VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
The mission for Veterans Park Academy for the Arts is: To develop and enrich each student to their highest potential through academics, athletics and the arts.
The vision of the School District of Lee County is: To be a world-class school system.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Veterans Park Academy for the Arts is a K - 8 school serving as the East Zone attractor school for the Arts. The school opened in August 2004, with an enrollment of 850 students. This year our enrollment is 1394 students. We also serve students with
Autism in 5 full time Autistic classrooms as well as one PreK ESE class.
We have 98 instructional staff members and 22 support personnel. Ninety-four teachers are highly qualified. The four teachers who are not highly qualified have compliance plans on file.
Veterans Park Academy for the Arts supports the Lee County School District's vision to be a world class school system. Our mission is to develop and enrich the whole child through academics, the arts, and athletics. Veterans Park is committed to providing students with a learning environment that is both academically rigorous and enriched by the arts. Our priorities are to increase student learning gains in all subject areas and to maintain our status of an 'A' school.
For the 2008-2009 school year Veterans Park made AYP in both reading and math.
Our goal for 2009-2010 is to make AYP for the second year in a row. Our long term goal is to increase the learning gains in all subgroups.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Veterans Park is privilege to have a dedicated and knowledgeable staff. The middle school staff will be sending home monthly newsletters to all parents. For the first time VPAA will have a school-wide writing plan to maintain the success achieved on the FCAT Writes.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Challenges that Veterans Park Academy of the Arts will face in the 2009-2010 school year are two new first year assistant principals as well as budget cuts although we have an increase in enrollment. Veteran's Park Student with Disabilities, Black, and Economically Disadvantaged subgroups will be our biggst challenge in achieving AYP in both reading and math.
Student Demographics
Elementary School Data
08/09 School Year
Total Minority 63.3%
ESE 15.8%
Gifted 1.5%
LEP 3.6%
F/R Lunch 61%
Middle School Data
08/09 School Year
Total Minority 63.6%
ESE 10.6%
Gifted 3.3%
LEP 5.1%
F/R Lunch 61%
Student Attendance Rates
95%
Student Mobility
Mobility
08/09 School Year
Elementary School 16.9%
Middle School 13.7%
Student Suspension Rates
07-08 08-09
Susp Bus Priv 19 37
In school suspension 325 177
Out of school susp 217 79
Veterans Park has reduced the number of out of school and in-school suspensions. We are on a positive trend of ensuring students remain in the classroom.
Student Retention Rates
Class Size
Pk-3 4-8
VETERANS PARK 16.03 18.69
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Veterans Park is a K-8 school. Our feeder school for Veteran's Park Middle is Veteran's Park Elementary
Partnerships and Grants
Veterans Park Academy for the Arts has an active partnership with Lee County Parks and Recreation. They participate in our career day as well as conduct sensitivity training, education on heroes and work with our special needs population. Many businesses participate in fundraising as well as job/career fair including but not limited to Publix, Elite Electrical Contractors, Il Primo Pizza and Wings, Country style Ice Cream, Gulf Coast Symphony.
Through grants VPAA acquired a climbing wall and a Weather bug station. The library started a "Friends of the Library" fundraising group, allowing friends and business to contribute to the library fund.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Dale Houchin
|
BS-Western Kentucky University MS-Western Kentucky University
|
2
|
15
|
Principal Of Veterans Park 2008-20010
Grade:A
Made AYP in all subgroups
|
|
Assis Principal
|
John Peters
|
BS- USF
MS- Nova Southeastern
|
3
|
5
|
Asst. Principal of Veterans Park 2008-2010
Grade: A
Made AYP in all subgroups
2007-2008
Grade: B
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Kelly Maniscalco
|
BS- Florida Southern College
MS- Nova Southeastern University
|
1
|
1
|
Assistant Principal Veterans Park 2009-2010
Grade: A
Made AYP in all subgroups
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Tracey Zenoniani
|
BS- University of South Florida
MS- Nova Southeastern University
|
1
|
1
|
Assistant Princial Veterans Park 2009-2010
Grade: A
Made AYP in all subgroups
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Reading
|
Tracy Duval
|
BA- Speech language Pathology MA Specific learning Disabilities K-12
|
2
|
6
|
Veterans Park 2008-2009
Grade:A
|
|
Reading
|
Michelle Mell
|
BS- Early Childhood ducation
M.Ed. -Early Childhood Education
National Board Certification
|
6
|
1
|
Veterans Park
2008-2009
Grade:A
Made AYP
2007-2008
Grade :B
Did not make AYP
2008-2009
Grade:A
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Regular meetings of new teachers with Assistant Principal
|
Tracey Zenoniani
|
On-going
|
|
|
Partnering new teachers to VPAA with Veteran staff
|
Tracey Zenoniani
|
On-going
|
|
|
Professional Learning Communtities
|
Asst. Principals
|
on-going
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Nick Erickson
|
Elementary K-6, ESE K-12
|
Reading
|
Nick is currently working on his reading endorsement.
|
|
Beau Voltz
|
Elementary k-6, ESE K-12
|
Reading
|
Beau is currently working on his reading endorsement.
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 98 | 4 | 32 | 36 | 28 | 17 | 92 | 10 | 3 | 3 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Rachel Locker
|
Anita Pender
|
Anita is a former reaing teacher with positive academic results
|
APPLES programs as well as weekly meetings to discuss evidence-based strategies.
|
|
Angela White
|
Joann Williams
|
Ms. Williams is a 5th grade teacher who has shown high performance in all levels.
|
APPLES programs as well as weekly meetings to discuss evidence-based strategies.
|
|
Katie Gallardo
|
Lori Spiers
|
Ms. Spiers is a 5th grade teacher who has shown high performance in all levels.
|
APPLES programs as well as weekly meetings to discuss evidence-based strategies.
|
|
Holly Baughman
|
Mercy Alonso
|
Ms. Alonso is a 3rd grade teacher who has shown high performance in all levels.
|
APPLES programs as well as weekly meetings to discuss evidence-based strategies.
|
|
Denise Shadrick
|
Michelle Mell
|
Ms. Mell is a former 4th grade teacher who has shown positive academic performance in all subjects.
|
APPLES programs as well as weekly meetings to discuss evidence-based strategies.
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I coordinates with other programs funded under NCLB through the SIP (School Improvement Plan) process.
The Foundation for Lee County Schools provides resources to teachers to enhance classroom instruction. They also are the liaison between business and community to build partnerships with schools. The Foundation sponsors a Collegium to recognize high quality instructional staff. This benefits the retention of teachers in Title I schools. The resources provided by the Foundation benefit students and teachers as well as enhancing the educational programs in the classrooms. All targeted subgroups of students benefit from these resources. These services will assist schools in increasing student achievement. Collaborative partners include Early Childhood Services (Headstart, VPK); Adult Education; Foundation for Lee County Schools; Youth Coalition; Edison College; Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part A coordinates with Title I, Part C to provide expanded academic enrichment opportunities to Migrant students. Services include after school tutorials in reading and math; health services; and literacy workshops for parents as a result of the coordination of these funds. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title I, Part D
The facilities and schools coordinate with health services (mental and physical) and other social services to meet the need of students returning back to their assigned educational facility. The district Health Services, Student Services, Title I, Title III and ESE departments are all a part of the collaborative effort. For example: social workers from student services has the process and procedures in place to assist students and their families with social services for food stamps and other health services; the ESE Department has established a memorandum of understanding for assistance with housing and counseling services through Ruth Cooper and the Lutheran Service; vocational instructors establish partnership with businesses so students will have an opportunity to continue to develop their vocational skill.
Title II
Title I coordinates with other programs funded under NCLB through the SIP (School Improvement Plan) process. Within this plan, schools complete a Professional Development Plan in collaboration with Title II. The PDP is concentrated in reading, math, science and writing to meet the needs of the targeted subgroups not making AYP. The PDP includes teachers, paraprofessionals, and administrators. As part of the School Advisory Council, parents are included in this planning process. Each school completes a needs assessment before writing goals for the year. School improvement plans are written to ensure compliance with all state and national regulations. This collaboration ensures that all programs funded under NCLB use funds to support schools, not supplant district obligations. All school improvement plans are reviewed at the district level for appropriate use of funds and effectiveness. This district level review prevents duplication of services and facilitates coordination between agencies. Each school's SIP is reviewed by all stakeholders and submitted to the Board for approval. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title III
Title I, Part A coordinates with Title III to expand academic enrichment opportunities for ELLs. These services include after school tutorials, professional development, supplemental scientifically research based resources and materials. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title X- Homeless
Title X coordinates with Title I, Part A, to provide comparable services to homeless children who are not attending Title I schools. By providing ongoing collaboration between Title X and Title I, Part A, program staff, the same services for homeless students in non Title I schools are provided to homeless students in Title I schools. In addition to serving homeless students not enrolled in Title I schools, set-aside funds are used to provide services to homeless students who are attending Title I schools. Homeless students who attend Title I school-wide or targeted assistance schools may have unique challenges that are not addressed by the regular Title I program at these schools. These challenges may create barriers to full participation in Title I programs and defeat the overarching program goal of helping all students meet challenging state standards. For instance, students residing in shelters, motels, or other overcrowded conditions may not have a quiet place to study at the end of the day and may require extended after-school library time; tutoring and/or accessibility to tutoring as needed, school supplies, expedited evaluations, extended days/ learning opportunities, Saturday schools, summer academic camps, coordination of services with shelters or other homeless service providers, or, a student who is dealing with the stress and anxiety associated with homelessness may not be able to focus on his or her studies and may benefit from school counseling services. Through Title I, Part A, or Title I, Part A, in conjunction with Title X, McKinney-Vento funding homeless students can take part in services that enable them to benefit more from a school’s Title I program
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
SAI is used to provide unique learning programs at schools. SAI funds are also used to fund summer school programs throughout the District. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Violence Prevention Programs
The Youth Coalitions within Lee County provide opportunities for partnerships between the District and other social services. These social services assist all at-risk students through after-school programs that include academic, social, and health services. Anticipated outcomes include a safe environment for children and increased academic achievement. Bullying prevention programs are offered throughout the District. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs
Nutrition Programs
Food and Nutrition Services offers healthy meals to all students. This includes ensuring that families are offered free and reduced lunch applications throughout the year. Many Title I schools have also developed “Backpack Programs” in which nutritious food is sent home in a backpack each weekend to struggling families to ensure that children and families have food throughout the week. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Housing Programs
Head Start
Activities with Early Childhood include three blended VPK/Title I classrooms for four-year olds. This is a voluntary program that identifies high-risk students to receive a full year of educational opportunities. The benefits for students include readiness for Kindergarten and focusing on building literacy for early reading skills. The expected outcome is for the four-year old who participates in the programs to be able to perform at the readiness level in all areas of the kindergarten readiness screening. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Adult Education
Adult Education partners with several Title I schools to offer ESOL classes for parents to learn English. Adult Education partners with Title I, Part A to offer paraprofessional classes to prepare paraprofessionals to take the qualifying test, ParaPro. Adult Education instructors review reading, math and writing skills, as well as test administration. Title I paraprofessionals benefit by becoming highly qualified as defined by NCLB. The benefit of these classes is to help the monolingual parents learn English so that they can become more self-sufficient. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Math 6-8
|
Tina Davis
|
No less than once per month
|
Wednesday afternoon
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, create CCE
|
|
Science 6-8
|
Josh Evans
|
No less than once per month
|
Wednesday afternoons
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create CCE.
|
|
Lang Arts 6-8
|
Suzette Esponda
|
No less than once per month
|
Wednesday afternoons
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create CCE.
|
|
Social Studies 6-8
|
Ryan O'Connell
|
No less than once per month
|
Tuesday afternoons
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create CCE.
|
|
Kindergarten
|
Melissa Wooten
|
Weekly
|
Common planning
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create common assessments.
|
|
1st grade
|
Rachel Watkins
|
Weekly
|
Common planning
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create common assessments.
|
|
2nd grade
|
Carrie Rewis
|
Weekly
|
Common planning period
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create common assessments.
|
|
3rd grade
|
Mercy Alonso
|
Weekly
|
Common planning period
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create common assessments.
|
|
4th grade
|
Melissa Johns
|
weekly
|
Common planning period
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create common assessments.
|
|
5th grade
|
Andrew Coffman
|
weekly
|
Common planning period
|
Analyze student progress, share best practices and strategies, and create common assessments.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
Orientation meetings will be held prior to the start of the school year for kindergarten students and their families to familiarize them with the school and expectations for the coming year.
All students are assessed prior to or upon entering within the areas of Basic Skills/School Readiness, Oral Language/Syntax, Print/Letter Knowledge, and Phonological Awareness/Processing.
Screening data will be collected and aggregated prior to September 10th, 2009. Data will be used to plan daily academic and social/emotional instruction for all students and for groups of students or individual students who may need intervention beyond core instruction. Core Kindergarten academic and behavioral instruction will include daily explicit instruction, modeling, guided practice and independent practice of all academic and/or social emotional skills identified by screening data. Social skills instruction will occur daily for 20 minutes using the Skills Streaming Curriculum and will be reinforced throughout the day through the use of a common language, re-teaching, and positive reinforcement of pro-social behavior.
Screening tools will be re-administered mid-year and at the end of the year in order to determine student learning gains in order to determine the need for changes to the instructional/intervention programs.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The Students with Disabilities subgroup scored 45% to meet AYP through Safe Harbor Criteria.
|
In 2009-2010 school year the Students with Disabilities subgroup will increase from 45% to 59% to meet AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school will implement the new FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
Asst. Principal and Reading Coaches
|
Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
FAIR assessments
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Reading and Language Arts classes.
|
Reading Coach, Language Arts Chair
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through FAIR assessments
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research Based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented.
|
Principal, Asst Principal, and Reading Coaches
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009 the 62% of Black subgroup were proficient making AYP through safe harbor.
|
In the 2009-2010 school year the black subgroup will increase from 62% to 66% meeting AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school will implement the new FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
Asst. Principal and Reading Coaches
|
Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
FAIR assessments
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Reading and Language Arts classes.
|
Reading Coach, Language Arts Chair
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through FAIR assessments
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research Based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented.
|
Principal, Asst Principal, and Reading Coaches
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009 the 61% of the Hispanic subgroup scored proficient earning AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
In the 2009-2010 school year the percentage of students scoring proficient in the Hispanic subgroup will increase from 61% to 65% meeting AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school will implement the new FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
Asst. Principal and Reading Coaches
|
Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
FAIR assessments
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Reading and Language Arts classes.
|
Reading Coach, Language Arts Chair
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through FAIR assessments.
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented
|
Asst. Principal and Reading Coaches
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009 the 63% of the Economically Disadvantaged subgroup scored proficient earning AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
In the 2009-2010 school year the percentage of students scoring proficient in the Economically Disadvantaged subgroup will increase from 63% to 67% meeting AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school will implement the new FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
Asst. Principal and Reading Coaches
|
Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
FAIR assessments
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Reading and Language Arts classes.
|
Reading Coach, Language Arts Chair
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through FAIR assessments
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented.
|
Principal, Asst Principal, and Reading Coaches
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009 the 45% of the Students with Disabilities subgroup scored proficient earning AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
In the 2009-2010 school year the percentage of students scoring proficient in the Economically Disadvantaged subgroup will increase from 45% to 51%meeting AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The school will implement the new FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
Asst. Principal and Reading Coaches
|
Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
FAIR assessments
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Reading and Language Arts classes
|
Reading Coach, Language Arts Chair
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through FAIR assessments
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research Based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented.
|
Principal, Asst Principal, and Reading Coaches
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
All Reading Objectives
|
Differentiated Instruction
|
Consultant
|
August 2009
|
Lesson Plans
Classroom Walkthrough
|
Principal, Asst. Principal, Reading Coach
|
|
All Reading Objectives
|
Achievement Series
|
Dept. Heads and Grade Level Chairs
|
October 2009
|
Common Course Assesments
Lesson Plans
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
|
All Reading Objectives
|
Professional Learning Communitities
|
Dept. Heads and Grade Level Chairs
|
On-going 2010-2011
|
Common Course Assessments.
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
|
All Reading Objectives
|
Choosing Excellence and CSI
|
Consultant
|
October 2011
|
Lesson Plans
walkthroughs
|
Principal Asst. Principals
|
|
All Reading Objectives
|
Macmillian/Treasures Training
|
Reading Specialist
|
On-going 2009-2010
|
Lesson plans walkthroughs
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
|
All Reading Objectives
|
Language! Training
|
Reading Specialist
|
on-going 2009-2010
|
Lesson plans walkthroughs
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
On a daily basis each middle school teacher will begin the day with a reading activity. Using Instructional Focus Calender all Social Studies and Science teachers will work on reading strategies through reading in the content area.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Computers |
Technology |
$30,000.00 |
| Doc Cameras |
Technology |
$9,360.00 |
| Projectors |
Technology |
$15,720.00 |
| Total: $55,080.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Kagan Cooperative Learning |
Title II |
$2,878.00 |
| Total: $2,878.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| A + Team |
ARRA |
$8,800.00 |
| Total: $8,800.00 |
| Final Total: $66,758.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2008-2009 58% of the Black subgroup scored proficient to meet AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
In 2009-2010 the percentage of the Black subgroup will increase from 58% to 63% to meet AYP through Safe Harbor Criteria.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Manipulatives and hands on activities will be used to teach concepts
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principal
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed as well as classroom walkthroughs.
|
Classroom walkthrough log to determine the frequency of use.
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Math classes
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principals
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through Common Course Assessment
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research Based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented
|
Principal, Asst Principal and math department chair
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2008-2009 62% of the Hispanic scored proficient to meet AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
In 2009-2010 the percentage of the Hispanic will increase from 62% to 66% meet AYP through Safe Harbor Criteria.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Manipulatives and hands on activities will be used to teach concepts
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principal
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during walkthroughs and will be submitted on a weekly basis.
|
Classroom walkthrough log to determine the frequency of use.
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Math classes
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principals
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through Common Course Assessments.
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research Based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented.
|
Principal, Asst Principal, and math department chair.
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2008-2009 61% of the Economically Disadvantaged scored proficient to meet AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
In 2009-2010 the percentage of the Economically Disadvantaged will increase from 61% to 65% meet AYP through Safe Harbor Criteria.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Manipulatives and hands on activities will be used to teach concepts.
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principal
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during walkthroughs and will be submitted on a weekly basis.
|
Classroom walkthrough log to determine the frequency of use.
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Math classes.
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principals
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through Common Course Assessments.
|
| 3 |
Marzano Research Based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be implemented.
|
Principal, Asst Principal, and math department chair.
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Classroom walkthrough logs to determine the frequency of strategy usage.
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2008-2009 52% of the Students with Disabilities scored proficient to meet AYP through Safe Harbor.
|
In 2009-2010 the percentage of the Students with Disabilities will increase from 52% to 57% meet AYP through Safe Harbor Criteria.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Manipulatives and hands on activities will be used to teach concepts.
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principal
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during walkthroughs and will be submitted on a weekly basis.
|
Classroom walkthrough log to determine the frequency of use.
|
| 2 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Math classes.
|
Math Department Chair and Asst. Principal
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through Common Course Assessments.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
All math objectives
|
Differentiated Instruction
|
Consultant
|
August 2010
|
Lesson Plans
Classroom Walkthrough
|
Principal, Asst. Principal, Reading Coach
|
|
All math objectives
|
Achievement Series
|
Consultant
|
October 2010
|
Common Course Assessments
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
|
All math objectives
|
Professional Learning Communitites
|
Dept Chairs,Grade Level Chairs, Asst Princials
|
On-going
August- June 2011
|
Lesson Plans, Journal and Classroom Walk throughs to observe strategies
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Sopris West Transitional Math Workbooks |
Materials |
$1,841.40 |
| Total: $1,841.40 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| computers |
Technology |
$30,000.00 |
| Total: $30,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Achievement Series training |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Calculators |
Materials |
$200.00 |
| Math Manipulatives |
Materials |
$500.00 |
| Total: $700.00 |
| Final Total: $32,541.40 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
On the 2008-2009 Science, 45% of the fifth and eighth grade students scored proficient.
|
On the 2009-2010 FCAT Science, students will increase proficiency scores as reported on State School Grade Report, increasing from 45% to 49%.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students will engage in hands on experiments in the science lab
|
Grade Level Chair, Principal, Asst. Principal.
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during walkthroughs and will be submitted on a weekly basis.
|
Classroom walkthrough log and focused walkthrough to determine the frequency of hands on experiments.
|
| 2 |
Marzano Research Based Instructional and Kagan Cooperative Learning Strategies will be used.
|
Grade Level Chair, Principal, Asst. Principal.
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during walkthroughs and will be submitted on a weekly basis.
|
Classroom walkthrough log and focused walkthrough to determine frequency of strategies being used.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
All science objectives
|
Professional Learning Communities
|
Dept Chairs,Grade Level Chairs, Asst Principals
|
On-going
August2010- June 2011
|
Lesson Plans
Classroom Walkthrough
|
Principal, Assistant Principal
|
|
All science objectives
|
Achievement series
|
Consultant
|
November 2010
|
Lesson Plans
Classroom Walkthrough
|
Principal, Assistant Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Smart Boards |
Technology |
$12,000.00 |
| Computers |
Technology |
$3,600.00 |
| Total: $15,600.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Integration of Math and Science Using the Weatherbug Training |
Tilte II |
$815.00 |
| Total: $815.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Chemical Cabinet |
Furniture/Materials |
$800.00 |
| Hands on lab materials |
Materials |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $1,800.00 |
| Final Total: $18,215.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
On the 2008-2009 Florida Writes, 95% of the students scored proficient.
|
On the 2009-2010 Florida Writes, 95% or more students will score proficient as measured by the School Grade Report.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Develop an Instructional Focus Calendar for Language Arts classes.
|
Language Arts Department Chair, Grae Level Chair, Principal,and Asst. Principal
|
Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through Common Course Assessments
|
| 2 |
Marzano researched Based Instructional Strategies will be used in all classrooms.
|
Language Arts Department Chair, Grade Level Chair, Principal,and Asst. Principal
|
Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be submitted weekly to Assistant Principal.
|
Effectiveness will be determined by school-wide quarterly writing assignments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
On the 2010-2011 Florida Writes, 95% or more students will score proficient.
|
Differentiated Instruction
|
Consultant
|
On going August 2010-June 2011
|
Lesson Plans
Classroom Walkthrough
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
|
On the 2010-2011 Florida Writes, 95% or more students will score proficient.
|
Professional Learning Communities
|
Dept Chairs, Grade Level Chairs, Asst Principals
|
On-going
August 2010- June 2011
|
Lesson Plans, Journal and Classroom Walkthroughs to observe strategies
|
Principal, Asst. Principal
|
|
On the 2010-2011 Florida Writes, 95% or more students will score proficient.
|
Just Writes
|
Kathy Robinson
|
On going August 2010- June 2011
|
Lesson Plans, Journal and Classroom Walkthroughs to observe strategies
|
Asst. Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| K-8 Writing materials |
Materials |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $1,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Computers |
Technology |
$30,000.00 |
| Total: $30,000.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Kathy Robinson Writing Training |
Title II |
$4,629.00 |
| Total: $4,629.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $35,629.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Suspected low parent attendance at academic and curricular activities
|
Establish baseline data of parent involvement at academic and curricular activities using the sign-in sheets at parent involvement oppurtunities.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Promote activities through parent link, newsletters, class websites
|
Asst. Principal
|
Hardcopies of newsletters, data on parent link, monitoring class websites
|
Data collection and parent communication notebook
|
| 2 |
Family Night
|
RTI Coordinator and teachers
|
Parent Survey
|
Results of Parent Survey
|
| 3 |
Parent Climate Survey
|
RTI Coordinator and Asst. Principal
|
Results of Parent Survey
|
Survey will be given three times a year results will be analyzed to determine needs.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Suspected low parent attendance at academic and curricular activities
|
Volunteer Training
|
Asst. Principal
|
on-going
|
Parent log and newsletters
|
Asst. Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Parent Involvement Training |
Title II |
$186.00 |
| Total: $186.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Printing costs of Newsletters/Surveys/Parent Climate |
Materials |
$600.00 |
| Total: $600.00 |
| Final Total: $786.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Mathematics |
Sopris West Transitional Math Workbooks |
Materials |
$1,841.40 |
| Writing |
K-8 Writing materials |
Materials |
$1,000.00 |
| Total: $2,841.40 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Computers |
Technology |
$30,000.00 |
| Reading |
Doc Cameras |
Technology |
$9,360.00 |
| Reading |
Projectors |
Technology |
$15,720.00 |
| Mathematics |
computers |
Technology |
$30,000.00 |
| Writing |
Computers |
Technology |
$30,000.00 |
| Science |
Smart Boards |
Technology |
$12,000.00 |
| Science |
Computers |
Technology |
$3,600.00 |
| Total: $130,680.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Kagan Cooperative Learning |
Title II |
$2,878.00 |
| Mathematics |
Achievement Series training |
|
$0.00 |
| Writing |
Kathy Robinson Writing Training |
Title II |
$4,629.00 |
| Science |
Integration of Math and Science Using the Weatherbug Training |
Tilte II |
$815.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Parent Involvement Training |
Title II |
$186.00 |
| Total: $8,508.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
A + Team |
ARRA |
$8,800.00 |
| Mathematics |
Calculators |
Materials |
$200.00 |
| Mathematics |
Math Manipulatives |
Materials |
$500.00 |
| Science |
Chemical Cabinet |
Furniture/Materials |
$800.00 |
| Science |
Hands on lab materials |
Materials |
$1,000.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Printing costs of Newsletters/Surveys/Parent Climate |
Materials |
$600.00 |
| Total: $11,900.00 |
| Final Total: $153,929.40 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 8/31/2009 8:41:21 AM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
Schools were not awarded SIP funds for the 2010-2011 school year
|
0
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The School Advisory Council of Veterans Park Academy for the Arts for the 2010-2011 school year would like to work in conjunction with the Parents in Action Group to increase parent and family involvement in all aspects of the school community. SAC approved the SIP at the August 2010 meeting.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Dale Houchin,
Principal
|
|
2)
Rachel Crackel,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Tonya Knight,
Teacher
|
|
4)
Diana Gordic,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Carlos Alonso,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Vicki Gohagen,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Randy Yelvington,
Business Member
|
|
8)
Jacqui Hill,
Parent
|
|
9)
Katherine Barnes,
Parent
|
|
10)
Kristen Prieto,
Parent
|
|
11)
Beverly Robinson,
Parent
|
|
12)
Wes Barnes,
Parent
|
|
13)
Vanessa Freire,
Parent
|
|
14)
Romona Gollman,
Parent
|
|
15)
Cheryl Scudder,
Parent
|
|
16)
Ruth Anglickis,
Community Member
|
|
17)
Teresa Rib,
School Support Personnel
|
|
18)
Carmen Rodriquez,
School Support Personnel
|
|
19)
Kelly Maniscalco,
Assistant Principal
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Lee School District VETERANS PARK ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
73%
|
70%
|
95%
|
45%
|
283
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
71% |
74% |
|
|
145 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
68% (YES) |
74% (YES) |
|
|
142
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
570 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Lee School District VETERANS PARK ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
64%
|
62%
|
84%
|
38%
|
248
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
58% |
67% |
|
|
125 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
66% (YES) |
71% (YES) |
|
|
137
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
510 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
B |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Lee School District VETERANS PARK ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
68%
|
63%
|
90%
|
38%
|
259
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
65% |
68% |
|
|
133 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
69% (YES) |
67% (YES) |
|
|
136
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |