VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

Mission Statement

The mission of North Marion High School is to prepare our students in an atmosphere of encouragement, enthusiasm, and excellence for further education, future employment and effective citizenship.

Vision Statement

The vision of North Marion High School is to become an "A" high school, to prepare all students to be competitive and competent in real world situations and to provide all students with equal and fair opportunities for success.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

North Marion High school was built in 1963. It started as one building. Since that time it has evolved into five buildings and a gymnasium. Three of the buildings are two-story containing forty-three classrooms and a media center. The main building consists of eighteen classrooms, seven computer labs, a band room, multipurpose room, and cafeteria. All the administrative offices are also located in the main building. We also have a vocational wing with seven classrooms, including two computer labs and an automotive shop area.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

Two assistant principals have successfully completed the requirements of the District Leadership Portfolio. They are now eligible for principalship, should they become available.
The third assistant principal was accepted to the District Principal Preparation Program and will be participating in several professional development sessions throughout the school year.

We will gain two ESE paraprofessionals to assist with the staffing and coteach classes.

NMHS has been assigned a curriculum coach to assist in classrooms as needed.

Our ninth grade students’ FCAT math scores for level 3 and above improved by 3% over last year.

54% of our students taking the AICE exams have received a passing score enabling them to qualify for college credit in that subject area.

In 2007-08, the first year of inception for the AICE program, we had 1 person graduate with an AICE diploma. In 2008-09, we had 4 out 6 students complete the AICE diploma.

North Marion High School’s commitment to excellence is shown through our students’ participation in community outreach programs. Our students give from their heart. We have contributed 401 pints of blood during the 2008-09 school year, enough blood to save 1, 021 lives in our community. The students and their families have also contributed enough food to feed 80 families during the 2008 holiday season. During our Relay for Life campaign, NMHS students raised over $25,000 for cancer research.

North Marion High School Magnet Program offers students with a particular interest the opportunity to participate in the AICE program or our Biotechnology program an opportunity to attend outside our normal attendance zone. Applications are required and more information about these programs can be found on our website at www.northmarionhighschool.org.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

Due to budget cuts we will lose a reading coach for this coming school year. This person served as a staff development liaison, data analyst, and coordinated the SRI, FORF, and MAZE testing. In addition, she was able to assist administration with the day to day observations of the reading classrooms.

Due to the economy, mobility rate is showing an increase.


Student Demographics

North Marion High School has a diverse population. Student demographics are as follows: 63.5% white, 25 % African-American, 9% Hispanic, .05 Asian, .05 Indian Alaskan, and 1.5% other. About 47% of the student body is economically disadvantaged and 60% of students are on free or reduced lunch.


Student Attendance Rates

NMHS attendance rate has been consist over the last two school years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. We had a 92% rate of attendance, leading the district.


Student Mobility

The mobility rate (students moving in and out of school) is approximately 35%. Due to the economy, mobility rate is showing an increase.


Student Suspension Rates

2008-2009: the total number of incidences reported on referrals was 4255; total number of ISS days was 343 and OSS was 1064.
2007-2008: the total number of incidences reported on referrals was 4827; total number of OSS days was 1547.
2006-2007: the total number of incidences reported on referrals was 4255; total number of OSS days was 952.


Student Retention Rates

Students are promoted to the next grade level based on the number of years they are in high school. For example: first year in high school=9th grade; 2nd year in high school =10th grade, etc. Credits do not figure into this until they reach their 4th year in high school. They must have 24 credits by the end of their 4th year in order to graduate with their class.


Class Size

Due to budget cuts, the class size may increase in some areas.
The teacher to student ratio is multi-graded in all classrooms with the exception of most of the English classes. The average class size for core (math, science, English, social studies)classes is 18.
ESOL classes(multi-graded): average class size is 5.
Coteach classes: 9th grade has an average class size of 22 with a student to teacher ratio of 11:1; 10th grade has an average class size of 23 with a student to teacher ratio of 11:1; 11th grade has an average class size of 20 with a student to teacher ratio of 10:1; 12th grade has an average class size of 22 with a student to teacher ratio of 11:1.
Varying Exceptionalities (multi-graded): average class size of 7, with student to teacher ratio of 4:1.
Mentally handicapped(multi-graded): average class size is 6, making the student to teacher ratio 3:1.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

We receive the majority of our students from North Marion Middle School and Fort McCoy School.
North Marion Middle School drop from a B to a C for 2009. They scored well below the state and district averages for the percentage of students scoring a level 3 and above in both reading and math for all grade levels. However, the percentage of 6th graders increased from 55 to 59 for reading and from 40 to 43 for math. Science scores were also below the state and district levels. Writing scores increased from 80 to 85 percent of those at 3.5 and above. 74% of the criteria met AYP.
Fort McCoy School improved their grade from a B to an A for 2009. All grade levels showed a marked improvement in the scores for students scoring a level 3 and above in reading and math. Science showed a 3% increase over last year. Writing scores dropped 2% from last year. 97% of the criteria was met for AYP.


Partnerships and Grants

NMHS has a business partnership with T-Square Stud Farm and with System Components. These partnerships assist in sponsorship of the Reading Race, teacher grants, and teacher and student incentive programs.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Kathleen Quelland PE K-12
Educational Leadership
School Principal
Cooperative Education
4 13 Lead AP at Westport High School 2003-2004: Grade C: Gains % meeting high standards in reading increased from 32%-37% and math from 61% to 69%.
AP of NMHS in 2008-2009:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 32%, Math Mastery : 64%, Writing Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 32%, AYP 77% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2007-2008:
Grade B: Reading Mastery: 38%, Math Mastery : 69%, Writing Mastery: 74%, Science Mastery: 31%, AYP 95% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2006-2007:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 27%, Math Mastery : 60%, Writing Mastery: 70%, Science Mastery: 28%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2005-2006:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 25%, Math Mastery : 58%, Writing Mastery: 69%, Science Mastery: 24%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
Assis Principal Renee Jones Educational Leadership
School Principal
English 6-12
4 9 AP of NMHS in 2008-2009:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 32%, Math Mastery : 64%, Writing Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 32%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2007-2008:
Grade B: Reading Mastery: 38%, Math Mastery : 69%, Writing Mastery: 74%, Science Mastery: 31%, AYP 95% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2006-2007:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 27%, Math Mastery : 60%, Writing Mastery: 70%, Science Mastery: 28%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2005-2006:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 25%, Math Mastery : 58%, Writing Mastery: 69%, Science Mastery: 24%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
Assis Principal Carol Sales Educational Leadership
School Principal
Health K-12
Science 5-9
4 7 AP of NMHS in 2008-2009:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 32%, Math Mastery : 64%, Writing Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 32%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2007-2008:
Grade B: Reading Mastery: 38%, Math Mastery : 69%, Writing Mastery: 74%, Science Mastery: 31%, AYP 95% of criteria met (black, SWD, ED not met).
2006-2007:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 27%, Math Mastery : 60%, Writing Mastery: 70%, Science Mastery: 28%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
2005-2006:
Grade D: Reading Mastery: 25%, Math Mastery : 58%, Writing Mastery: 69%, Science Mastery: 24%, AYP 77% of criteria met.
Assis Principal Donald Maier Bachelor’s of Art from St. Leo’s College in Business Administration. Masters in educational leadership from Nova University. Certification in middle grade integrated curriculum, ESE, and educational leadership 2 First year Assistant Principal.

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
Curriculum Coach Stacy Bush English Literature BA, English 6-12, Reading Endorsement, ESOL Certification 5 03-04 WPHS--29% scored a level 3 or above in Reading; 62% scored level 3 or above in Math; writing was down from 87-86% in writing; School grade of a C; 73% of criteria for making AYP.


05-06 FMS--59% scored a level 3 or above in Reading; 56% scored level 3 or above in Math; writing was up from 81-94% in writing; School grade of a A; 100% of criteria for making AYP.
08-09 VHS--52% scored a level 3 or above in Reading; 76% scored level 3 or above in Math; writing was down from 93-87% in writing; School grade of a C; 79% of criteria for making AYP.

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1. Regular meetings with Principal/assistant principal Principal/assistant principal On-going
2. Partner new teachers with veteran teachers on staff Assistant principal On-going
3. College campus job fairs Principal March-May 2010
4. Soliciting referrals from current employers Principal As needed
5. Welcome Packet—supplies, treats, etc. Assistant Principals 5th day of work


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
All teachers are highly qualified na na na


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
775.338.722.633.433.810011.82.627.3


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
Anthony Maffei Isaac Bentley Work in the Auto Mechanics area Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
Samantha Scaggs David McKathan Social Studies teachers--Mrs. Scaggs is a social studies teacher who is conscientious and excited about her subject area. Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
Leslie Priest Christy Darji Guidance Department Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS. Work together as needed for scheduling of students.
Kimberly Martin-Donald Angela Waligora Guidance Department Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS. Work together as needed for scheduling of students.
Diana Foster Charles Lovingood Diana is a strong teacher and well versed in the policies and procedures at NMHS. In addition, she will benefit from him as she will be teaching the leadership class and Charles has done that curriculum before. Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
Paula Williams Li Guo Math Department Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
James McKinon Judith Slack Deans Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS. Work together as needed for student behavior.
Carol Sales Donald Maier Assistant Principals Meet and work together daily for first couple of weeks to explain the procedures and expectations for NMHS.
Ken Wall Katherine Perez Upper level science teachers department Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
Craig Damon Thomas Mitsunaga Mr. Damon has done the job that Mr. Mitsunaga is expected to do. Meeting Weekly for the first two months to discuss lesson planning, procedures and policies at NMHS. They will then meet monthly plus as needed(such as around grading times, homecoming, change of schedule, before drills, etc.)
Renee Jones Stacey Bush admin Working together to plan school-wide staff development based on the needs of the teachers/students.



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A

Not a title I school


Title I, Part C- Migrant

Not a title I school


Title I, Part D

Not a title I school


Title II

Part A: District provides staff development activities to improve basic educational programs and to assist administrators and teachers in meeting highly qualified status. For High Schools Title II – Part D funds are used to purchase SuccessMaker licenses and provide professional development for SuccessMaker.)


Title III

Services are provided through the District, for education materials and ELL district support services on an as needed basis to improve the education of immigrant and English Language Learners.


Title X- Homeless

District Homeless Social Worker provides resources (Clothing, school supplies, social services referrals….) for students identified homeless under the McKinney-Vento Act to eliminate barriers for a free and appropriate education.


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

We have some SAI funds which will assist in tutoring for our level 1 and 2 students.????


Violence Prevention Programs

NMHS currently is providing anger management groups throughout the school year


Nutrition Programs

District oversees the nutritional programs for all schools


Housing Programs

N/A


Head Start

N/A


Adult Education

N/A


Career and Technical Education

NMHS offers several Career & Technical programs such as, agriculture, automotive, health occupations, criminal justice, TV production, and business. If students meet the qualifications established by the state, they can earn a Gold Seal Scholarship.

The Allied Health Major offers students the ability to complete the program and sit for the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) test. Upon successful completion, students begin their career directly out of high school, while continuing their education for higher certification.

NMHS Automotive program is NATEF certified which allows students to prepare for the work force by readying them to be ASE certified upon the completion of the program. It will also allow them to continue their career goals at the junior/community college level.

NMHS Business Technology Department is implementing the “Model Office Classroom”. A Model Office classroom is a unique educational environment that stimulates responsibility and character while emulating a work place atmosphere. Our goal is to provide a powerful student learning management system which validates master career skills, develops a high-level work ethic, fosters personal growth, encourages teamwork, and EMPOWERS students through choice, accountability, and competency-based learning and certifies competence in career and life skills.

Competency in the use of computers is a requirement for all degree seeking students at Central Florida Community College. One option to satisfy this requirement is satisfactory completion of a high school computer course which is equivalent to 3 credit hours at CFCC.
* On campus Dual Enrollment option potentially available.
* Completion of the Digital Design Program and the Web Design Program is equivalent to up to 12 credit hours at Santa Fe Community College.
* IC3 Certification and Adobe Certifications can be acquired through our Information Technology

We have a unique major area of interest in our Biotechnology Program. This program allows students to take courses that satisfy both their MAI and science credits while teaching them skills in the area of their career choice. Students will take classes in agriscience foundations, agriculture biotechnology, plant biotechnology, genetics, and agribusiness cooperative education.

Other Major Areas of Interest (MAI) at NMHS are:
Animal Science Services, Athletic Training, Air Force JROTC, Music, Public Service Education, Automotive, Television Production, Web Design, Art, and the AICE Diploma Option.


Job Training

Our special diploma ESE students have the ability to enroll in the Career Based Vocational Training (CBVT) program. This program allows students to go to worksites 5 days a week and learn valuable job skills.

We also have a Cooperative Education program where our students may gain credits while working at a job in the community.

NMHS also offers the Florida Ready to Work Program. Florida Ready to Work is a new employee credentialing program that tests – and scores – job skills and work habits. It gives jobseekers a competitive edge – a Credential that proves to employers that they have the right skills and the right attitude for the job. For employers, it takes the guesswork out of hiring, saving time and money. Florida Ready to Work is sponsored by the state of Florida, so there is no cost for employers or jobseekers to participate in the program. (http://floridareadytowork.com)


Other

N/A


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Kathy Quelland, Principal: Provides a common vision for the use of data-based decision-making, ensures that the school-based team is implementing RtI, conducts assessment of RtI skills of school staff, ensures implementation of intervention support and documentation, ensures adequate professional development to support RtI implementation, and communicates with parents regarding school-based RtI plans and activities.
Don Maier, Asst. Principal of Discipline: Participates in student data collection; Provide intervention with individual students. He will make parent contact and counseling to assist students in correcting their behavior. He will also facilitate the SAT meetings.
Select General Education Teachers (Secondary): Provides information about core instruction, participates in student data collection, delivers Tier 1 instruction/intervention, collaborates with SAT team to implement Tier 2 interventions, and integrates Tier 1 materials/instruction with Tier 2/3 activities.
Exceptional Student Education (ESE) Teachers: Participates in student data collection, integrates core instructional activities/materials into Tier 3 instruction, and collaborates with general education teachers through such activities as co-teaching. Teachers include: Karen Mackey, Thomas Luther, David Waters, Lawanna Howell, Colleen Blackburn, Raeanna Kramer, and Robert Panitzke.
Support facilitators: Develops, leads, and evaluates school core content standards/ programs; identifies and analyzes existing literature on scientifically based curriculum/behavior assessment and intervention approaches. Teachers include: Mary White, Connie Lightfoot, Kim Panitzke, Thomas Mitsunaga, Tara Diamond, Nikisha Augustine,
Identifies systematic patterns of student need while working with district personnel to identify appropriate, evidence-based intervention strategies; assists with whole school screening programs that provide early intervening services for children to be considered “at risk;” assists in the design and implementation for progress monitoring, data collection, and data analysis; participates in the design and delivery of professional development; and provides support for assessment and implementation monitoring.
Reading Instructional Specialist: Though this person is a district person, they Provide guidance on K-12 reading plan; assists in data analysis; provides professional development and technical assistance to teachers regarding data-based instructional planning for reading teachers and CAR-PD teachers.
School Psychologist-Stacy Heck: Participates in collection, interpretation, and analysis of data; facilitates development of intervention plans; provides support for intervention fidelity and documentation; provides professional development and technical assistance for problem-solving activities including data collection, data analysis, intervention planning, and program evaluation; facilitates data-based decision making activities.
Dean of students/ISS Teacher: Provide intervention with individual students. They will make parent contact and counseling to assist students in correcting their behavior.
Guidance Department: Assist individual students as per grade level assigned in changing behavior through counseling and academic assistance. They will also assist in parent contact and/or conferences.


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

The Leadership Team will focus meetings around one question: How do we develop and maintain a problem-solving system to bring out the best in our schools, our teachers, and in our students?

The team meets once a week to engage in the following activities:
Step 1: Problem Identification – identify and define the target problem
Step 2: Problem Analysis – attempt to determine why the problem is occurring
Step 3: Intervention Design - decide what is going to be done about the problem
Step 4: Response to Intervention –Monitor progress and determine “ Is it working?”
The implementation of SAT is a well defined process which begins with the completion of the SAT Request (STS # 35). The Marion County Student Assistance Team Packet steps the team through the process.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

The RtI Leadership Team met with the School Advisory Council (SAC) and principal to help develop the SIP. The team provided data on: Tier 1, 2, and 3 targets; academic and social/emotional areas that needed to be addressed; helped set clear expectations for instruction (Rigor, Relevance, Relationship); facilitated the development of a systemic approach to teaching (Gradual Release, Essential Questions, Activating Strategies, Teaching Strategies, Extending, Refining, and Summarizing); and aligned processes and procedures.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Baseline data: Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN), FAIR data, Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT)
Progress Monitoring: Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR), SRI, FCAs, FCAT Simulation
Midyear: Benchmark Assessment, Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR)
End of year: FAIR, FCAT
Frequency of Data Days: once a month for data analysis


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

The staff will be trained during early release days or the first staff development day on the calendar.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


Strengths
Writing: Tenth Grade is performing above district average for the percentage 9of level 3.5 and above.
Science: Eleventh graders are performing at state and district average in Life and Environmental Sciences.
Math: Ninth grade is performing at the state and district average for number sense, geometry, algebraic thinking, and data analysis. Tenth grade is performing at the state and district average for number sense.
Reading: Ninth grade is performing at the state and district average for words/phrases and comparisons.
Weaknesses
Science: Improvement is needed in physical and chemical sciences, earth and space sciences, and scientific thinking.
Math: Overall math scores are good, but improvement in each strand is needed to put us above the state and district average for both ninth and tenth grade. In tenth grade, geometry and measurement are particularly low.
Reading: Tenth grade reading scores dropped drastically over last year in all content areas.
We need to concentrate on our lowest quartile making the learning gains in both reading and math.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

The IFCs were revised in July 2009. The IFC will be updated in July 2010 as determined by disaggregated data results from the September previous year. The 2009 FCAT results were utilized to develop the IFCs.

Teachers will be responsible for determining the instructional focus of whole group lessons, and small group/differentiated instruction.

Benchmarks were selected as indicated by students’ strengths and weaknesses, which were measured by progress on class work assignments, assessments, and data results.

The duration of instruction for each Benchmark was determined by the amount of time allotted in the IFC to ensure that students are exposed to all Benchmarks prior to FCAT testing. Within the amount of time allotted in the IFC, teachers will provide instruction on each Benchmark, allow the students an opportunity to practice, assess the students’ knowledge, and then re-teach the Benchmark as indicated by student progress, either in a whole group or small group setting.

Administration will implement a continuous cycle of making classroom visitations, evaluating lesson plans, monitoring teacher data, and conducting data planning sessions with teachers to ensure that the IFC is being utilized and implemented effectively. Mentor teachers will also be assigned to teachers who are demonstrating signs of struggling with IFC implementation.

Teachers who are struggling with implementing the IFC will be provided additional opportunities to attend professional development sessions, have a mentor assigned to them, and participate in the process of observing other teachers who are successful. The department chairperson will provide additional assistance to the teacher. The teacher will utilize the support of their colleagues during monthly team meetings.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Science: Emphasis will be placed on all areas of science by grade level teachers. Most 11th grade students are enrolled in physical science or chemistry, but there may need to be an intensive review of earth/space science and scientific research by those teachers.
Math: For ninth grade students, number sense and measurement need the most work. Tenth grade students need more work on geometry and algebraic thinking as those are the areas of the test most heavily weighted.
Reading: Ninth grade will need to concentrate most on main idea/purpose and reference/research. Tenth grade will need to concentrate on words/phrases and main idea/purpose.


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

In analyzing the data, we have determined the teachers who have made the most learning gains with their students and have adjusted the master schedule as needed.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

The school offers students elective courses in art, business, technology, and career study. Many of these courses focus on job skills and offer students internships.

Teachers focus on 7 questions daily: What am I teaching? Why am I teaching this? How am I teaching? Why am I teaching that way? How are my students doing? How do I know how they are doing? What am I doing about the ones who aren’t doing well?

In addition, teachers use bell ringers to enforce the IFCs. Vocabulary is a large part of the lessons in all subject areas and grade levels.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

The College and Career Center is the place to coordinate all College and Career activities for the high school. Each Center has a College and Career Specialist that facilitates the activities for the Center. It is recommended that every student visit the Center at least once each year. The suggested list of activities to accomplish each year is as follows:

The CHOICES Planner Portfolio that each student begins during the middle school assessment will be updated each year at the student’s high school College & Career Center. Each high school has developed a plan to facilitate when students re-visit the lab to update their Plan and to participate in other career development activities: resume writing, post-secondary opportunities, College Placement (CPT) Test, Ready To Work Certification, career research, scholarships, and additional assessments.

The recommended second visit to the Center will incorporate Guidance to assist students in registration for the next grade level. Students will begin to incorporate their Electronic Personal Education Plan (ePEP) through FACTS.org and their CHOICES Planner Portfolio. With both of these resources students should have the information needed for easy registration to the next grade.

Every year, after FCAT testing, students and parents participate in Northside Night which exposes them to next year’s curriculum to inform their course selection.

During or after the Northside night, students and parents decide on the courses that best meet their needs. In some cases, students and/or parents may set a meeting with a counselor to decide what classes will be taken. Final course selection is sent home for parent’s signature.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


Grade level teachers and subject area teachers meet monthly to determine the areas of students’ strengths and weaknesses as demonstrated by class work assignments and assessment results. Lesson plans will be created for differentiated instruction, which provides lessons for all levels of students, below mastery, at mastery, and above mastery.

Best practices are shared at each of these meetings.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

Focus lessons are determined teacher by teacher from the information gained in the monthly subject area and grade level meetings. Teachers will use best practices to help implement the focus lessons. All teachers are required to implement the lessons using their class content.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

Student mastery based on FCAs (focus calendar assessments) will determine if the lessons are mastered or need to be re-taught. Data from these FCAs will be analyzed by administration and teachers on a monthly basis.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


Formative assessments for all students across the district include FAIR for reading and Focus Calendar Assessments for reading, math, and science. The FAIR assessment screen students three times a year. Students will be assessed with FCAs monthly. Four times a year students will be assessed in writing with Demand writing prompts provided by the district.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

The data from the FCAs are put into Pearson Benchmark. The teachers have access to see the data and will determine the focus lessons based on this data.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

Students at and above mastery level will receive opportunities to enhance or enrich current skills by participating in project activities, hands-on activities, or other supplemental lessons which will reinforce the skill and maintain the level of mastery/proficiency.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

Administrative staff will be in charge of a subject area and will facilitate the meetings. Grade level teachers and subject area teachers meet monthly (at different times) to determine the areas of students’ strengths and weaknesses as demonstrated by class work assignments and assessment results. Lesson plans will be created for differentiated instruction, which provides lessons for all levels of students, below mastery, at mastery, and above mastery.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

The Principal and Leadership Team will meet with teachers either during weekly meetings, or one-on-one to discuss assessment results and student progress. During these meetings, lesson plans, data binders, and student portfolios will be utilized to provide evidence of instruction, assessment, and differentiation to address individual student needs. Progress Monitoring logs will also be utilized to document the process of teaching, assessing, re-teaching, and re-assessing.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


North Marion High School offers a comprehensive curriculum which includes college preparatory, and general diploma studies. A specialized program in biotechnology, one of the few offered in the state of Florida is also offered here. We also have a team of tenth grade students who are part of the Power Standards group. This group of teachers uses hands-on performance type of assessments instead of the traditional paper and pencil assessments. In addition, a variety of career preparation programs are available to serve the needs of all students. Colts on Character Program provides students with character education as a character word is highlighted each month. Students write about the character traits and incorporate this in to each day. NMHS is the designated magnet school in Marion County for AICE Curriculum.
AICE: The top academic students at North Marion High School participate in the Advanced International Certificate of Education (AICE) program in the 11th and 12th grade years, with Pre-AICE (IGCSE) classes offered in the 9th and 10th grade years. Administered and examined by the University of Cambridge, England, students are required to sit for six exams with at least one exam in each of the three subject areas: Mathematics and Sciences, Languages, Arts and Humanities. Students choose three or more additional examinations from among all courses offered. The General Certificate of Education (GCE) courses are tested at both the Advanced Subsidiary (AS) and Advanced (A) Levels. Courses are identified by AICE. The 2007-2008 school year was the inception year for NMHS as a Cambridge International Center. Current courses offered in AICE include Mathematics, Biology, English Language, Thinking Skills, English Language, Literature and U.S. History. Passing grades range from “a” to “e”, with “a” being the highest.
Advanced Placement (AP) courses are offered in correlation with the AICE program. Examinations offered are Economics and American Government.
Dual Enrollment (DE) is offered through a cooperative program with Central Florida Community College in which students earn both high school and college credits. These courses are designated by college course numbers consisting of alpha-numeric designations.
Honors classe/Pre AICE classes are offered in Pre AICE English Language, Pre AICE English Literature, English III Honors, English IV Honors, Pre AICE Math 1-III, Algebra II honors, Trig and Analytic Geometry, Pre AICE Biology, Pre AICE Chemistry, Pre AICE World History, Anatomy and Physiology honors, American Government honors and Economics honors. These courses are identified by the letters “HON” or “Pre-AICE” and flagged on the transcript.
Intensive classes: We offer a variety of intensive reading and math classes to fit the needs of our students.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Resources from the state adopted materials which are designed for intensive instruction will be utilized. Technology will be utilized (ASCEND math program, FCAT explorer, etc.). Teachers will use best practices discussed in PLC to provide different methods of reaching non-mastery students. Those students who are consistently not mastering areas may be required to participate in after school tutoring sessions.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

Classroom Walkthroughs, formal observations, teacher input, and student performance/data analysis will determine the need for professional development sessions.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

Students who score a level 1 or 2 on the FCAT or students not making gains as determined by FCAs and progress monitoring will be targeted for intensive instruction in reading and math. Students may be offered after school tutoring sessions if the budget allows.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

Effectiveness will be determined by the FCA and Benchmark data, FAIR data, and results on classroom assessments. Students and parents will be given the information to do FCAT explorer on line.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

Students who typically exceed mastery levels participate in the school’s AICE or Pre-AICE program. Students also elect to enroll in foreign language and career/college prep electives.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

Teacher recommendation, FCAT scores, GPA, student interest all play a part in the identification process. Parents are free to set meetings with the guidance office and /or administration to determine what is best for the student.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
Reading Department Stacey Bush, Curriculum Coach Monthly 2nd Friday of the month at 8:10 Analyze the data from the Reading FCAs by individual students, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Share best practices.
School Reading Leadership Team Marth Pilcher Monthly 1st Friday of the month at 8:10 The school reading leadership team shares all the intensive reading students and supports reading across content areas. They monitor data of shared students, collaborate on best practices and lessons, sponsor incentive programs, and do action research. They also set up incentive programs for student body for reading goals.
Reading/English Department teachers Renee Jones, Asst. Principal of Curriculum Monthly 2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM Analyze the data from the Reading FCAs, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Assess vertical Curriculum alignment. Share best practices.
Social Studies department teachers Kathy Quelland, Principal Monthly 2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM Analyze the data from the Demand Writing, increase reading and writing skills. Share best practices.
Math department teachers Carol Sales, Asst. Principal of Instruction Monthly 2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM Analyze the data from the Math FCAs, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Assess vertical Curriculum alignment. Share best practices.
Science department teachers Don Maier, Asst. Principal of Discipline Monthly 2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM Analyze the data from the Science FCAs, discuss remediation and enrichment methods. Assess vertical Curriculum alignment. Share best practices.
Elective Teachers Kathy Quelland, Principal Monthly 2nd Monday of Month at 8:10 AM Analyze Data from Reading and math FCAs; discuss reading and writing in content areas.
Vocational teachers Lynn Nobles, Vocational Administrator Monthly 2nd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM Analyze Data from Reading and math FCAs; discuss reading and writing in content areas.
Teachers at each Grade level (9th -12th grade) Administrative Staff Monthly 3rd Tuesday of Month at 8:10 AM Discuss issues with students: who is struggling (attendance, behavior, grades, etc.) Share what is working in one class for individual students, etc.


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition

N/A


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.

North Marion High School’s percentage of graduates completing a college prep curriculum, enrolled in Algebra I course before 9th grade, completed at least one level 3 high school math course, and completed a Dual Enrollment (DE) math course were all below the district averages. Many of our students are enrolled in AICE classes as opposed to Dual enrollment as it is a better reflection for college acceptance. Distance to the college campus is overwhelming for some of our students. The administration feels that with our new AICE program these percentages will increase over the next couple of years.
In addition, the number of students scoring above college-level cut scores will improve with the more rigorous program. Our students’ scores are already above the state and district averages for the SAT college-level cut score.

When students enter high school their Career Plan can be the driving force behind their academic success. When students are focused on the future, they are successful and understand the requirements for their future.

The College and Career Center is the place to coordinate all College and Career activities for the high school. Each Center has a College and Career Specialist that facilitates the activities for the Center. It is recommended that every student visit the Center at least once each year. The suggested list of activities to accomplish each year is as follows:

The CHOICES Planner Portfolio that each student begins during the middle school assessment will be updated each year at the student’s high school College & Career Center. Each high school has developed a plan to facilitate when students re-visit the lab to update their Plan and to participate in other career development activities: resume writing, post-secondary opportunities, College Placement (CPT) Test, Ready To Work Certification, career research, scholarships, and additional assessments.

The recommended second visit to the Center will incorporate Guidance to assist students in registration for the next grade level. Students will begin to incorporate their Electronic Personal Education Plan (ePEP) through FACTS.org and their CHOICES Planner Portfolio. With both of these resources students should have the information needed for easy registration to the next grade.



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/12/2009 12:12:25 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
If SAC funds become available, they will be used for teacher grants of $500 or less per teacher as needed. 3000
If SAC funds become available, they will be used to print and mail parent newsletters home. 2000



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


SAC is the sole body responsible for final decision making at the school relating to implementation of the provisions in sections 1001.42 (16) and 1008.345 (School Improvement).

SAC members are either appointed (community members, students, administration) or elected (parents, teachers, students, support staff) to the committee at the beginning of each school year.

The SAC meets on a monthly basis and is composed of school administrators, students, teachers, business partners and community members. Some of the activities of the SAC include assisting in writing the school improvement plan, decisions regarding School Improvement Funds, policy development and discussions of school based concerns. In addition, the SAC supports teacher initiatives in the classroom and provides funding through grants if funds are available.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Quelland, Kathleen,   Principal
2)  Chesser, Dennis,   SAC Chair
3)  Moronta, Victoria,   Student
4)  Hall, Samantha,   Student
5)  Foster, Parker,   Student
6)  Jenkins, Victoria,   Student
7)  Foster, Diana,   Teacher
8)  Spencer, Dana,   Teacher
9)  Mackey, Karen,   Teacher
10)  McKinon, James,   Teacher
11)  Parker, Adam,   Business Member
12)  Graham, Hazel,   Parent
13)  Sapp, Tracy,   Parent
14)  Taylor, Kelli,   Parent
15)  Missell, Stephanie,   Parent
16)  Axson, Pete,   Parent
17)  Bennetch, Eileen,   Parent
18)  Bennetch, Sue,   Parent
19)  Watson, Karen,   Parent
20)  Burgess, Keann,   Parent
21)  Edge, Karen,   Parent
22)  Greene, Missy,   Parent
23)  Hanson, Kimberly,   Parent
24)  Harris, Bette,   Parent
25)  Jenkins, Connie,   Parent
26)  Kernan, Audrey,   Parent
27)  Looney, Rissette,   Parent
 

AYP DATA

No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Marion School District
NORTH MARION HIGH SCHOOL
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 35%  71%  77%  36%  219   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 43%  74%      117  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 40% (NO)  59% (YES)      99  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         435   
    Percent Tested = 98%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         D  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Marion School District
    NORTH MARION HIGH SCHOOL
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 43%  75%  81%  35%  234   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 53%  83%      136  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 47% (NO)  76% (YES)      123  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         503   
    Percent Tested = 98%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         B  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Marion School District
    NORTH MARION HIGH SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 31%  68%  77%  31%  207   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 40%  69%      109  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 34% (NO)  59% (YES)      93  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         419   
    Percent Tested = 98%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         D  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested