VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

Vision Statement:
Independence Middle School staff is committed to providing a safe environment with instruction that is rigorous and relevant, while holding high academic standards for all students. Faculty will continuously pursue individual professional growth and development to meet the needs of our students

Mission Statement:
The shareholders of Independence Middle School are committed to excellence in education that prepares students with the knowledge, skills, and values required to be productive citizens and life-long learners.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Brief History and Background of the School
Independence Middle School (IMS), was built in 2002, and currently serves a population of approximately 1,300 students. Our facility resides in Jupiter, Florida within the Abacoa Community Neighborhood. IMS has maintained an “A” rating since it opened its doors and also continues to be a “5 Star School.” There are four main buildings and twelve modular classrooms on the campus. Perimeter gates and fences have been installed to assist with safety and supervision.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

IMS offers a Pre-Teaching Academy which is part of the school Magnet and Choice Programs offered through the District.
Our school offers a variety of extra-curricular activities such as our Athletics Program, Intramurals and clubs such as: chess, fishing, guitar, book club, equestrian club and academic games.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
IMS recently was allocated two EBD units which will require additional staff training and District resources to meet the needs of this specific population. Additionally, we have three sub-groups that have nto made AYP which are: Black, Economically Disadvantaged (ED) and Students with Disabilities (SWD). We are now part of the Differentiated Accountability System since we did not meet AYP.


Student Demographics

Student Demographics
IMS serves a diverse school population that consists of 1,283 students. 72% of our students are white, 9% of our students are Black, 12% of our students are Hispanic, 3% of our students are Asian, 2% of our students are American Indian and 2% are classified as Multi-Ethnic. We serve approximately 19 ELL students currently. We have approximately 20% of our student population on the free/reduced meal program. Additionally, 11% are Students with Disabilities (SWD), and nearly 12% are gifted.


Student Attendance Rates

Student Attendance Rates
For 2009 IMS had the following attendance rate: 95% which is the same for the 2008 school year. The District attendance rate is 95% so IMS is in alignment with the District attendance rate.


Student Mobility

Student Mobility
The mobility rate of the school is 3%.


Student Suspension Rates

Student Suspension Rates
The student suspension rate for IMS was 8%, which is unchanged from the 2008 school year.


Student Retention Rates

Student Retention Rates
The retention rate for 2008 was 1% which decreased from 2% in 2007 and is below the District average of 4.9%.


Class Size

Class Size
The District has placed a strong emphasis on schools remaining within CSR requirements. IMS has complied with the 22:1 teacher-student ration in intensive reading and math classes however, we were not able to maintain these ratios within science and social studies. We did meet CSR requirements for District overall averages.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
The elementary schools that feed into Independence Middle School are: Beacon Cove Intermediate (BCI), and Jerry Thomas Elementary School. Both schools are “A” rated schools by the state and met AYP.


Partnerships and Grants

Partnerships and Grants
IMS has numerous Business Partnerships such as: Town of Jupiter, Jupiter Fitness, Jupiter Public Library, and Barnes & Noble.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Assis Principal Mr. Scott Duhy BS-History & Political Science, Florida State University, MA in Education-University of Phoenix, Certification-Social Science (K-12), Educational Leadership 5 4 Assistant Principal-Independence Middle School 2008-2009
Grade Reading Mastery: 84%, Math Mastery 82%, Science Mastery 63%, AYP: 92%. Black Students did not make AYP in Reading. Black and Economically Disadvantaged students did not make AYP in Math.
2007-2008
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 82%, Math Mastery: 81%, Science Mastery: 63%, AYP: 95%. SWD did not make AYP.
2006-2007
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 80%, Math Mastery: 80%, Science Mastery: 66% AYP: 97%. SWD did not make AYP in reading.
2005-2006
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 82%, Math Mastery: 83%. AYP: 97%. SWD did not make AYP in math.
2004-2005
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 74%, Math Mastery: 83%. AYP: 100%. All sub-groups made AYP.
Principal Mrs. Lori Bonino BS-Varying Exceptionalities, Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP), Master of Science-Educational Leadership, Nova Southeastern, Principal Certification-State of Florida, ESOL endorse 1 21 Principal of Independence Middle School 2008-2009
Grade: A, Reading Mastery: 84%, Math Mastery: 82%, Science Mastery: 63%. AYP: 92%. Black students did not make AYP in reading. Black and Economically Disadvantaged students did not make AYP in Math.
Principal of Lighthouse Elementary School from 2001-2008
2007-2008
Grade-A
Reading Mastery: 96%, Math Mastery: 94%, Science Mastery: 81%.
2006-2007
Grade – A Reading Mastery: 96%, Math Mastery: 95%, Science Mastery: 82%.
2005-2006
Grade – A
Reading Mastery: 93%. Math Mastery: 91%.
2004-2005
Grade- A
Reading Mastery: 92%, Math Mastery: 89%.
Assis Principal Dr. Kathy Carden Ed.D-Educational Leadership, Nova Southeastern University, Master of Arts-Education, USF, BS-Physical Education, UCF, Certification-Educational Leadership, Physical Education, MG Endorsement 7 10 Assistant Principal-Independence Middle-
2008-2009
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 84%, Math Mastery 82%, Science Mastery 63%, AYP: 92%. Black Students did not make AYP in Reading. Black and Economically Disadvantaged students did not make AYP in Math.
2007-2008
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 82%, Math Mastery: 81%, Science Mastery: 63%, AYP: 95%. SWD did not make AYP.
2006-2007
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 80%, Math Mastery: 80%, Science Mastery: 66% AYP: 97%. SWD did not make AYP in reading.
2005-2006
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 82%, Math Mastery: 83%. AYP: 97%. SWD did not make AYP in math.
2004-2005
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 74%, Math Mastery: 83%. AYP: 100%. All sub-groups made AYP.
Assis Principal Mr. Martest Sheffield BS-Computer Science, Voorhees College, MS-Educational Leadership, Nova Southeastern University, Certification-Computer Science (K-12), Educational Leadership 7 9 Assistant Principal-Independence Middle School 2008-2009
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 84%, Math Mastery 82%, Science Mastery 63%, AYP: 92%. Black Students did not make AYP in Reading. Black and Economically Disadvantaged students did not make AYP in Math.
2007-2008
Grade Reading Mastery: 82%, Math Mastery: 81%, Science Mastery: 63%, AYP: 95%. SWD did not make AYP.
2006-2007
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 80%, Math Mastery: 80%, Science Mastery: 66% AYP: 97%. SWD did not make AYP in reading.
2005-2006
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 82%, Math Mastery: 83%. AYP: 97%. SWD did not make AYP in math.
2004-2005
Grade A, Reading Mastery: 74%, Math Mastery: 83%. AYP: 100%. All sub-groups made AYP.

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
Reading Mary Ali-Smith Professional Educator’s & Master’s Degree:
Elementary Education, English
MG Integrated Curr., Social Science, Gifted, Reading Endorsement
6 1 2008-2009: Grade A. Did not make AYP for Black students or ED students.

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1. Regular meetings of new teachers with Principal
2. Regular meetings with ITAP
3. Pairing new staff members with veteran staff members
4. Soliciting referrals from current staff members
5.
Principal

ITAP coordinators
ESP Contact

Principal/Administration
On-going

On-going
On-going

On-going


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
Michael Edgley Professional State Technology Mr. Edgley will take the test necessary for further certification
Joann Parker Professional State ESE Mrs. Parker took the necessary test and is awaiting her scores
Sara Macqueen Professional State ESE Mrs. MacQueen is completing requirements.
Linda O’Toole Professional State ESE Mrs. O’Toole is completing
requirements.


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
7533904379031035


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
No data submitted



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A

n/a


Title I, Part C- Migrant

n/a


Title I, Part D

n/a


Title II

n/a


Title III

n/a


Title X- Homeless

n/a


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

n/a


Violence Prevention Programs

n/a


Nutrition Programs

n/a


Housing Programs

n/a


Head Start


Adult Education


Career and Technical Education


Job Training

n/a


Other

n/a


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.


The school-based RtI Leadership Team is comprised of the following members: principal, assistant principal, ESE contact, ELL contact, school psychologist, classroom teacher, reading/math/science coaches, RtI/Inclusion Facilitator (LFT), and guidance staff.


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).


The school-based RtI Leadership Team will meet regularly to review universal screening data, diagnostic data, and progress monitoring data. Based on this information, the team will identify the professional development activities needed to create effective learning environments. After determining that effective Tier 1-Core Instruction is in place, the team will identify students who are not meeting identified academic targets. The identified students will be referred to the school-based RtI Leadership Team. The SBT will use the Problem Solving Model to conduct all meetings. Based on data and discussion, the team will identify students who are in need of additional academic and/or behavioral support (supplemental or intensive). An intervention plan will be developed which identifies areas of deficiencies and appropriate research-based interventions to address these deficiencies. The team will ensure the necessary resources are available and the intervention is implemented with fidelity. Each case will be assigned a case liaison to support the interventionist and report back on all data collected for further discussion at future meetings.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan


Members of the school-based RtI Leadership Team will meet with the School Advisory Council (SAC) and will help develop the SY10 SIP. Utilizing the previous year’s data, information on Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 targets and focus attention on deficient areas will be discussed. The RtI Facilitator will provide professional development for the SAC members on the RtI process.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.


Baseline data: Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT), Curriculum Based Measurement, PBC Fall Diagnostics, Palm Beach Writes, Diagnostic Assessment for Reading (DAR), Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN), Comprehensive English Language Learning Assessment (CELLA), Discipline Referrals, Retentions, Absences. Midyear data: Diagnostic Assessment for Reading (DAR), Palm Beach Winter Diagnostics, Palm Beach Writes, Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN). End of year data: FCAT, FCAT Writes.


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.


Professional development will be offered to RtI/Inclusion Facilitator by district staff every Monday during SY10. The school-based RtI/Inclusion Facilitator will provide in-service to the faculty on designated professional development days (PDD). These training opportunities will include the following: Problem Solving Model, consensus building, Positive Behavioral Intervention and Support (PBIS), data-based decision-making to drive instruction, progress monitoring, selection and availability of research-based interventions, tools utilized to identify specific discrepancies in reading.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


Strengths: In grades 6-8, 84% of our students achieved high standards in reading and 73% made reading gains. 82% of our students in grades 6-8 achieved highs standards in math and 75% made learning gains.
Weaknesses: Across all grade levels, cluster 1 and 2 specifically: main idea, plot, drawing inferences and words in context were areas of weakness. Measurement and number sense are areas of weakness in grades 6-8.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

The IFCs were developed in July-August 2009. The IFC will be updated in October and again in January as determined by disaggregated data from the Fall and Winter Diagnostics.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Reading: Clusters 1 and 2 will be given priority focus.
Writing: Organization was the least proficient strand and will be given priority focus.
Mathematics: Number Sense will be given priority focus.
Science: Scientific reasoning will be given priority focus.


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

Once FCAT scores were received, the administration determined student needs and adjusted the master schedule accordingly. Teachers that showed greater learning gains were also placed with less proficient students. By offering high school level classes at IMS we allow our students to reach higher levels and offer them a better chance of succeeding at higher level classes in high school and college.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

IMS offers elective courses in art, business, technology, foreign languages and career studies. These classes teach students job and/or employability skills to prepare them for internships and future careers.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

The elective courses in business education,foreign languages, art, business and technology teach the students necessary employability skills. Additionally, our Guidance Department meets with all eighth graders to complete an electronic Personal Education Planner (ePEP).




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


Grade level, Departmental and LTMs will occur on a regular basis to ensure that lesson plans and instructional practices are aligned and meet the needs of all students from mastery to below mastery.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

The instructional focus lessons were developed by the District with input from teachers and District staff. All instructional staff attended training on Curriculum Frameworks and work collaboratively to adjust the lessons accordingly to meet student needs.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

Student performance on the embedded assessments as well as student work samples will determine when/if instructional focus lessons need to be revised and or re-taught.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


Our district provides embedded assessments that are aligned to our scope and sequence, as well as Diagnostic Assessments that are aligned to the Sunshine State Standards. The formative assessments are used on an on-going basis as determined by each teacher and his/her student needs.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

District-provided embedded and teacher made assessments define mastery as 80% and above. District-provided Diagnostic Assessments define mastery as Level 3 and above. When a student does not perform well on an embedded assessment/formative assessment, the teacher then determines which students need to be re-taught or provided enrichment opportunities.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

Teachers will differentiate their instruction based on student needs/performance. Those students demonstrating mastery or above will receive opportunities to enrich or enhance current skills by participating in projects, hands-on activities, or other supplemental lessons.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

Teachers will meet on a regular basis either in departmental or grade level meetings to review to review data and adjust their instruction accordingly. The Department Chair or grade level team leader will facilitate the meeting and a member of the administrative team will attend each of these meetings. In turn, the administrative team will meet frequently to analyze data and look at trends.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

The Principal and Leadership Team will meet with the teachers either during weekly meetings, or one-on-one to discuss student performance and progress. Lesson plans, student work samples, SAL-P data, and other assessment data will be discussed. The process of teach, assess, re-teach, and re-assess will be discussed and monitored.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


Resources approved by the District will be utilized for core academic areas. V-Math will be utilized for the intensive math students. Gizmos will be utilized as a resource in math/science. Read 180 will be utilized as the intensive reading program. Additionally, CORE, FCAT Explorer and FLVS may be used as supplemental instructional resources. ComPASS Learning and our Tutorial program will be used to assist students below proficiency in any of the core academic subjects.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

V-Math, Read 180 and ComPass are all aligned with the State benchmarks and therefore allow students to work on those target skills/ areas that need specific intervention/remediation


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

IMS has a Professional Development Committee (PDC) that meets to determine staff development needs.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

Any student that demonstrates that he/she is scoring below proficiency in either math or reading will be targeted for supplemental or intensive instruction.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

All personnel providing services to a student not making mastery will meet to discuss their evidence and/or documentation of strategies and interventions that have previously been utilized. Factors hindering implementation of a strategy (attendance, behavior, etc) will be addressed and resolved. Strategies that are unsuccessful will be discontinued and replaced with alternative interventions.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

Students who typically exceed mastery levels participate in the school’s gifted program or advanced courses. Students also enroll in elective courses that include foreign language. Additionally, students may enroll in FLVS for acceleration purposes.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

Data analysis, teacher recommendation, parent conferences are all methods utilized for identifying students for enrichment activities.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
6th, 7th, and 8th grade reading teachers, reading coach, ESE teachers Reading Coach Bi-weekly During planning time Analyze the effectiveness of the IFC, mini-lessons, Read 180 data, to determine if revisions need to occur.
Reading Leadership Team, ESOL contact, ESE Teacher Reading Coach Monthly PDD Discuss the CRP, school-wide reading initiatives and their effectiveness
6th , 7th, and 8th grade math teachers, math coach and Secondary Technology Support Technician (STST) Math Dept. Chair
Math Coach
Monthly During common planning time To discuss the math IFC, mini-lessons and data to determine if revisions are needed.
6th, 7th, and 8th grade science teachers and science coach Science Dept. Chairs
Science Coach
Monthly During Common Planning time To discuss the science frameworks, embedded assessment data, and to determine if instructional revisions are needed
Grade Level Teams Team Leaders
Administration
Monthly PDDs Data analysis of student diagnostics and other assessment


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition

n/a


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.

n/a



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

No Other Goals were submitted for this school

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/28/2009 12:30:45 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year



SAC Members

Members
1)  Lori Bonino,   Principal
2)  Fred Sardinha,   SAC Chair
3)  P.F.,   Student
4)  Joanna Hataway,   Teacher
5)  Denise McBrayer,   Teacher
6)  Lisa Petroccia,   Teacher
7)  Lisa Igo,   Teacher
8)  Melinda Pierce,   Teacher
9)  Debi Franklin,   Teacher
10)  Terri Monk,   Teacher
11)  Deena George,   Teacher
12)  Tracy Brackett,   Parent
13)  Donna Gephart,   Parent
14)  Jay Bloom,   Parent
15)  Janet Bell,   Parent
16)  Debra Halladay,   Parent
17)  Candice Yeager,   Parent
18)  Michelle Borenstein,   Parent
19)  Jacquie Gold,   Parent
20)  Bill Mallette,   Parent
21)  Don Dillon,   Parent
22)  Annette Majewski,   Parent
23)  Glenda Sheffield,   Parent
24)  Judi Ackerman,   Parent
25)  Wendy Harrison,   Community Member
26)  Dale Long,   School Support Personnel
 

AYP DATA

No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Palm Beach School District
INDEPENDENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 84%  82%  95%  63%  324   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 73%  75%      148  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 74% (YES)  70% (YES)      144  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         616   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Palm Beach School District
    INDEPENDENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 82%  81%  92%  63%  318   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 60%  75%      135  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 61% (YES)  68% (YES)      129  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         582   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Palm Beach School District
    INDEPENDENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 80%  80%  90%  66%  316   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 63%  77%      140  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 62% (YES)  73% (YES)      135  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         591   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested