VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Mission Statement
The mission of North Marion High School is to prepare our students in an atmosphere of encouragement, enthusiasm, and excellence for further education, future employment and effective citizenship.
Vision Statement
The vision of North Marion High School is to become an "A" high school, to prepare all students to be competitive and competent in real world situations and to provide all students with equal and fair opportunities for success.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
North Marion High school was built in 1963. It started as one building. Since that time it has evolved into five buildings and a gymnasium. Three of the buildings are two-story containing forty-three classrooms and a media center. The main building consists of eighteen classrooms, seven computer labs, a band room, multipurpose room, and cafeteria. All the administrative offices are also located in the main building. We also have a vocational wing with seven classrooms, including two computer labs and an automotive shop area.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Two assistant principals have successfully completed the requirements of the District Leadership Portfolio. They are now eligible for principalship, should they become available.
The third assistant principal was accepted to the District Principal Preparation Program and will be participating in several professional development sessions throughout the school year.
We will gain two ESE paraprofessionals to assist with the staffing and coteach classes.
NMHS has been assigned a curriculum coach to assist in classrooms as needed.
Our ninth grade students’ FCAT math scores for level 3 and above improved by 3% over last year.
54% of our students taking the AICE exams have received a passing score enabling them to qualify for college credit in that subject area.
In 2007-08, the first year of inception for the AICE program, we had 1 person graduate with an AICE diploma. In 2008-09, we had 4 out 6 students complete the AICE diploma.
North Marion High School’s commitment to excellence is shown through our students’ participation in community outreach programs. Our students give from their heart. We have contributed 401 pints of blood during the 2008-09 school year, enough blood to save 1, 021 lives in our community. The students and their families have also contributed enough food to feed 80 families during the 2008 holiday season. During our Relay for Life campaign, NMHS students raised over $25,000 for cancer research.
North Marion High School Magnet Program offers students with a particular interest the opportunity to participate in the AICE program or our Biotechnology program an opportunity to attend outside our normal attendance zone. Applications are required and more information about these programs can be found on our website at www.northmarionhighschool.org.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Due to budget cuts we will lose a reading coach for this coming school year. This person served as a staff development liaison, data analyst, and coordinated the SRI, FORF, and MAZE testing. In addition, she was able to assist administration with the day to day observations of the reading classrooms.
Due to the economy, mobility rate is showing an increase.
Student Demographics
North Marion High School has a diverse population. Student demographics are as follows: 63.5% white, 25 % African-American, 9% Hispanic, .05 Asian, .05 Indian Alaskan, and 1.5% other. About 47% of the student body is economically disadvantaged and 60% of students are on free or reduced lunch.
Student Attendance Rates
NMHS attendance rate has been consist over the last two school years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. We had a 92% rate of attendance, leading the district.
Student Mobility
The mobility rate (students moving in and out of school) is approximately 35%. Due to the economy, mobility rate is showing an increase.
Student Suspension Rates
2008-2009: the total number of incidences reported on referrals was 4255; total number of ISS days was 343 and OSS was 1064.
2007-2008: the total number of incidences reported on referrals was 4827; total number of OSS days was 1547.
2006-2007: the total number of incidences reported on referrals was 4255; total number of OSS days was 952.
Student Retention Rates
Students are promoted to the next grade level based on the number of years they are in high school. For example: first year in high school=9th grade; 2nd year in high school =10th grade, etc. Credits do not figure into this until they reach their 4th year in high school. They must have 24 credits by the end of their 4th year in order to graduate with their class.
Class Size
Due to budget cuts, the class size may increase in some areas.
The teacher to student ratio is multi-graded in all classrooms with the exception of most of the English classes. The average class size for core (math, science, English, social studies)classes is 18.
ESOL classes(multi-graded): average class size is 5.
Coteach classes: 9th grade has an average class size of 22 with a student to teacher ratio of 11:1; 10th grade has an average class size of 23 with a student to teacher ratio of 11:1; 11th grade has an average class size of 20 with a student to teacher ratio of 10:1; 12th grade has an average class size of 22 with a student to teacher ratio of 11:1.
Varying Exceptionalities (multi-graded): average class size of 7, with student to teacher ratio of 4:1.
Mentally handicapped(multi-graded): average class size is 6, making the student to teacher ratio 3:1.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
We receive the majority of our students from North Marion Middle School and Fort McCoy School.
North Marion Middle School drop from a B to a C for 2009. They scored well below the state and district averages for the percentage of students scoring a level 3 and above in both reading and math for all grade levels. However, the percentage of 6th graders increased from 55 to 59 for reading and from 40 to 43 for math. Science scores were also below the state and district levels. Writing scores increased from 80 to 85 percent of those at 3.5 and above. 74% of the criteria met AYP.
Fort McCoy School improved their grade from a B to an A for 2009. All grade levels showed a marked improvement in the scores for students scoring a level 3 and above in reading and math. Science showed a 3% increase over last year. Writing scores dropped 2% from last year. 97% of the criteria was met for AYP.
Partnerships and Grants
NMHS has a business partnership with T-Square Stud Farm and with System Components. These partnerships assist in sponsorship of the Reading Race, teacher grants, and teacher and student incentive programs.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Kathleen Quelland
|
PE K-12
Educational Leadership
School Principal
Cooperative Education
|
4
|
13
|
Lead AP at Westport High School 2003-2004: Grade C: Gains % meeting high standards in reading increased from 32%-37% and math from 61% to 69%.
AP of NMHS in 2008-2009:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 32%, Math Mastery : 64%, Writing Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 32%, AYP 77% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2007-2008:
Grade B: Reading Mastery: 38%, Math Mastery : 69%, Writing Mastery: 74%, Science Mastery: 31%, AYP 95% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2006-2007:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 27%, Math Mastery : 60%, Writing Mastery: 70%, Science Mastery: 28%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2005-2006:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 25%, Math Mastery : 58%, Writing Mastery: 69%, Science Mastery: 24%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Renee Jones
|
Educational Leadership
School Principal
English 6-12
|
4
|
9
|
AP of NMHS in 2008-2009:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 32%, Math Mastery : 64%, Writing Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 32%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2007-2008:
Grade B: Reading Mastery: 38%, Math Mastery : 69%, Writing Mastery: 74%, Science Mastery: 31%, AYP 95% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2006-2007:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 27%, Math Mastery : 60%, Writing Mastery: 70%, Science Mastery: 28%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2005-2006:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 25%, Math Mastery : 58%, Writing Mastery: 69%, Science Mastery: 24%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Carol Sales
|
Educational Leadership
School Principal
Health K-12
Science 5-9
|
4
|
7
|
AP of NMHS in 2008-2009:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 32%, Math Mastery : 64%, Writing Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 32%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2007-2008:
Grade B: Reading Mastery: 38%, Math Mastery : 69%, Writing Mastery: 74%, Science Mastery: 31%, AYP 95% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2006-2007:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 27%, Math Mastery : 60%, Writing Mastery: 70%, Science Mastery: 28%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2005-2006:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 25%, Math Mastery : 58%, Writing Mastery: 69%, Science Mastery: 24%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Donald Maier
|
Bachelor’s of Art from St. Leo’s College in Business Administration. Masters in educational leadership from Nova University. Certification in middle grade integrated curriculum, ESE, and educational leadership
|
|
2
|
First year Assistant Principal.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Curriculum Coach
|
Stacy Bush
|
English Literature BA, English 6-12, Reading Endorsement, ESOL Certification
|
|
5
|
03-04 WPHS--29% scored a level 3 or above in Reading; 62% scored level 3 or above in Math; writing was down from 87-86% in writing; School grade of a C; 73% of criteria for making AYP.
05-06 FMS--59% scored a level 3 or above in Reading; 56% scored level 3 or above in Math; writing was up from 81-94% in writing; School grade of a A; 100% of criteria for making AYP.
08-09 VHS--52% scored a level 3 or above in Reading; 76% scored level 3 or above in Math; writing was down from 93-87% in writing; School grade of a C; 79% of criteria for making AYP.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
1. Regular meetings with Principal/assistant principal
|
Principal/assistant principal
|
On-going
|
|
|
2. Partner new teachers with veteran teachers on staff
|
Assistant principal
|
On-going
|
|
|
3. College campus job fairs
|
Principal
|
March-May 2010
|
|
|
4. Soliciting referrals from current employers
|
Principal
|
As needed
|
|
|
5. Welcome Packet—supplies, treats, etc.
|
Assistant Principals
|
5th day of work
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
All teachers are highly qualified
|
na
|
na
|
na
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 77 | 5.3 | 38.7 | 22.6 | 33.4 | 33.8 | 100 | 11.8 | 2.6 | 27.3 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Anthony Maffei
|
Isaac Bentley
|
Work in the Auto Mechanics area
|
Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
|
|
Samantha Scaggs
|
David McKathan
|
Social Studies teachers--Mrs. Scaggs is a social studies teacher who is conscientious and excited about her subject area.
|
Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
|
|
Leslie Priest
|
Christy Darji
|
Guidance Department
|
Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS. Work together as needed for scheduling of students.
|
|
Kimberly Martin-Donald
|
Angela Waligora
|
Guidance Department
|
Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS. Work together as needed for scheduling of students.
|
|
Diana Foster
|
Charles Lovingood
|
Diana is a strong teacher and well versed in the policies and procedures at NMHS. In addition, she will benefit from him as she will be teaching the leadership class and Charles has done that curriculum before.
|
Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
|
|
Paula Williams
|
Li Guo
|
Math Department
|
Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
|
|
James McKinon
|
Judith Slack
|
Deans
|
Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS. Work together as needed for student behavior.
|
|
Carol Sales
|
Donald Maier
|
Assistant Principals
|
Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS.
|
|
Ken Wall
|
Katherine Perez
|
Upper level science teachers department
|
Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
|
|
Craig Damon
|
Thomas Mitsunaga
|
Mr. Damon has done the job that Mr. Mitsunaga is expected to do.
|
Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
|
|
Renee Jones
|
Stacey Bush
|
admin
|
Working together to plan school-wide staff development based on the needs of the teachers/students.
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Not a title I school
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Not a title I school
Title I, Part D
Not a title I school
Title II
Part A: District provides staff development activities to improve basic educational programs and to assist administrators and teachers in meeting highly qualified status. For High Schools Title II – Part D funds are used to purchase SuccessMaker licenses and provide professional development for SuccessMaker.)
Title III
Services are provided through the District, for education materials and ELL district support services on an as needed basis to improve the education of immigrant and English Language Learners.
Title X- Homeless
District Homeless Social Worker provides resources (Clothing, school supplies, social services referrals….) for students identified homeless under the McKinney-Vento Act to eliminate barriers for a free and appropriate education.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
We have some SAI funds which will assist in tutoring for our level 1 and 2 students.????
Violence Prevention Programs
NMHS currently is providing anger management groups throughout the school year
Nutrition Programs
District oversees the nutritional programs for all schools
Housing Programs
N/A
Head Start
N/A
Adult Education
N/A
Career and Technical Education
NMHS offers several Career & Technical programs such as, agriculture, automotive, health occupations, criminal justice, TV production, and business. If students meet the qualifications established by the state, they can earn a Gold Seal Scholarship.
The Allied Health Major offers students the ability to complete the program and sit for the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) test. Upon successful completion, students begin their career directly out of high school, while continuing their education for higher certification.
NMHS Automotive program is NATEF certified which allows students to prepare for the work force by readying them to be ASE certified upon the completion of the program. It will also allow them to continue their career goals at the junior/community college level.
NMHS Business Technology Department is implementing the “Model Office Classroom”. A Model Office classroom is a unique educational environment that stimulates responsibility and character while emulating a work place atmosphere. Our goal is to provide a powerful student learning management system which validates master career skills, develops a high-level work ethic, fosters personal growth, encourages teamwork, and EMPOWERS students through choice, accountability, and competency-based learning and certifies competence in career and life skills.
Competency in the use of computers is a requirement for all degree seeking students at Central Florida Community College. One option to satisfy this requirement is satisfactory completion of a high school computer course which is equivalent to 3 credit hours at CFCC.
* On campus Dual Enrollment option potentially available.
* Completion of the Digital Design Program and the Web Design Program is equivalent to up to 12 credit hours at Santa Fe Community College.
* IC3 Certification and Adobe Certifications can be acquired through our Information Technology
We have a unique major area of interest in our Biotechnology Program. This program allows students to take courses that satisfy both their MAI and science credits while teaching them skills in the area of their career choice. Students will take classes in agriscience foundations, agriculture biotechnology, plant biotechnology, genetics, and agribusiness cooperative education.
Other Major Areas of Interest (MAI) at NMHS are:
Animal Science Services, Athletic Training, Air Force JROTC, Music, Public Service Education, Automotive, Television Production, Web Design, Art, and the AICE Diploma Option.
Job Training
Our special diploma ESE students have the ability to enroll in the Career Based Vocational Training (CBVT) program. This program allows students to go to worksites 5 days a week and learn valuable job skills.
We also have a Cooperative Education program where our students may gain credits while working at a job in the community.
NMHS also offers the Florida Ready to Work Program. Florida Ready to Work is a new employee credentialing program that tests – and scores – job skills and work habits. It gives jobseekers a competitive edge – a Credential that proves to employers that they have the right skills and the right attitude for the job. For employers, it takes the guesswork out of hiring, saving time and money. Florida Ready to Work is sponsored by the state of Florida, so there is no cost for employers or jobseekers to participate in the program. (http://floridareadytowork.com)
Other
N/A
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Reading Department
|
Stacey Bush, Curriculum Coach
|
Monthly
|
2nd Friday of the month at 8:10
|
Analyze the data from the Reading FCAs by individual students, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Share best practices.
|
|
School Reading Leadership Team
|
Marth Pilcher
|
Monthly
|
1st Friday of the month at 8:10
|
The school reading leadership team shares all the intensive reading students and supports reading across content areas. They monitor data of shared students, collaborate on best practices and lessons, sponsor incentive programs, and do action research. They also set up incentive programs for student body for reading goals.
|
|
Reading/English Department teachers
|
Renee Jones, Asst. Principal of Curriculum
|
Monthly
|
2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM
|
Analyze the data from the Reading FCAs, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Assess vertical Curriculum alignment. Share best practices.
|
|
Social Studies department teachers
|
Kathy Quelland, Principal
|
Monthly
|
2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM
|
Analyze the data from the Demand Writing, increase reading and writing skills. Share best practices.
|
|
Math department teachers
|
Carol Sales, Asst. Principal of Instruction
|
Monthly
|
2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM
|
Analyze the data from the Math FCAs, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Assess vertical Curriculum alignment. Share best practices.
|
|
Science department teachers
|
Don Maier, Asst. Principal of Discipline
|
Monthly
|
2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM
|
Analyze the data from the Science FCAs, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Assess vertical Curriculum alignment. Share best practices.
|
|
Elective Teachers
|
Kathy Quelland, Principal
|
Monthly
|
2nd Monday of Month at 8:10 AM
|
Analyze Data from Reading and math FCAs; discuss reading and writing in content areas.
|
|
Vocational teachers
|
Lynn Nobles, Vocational Administrator
|
Monthly
|
2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM
|
Analyze Data from Reading and math FCAs; discuss reading and writing in content areas.
|
|
Teachers at each Grade level (9th -12th grade)
|
Administrative Staff
|
Monthly
|
3rd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM
|
Discuss issues with students: who is struggling (attendance, behavior, grades, etc.) Share what is working in one class for individual students, etc.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
N/A
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
North Marion High School’s percentage of graduates completing a college prep curriculum, enrolled in Algebra I course before 9th grade, completed at least one level 3 high school math course, and completed a Dual Enrollment (DE) math course were all below the district averages. Many of our students are enrolled in AICE classes as opposed to Dual enrollment as it is a better reflection for college acceptance. Distance to the college campus is overwhelming for some of our students. The administration feels that with our new AICE program these percentages will increase over the next couple of years.
In addition, the number of students scoring above college-level cut scores will improve with the more rigorous program. Our students’ scores are already above the state and district averages for the SAT college-level cut score.
When students enter high school their Career Plan can be the driving force behind their academic success. When students are focused on the future, they are successful and understand the requirements for their future.
The College and Career Center is the place to coordinate all College and Career activities for the high school. Each Center has a College and Career Specialist that facilitates the activities for the Center. It is recommended that every student visit the Center at least once each year. The suggested list of activities to accomplish each year is as follows:
The CHOICES Planner Portfolio that each student begins during the middle school assessment will be updated each year at the student’s high school College & Career Center. Each high school has developed a plan to facilitate when students re-visit the lab to update their Plan and to participate in other career development activities: resume writing, post-secondary opportunities, College Placement (CPT) Test, Ready To Work Certification, career research, scholarships, and additional assessments.
The recommended second visit to the Center will incorporate Guidance to assist students in registration for the next grade level. Students will begin to incorporate their Electronic Personal Education Plan (ePEP) through FACTS.org and their CHOICES Planner Portfolio. With both of these resources students should have the information needed for easy registration to the next grade.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The total percent for proficiency in reading dropped 8% points from 43-35% on the 2009 FCAT reading test.
|
North Marion High School will continue the school-wide reading emphasis to improve reading skills of all students and increase the number of students reading on grade level by 25% as measured by the 2009 FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Continue the use of the Continuous Improvement Model
and FCAs to monitor progress
|
K. Quelland, Principal and C. Sales, API
|
Monitor Data received from Benchmark, FAIR data.
|
Reports from Benchmark, FAIR
|
| 2 |
Train ALL teachers in guided reading strategies
|
Stacey Bush, Curriculum Coach
|
Observe reading strategies used in classroom via CWT and lesson plan checks.
|
Grade reports, FCA data
|
| 3 |
Use the data obtained from Pearson Inform and Pearson Benchmark to guide instruction
|
Various administrators as per the PLC chart
|
Lesson Plans will be reviewed during CWT
|
Lesson plans, FCA data
|
| 4 |
Have class size for all remedial classes capped at 20 students
|
R. Jones, APC
|
Monitor those classes and used data from FAIR to determine effectiveness
|
FAIR data, FCA data reports
|
| 5 |
All teachers will include short and extended response questions on every written assessment given.
|
Administrators according to the PLC chart
|
Scores on FCAs for short and extended response items.
|
FCA data reports.
|
| 6 |
We are increasing the number of AP classes being offered at the 9th - 11th grade levels.
|
Renee Jones, APC
|
Lesson Plan, Grade book
|
Grade Report, AP Exams
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Only 20% of African Americans tested scored at or above grade level in reading according to the 2009 FCAT reading test.
|
American students will grow from 20% to 65% in the number of students scoring at level 3 or above on the FCAT Reading Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Specific mentoring of African American students by minority staff members.
|
Mr. McKinon, Dean of students
|
Student progress assessed using FAIR, FCAs, Benchmark.
|
Logs kept during mentoring times with students.
|
| 2 |
Train ALL teachers in guided reading strategies
|
Reading Coach
|
Observe reading strategies used in classroom via CWT and lesson plan checks.
|
Grade reports, FCA data
|
| 3 |
We will use the District Benchmark Assessment Data to predict how students will do on the FCAT and remediate as needed.
|
Various administrators as per the PLC chart
|
Lesson plans evaluated through CWT
|
Reports from benchmark and FCAs.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Only 29% of Economically disadvantaged students tested scored at or above grade level in reading according to the 2009 FCAT reading test.
|
Economically disadvantaged students grow from 29 to 65% in the number of students scoring at level 3 or above on the FCAT Reading Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Continue the use of the Continuous Improvement Model
and FCAs to monitor progress
|
K. Quelland, Principal, C. Sales, Asst Principal of Instruction, Social Worker
|
Monitor Data received from Benchmark, FAIR data.
|
reports from Benchmark, FAIR
|
| 2 |
Due to the economic conditions of the times, we hope to reach the students where they are, by mentoring them. We hope to help them understand that by concentrating on their education while they are here, they may be able to improve their status.
|
Carol Sales, API
|
Student progress assessed using FAIR, FCAs, Benchmark.
|
Logs kept during mentoring times with students.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
North Marion High School will continue the school-wide reading emphasis to improve reading skills of all students and increase the number of students reading on grade level by 25% as measured by the 2009 FCAT.
|
Reading Strategies
|
Stacey Bush, Curriculum Coach
|
During professional development days beginning in August.
|
Lesson plans, CWT
|
Principal, asst. principals
|
|
Increasing the number od students in AP classes at the 9th-11th grades
|
advanced classes
|
College Board
|
October 2009
|
lessons plans
|
Principal, asst. principals
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
All teachers will continue to receive training on various reading strategies to be used in their classrooms. CWT and best practice sharing will be the evaluation tools. Specific monitoring will be done by the principal of the elective, social studies, and vocational teachers.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Textbooks for use in AP classes |
District funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Total: $10,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Engaged classrooms and CPS clicker systems |
District |
$70,000.00 |
| Total: $70,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Need copies for teachers |
District funds |
$0.00 |
| Training for new AP teachers |
District funds |
$600.00 |
| Total: $600.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $80,600.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The total percent for proficiency in math dropped 4% points from 75-71% on the 2009 FCAT Math test.
|
NMHS will increase the % of students from 65 to 68% passing for all students on the FCAT math test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Math teachers will continue to incorporate power standards and facilitate real life assessments.
In addition, power words from each discipline will also be reviewed on a regular basis.
|
Carol Sales, API
|
Monitoring through CWT and data on Benchmark, FCAs.
|
Reports from Benchmark and Inform.
|
| 2 |
CPS (Clicker) systems used in all 9th and 10th grade math classes; All 9th and 10th grade teachers have SMART boards
|
Carol Sales, API
|
Monitoring through CWT and data on Benchmark, FCAs.
|
Reports from Benchmark and Inform.
|
| 3 |
The ASCEND math program is being used to remediate low level math students.
|
Carol Sales, API
|
Monitoring through CWT and data on Benchmark, FCAs.
|
Reports from Benchmark and Inform.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Only 49% of African Americans tested scored at or above grade level in math according to the 2009 FCAT math test.
|
African American students will show an increase from 49 to 68% increase in the number of students scoring at level 3 or above on the FCAT Math Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Specific mentoring of African American students by minority staff members.
|
Mr. McKinon, Dean of students
|
Student progress assessed using FAIR, FCAs, Benchmark.
|
Logs kept during mentoring times with students.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Only 63% of Economically disadvantaged students tested scored at or above grade level in math according to the 2009 FCAT math test.
|
Economically disadvantaged students will increase from 63% to 68% in the number of students scoring at level 3 or above on the FCAT Math Test.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Offer tutoring with transportation for after school/Saturdays.
|
Carol Sales, API
|
Student progress assessed using FAIR, FCAs, Benchmark.
|
Keep attendance records, records of parent notification of the program, and reports from progress monitoring tools.
|
| 2 |
Due to the economic conditions of the times, we hope to reach the students where they are, by mentoring them. We hope to help them understand that by concentrating on their education while they are here, they may be able to improve their status.
|
Carol Sales, API
|
Student progress assessed using FAIR, FCAs, Benchmark.
|
Logs kept during mentoring times with students.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
NMHS will increase the % of students from 65 to 68% passing for all students on the FCAT math test.
|
more teachers will be using the clicker system and engaged classrooms to increase student motivation.
|
Experienced Teachers
|
By December 2009
|
CWT, formal Observations
|
Administration
|
|
NMHS will increase the % of students from 65 to 68% passing for all students on the FCAT math test.
|
After school tutoring
|
Carol Sales
|
Jan-Feb 2010
|
FCAT scores
|
Carol Sales
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Clicker systems and Engaged classroom |
District |
$30,000.00 |
| Total: $30,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Other teachers to instruct and model |
none |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Bus Transportation |
District Funds |
$0.00 |
| Bus transportation
Novels to use for book chats
|
District Funds |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $30,000.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 2009 FCAT scores 32% of students scored a level 3 or above on the Science FCAT
|
Using the SSS to direct instruction, NMHS students will attain at least 37% of students reaching a level 3 or above. This will bring our school to the state average.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Utilize performance based assessments and hands on experiments to teach the standards at each grade level.
|
Principal and APD, APC, API
|
observations using CWT and lesson plan checks
|
CWT reports
|
| 2 |
2. All 11th grade students will be enrolled in a physical science or chemistry class where they will be taking Science FCAs
|
APC
|
analyzing data from FCAs and Benchmark assessments.
|
Reports generated from benchmark and inform.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Using the SSS to direct instruction, NMHS students will attain at least 37% of students reaching a level 3 or above. This will bring our school to the state average.
|
Increased Technology in the science classrooms to increas student motivation.
|
Quelland
|
December 2009
|
CWT, FCAT scores
|
Administration
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA
|
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Purchase of Clicker systems and engaged classrooms |
District |
$40,000.00 |
| Total: $40,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Provide training to teachers receiving new technology |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $40,000.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 2009 writing scores 71% of students scored a level 3.5 or above.
|
The percentage of students scoring a level 3.5 or above will increase by 6%, meeting the state average.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students will use the writing process daily. Writing will be recorded in a journal or notebook for easy monitoring of progress.
|
English Teachers, administration
|
A school wide process will be established so that at given times, students will be able to display their work for administrators during CWT…
|
Progress determined by increase of scores throughout the year.
|
| 2 |
The revision and editing process will be explicitly taught and used in student drafts in all content areas.
|
Various administrators as per the PLC chart
|
Administrators will monitor revision process by reviewing samples of student drafts
|
Progress determined by increase of scores throughout the year.
|
| 3 |
Demand writings will be done 4 times a year in all English classes. Character Essays will be done in all Social Studies classes monthly
|
API, APC
|
Holistic scoring will be used to score all writings.
|
Scored writings will be used to determine grasp of writing process.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
The percentage of students scoring a level 3.5 or above will increase by 6%, meeting the state average.
|
Holistic Scoring
|
Sandy Wilson
|
Within first two months, determined by new teachers
|
Double scoring with peer teacher
|
APC
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| District provided training in holistic scoring |
District |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
There will be a 5% increase in the number of opportunities and participants in parental and community participation at various scheduled events at NMHS
|
There will be a 5% increase in the number of opportunities and participants in parental and community participation at various scheduled events at NMHS
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Collect articles and information from teachers and staff to put in the newsletter.
Newsletters will be posted on the website and mailed to
|
Carol Sales
|
SAC membership
parent survey at the end of the school year
parent night rosters
volunteer hour logs.
|
Membership roster and minutes from meetings
|
| 2 |
Change Marquee Daily
|
Dana Spencer
|
Word of Mouth
|
Surveys
|
| 3 |
Set up booths at open house, curriculum fair, and informational meetings
|
Various members of staff
|
Number of parent volunteers who sign up.
|
Rosters from the event.
|
| 4 |
As the district sends us letters to be sent home, we will be sure to distribute them to all students.
|
Carol Sales
|
possible responses from parents
|
Surveys
|
| 5 |
All teachers and administrative staff will keep their website updated and advertise via the newsletter that it is available.
|
All teachers and administrative staff
|
Counter on the websites
|
Counter on the websites
|
| 6 |
Dates must be set and advertised for FCAT awareness night.
|
Guidance
|
Number of parents who show up
|
Attendance roster from night of the event.
|
| 7 |
Purchase the planners to have available for sale to students
|
Kathy Quelland
|
number of planners that are purchased by students
|
Monies collected forms.
|
| 8 |
Contact CFCC to set up the dates and specifics for College and Career night
|
Guidance department
|
Number of parents/students who show up
|
Attendance roster
|
| 9 |
We make announcements home as needed to specific groups or the entire student body through the AlertNOW phone calling system
|
Kathy Quelland
|
reports from calling system
|
Reports from phone system
|
| 10 |
Parent access to student’s grades. (Jan 2010) Teachers will have to be taught how to use and will have to update grades on a weekly basis.
|
District
|
E-counter
|
E-counter
|
| 11 |
Make parents aware of the opportunity to email the teacher through the school website or individual teacher websites.
|
Carol Sales/ Vickie Miller
|
# of emails received and sent
|
Reports as mentioned by teachers.
|
| 12 |
Northside Night Curriculum Fair Dates must be set and advertised.
|
Renee Jones and staff
|
Number of parents/students who show up
|
Attendance roster
|
| 13 |
Dates must be set and advertised for ESOL Parent Night.
|
Guidance
|
Number of parents who show up
|
Attendance roster
|
| 14 |
Dates must be set and advertised for Financial Aid/Scholarship Night.
|
Guidance
|
Number of parents who show up
|
Attendance roster
|
| 15 |
Parents received personalized invitation to end of the year awards assemblies for those students who were to be recognized.
|
Administrative staff
|
Number of parents who show up
|
Attendance roster
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
There will be a 5% increase in the number of opportunities and participants in parental and community participation at various scheduled events at NMHS
|
Power Teacher
|
District
|
Aug 2009
|
Weekly spot checking
|
Administration
|
|
There will be a 5% increase in the number of opportunities and participants in parental and community participation at various scheduled events at NMHS
|
Teacher Websites
|
School Personnel
|
Aug 2009 and as needed
|
Teacher Websites
|
Administration
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
Drop Out Prevention Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The Drop out Rate for NMHS is currently 5.8%.
|
NMHS will decrease the drop-out prevention rate by .5%. From 5.8% to 5.3% for 2009-2010 SY.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Mentoring: Students will be placed in small groups with a member of the school staff. They will meet as a group once a month to do activities. In addition, the staff member will meet with them at least every two weeks to discuss grades, FCAT scores, family issues that may be preventing regular attendance or impeding learning.
|
Carol Sales
|
Student grades (scores on FCAs, Benchmarks, as well) and attendance rates.
|
Reports from SMS, Pearson Benchmark, and Power Teacher
|
| 2 |
Improve Relationships: Staff will implement some common practices (such as verbally greeting students at the door, calling students when they are absent for a while, etc.) which will assist in making students feel welcome and safe. In turn, we hope to increase their desire for learning.
|
Carol Sales
|
Talking with students in during mentoring, surveys
|
Reports from SMS and Power Teacher
|
| 3 |
Teach every teacher what type of learner they are and some strategies to use to reach each type of student they teach.
|
Carol Sales
|
CWT
|
CWT forms, formal observations of teachers
|
| 4 |
Teach every student what type of learner they are and some strategies to use to learn the material for every class situation.
|
Carol Sales
|
Talking with students in during mentoring, surveys.
|
CWT, observations, discussions with students.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
NMHS will decrease the drop-out prevention rate by .5%. From 5.8% to 5.3% for 2009-2010 SY.
|
Learning Styles
|
Carol Sales
|
Teacher preview week
|
Classroom walkthrough, lesson plans
|
Carol Sales
|
|
NMHS will decrease the drop-out prevention rate by .5%. From 5.8% to 5.3% for 2009-2010 SY.
|
Mentoring
|
Carol Sales
|
September 2009
|
journals, meeting dates/times
|
Carol Sales
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Drop Out Prevention Goal |
|
School Health Goal Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Add some health education information to at least 50% of the parent newsletters.
|
Increase overall health of the North Marion families
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
clinic assistant will send information to be placed in the newsletter and on the website
|
Carol Sales or person writing the newsletter
|
Contact her monthly to ask for materials
|
Newsletters
|
| 2 |
Add links to the NMHS website
|
Carol Sales or person writing the newsletter
|
Send Vickie Miller the websites
|
Website
|
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Continue the L.I.F.E. program for interested teachers
|
Improve the overall health of NMHS staff
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Recruit Staff
|
Cheryl Freimuth
|
Number of people involved in the program.
|
Completed Roster with MIP points.
|
| 2 |
Set up meetings
|
Cheryl Freimuth
|
Response from participants
|
Completed Roster with MIP points.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of School Health Goal Goal |
|
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Textbooks for use in AP classes |
District funds |
$10,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Writing |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Science |
NA
|
|
$0.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Drop Out Prevention |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $10,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Engaged classrooms and CPS clicker systems |
District |
$70,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Clicker systems and Engaged classroom |
District |
$30,000.00 |
| Writing |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Science |
Purchase of Clicker systems and engaged classrooms |
District |
$40,000.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Drop Out Prevention |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $140,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Need copies for teachers |
District funds |
$0.00 |
| Reading |
Training for new AP teachers |
District funds |
$600.00 |
| Mathematics |
Other teachers to instruct and model |
none |
$0.00 |
| Writing |
District provided training in holistic scoring |
District |
$0.00 |
| Science |
Provide training to teachers receiving new technology |
District |
$0.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Drop Out Prevention |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $600.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Bus Transportation |
District Funds |
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Bus transportation
Novels to use for book chats
|
District Funds |
$0.00 |
| Writing |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Science |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Drop Out Prevention |
NA |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $150,600.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/12/2009 12:12:25 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
If SAC funds become available, they will be used for teacher grants of $500 or less per teacher as needed.
|
3000
|
|
If SAC funds become available, they will be used to print and mail parent newsletters home.
|
2000
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
SAC is the sole body responsible for final decision making at the school relating to implementation of the provisions in sections 1001.42 (16) and 1008.345 (School Improvement).
SAC members are either appointed (community members, students, administration) or elected (parents, teachers, students, support staff) to the committee at the beginning of each school year.
The SAC meets on a monthly basis and is composed of school administrators, students, teachers, business partners and community members. Some of the activities of the SAC include assisting in writing the school improvement plan, decisions regarding School Improvement Funds, policy development and discussions of school based concerns. In addition, the SAC supports teacher initiatives in the classroom and provides funding through grants if funds are available.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Quelland, Kathleen,
Principal
|
|
2)
Chesser, Dennis,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Moronta, Victoria,
Student
|
|
4)
Hall, Samantha,
Student
|
|
5)
Foster, Parker,
Student
|
|
6)
Jenkins, Victoria,
Student
|
|
7)
Foster, Diana,
Teacher
|
|
8)
Spencer, Dana,
Teacher
|
|
9)
Mackey, Karen,
Teacher
|
|
10)
McKinon, James,
Teacher
|
|
11)
Parker, Adam,
Business Member
|
|
12)
Graham, Hazel,
Parent
|
|
13)
Sapp, Tracy,
Parent
|
|
14)
Taylor, Kelli,
Parent
|
|
15)
Missell, Stephanie,
Parent
|
|
16)
Axson, Pete,
Parent
|
|
17)
Bennetch, Eileen,
Parent
|
|
18)
Bennetch, Sue,
Parent
|
|
19)
Watson, Karen,
Parent
|
|
20)
Burgess, Keann,
Parent
|
|
21)
Edge, Karen,
Parent
|
|
22)
Greene, Missy,
Parent
|
|
23)
Hanson, Kimberly,
Parent
|
|
24)
Harris, Bette,
Parent
|
|
25)
Jenkins, Connie,
Parent
|
|
26)
Kernan, Audrey,
Parent
|
|
27)
Looney, Rissette,
Parent
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Marion School District NORTH MARION HIGH SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
35%
|
71%
|
77%
|
36%
|
219
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
43% |
74% |
|
|
117 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
40% (NO) |
59% (YES) |
|
|
99
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
| Percent Tested = 98% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Marion School District NORTH MARION HIGH SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
43%
|
75%
|
81%
|
35%
|
234
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
53% |
83% |
|
|
136 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
47% (NO) |
76% (YES) |
|
|
123
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
| Percent Tested = 98% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
B |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Marion School District NORTH MARION HIGH SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
31%
|
68%
|
77%
|
31%
|
207
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
40% |
69% |
|
|
109 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
34% (NO) |
59% (YES) |
|
|
93
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
419 |
|
| Percent Tested = 98% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
D |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |