.74% with disabilities, 20.11% LEP students and 90.63% of our students receive free or reduced lunch.


Student Attendance Rates

Boone Middle School had an increase in attendance in the 2006-2007 school year from 88.77% to 92.65% attendance in 2007-2008. In 2008-2009 the attendance held steady at 92.36% and we hope to increase that number this year by at least 3% or 95.36% which will in turn impact and increase learning gains.


Student Mobility

The mobility rate of the school was 34.16% for 2008-2009 which was a significant drop from the previous year. In 2007-2008 the mobility rate was 39.79 which comes predominantly from our migrant population. The District mobility rate is 39.1% compared 31.2% for the state of Florida. As the years progress it seems that fewer of our families work the migrant farm schedules and instead secure employment with government agencies, retail, hospitality industries, and other industries in Polk, Orange, and Osceola County.


Student Suspension Rates

2006-2007: In-school 626, Out-of-school 537
2007-2008: In-school 2, Out-of-school 1013
2008-2009: In-school 20, Out-of-school 1130


Student Retention Rates

2006-2007: 6th grade-2.45%, 7th grade-6.60%, and 8th grade-4.01%
2007-2008: 6th grade-0.28%, 7th grade-0.61%, and 8th grade- 0.00%
2008-2009: 6th grade-0.94%, 7th grade- 0.62%, and 8th grade- 1.30%

We are below the retention rate of many of the area middle schools.


Class Size

Class size has been reduced in all subject areas and across grade levels to reduce discipline problems and strengthen the one-on-one relationship between students and teachers. The average class size was reduced from 20.3 to 19.48 last year in general education classrooms. Some had no more than 15 in a class. In Varying Exceptionalities there was a 1 teacher to 3 student ratio. In the Mentally Handicapped class there was 1 teacher to 8 student ratio and in the Emotional Behavior Disorders classroom there was 1 teacher to 5 student ratio according to our student population. These were multi-grade classes with a paraprofessional to assist in each class.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

The elementary schools that feed into Boone Middle School were all A schools or improved a letter grade in the last year. Alta Vista Elementary improved from a D to a C and met 95% of their AYP requirement. Bethune Academy retained their A and met 97% of AYP. Davenport School of the Arts remained an A school and met 85% of AYP. Eastside Elementary improved from a B to an A and made AYP with 100%. Loughman Oaks improved from a C to a B and made 90% of AYP. Ridgeview Global Academy remained and A school and met AYP. Sandhill Elementary remained an A school and made AYP. Our students matriculate to two high schools. Haines City High School received a school grade of D for 2009 and did not meet AYP with a 74%. The other high school is Ridge Community High School which received a school grade of D and met 77% of AYP. With our feeder schools doing so well Boone Middle should be able to achieve AYP with Safe Harbor this year.


Partnerships and Grants

Boone Middle will continue the strong partnership with many businesses in the community including Steven Wilder Law, Inc., McDonald's Restaurants, Progress Energy, Lowe's, Target, WalMart, State Farm Insurance, Wachovia Bank, and CenterState Bank. All of the community partners participate in Career Day and help with providing funding and speakers for our students. During the 2008-2009 school year, Boone was awarded numerous grants: Two $1000 Polk Education Foundation (PEF) School-to-School Grants. One was awarded for Writing Workshops and the other for implementing the Math and Science Rally at any grade level. These grants are awarded by the PEF for their innovative approach to teaching, presented at an EXPO fair in the fall, and published for instructional use in the district of Polk, Hardee, and Highlands. For the third year Progress Energy has awarded a $1,500 grant to secure supplies for the campus Math/Science Rally for FCAT Enhancement which allows all students on campus to participate and increase real world knowledge about difficult math and science concepts. Lowe's awarded a $5,000 grant for Science. A $500 Disney Teacherrific mini grant was also awarded to be used for Social Studies as well as a Service Learning grant of $1,000 to enhance reading comprehension for 6th grade students.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Martha Santiago Ed.D - Educational Leadership 1 13 DRMS 2001-C 69% lowest 25% made learning gains in Reading; 77% met high standards in Writing 2003 AYP C
Sandhill-New School 2000 - No Data
ESOL Director for District
Assis Principal Angela Wilder M.S. Educational Leadership 3 5 C
Reading Mastery 45%-Math 39%-Writing 87%-Science 22%
AYP-64%
Assis Principal Dwight Frazier M.S. Ed Leadership 3 4 C
Reading Mastery 45%-Math 39%-Writing 87%-Science 22%
AYP-64%
Assis Principal Samantha Sitek M.Ed
Educational Leadership
1 4 2008-2009
Grade: F, Reading Mastery:51%, Math Mastery:42%, Science Mastery 21%, Writing Mastery 92% AYP:67%,ELL,SWD,Economically Disadvantaged, White, Black and Hispanic did not make AYP in Math, Reading,Science and Writing. 2007-2008
Grade: B, Reading Mastery:
71%, Math Mastery 68%, Science Mastery:17%, Writing Mastery 89%. AYP: 74%, Black, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged and SWD did not make AYP in Reading, Math and Science

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
Science Christy Aycock AS Dental Hygiene, BA Psychology and Gerontology, M.ED. Educational Leadership/K-6 Elem., Science 5-9, Educational Leadership K-12 9 1 C
Reading Mastery 45%-Math 39%-Writing 87%-Science 22%
AYP-64%
Reading Mrs. Deborah Widner Masters Degree/Reading Endorsement/National Board Certification/ESOL A
AYP-N
Reading 78%, Math 79%, Writing 74%, Science 49%
Math Dr. Cynthia Weller Master of Arts in Education/Doctorate in Education B in Virginia
Reading 87%, Math 81%, Science 95%, 56% Minority, 44% LSES, AYP Yes

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1. To recruit and retain all teachers will participate in: PEC, New teacher training, AIF facilitators coaching, Learning Focused Professional Development, RtI training, PLC, T.A.R.G.E.T. Administration, Reading AIF, Math AIF, Title I Science Resource Coach, Title I Program Facilitator May 2010


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
None n/a n/a n/a


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
496502922181002045


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
Mary Pat Boggs Dean Hannah
ESE teacher
Mrs. Boggs is the ESE Facilitator and very knowledgeable. The mentor and mentee are having weekly meetings in a professional learning community to discuss evidence-based strategies for each domain. The mentor is given release time to observe the mentee. Time is given for the feedback, coaching and planning.
Cheryce Harris
Band Director
Mr. Brodwin- Orchestra
Mr. Ridgley- Chorus
Cheryce is the band director with 24 years of experience. Weekly meetings with the mentee and mentor in a professional learning community provide support for the new orchestra director.
Deborah Widner
Reading AIF
Deborah Widner
Reading AIF
Mrs. Widner is a 24 year experienced National Board Certified teacher with a Masters Degree in Reading and the Reading AIF. Weekly mentor and mentee are being held. The mentor is visiting the classroom, observing, and giving feedback, coaching, and helping with planning.
Deborah Widner
Reading AIF
Radile Benton-Flores
Language Arts
Mrs. Widner is a 24 year experienced National Board Certified teacher with a Masters Degree in Reading and the Reading AIF. Weekly mentor and mentee are being held. The mentor is visiting the classroom, observing, and giving feedback, coaching, and helping with planning.
Dr. Cynthia Weller
Math AIF
Angela Lopez- Math
Robbie Arceneuax-ESE
Dr. Weller has a Master of Arts in Education, a Doctorate in Education, 32 Weekly mentor and mentee meetings are being held. The mentor is visiting the classroom.



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A

Title 1, Part A, funds school-wide services in Boone Middle School to provide supplemental instructional resources and interventions for students with academic achievement needs. Title 1, Part A, support provides after-school and summer instructional programs, supplemental instructional materials, resource teachers, technology for students, professional development for the staff, and resources for parents.


Title I, Part C- Migrant

Migrant students enrolled in Boone Middle School will be assisted by the school and by the District Migrant Education Program (MEP). Students will be prioritized by the MEP for supplemental services based on need and migrant status. MEP Teacher Advocates (Lydia Daniels- Boone Middle) assigned to schools with high percentages of migrant students, monitor the progress of these high need students and provide or coordinate supplemental academic support. Migrant Home-School Liaisons identify and recruit migrant students and their families for the MEP. They provide support to both students and parents and locating services necessary to ensure the academic success of these students whose education has been interrupted by numerous moves.


Title I, Part D

Title 1, Part D, provides Transition Facilitators to assist students with transition from Department of Juvenile Justice(DJJ)facilities back into their zoned school. The Transition Facilitators communicate with the Guidance Counselors at schools to facilitate the transfer of records and appropriate placement.


Title II

District receives supplemental funds for our Title 1 school for professional development to improve teaching strategies for teachers working with at risk students, create Professional Learning Communities, and coordinates with Boone to provide continuous learning support for all staff. Teacher Support Teams (TST) were formed to promote cohesiveness and positive school culture. All teachers attend small learning communities during the weekly professional development opportunities. These small learning communities guided by Dr. Block and Mrs. Milburn provide avenues of support as teachers meet weekly to discuss and strategize the best ways to increase student achievement. In addition, School Technology Services provide technical support, technology training, and licenses for software programs and web-based access via Title II-D funds.


Title III

Services are provided through the district for education materials and ELL district support services to improve the education of immigrant and English Language Learners. The Boone ESOL Department provides support to the students and families by encouraging them to attend Family Nights on Tuesdays to increase their technology skills and knowledge of the English language for success.


Title X- Homeless

Each year a survey is taken through the Hearth program, funded through Title X, provides support for identified homeless students. Title 1, Part C provides for this program to identify the homeless children at Boone. Teachers at Boone build relationships with their students which is the key to student success and are aware of the difficulties that many experience. The Migrant Liaison gathers the data and provides help and support to the students and their families. Staff at Boone frequently help out in these situations, also.


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

SAI funds will be coordinated with the Title I funds to provide after school math and reading support for all level 1 students who are able to participate. The summer Credit Retrieval program makes it possible for students to succeed and gain credit when it may not have been achieved in their regular classes during the school year. SES (Supplemental Educational Services) provides additional academic instruction for economically disadvantaged students for enhancement in Reading, Math, and Science.


Violence Prevention Programs

Title IV provides violence and drug prevention programs. Through these programs, Boone offered the Anti-Bullying Program (Too Good for Violence), Gang Awareness, and Consequences of Crime classes with graduation and a celebration at the end of the lessons. Many speakers are scheduled throughout the year to support making the right choices in life for our students. School safety is a major concern.


Nutrition Programs

Boone offers the Free and Reduced Lunch plan as well as Free and Reduced Breakfasts each day to the 92.6% of students who qualify. For many of the students these are the only two meals they may receive each day.


Housing Programs

N/A


Head Start

N/A


Adult Education

Parents are encouraged to attend technology classes on our campus weekly which includes the use of Microsoft Word and English language classes on Tuesday Family Nights. Childcare is provided.


Career and Technical Education

Ridge Technical Career Center holds tours and sends representatives from different vocations to Boone Middle to showcase the many careers available for our students who many not be college bound. On campus classes in Technology, Agri-Science, Family Consumer Science, Art, Band, Chorus, and Strings are offered to help students achieve personal goals.


Job Training

N/A


Other

N/A


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Principal: Dr. Martha Santiago provides a common vision for the use of data-based decision-making, ensures that the school-based team is implementing RtI, conducts assessment of RtI skills of school staff, ensures implementation of intervention support and documentation, ensures adequate professional development to support RtI implementation, and communicates with parents regarding school-based RtI plans and activities.

Assistant Principals: Angie Wilder, Dwight Frazier, and Samantha Sitek will assist the Principal in all of the implementation, monitoring, and communication of the RtI program.

Program Facilitator: Sandra Moore provides information about core instruction, participates in student data collection,delivers Tier 1 instruction/intervention, collaborates with other staff to implement Tier 2 interventions, and integrates Tier 1 materials/instruction with Tier 2/3 activities.

Instructional Coach/Science: Christy Aycock- Develops, leads, and evaluates school core content standards/programs; identifies and analyzes existing literature on scientifically based curriculum/behavior assessment and intervention approaches.Identifies systematic patterns of student need while working with district personnel to identify appropriate, evidence-based intervention strategies; assists with whole school screening programs that provide early intervening services for children to be considered "at risk", assists in the design and implementation for progress monitoring, data collection, and data analysis; participates in the design and delivery of professional development; and provides support for assessment and implementation monitoring.

ESE Facilitator: Mary Pat Boggs- participates in student data collection, integrates core instructional activities/materials in to Tier 3 instruction, and collaborates with general education and ESE teachers through such activities as co-teaching.

Reading Instructional Specialist:

Technology Specialist:

Speech Language Pathologist:

Student Services Personnel:


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

The RtI Leadership Team will meet once a week to determine how to develop and maintain a problem-solving system to bring out the best in our school, our teachers, and our students. Once a week the team will review universal screening data and link to instructional decisions; review progress monitoring data at the grade level and classroom level to identify students who are meeting/exceeding benchmarks, at moderate risk or at high risk for not meeting benchmarks. Based on this information, the team will identify professional development and resources. The team will collaborate regularly, problem solve, share effective practices, evaluate implementation, make decisions, and practice new processed and skills. The team will also facilitate the process of building consensus, increasing infrastructure, and making decisions about implementation.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

The RtI Team met for several full day sessions and evaluated the needs of the school to make learning gains, meet AYP, and improve academic and social/emotional areas. The RtI Team members are key personnel and had a hands-on role in developing the SIP. The data provided on the Tier 1,2, and 3 targets helped set clear expectations and facilitated the development of a systemic approach to teaching with rigor, relevance, and building relationships being the focus. Learning Focused Strategies in accordance with the Florida Continuous Improvement Model align process and procedures and will produce amazing results.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Baseline data: Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN), Assessment and Information Management System (AIMS web),Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT)
Progress Monitoring: PMRN, AIMS web, Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM), FCAT Simulation
Midyear: Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR), Diagnostic Assessment for Reading (DAR), Early Reading Diagnostic Assessment (ERDA)
End of year: FAIR, AIMS web, FCAT
Frequency of data days: twice a month


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

Professional development will be provided during teachers' common planning time and small sessions will occur throughout the year.Two PD sessions entitled: "RtI: Problem Solving Model: Building Consensus Implementing and Sustaining Problem-Solving/RtI" and "RtI: Challenges to Implementation Data-based Decision-making, and Supporting and Evaluating Interventions: will take place in mid-August and October.

The RtI Team will also evaluate additional staff PD needs during the weekly RtI Leadership Team meetings.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


Strengths: Across all grade levels, 61% of struggling students made a year’s progress in Math and Reading, 87% of students met standards in Writing, and in Science, students were 22% proficient which was comparable to district level percentages.
Weaknesses: Across all grade levels in math, the lowest content area is number sense and measurement scoring in the 36% to 50% range. In grades 6 and 7 students’ reading scores in main idea/purpose and compare/contrast plus cause and effect were in the 36% to 55% range. AYP was 64% school wide.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

The Instructional Focus Calendars (IFC) were created in August 2009. The IFC will be updated in October 2009 as determined by disaggregated data results from the September Pre-Test, and again in January 2010 as determined by the disaggregated data results from the December Mid-Term Test.
The 2009 FCAT results were utilized to develop the IFCs. Data results from the September PreTest and December Mid-Term Test will also be utilized.
Teachers will be responsible for determining the instructional focus of whole group lessons, and group/differentiated instruction. They meet twice weekly to determine the results of teaching strategies.
Benchmarks were selected as indicated by students' strengths and weaknesses, which were measured by progress on class work assignments, assessments, and data results.
The duration of instruction for each Benchmark was determined by the amount of time allotted in the IFC to ensure that students are exposed to all Benchmarks prior to FCAT testing. Within the amount of time allotted in the IFC, teachers will provide instruction on each Benchmark, allow the students and opportunity to practice, assess the students' knowledge, and then re-teach the Benchmark as indicated by student progress, either in a whole or small group setting.
Administration will implement a continuous cycle of making classroom visits, evaluating lesson plans, monitoring teacher data, and conducting meetings with teachers to ensure that the IFC is being utilized and implemented effectively. Coaches will also be assigned to teachers who are demonstrating signs of struggling with IFC implementation.
Teachers who are struggling with implementing the IFC will be provided additional opportunities to attend professional development sessions, have a mentor assigned to them, and participate in the process of observing other teachers who are successful. The subject area coaches and/or department chairperson will provide additional assistance to the teacher. The teacher will participate in Professional Learning Communities and utilize the support of their colleagues during weekly team meetings.
The administration will meet with each teacher individually to analyze data for each student assigned to the teacher. Learning gains will be constantly monitored and strategies in place. Teachers will work with AIF in each subject area for reinforcement.

Boone Middle School is a Learning Focused Strategies school following the Florida Continuous Improvement Model and all teachers follow the guidelines in teaching the Essential Question throughout each lesson in each class on campus. The students know what they are learning and why to ensure relevant instruction. Summarizing is the focus throughout the lessons to reinforce learning and increase knowledge.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Focus instructional Benchmarks:
Reading: Main idea and cause and effect were the least proficient strands in 6th, 7th, and 8th grades. Inference and summarizing will be utilized throughout the campus to improve reading scores. Research shows these two high yield strategies will increase student achievement.
Writing: Organization was the least proficient strand and will be given priority focus.
Mathematics: Number Sense and measurement were the least proficient strands and will be given priority focus.
Science: Scientific Thinking was the least proficient strand and will be given priority focus.


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

Once FCAT scores are released each student is placed in classes that will give high yield results for success. Boone Middle School is a Learning Focused Strategies school following the Florida Continuous Improvement Model and all teachers follow the guidelines in teaching the Essential Question throughout each lesson in each class on campus. The students know what they are learning and why to ensure relevant instruction. Summarizing is the focus throughout the lessons to reinforce learning and increase knowledge.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

The electives offered at Boone Middle School include Art, Technology, Band, TV production, Chorus, Agriculture, Family and Consumer Science for teaching life skills and career study, and Orchestra. Many career and life skills are learned through these courses to prepare our students for the future. Our Robotics team meets once a week to prepare for the ASPIRE competitions. Our TSA (Technology Student Association) students regularly win state and place at national competitions. Students choose electives based on FCAT scores and interests. Parents meet with the guidance counselors and give input in the choices their child makes.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

Our students excel in technology, music, art, and television production. Boone Middle School won first place for best video at the county competition last year. The students attain great satisfaction from the teamwork and a job well done which prepares them for the real world. Our Robotics team meets once a week to prepare for the ASPIRE competitions. Our TSA (Technology Student Association) students regularly win state and place at national competitions. The E Team and Math Counts teams meet weekly to prepare for competition. The Boone Middle Chess Club hosts the Ridge Chess Tournament once a month and places in the top three teams. Students choose electives based on FCAT scores and interests. Parents meet with the guidance counselors and give input in the choices their child makes.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


All grade level teachers will meet weekly by subject area to determine the areas of students' strengths and weaknesses as demonstrated by class work assignments and assessment results. Lesson plans will be created according to the curriculum map guide in the Learning Focused Strategies format for differentiated instruction which provides lessons for all levels of students, below mastery, at mastery, and above mastery.
Teachers will meet weekly for department/subject area meetings for vertical alignment of the curriculum and weekly as grade level teams in Professional Learning Communities to share best practices and resources.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

Focused lessons will be provided by the instructional coaches for each subject area based on a review of previous assessments where students were struggling.
The focus lessons selected by the instructional coaches are aligned to the Benchmarks and standards for each subject area and cover those Benchmarks that are annually assessed on the FCAT.
The 5-10 minutes focus lessons will be taught at the beginning of each class period.
Reading teachers will teach the focus lesson that correlates with their subject with the emphasis on summarizing and inferences. Math teachers will teach the focus lesson that correlates with their subject area with the emphasis on number sense and measurement. Science teachers will teach the focus lesson that correlates with their subject with the emphasis on scientific method and data analysis. Elective and Social studies teachers will also teach focus lessons which include all the aforementioned areas of need according to their subject where applicable.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

Student mastery on mini-assessments based on the focus lessons will determine if the focus lessons need to be revised and/or re-taught.
Teachers and administrators will ensure the effectiveness of the focus lessons by analyzing data results from focus lessons as they are re-assessed intermittently throughout the year. Proficiency of skills and Benchmarks should also be evident in skills and Benchmarks that are taught as part of the whole group instruction.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


To determine student comprehension, based on the IFCs, mini-assessments will be administered by the teachers. Ten questions per Benchmark will be utilized for assessment purposes and will be teacher made according to the progress of their students. These assessments will be administered on a monthly basis.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

Mastery will be set at 80% which is higher than the traditional score of 70% to ensure student proficiency of each Benchmark. The assessment results will be used to determine the instructional focus of whole group lessons. An Item-Analysis of the assessment will be utilized to re-teach the questions that students missed most frequently.
Teachers will differentiate their instruction as indicated by assessment results to provide intensive instruction to those students earning less than 50%, additional instruction, and practice opportunities for those students earning between 50-70%, and enrichment/advanced instruction to students earning 80-100%.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

Students at and above mastery level will receive opportunities to enhance or enrich current skills by participating in project activities, hands-on activities, or other supplemental lessons which will reinforce the skill and maintain the level of mastery/proficiency. Our Math/Science Rally is a two day hands-on activity for all students on campus. The stations are manned by the students at and above mastery level to enable them to mentor students struggling with concepts that may be difficult. Many of our PreAP students are above mastery level and are mentors to other students.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

Teachers will meet weekly to review assessment data (formative and summative) alternating by content area and the next time by grade level.
The meeting will be facilitated by the subject area coach/AIF, team leader, the department chairperson, and/or administration. A teacher will be designated to record notes from the meeting and the notes will be submitted along with the weekly agenda to the administration. A uniform documentation sheet will be distributed to the leaders in each area. Members of the administrative staff will attend meetings on a rotating basis.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

The Principal and the Leadership Team will meet with teachers either during weekly meetings, or one-on-one to discuss assessment results and students progress. During these meetings, lesson plans, data binders, and student portfolios will be utilized to provide evidence of instruction, assessment, and differentiation to address individual student needs. Progress Monitoring logs will also be utilized to document the process of teaching, assessing, re-teaching, and re-assessing.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


The core subjects are Reading, Math, Language Arts, Science, and Social Studies. Supplemental subjects, also known as Electives, are art, band, chorus, orchestra, agriculture, family consumer science, technology, and ITV. Intensive instruction involves scheduling students into additional reading and math classes. Interventions in each class include on a daily basis whole group explicit instruction, small group differentiated instruction, independent practice monitored by the teacher, infusion of SSS benchmarks specific to the subject area, and a focus on informational text at a ratio matching FCAT. Each struggling student must be given the instruction that best fits his or her needs. As a school wide focus, RtI will provide additional support.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Resources from the state adopted textbooks which are designed for intensive instruction will be utilized. Computerized programs including FastForward, Read 180, and Compass Odyssey Lab in addition to FCAT Explorer will also be utilized. Teachers will utilize instructional strategies or best practices discussed in Professional Learning Communities on a consistent and pervasive basis. Learning Focused Strategies Professional Development courses such as Catching Kids Up provides instructional strategies that give the most impact in achievement. Extended thinking skills strategies can yield a 45% gain in achievement levels, and summarizing can yield a 34% percentile gain. Students consistently demonstrating non-mastery may be required to participate in tutorial sessions before or after school. Tutoring is provided and the students are encouraged to attend in small group settings.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

Thorough data analysis, administrative walkthroughs, and teacher requests or surveys provide evidence of common areas of concern in the areas of instructional delivery, classroom management, etc. The need for professional development sessions will be determined according to those findings and will be implemented.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

As a result of progress monitoring (class work assignments and assessment results) and observations (classroom teacher, instructional coach, administrators, counselors, etc.) students who consistently demonstrate academic difficulty will receive supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions. Students not making mastery will be offered after-school assistance from SES tutoring, as well as assistance during the regular school day from instructional coaches, and personnel hired to provide tutorial services. We are recruiting volunteers from the community and business to tutor/mentor students who are struggling.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

All personnel (see above) providing services to a student not making mastery will meet to discuss their evidence and/or documentation of strategies and interventions that have previously been utilized. Factors such as attendance, behavior, etc. hindering implementation of intervention strategies will be addressed and resolved by the implementation of RtI. Strategies that are unsuccessful will be discontinued and replaced with alternative interventions. Focus assessments through FCAT Explorer will also be utilized to determine the effectiveness of supplemental instruction.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

Students who typically exceed mastery levels participate in the school's gifted or PreAP program. Students also enroll in Art class, ITV production, Technology, and Honors Algebra.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

FCAT results, student grades in a specific course, as well as assessment results that demonstrate consistent proficiency/mastery are used to determine placement in higher level courses and academic programs. Teacher recommendation is also taken into consideration. Parent conferences are held with the recommending teacher, instructional coach, guidance counselor, and a member of the leadership or administrative team. The parents are counseled on the expectations for the student in the higher level course, as well as their continued parental involvement.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
6th, 7th, and 8th grade reading teachers, Reading AIF, ESE teachers, and ESOL teacher Alicia Nunez-Duran, Reading Department Chair and Mrs. Deborah Widner, Reading AIF Weekly Odd Day, 3rd period Analyze the effectiveness of the Reading FCIM calendars according to the District Curriculum Map guides, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, FAIR test data, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
6th, 7th, and 8th grade Math teachers, Math AIF and technology specialist Dr. Cynthia Weller, Math AIF and Gary Robertson, Math Chair Weekly Odd days during 7th period Analyze the effectiveness of the Math FCIM calendars according to the District Curriculum Maps, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
6th, 7th, and 8th grade Science Teachers, Title 1 Science Resource Coach Dr. Paul Blackburn, Science Chair and Christy Aycock, Science Resource Coach Weekly Even days, period 6 Analyze the effective of the Science FCIM calendars according to the District Curriculum Map, focus lessons, mini-assessments, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
Each content area team Principal, Dr. Martha Santiago and APC Angie Wilder Monthly During the common planning period Lesson Study centered on planning with and utilizing the research-based lesson delivery model in LFS with fidelity


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition

N/A


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.

N/A



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/11/2009 12:52:51 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


The School Advisory Council (SAC) has an important function for the success of Boone Middle School. Listed below are some of the functions of the SAC:
1. Reach out to community to obtain more partners
2. Give input to improve relations and school climate with students, teachers, administration and the community
3. Sponsor drives to increase parent involvement
4. Become ambassadors to spread the good news that great things are happening at Boone Middle School.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Dr. Martha Santiago,   Principal
2)  James MacMeekin,   SAC Chair
3)  Diego Mosquera,   Student
4)  Galib Khalek,   Student
5)  Dominique Davis,   Student
6)  Cristian Cueventes,   Student
7)  Mariela Tena,   Student
8)  Joann Ephraim,   Teacher
9)  Les Snider,   Teacher
10)  Gaspar E. Jaen,   Parent
11)  Rosa Pollard,   Parent
12)  Belinda Blanco,   Parent
13)  Doris Colon,   Parent
14)  Martha Raya,   Parent
15)  Tracy Jordan,   Parent
16)  Marin Hernandez,   Parent
17)  Lucille Newbold,   Community Member
18)  Charles Newbold,   Community Member
19)  Thomas Broadaway,   Community Member
20)  Joseph Hamilton,   Community Member
21)  Sonia Cedeno,   School Support Personnel
22)  Lesbia Feliciano,   School Support Personnel
23)  Dwight Frazier,   Assistant Principal
 

AYP DATA

2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk SHELLEY S. BOONE MIDDLE SCHOOL 0321
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 939
Math: 939  
2008-2009
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N
TOTAL4  100  100  40  36  91         NA  60  60  N 66  64  N 43  39 
WHITE  100  100  57  46          NA  47  43  N 51  54  N 53  50 
BLACK  100  100  36  27  88         NA  65  64  N 77  73  N 39  30 
HISPANIC  100  100  34  34  91   93      NA  65  66  N 68  66  N 39  37 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  100  100  39  35  90         NA  62  61  N 68  65  N 42  38 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  99  99  21  26  78   80      NA  77  79  N 78  74  N 33  30 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  99  99  23  21  68   92      NA  83  77  N 87  79  N 30  25 

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk SHELLEY S. BOONE MIDDLE SCHOOL 0321
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 1026
Math: 1026  
2007-2008
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  40  34    91      NA  64  60  N 67  66  N 44  49 
WHITE  98  98  53  49          NA  47  47  N 51  51  N 51  56 
BLACK  99  99  35  23  89   88      NA  67  65  N 81  77  N 39  38 
HISPANIC  99  99  35  32    91      NA  72  65  N 70  68  N 43  50 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  99  38  32  93   90      NA  68  62  N 70  68  N 44  47 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  99  100  23  22  83   78      NA  87  77  N 85  78  N 38  47 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  99  99  17  13  79   68      NA  81  83  N 85  87  N 29  25 

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Polk SHELLEY S. BOONE MIDDLE SCHOOL 0321
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 936
Math: 936  
2006-2007
School Grade1:
C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  36  33  91         NA  67  64  N 72  67  N 44  53 
WHITE  99  99  53  49          NA  51  47  NA 56  51  N 48  NA  59 
BLACK  100  100  33  19  93   89      NA  74  67  N 84  81  N 43  58 
HISPANIC  99  99  28  30  88         NA  72  72  N 75  70  N 42  49 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  99  32  30  91   93      NA  69  68  N 76  70  N 43  51 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  99  99  13  15  61   83      NA  90  87  N 90  85  N 38  50 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  98  98  19  15  81   79      NA    81  N 93  85  N   NA    NA 


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Polk School District
SHELLEY S. BOONE MIDDLE SCHOOL
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 45%  39%  87%  22%  193   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 61%  61%      122  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 75% (YES)  71% (YES)      146  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         461   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Polk School District
    SHELLEY S. BOONE MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 46%  40%  87%  18%  191   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 61%  62%      123  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 69% (YES)  67% (YES)      136  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         450   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Polk School District
    SHELLEY S. BOONE MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 41%  37%  90%  17%  185   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 59%  63%      122  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 70% (YES)  69% (YES)      139  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         446   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested