VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
New Dimensions High School Beliefs:
• Every student can be successful.
• Everyone is a life-long learner.
• Every student can exceed expectations.
• Every student is capable of obtaining and applying knowledge.
• Everyone is capable of fulfilling his or her life-long dreams.
New Dimensions High School Mission:
To provide learning opportunities which are participatory, involving hope, curiosity and commitment, so that action becomes a legitimate result of learning.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
New Dimensions High School is Osceola County’s first charter school. Built upon the premise of small class sizes and more personalized attention, NDHS is a public school alternative to the students and parents of Osceola County. NDHS began setting its tradition of high standards August 10, 1998 when it first opened its doors to 87 ninth and tenth graders. Since then, it has grown and has met with many success stories. During the 2000-01 school year, NDHS served 202 ninth through twelfth grade students. We had our first graduating class at the completion of the 2000-01 school year. Ten seniors graduated with 90% of the students having post-secondary educational plans. In the 2001-02 school year, we graduated 16 seniors. The classes of 2003 and 2004 graduated 27 students each. More recently, we had a student enrollment of 320 for the 06-07 school year and we graduated 55 students in May of 2007. The 2008-09 school year has an enrollment of approximately 325 students, 89% minority. The 2009-10 year has opened at full capacity of 350 students with a waiting list. We have an 84% minority population.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
After earning a school record high of 519 accountability points on the 2009 FCAT and demonstrating increases in math school wide, writing, and students making learning gains in both reading and math and our pbottom quartile in both areas, which raised the school grade to a high “B” from a “D,” New Dimensions High School enters the next school year with renewed confidence to earn the additional 6 points to achieve an “A.”
In addition, New Dimensions High School won the FLDOE High School Literacy Leadership Team of the Year and look forward to continuing to promote literacy school-wide.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Due to the state's budget cuts, NDHS will lose its valuable partnership and support of FLARE, which provided a FLARE coordinator at not cost to provide reading professional development. This had been a very integral part of our professional development program.
Also because of budget contraints, we can no longer employ a curriculum coach to work with teachers in their classrooms.
Student Demographics
New Dimensions High School serves a multi-ethnic school population that consists of 350 students from an enrollment that encompasses the entire county, with a total minority population of 84%. 58% of students are Hispanic, 16.5% are Black, 16% are White, and 7.5% are American Indian, Asian, or multi-racial. Economically disadvantaged students account for 71% of the population. Additionally, 4% of students are Students with Disabilities (SWD), and 8% are classified as English Language Learners (ELL.
Student Attendance Rates
The average daily attendance (ADA) rate for NDHS is 93.2%. The ADA rate for the entire School District of Osceola County is 94.3%. The ADA for the other 8 high schools in the county is 93.4%.
Student Mobility
The mobility rate of the school is 29%. During the past several years, a contrbuting factor to this mobility comes predominantly from the area we serve being hit very hard by the foreclosure siuation in Central Florida.
Student Suspension Rates
The Out of School Suspensionm rate for New Dimensions High School is 6.6%
Student Retention Rates
NDHS has a retention rate for the 2009 school year of 1.5%. This compares favorably to the 11.1% average retention rate for the other high schools within the school district.
Class Size
The average class size for the 2009 school year was 19.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Because we are a charter school that can be attended by all students within the School District of Osceola County, we have no specific feeder school.
Partnerships and Grants
NDHS shares several wonderful partnerships with organizationa within the community.
The Radisson Worldgate Resort continues to partner with NDHS and houses the Second Chance Academt on its premises. This is a school/work program for at risk students. Students complete their graduation requirements/school curriculum via a web based program and work at the resort for On-the-job training elective credits.
We also have an articulation agrement with Valencia Community College in which our students attend their campu as dually enrolled students and we also teach a number of their college level courses here on our campus.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Dr. Tina Cafiero
|
D.Ed. -Educational Leadership, University of Central FL
M.Ed. – Educational Leadership - University of Central FL
FL Certifications: Educational Leadership (all levels), Consumer Science k-12, Occupational Specialist
|
11
|
11
|
Dr. Cafiero serves as the Director of Instruction and was one of the founding members of the school and has been an administrator at the school since it opened. All school performance record data falls within her oversight at NDHS.
|
|
Principal
|
Dr. Jackie
|
Ph.D. Educational Leadership, Walden University, M.Ed. French, West Georgia University, FL Certifications: Educational leadership (all levels), French k-12
|
11
|
11
|
Dr. Grimm serves as the Director of Operations and was one of the founding members of the school and has been an administrator at the school since it opened. All school performance record data falls within her oversight at NDHS
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
| No data submitted |
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
1. Regular meetings of new teachers with Principal
|
Director
|
ongoing
|
|
|
2. Partnering new teachers with veteran staff
|
Director
|
ongoing
|
|
|
3. Use of Teacher-Teacher.com website for posting openings and to conduct applicant searches and review resumes
|
Director
|
ongoing or as needed
|
|
|
4. Intensive professional Development in a wide variety of areas: ie: Professional Ethics, Reading in the Content Areas, Policies and Procedures, ELL Instructional Strategies, Data Analysis, Professional Learning communities
|
Directors, staff members, lead teachers, curriculum coach
|
On-going
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Jaimie Toland
|
Language Arts 6-12
|
Language Arts and Reading
|
Completion of the Reading Endorsement - she only has the last of the 6 competencies to complete.
|
|
Ingrid Lozano
|
Art K-12
|
Dance and Aerobics
|
Will take the Physical Education Subject Area exam this school year or complete coursework.
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 19 | 10 | 37 | 21 | 37 | 58 | 93 | 16 | 0 | 21 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Scott Pettengill
|
Ryan Adams, Dr. Cafiero
|
first year at NDHS
|
IPDP development, Lesson plan review, Certification requirement orientation and review, annual assessment program orientation
|
|
Ingrid Lozano
|
Sonia Albaladejo, Dr. Cafiero
|
First year teacher
|
IPDP development, Lesson plan review, Certification requirement orientation and review, annual assessment program orientation, Preparing New Educators Program
|
|
Edith Reinhardt
|
Theresa Barrett, Dr. Cafiero
|
First year teacher
|
IPDP development, Lesson plan review, Certification requirement orientation and review, annual assessment program orientation, Preparing New Educators Program
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part D
Title II
Title III
Title X- Homeless
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Violence Prevention Programs
Nutrition Programs
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Content Area Team (Reading, Math, and Science Teams)
|
TBD
|
Monthly
|
4th Wednesday of the month
|
Analyze the effectiveness of the FCIM calendars/curriculum maps for their specific content area, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
|
|
Departmental PLC
|
TBD
|
Monthly
|
2nd Wednesday of each month
|
Analyze the effectiveness of the FCIM calendars/curriculum maps for their deaprtment, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions. Discuss methods for infusing support into their curriculm to address the weakness determined in the data analysis.
|
|
Literacy Leadership Team
|
TBD
|
Monthly
|
3rd Wednesday of each month
|
Determine school-wide literacy goals, support all content area teachers in infusing literacy strategies into their content area, provide professional development in literacy strategies
|
|
Post-Secondary readiness PLC
|
TBD
|
Monthly
|
4th Wednesday of the month
|
Analyze the needs of our potential graduates, look at college entrance exam data to eastablish areas that need support,survey potential grads on their post-secondary needs and plans, and provide support for college applications and scholarships.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
na
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
This year NDHS has restructured its senior homeroom program to specifically address the needs of our potential graduates. A select group of teachers along with an administrator will work weekly with our seniors to determine post-secondary needs. SAT and ACT test taking strategies will be given, along with college application and scholarship application completion. We will aslo be bringing in speakers and representatives from colleges, university and trade schools to speak iwth our students about post secondary options. We will also continue to work with Valencia Community College in building our Dual Enrollment program on campus and to administer the CPT on our campus. NDHS will also maintain its scholarship database for students to access for all scholarship information that the school receives.
This group of teachers and administrator will use the High School Feedback Report to analyze the post-seconday rediness and entrance data for NDHS and tailor the program according to needs and trends determined.
In addition, NDHS continued to add rigorous courses to teh curriculum offering. We added three new AP programs and three Dual Enrollment courses to be taught on our campus. Students are encouraged to take these rigorous classes. We will also continue our partnership with Valencia Community College and offer the CPT on our campus annually.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
- All sub groups did not make AYP in reading
- Weakest area for both 9th and 10th grade students is Reference and Research
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Weekly reading homeroom program dedicated to the FCAT benchmarks
|
Administration, homeroom teachers
|
Homeroom FCAT Benchmark assessemnts given perodically during school year
|
Progress monitoring of the assessments
|
| 2 |
The Reading PLC will meet to discuss data and adjust instruction accordingly to meet student needs.
|
Reading PLC Members, administration
|
CIM Benchmark assessment results,minutes of Reading PLC
|
Assessment Data, discussion with PLC members
|
| 3 |
Use the FAIR assessment with all level 1 and 2 students in reading
|
Reading teachers, administrator
|
Data from the 3 FAIR assessments and the ongoing progress monitoring assessments will be monitored regularly to determine student instructional needs.
|
FAIR assessment data, ongoing progress monitoring assessment data
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
FAIR Assessment Training
|
Reading Lead Teacher
|
August 2009
|
Ckecking schedule to make sure assessment is administered during the 3 windows, review student data from assessment
|
Reading teachers, administrators
|
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
Balanced Literacy with Janet Allen
|
JAnet Allen
|
October 2009
|
Presentation to NDHS staff by those teachers that attend
|
Administration
|
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
Professional Learning Communities
|
Dr. Cafiero
|
August 2009
|
Attend PLC meetings, minutes from PLCs
|
Staff and administration
|
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
"What Great Teachers do Differently" by Todd Whitaker book study
|
Administration and instructional staff
|
ongoing during first semester of school year
|
Activities required by staff for each chapter, classroom observations
|
Staff and administration
|
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
Reading Endorsement
|
District PD or ON-line program
|
ongoing
|
Content area teachers will obtain their reading endorsement or CAR-PD
|
Dr. Cafiero
|
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
Data Analysis
|
Dr Cafiero
|
August 2009
|
Provide data and techniques for analyzing school-wide and individual classroom data followed up by meetings with teachers on IPDP goals, CIM Binders
|
Dr Cafiero
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
All content area teachers are required to develop curriculum maps/instructional focus calendars that show the infusion of reading benchmarks into their content area. In addition, all staff members participate in the DATA analysis professional development in which school wide data is examined and disaggregated. All teachers must also demonstrate in their lesson plans what literacy strategies they are using daily with their students. In addition, during the content area PLC meetings, each department will discuss how they will embed reading into their curriculum.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
- All subgroups met NCLB AYP benchmark proficiency
- 78% of students at or above grade level in math
- 83% of students made a year's worth of progress in math
-76% of stuggling students made a year's worth of progress in math
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Math Benchmarks.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Utilize the FCIM to identify students in the core curriculum needing intervention and enrichment.
|
math teachers, administration
|
Review student data frequently and ensure instruction is redesigned to target the need of students based on assessment.
|
Progress of all students on assessment.
|
| 2 |
Conduct weekly math homeroom program dedicated to the FCAT benchmarks
|
Weekly reading homeroom program dedicated to the FCAT benchmarks
|
Homeroom FCAT Benchmark assessemnts given perodically during school year
|
Progress monitoring of the assessments
|
| 3 |
The Reading PLC will meet to discuss data and adjust instruction accordingly to meet student needs.
|
math PLC Members, administration
|
CIM Benchmark assessment results,minutes of Math PLC
|
Assessment Data, discussion with PLC members
|
| 4 |
Placement of all level 1 and 2 FCAT Math students into intensive math classes
|
Administration
|
Ongoing assessment and progress monitoring by the Intensive math teachers
|
FCAT results, classroom assessments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
Professional Learning Communities
|
Dr. Cafiero
|
August 2009
|
Attend PLC meetings, minutes from PLCs
|
Staff and administration
|
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
"What Great Teachers do Differently" by Todd Whitaker book study and instructional staff
|
Administration
|
ongoing during first semester of school year
|
Activities required by staff for each chapter, classroom observations
|
Staff and administration
|
|
Increase the percentage of students in all subgroups scoring at or above grade level to meet or exceed the NCLB AYP Benchmarks.
|
Data Analysis
|
Dr. Cafiero
|
August 2009
|
Provide data and techniques for analyzing school-wide and individual classroom data followed up by meetings with teachers on IPDP goals, CIM Binders
|
Dr. Cafeiro, staff
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 2009 FCAT Science data, 21% of students achieved level three and above.
|
Given instruction based on the Sunshine State Standards, NDHS students scoring at level three or above on the 2010 FCAT Science Assessment will meet or exceed the state average.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
All students will complete hands-on lab activities weekly and use a common lab report format to document hands-on investigations.
|
Teachers and Science Department Chair
|
Science PLC will review results of common assessment data regularly to determine progress toward benchmark (70% on common assessment).
|
Common assessments tied to Florida Science Standards administered regularly.
|
| 2 |
All eleventh grade students will be given CIM Science Benckmark assessments throughoutthe school year
|
Science taechers, administrator
|
Science PLC will review results of common CIM benchmark assessment data regularly to determine progress toward benchmark (70% on common assessment).
|
Data from CIM benchmark assessments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Given instruction based on the Sunshine State Standards, NDHS students scoring at level three or above on the 2010 FCAT Science Assessment will meet or exceed the state average.
|
Professional Learning Communities
|
Dr. Cafiero
|
August 2009
|
Attend PLCs, minutes from PLCs
|
Administration and staff
|
|
Given instruction based on the Sunshine State Standards, NDHS students scoring at level three or above on the 2010 FCAT Science Assessment will meet or exceed the state average.
|
"What Great Teachers do Differently" by Todd Whitaker book study
|
Administration
|
ongoing during first semester of school year
|
Activities required by staff for each chapter, classroom observations
|
Staff and administration
|
|
Given instruction based on the Sunshine State Standards, NDHS students scoring at level three or above on the 2010 FCAT Science Assessment will meet or exceed the state average.
|
Data Analysis
|
Dr Cafiero
|
Aug 2009
|
Provide data and techniques for analyzing school-wide and individual classroom data followed up by meetings with teachers on IPDP goals, CIM Binders Staff, Dr. Cafiero
|
Dr Cafiero, staff
|
|
Given instruction based on the Sunshine State Standards, NDHS students scoring at level three or above on the 2010 FCAT Science Assessment will meet or exceed the state average.
|
District Offered Science Professional development
|
Dr Various
|
On going
|
teacher inservice logs documenting participation in science professional development
|
science staff, administration
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
-95% of students met the state standards in writing
|
To continue to meet or exceed the state proficiency rate on the FCAT Writing.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Continue to conduct NDHS Writing Program annually
|
All teaching staff and administration
|
Simulation of the actual writing program is conduct periodically during year and essays are graded using the state rubric. Specific feedback given to the students to make improvements.
|
Data from the Pre, Post and Practice tests will be anaylzed
|
| 2 |
Writing will be conducted in all content areas.
|
Content area teachers
|
Content area teachers will grade writing assignments
|
NDHS FACT Program pre, post, practice data
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
To continue to meet or exceed the state proficiency rate on the FCAT Writing.
|
Writing Across the Curriculum
|
Patrick Gufford
|
Sept 3, 2009
|
The three teahcers that attend will present information to staff upon return, writing program and FCAT scores
|
Administration and instructional staff
|
|
To continue to meet or exceed the state proficiency rate on the FCAT Writing.
|
"What Great Teachers do Differently" by Todd Whitaker book study
|
Administration
|
ongoing during first semester of school year
|
Activities required by staff for each chapter, classroom observations
|
Staff and administration
|
|
To continue to meet or exceed the state proficiency rate on the FCAT Writing.
|
Holistic Scoring of FCAT Writes Essays
|
Administration
|
Dec. 2009
|
Teachers will be trained and utilized for the NDHS Writing Blitz Program conducted annually
|
Administration, all instructional staff
|
|
To continue to meet or exceed the state proficiency rate on the FCAT Writing.
|
Data Analysis
|
Dr Cafiero
|
Aug 2009
|
Provide data and techniques for analyzing school-wide and individual classroom data followed up by meetings with teachers on IPDP goals, CIM Binders
|
Staff, Dr. Cafiero
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Parent and community attendance at the SAC meetings for the 2008-09 school year
|
Increase the number of parent and or community attendance at the monthly SAC meeting by 20%.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Build database of parent email addresses so that meeting reminders can be sent as well as other information pertaining to the school.
|
Administration and current SAC members
|
Monitor the email addresses and the number of correspondences going out, and the response at meetings
|
observation
|
| 2 |
Provide Parent Workshops on College Readiness
|
Dr. Grimm
|
Hosting of the evening events, parental involvement
|
attendance at events, number of seniors going to college
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
School Climate Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Prior year bullying incidents on campus
|
NDHS will have a bully-free campus during the 2009-10 school year in which there are no incidents of bullying reported.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Implement the Bully-free program on campus.
|
Administration and staff
|
Monitoring of student behavior
|
TERMS discipline and SESIR reports
|
| 2 |
Require all staff to take the Anti-Bullying Professional Devlopment online course
|
All staff
|
Monitor the staff's enrollment in the online course
|
Inservice logs showing PD taken
|
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Three Dual Enrollment classes on master schedule for the 2008-09 school year.
|
To create an climate of rigor and high expectations by adding at least one additional college level course to the master schedule each school year.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Add AP class (es) to the master schedule for the 09-10 school year.
|
Administration
|
Review of master schedule, students enrolled in AP class(es).
|
Rosters, schedule
|
| 2 |
Have at least two teachers AP trained by the College Board each year.
|
Administration, select teachers
|
Enrollment of staff in AP training sessions
|
Number of teachers actually completing training
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Reduce Bullying on campus
|
Stop Bullying Now! PD
|
Online district course
|
Complted by Fall 09
|
Reviewing enrollment and completion records for course
|
Dr. Grimm
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of School Climate Goal |
|
Graduation Rate Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Most recent graduation rate data provided was 84%
|
Increase the graduation rate for NDHS students for 2010 by 5%.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Develop senior homeroom program
|
Dr. Grimm and select teachers
|
Weekly activities provided to seniors on graduation and college readiness
|
2010 graduation rate
|
| 2 |
Expose seniors to a variety of post-secondary education options and institutions
|
Dr. Grimm and select teachers
|
Schedule of college representatives to speak to students, number of college applications completed
|
Observation and records kept by senior homeroom teachers, senior homeroom teachers IPDPs
|
| 3 |
Continue to develop Scholarship page on school website
|
Dr. Grimm and select teachers
|
The addition of new scholarships posted to website
|
Scholarships received by our students
|
| 4 |
Increase parent support and involvement in post secondary ed planning
|
Dr. Grimm and select teachers
|
Parent Nights scheduled
|
Attendance and involvement by parents in offered activities
|
| 5 |
Increase offering of rigorous courses to the master schedule
|
Admin
|
Addition of AP and DE courses
|
Review of master schedule course offerings
|
| 6 |
Placement of students in to higher level courses
|
Admin, AP, DE Teachers
|
student schedules
|
AP exam results and DE final grades.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Graduation Rate Goal |
|
Health and Wellness Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
National research on teenage obesity and health issues.
|
NDHS will comply with the district health and wellness plan with 100% accuracy.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school Wellness committee will meet and attempt to implement the district plans
|
NDHS Wellness Committee
|
If all measures are met
|
The District Wellness Plan
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Health and Wellness Goal |
|
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/9/2009 1:42:30 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
Student Planners
|
1200
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The School Advisory Council (SAC) has an important function for the success of New Dimensions High School. Listed below are some of the functions of the SAC.
• Reach out to community to obtain more partners
• Help build parental involvement for the school
• Sponsor events for fundraising
• Review and provide feedback for the annual school improvement plan
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Tina Cafiero,
Principal
|
|
2)
Jackie Grimm,
Principal
|
|
3)
Christina Dodge,
Student
|
|
4)
Deborah Solano,
Student
|
|
5)
Val Margarit,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Ralph Barrett,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Paul Surko,
Teacher
|
|
8)
Thersa Barrett,
Teacher
|
|
9)
Wendy Farrell,
Business Member
|
|
10)
Fiona O'Duffy,
Parent
|
|
11)
Jackie Day,
Parent
|
|
12)
Nora Daza,
Parent
|
|
13)
Cormac O'Duffy,
Parent
|
|
14)
David Solano,
Parent
|
|
15)
Don Roberts,
Community Member
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Osceola School District NEW DIMENSIONS HIGH SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
45%
|
78%
|
95%
|
21%
|
239
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
53% |
83% |
|
|
136 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
58% (YES) |
76% (YES) |
|
|
134
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
519 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
B |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Osceola School District NEW DIMENSIONS HIGH SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
50%
|
70%
|
91%
|
32%
|
243
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
54% |
74% |
|
|
128 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
44% (NO) |
69% (YES) |
|
|
113
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
484 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Osceola School District NEW DIMENSIONS HIGH SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
31%
|
62%
|
84%
|
30%
|
207
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
38% |
74% |
|
|
112 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
48% (NO) |
63% (YES) |
|
|
111
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
430 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |