VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
The mission of Imagine School at North Manatee is to provide students a safe and equitable learning environment that fosters quality academics and positive character development.
Vision Statement
Imagine School at North Manatee is IMAGINE:
Individualized instruction to achieve learning gains.
Making a difference at home and in the community by creating productive citizens.
Achieving lifelong learners through child centered curriculum.
Gaining parental satfisfaction through involvement and decision making.
Instill shared values of integrity, justice and fun through daily experiences.
New school development to promote more opportunities in our growing society.
Ensure economic sustainability by operating within our means.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Brief History and Background of the School
Imagine School at North Manatee is a charter school in Manatee County that services students from Pre Kindergarten through Seventh grade. There are currently 240 students enrolled.
The 2009-10 school year will be the fourth year for Imagine School at North Manatee. Imagine Schools is a charter school management organization that believes that each of its schools should be strong in the areas of academic achievement, parent satisfaction, character development, economic sustainability, and participation in the development of new schools.
The purpose of Imagine Schools is to provide a strong educational service to the students, parents, and communities throughout the United States of America. The purpose of Imagine Schools is to assist parents and guardians by providing a quality education for their children. Three shared values guide our work:
(1)Integrity. Integrity means wholeness, or how things fit together. In the school setting it means we must balance the teaching and modeling of character development and academic achievement. Integrity drives us to live the same values outside the school as we do inside. It requires us to give the same priority to the wise use of resources as we give to developing virtuous characters and attaining academic success. Of course, it also means living up to our commitments to students, parents, and the local community. Integrity requires freedom mixed with responsibility and accountability.
(2)Justice. Justice means to each person what he or she deserves and to each person what is appropriate. Since each student, employee, parent, and organization with whom we interact is unique, each must receive special treatment. Justice does not mean sameness or equality, but that everyone is treated uniquely and appropriately.
(3)Fun. Imagine Schools strives to create the most fun and successful schools possible. The fun value requires extraordinary decentralization of decision-making to teachers, staff, and students to create a joy-filled school. Imagine Schools believes that each person was born to use his mind, heart, and physical skills to take actions, make decisions, and be held responsible for the results. Creating an environment where all stakeholders participate in educational, economic, and administrative decisions and take responsibility for the results is key to having an effective and enjoyable school.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Project CHILD (Changing How Instruction for Learning is Delivered) is a research-based teaching and learning system for grades K-5. The emphasis is on reading, writing, and mathematics. Science and social studies topics are incorporated throughout.
CHILD is a three-dimensional model that differs from the one-dimensional traditional model designed around a single teacher in a single grade. The CHILD triangulated design changes the traditional classroom in several dynamic ways.
Three teachers form cluster teams -- one teacher for reading, one for writing, and one for mathematics. Clusters teams work across three grade levels - K-2 for a primary cluster and 3-5 for an intermediate cluster. Teachers work with the same students for three years.
After direct instruction from the teacher, students work independently at three types of learning stations within their cluster. Students rotate to the three classrooms in their cluster. Each classroom has a Computer Station for technology-based work, a Textbook Station for paper/pencil work, and three Activity Stations for hands-on work. There is also a Teacher Station for small group tutorials and individual assistance.
The original research began in 1988 at Florida State University. Dr. Sally Butzin is the senior author. Since then there have been annual updates, along with numerous independent studies that document the effectiveness of the CHILD instructional system. CHILD students have significantly higher academic achievement and better behavior than their peers in traditional classrooms. Parent support and enthusiasm is also very high.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Imagine School at North Manatee has the opportunity to offer focused in house staff development due to the addition of a curriculum coordinator. She will assist us in building capacity within our school by training two on site coaches. We have also added a data coach whose role will be assist teachers in using assessment data to drive their classroom instruction.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
The demographics of the school are changing. These changes will have an impact on our subgroups.
Student Demographics
At Imagine School at North Manatee, currently approximately 20% of the student population receives free or reduced-price lunch, The breakdown of the school demographics is currently as follows: 66% White, 18% Hispanic, 10% African American, 4% Asian, and 2% Multiracial.
Student Attendance Rates
The student attendance rate at Imagine School at North Manatee is 94%.
Student Mobility
At Imagine School at North Manatee the mbility rate is 8%.
Student Suspension Rates
Only 2.9% of our students have been suspended.
Student Retention Rates
14? of our students have been retained.
Class Size
VPK: 18 students with one teacher and one aide, K-3: 18 students with one teacher, 4-7: 22 students with one teacher
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
We are a school of choice. Therefore, our Feeder Pattern is district wide.
Partnerships and Grants
Currently we are receiving Florida Department of Education Charter School Continuation Grant.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Kathleen Beauregard
|
Elementary Ed. K-6 and Ed. Leadership
BA: El. Ed
MA: Ed. Leadership
|
1
|
1
|
As a Staff Developer I worked with seven schools in the Pinellas County School District last year. All of the schools were in Region II. All schools received a school grade of A or B. Barmoor Elemenrary moved from a C to an A.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
| No data submitted |
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Partner with local colleges and universities Education Programs
|
Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Erin Bogie
|
El. Ed. K-6, English 5-9, Reading Endorsement
|
Self contained 6-7
|
Study group
|
|
Bethany Pisz
|
Temp Cert
|
Math/Science 3-5
|
Study Group
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 17 | 24 | 65 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Lisa Quiles
|
Marlen Perez
|
Lisa is the most expeirenced primary writing teacher on staff. Marlen is a first year writing teacher.
|
Subject area planning meetings, observations
|
|
Melissa Elbert
|
Edward Kreder
|
Melissa is the most experienced primary reading teacher on staff. Edward is a first year primary reading teacher.
|
Subject area planning meetings, observations
|
|
Beckie Britto
|
Bethany Pisz
|
Beckie is the most experienced intermediat math teacher on staff. Bethany is a first year intermediate math teacher.
|
Subject area planning meetings, observations
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part D
Title II
Title III
Title X- Homeless
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Violence Prevention Programs
Nutrition Programs
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Cluster
|
Cluster Leader
|
Monthly
|
Second Wednesday
|
Data Analysis
|
|
Subject Area
|
Cluster Leaders
|
Monthly
|
Third Wednesday
|
Lesson Study
|
|
Six Measures
|
Measure Leaders
|
Monthly
|
Fourth Wednesday
|
Schoolwide planning/anaylsis
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
The Voluntary Pre Kindergarten (VPK) program at Imagine School at North Manatee offers great lessons and activities that will prepare our young students for the rigors of our elementary school.
A great deal of emphasis is placed on providing the VPK students with a quality education. It is the school’s goal to see these VPK students progress their way through our elementary school and call Imagine School at North Manatee their school until they successfully complete our seventh grade.
Parent Involvement events for Transitioning Children into Kindergarten include Kindergarten Round Up. This event provides parents with an opportunity to meet the teachers and hear about the academic program. Parents are encouraged to complete the school registration procedure at this time to ensure that the child is able to start school on time.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
A. 160 students were tested in grades 3-6. 67% of tested students in grades 3-5 scored a level 3 or above on the reading portion of the FCAT. ..
|
By the end of the 2009-2010 academic year, we will have an increase of 2% in the number of students scoring at or above the proficiency level on the FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Instructional Focus Calendar
|
Principal
|
Data Analysis
|
FAIR
|
| 2 |
Small Group Teaching
|
Principal
|
Data Analysis
|
FAIR
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Progress Monitoring to increase proficiency levels of students
|
FAIR - PMRN
|
Dawn Bingham
|
August 18, 2009
|
Observation , Data Study, Lesson Study
|
Principal, Curriculum Coordinator
|
|
Small Group Instruction
|
Differentiated Learning
|
Dawn Bingham, Colleen Henderson
|
Sptember 30, 2009, October 1, 2009
|
Observation, Data Study, Lesson Study
|
Principal, Curriculum Cordinator, CHILD Consultant
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
All teachers in grades 6 and 7 will receive training on FAIR and PMRN in order to facilitate student progress.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| To provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-5. To provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-5 |
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Total: $11,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $11,000.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
160 students were tested in grades 3-5. 67% of tested students in grades 3-5 scored a level 3 or above.
|
By the end of the 2009-2010 academic year, we will have an increase of 5% in the number of students scoring at or above the proficiency level on the FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Small group instruction
|
Principal
|
Data Analysis
|
Benchmark Assessments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Small group Instruction
|
Differentiated Learning
|
Dawn Bingham, Colleen Henderson
|
November 10,2009
|
Data Analysis, Observation
|
Principal, Curriculum Coordinator, CHILD Consultant
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-5
|
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Total: $11,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $11,000.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
37 students were tested in 5th grade. 47% of tested students scored a level 3 or above on the science portion of the FCAT.
|
By the end of the 2009-2010 academic year, we will have an increase of 5% in the number of students scoring at or above the proficiency level on the Science portion of the FCAT
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Teach all strands
|
Principal
|
Collect Lesson Plans
|
Lesson Plan Books
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
All strands covered
|
Curriculum Guides
|
Colleen Henderson
|
September 16, 2009
|
Weekly Lesson Plans
|
Principal, Colleen Henderson
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-7 |
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Total: $11,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $11,000.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
41 students were tested in 4th grade. 75% of tested students in scored a level 3.5 or above on the Florida Writes.
|
By the end of the 2009-2010 academic year, we will have an increase of 4% in the number of students scoring at or above the proficiency level on the Writing portion of the FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Small group instruction
|
Principal
|
Observation, Data Analysis
|
District Assessment
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Samll group instruction
|
Differentiated instruction
|
Colleen Henderson, Dawn Bingham
|
Ongoing
|
Data Analysis
|
principal, Curriculum Coordinator
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-7 |
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Total: $11,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $11,000.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
67% of tested students in grades 3-5 scored a level 3 or above on the reading portion of the FCAT.
67% of tested students in grades 3-5 scored a level 3 or above on the math portion of the FCAT.
47% of tested students scored a level 3 or above on the science portion of the FCAT.
|
Increase the % of students scoring at or above grade level on the FCAT
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Encourage families to participate in Reading, Math and Science Nights held at school to provide parents ideas in how to help their students at home.
|
Principal
|
Sign in sheets, agendas, and workshop evaluations
|
Parent Survey 2010 and improved FCAT scores
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
To provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-5. To provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-5 |
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-5
|
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Writing |
provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-7 |
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Science |
provide training for teachers on the CHILD Instructional Delivery model used in grades K-7 |
Continuation Grant |
$11,000.00 |
| Total: $44,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $44,000.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
No. Disagree with the above statement.
Measures Being Taken to Comply with SAC Requirement
Advertising in the weekly school newsletter.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
Supplemental materials for interventions and science
|
1210
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Ms. Kathy Beauregard,
Principal
|
|
2)
Mrs. Michelle Grajewski,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Mrs. Beckie Britto,
Teacher
|
|
4)
Megan Husader,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Mrs. Nancy Schmidt,
Parent
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Manatee School District IMAGINE CHARTER SCHOOL AT NORTH MANATEE 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
71%
|
69%
|
84%
|
47%
|
271
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
73% |
47% |
|
|
120 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
73% (YES) |
47% (NO) |
|
|
120
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
511 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
B |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
No Data Found
No Data Found