VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Vision of the School District of Lee County: To be a world-class school system.
Mission: To establish a community of learners (students, parents, teachers) dedicated to meeting the academic, social, emotional, and creative needs of the school.
Belief: We believe in the "SWIM" motto at Rayma C. Page Elementary. Students are expected to Show respect, Welcome diversity, Improve daily, and Make responsible choices.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Rayma C. Page Elementary School is in its fifth year of existence. It is located in the south zone of Lee County and is named for the first woman ever elected to the Lee County School Board. Mrs. Page was a dedicated educator who served Lee County as Chairman of the School Board.
Rayma C. Page has a diverse student population. Our school demographic is as follows:
Total Enrollment: 650 Minority: 50.6% Majority: 49.4%
ESE (not gifted): 13.2%
Gifted: 1.69%
ESOL: 17.1%
Free and Reduced Price Lunch: 60%
Mobility Rate: 46.5%
School Grade 2005 - 2006: B
School Grade 2006 - 2007: A
School Grade 2007 - 2008: A
School Grade 2008 - 2009: A
The goal of Rayma C. Page is to develop a school environment that provides students opportunities to reach and exceed standards. Students are encouraged to think critically, interact appropriately and to work to their best potential. The faculty and staff lead students toward being disciplined, productive and informed individuals.
To support the goal of disciplined, productive students, the school is implementing the Positive Behavior Support System (PBS). In 2006 - 2007, RCPE received recognition as a model PBS elementary school. The school developed a school-wide system of support that includes proactive strategies for defining, teaching, and supporting appropriate student behaviors to create a positive school environment. To further promote PBS, classroom expectations were developed to coincide with our theme of dolphins. The expectations utilize the acronym SWIM which stands for Show respect - Welcome diversity - Improve daily - Make responsible choices. In building a community that supports students, we are thereby able to provide an environment that is conducive for learning.
Students at Rayma C. Page are provided a curriculum that supports the standards of the District and the State. The curriculum supports a 90 minute reading block, integrated units and differentiated instruction to meet the needs of the students. Technology is also utilized to assist in meeting the required standards. The school has various software programs available to improve students' reading and math levels. Technology is available in the classroom, in two computer labs and a wireless lab.
To promote community and ensure that parents stay informed, a monthly newsletter is sent home. Also, to promote parental involvement, the school has a Parent Teacher Organization (PTO). In addition, the school has elicited parent and community volunteers to assist with the daily activities of the school.
The faculty and staff of Rayma C. Page strive to create an environment that promotes student learning.
Organizational Structure
RCP has one principal and one assistant principal. The following staff members report to the principal: assistant principal, secretary to the principal, guidance counselor, behavioral specialist, reading specialist, building supervisor, school nurse, technology and media specialists, grade level chairs and Intensive Reading Teachers. The principal holds weekly faculty meetings, monthly grade level meetings, special group meetings and also communicates with all staff through a bi-weekly newsletter.
The assistant principal is reponsible for all scheduling textbook ordering, and safety; facilitates faculty meetings; and assists the principal in all matters relating school operations and the welfare of students and staff including discipline, budget and curriculum. The assistant principal is also responsible for holding meetings with new faculty members.
The guidance counselor communicates directly with students, parents, community agencies and educators and coordinates our RtI meetings.
The behavioral specialist communicates with all teachers on behavioral issues, parents when requested and students.
The Learning Resource Teacher communicates with educators in regards to the curriculum needs of the students and is a member of the RtI team, A+ team and SIP team.
The technology specialist communicates with both faculty and staff to provide both technology training and support.
The grade level chairs meet on a monthly basis to communicate school procedures and discuss student achievement. Classroom teachers communicate with students and parents. Student data is compared among grade level teachers and with administration.
Grade level teams meet weekly to plan curriculum and submit meeting minutes to the principal for review.
The secretary to the principal communicates with parents, office staff and faculty and educators. Office staff communicates with parents, students and faculty/staff.
The building supervisor works directly with the custodians to maintain the building and grounds.
Intensive Reading Teachers meet monthly to discuss successful strategies and ways to improve teaching. Student data is compared.
Feeder Pattern
The School District of Lee County is broken into three zones for the purpose of assigning students to schools. These three zones: East, South, and West are broken into sub-zones. Student residential addresses determine the zone and sub-zones the student is placed in. Our main feeder schools are Allen Park, Bonita Springs, Colonial, Edison Park, Franklin Park, Heights, Orangewood, Pinewoods, Ray V. Pottorf, San Carlos Park and Spring Creek.
Special Programs
The following special programs are available: inclusion model for ESOL instruction, differentiated and small group instruction, PreK/VE, ESE resource and part time gifted program. We also have three Supportive Behavior units, speech services, physical therapy, adaptive physical education and occupational therapy.
Unique/Facility Features
Rayma C. Page is unique because it is in a renovated K-Mart. It is located off US 41 and is surrounded by new businesses and housing developments.
The building was totally rebuilt and houses 52 classrooms, storage rooms, cafeteria, stage, 2 computer labs, science lab, art and music rooms, media center, television production studio, kitchen, staff lounge, offices, clinic, guidance center and 2 conference rooms. There are 3 support behavior units and one Pre K special education unit. Open areas include 2 playgrounds, one for Pre K and kindergarten and one for all other grade levels, a PE field, an outdoor PE pavilion basketball court and track. There are 3 parking areas. To ensure the safety of the students, the perimeter is enclosed in a chain link fence.
For the 2007 - 2008 school year, RCP received a school grade of "A". Adequate progress of the lowest 25% was made in reading (63%) and in math (73%).
Student Demographic
As of September, 2007, our total enrollment was 668 and student demographics are as follows: 42.6% White, 32.9% Hispanic, 19.3% Black and 5.2% Other Ethnicities.
As of September, 2008, our total enrollment is 650 and student demographics are as follows:
White 44.9%, Hispanic 32.9%, Black 14.7%, and 7.5% Other Ethnicities.
Our goal is to make A4 for the fourth year in a row through making AYP for the second year. We strive for increased achievement and improved academics and passion in teaching and an awareness of global knowledge for our students.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Title I ARRA
Identified as a Title I ARRA school in the Prevent 1 Category for Differentiated Accountability.
-Missed AYP for two consecutive years or a subsequent third year and have met at least 80% of AYP criteria.
-School implements interventions.
-Focused support and interventions for subgroups not making AYP
-District monitors progress and supports schools
Scheduling
Grouping leveled classroom teachers (IR and At/Above Grade Level) together for instructional and planning purposes. This will allow for grouping students across grade levels to meet student academic needs whether for remediation or enrichment. The use of shared planning time will allow for teachers to analyze data and make instructional decisions that will positively impact student achievement. This analysis will address individual student needs.
Faculty Changes
Placement of teachers for this year was based upon teachers' strengths to meet the needs of the grade level, increase student achievement and improve instruction.
Mrs. Denise Boring became the Assistant Principal after being the Reading/Curriculum Specialist at Rayma C. Page for the previous four years.
A Learning Resource Teacher has been assigned to Rayma C. Page after Title ARRA status allocated to Rayma C. Page. This position was assigned to Ms. Kenna Dawson who was a former intensive reading teacher at Rayma C. Page.
Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
For the pas two years (2007-2008 and 2008 - 2009) we have received Model School Status for PBS.
Awards
-Rayma C. Page Faculty's attendance was the highest in the county.
-David Martin, our art teacher, received Art Teacher of the Year Award for Lee County in 2008 - 2009.
-Jaime Arango, our building supervisor, was recognized for outstanding performance of properly maintaining our school.
AYP Subgroup Strengths
-Reading - Total, White, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged, Limited English Proficient and Student with Disabilities were above the target of 68%.
-Writing - The total writing score was 99% receiving 3.0 or above.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Although we have made AYP, the AYP and SIP Goals trend report, created by the Accountability, Research and Continuous Improvement Department, indicates that the following groups should be monitored to ensure that these groups reach their goal for 2009 - 2010 school year:
-Hispanic
-Limited Proficient
-Black
The following group did not meet the goal in Reading for 2008 - 2009 and will be monitored for 2009 - 2010
-Students with Disabilities
Student Demographics
Total Enrollment: 650 Minority: 50.6% Majority: 49.4%
ESE (not gifted): 13.2%
Gifted: 1.69%
ESOL: 17.1%
Free and Reduced Price Lunch: 60%
School Grade 2005 - 2006: B
School Grade 2006 - 2007: A
School Grade 2007 - 2008: A
School Grade 2008 - 2009: A
Student Attendance Rates
Daily attendance has increased over the past four years going from 91% to 96%. This is due to a combined effort of teachers, social worker home visits and office staff phone calls home. This year, plans are underway for positive reinforcement of attendance. We will implement quarterly "No Tardy" and "100% Attendance" parties as reinforcers.
Student Mobility
Mobility rate in 2005 - 2006 was at 121% and has decreased to 46.5% for 2008 - 2009.
Student Suspension Rates
2008 - 2009 School Year
ISS Events: 9 Days: 16 Students Contributing: 18
OSS Events: 71 Days: 115 Students Contributing: 42
2007 - 2008
ISS Events 51 Days: 28 Students Contributing: 39
OSS Events 128 Days: 261.5 Students Contributing: 70
Student Retention Rates
In 2007 - 2008, there were a total of 34 retainees.
In 2008 - 2009, there were a total of 47 retainees.
There was an increase by 12 retainees over the previous year. The increase is due to the effort of meeting the needs of our students in the lower grades. Data shows that students who are retained at an early age are more apt to show substantial learning gains.
Class Size
For the year 2008 - 2009, our class size were as follows:
Grades PK-03 = 16.86
Grades 4 - 8 = 16.44
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
The School District of Lee County is broken into three zones for the purpose of assigning students to schools. These three zones: East, South, and West are broken into sub-zones. Student residential addresses determine the zone and sub-zones the student is placed in. Our main feeder schools are Allen Park, Bonita Springs, Colonial, Edison Park, Franklin Park, Heights, Orangewood, Pinewoods, Ray V. Pottorf, San Carlos Park and Spring Creek.
Partnerships and Grants
RCP has also connected with various business partners: Beef O'Brady's, Publix, McDonald's, Mimi's, Arby's, Crispers, Jason's Deli, Domino's Pizza, Costco, Barnes and Nobles, Rotary South, Rotary Fort Myers, Kiwanis Club San Carlos, Dunkin Donuts, Chick-fil-A, Generations Roller Rink, Summit Church and Pelican Bay Development.
Dunkin Donuts and Chick-fil-A annually provides refreshments for the beginning of the year teacher and staff inservice days. In addition, Dunkin Donuts provides incentives throughout the year.
Costco provides backpacks and supplies for our students as does Summit Church.
Paul Page, widower of Rayma C. Page and member of Rotary Fort Myers, is a regular participant in RCP activities. he attends the quarterly awards ceremonies. Rotary of Fort Myers provides t-shirts for all honor roll recipients for these ceremonies.
Writing Grant - Allison Fortuna
A teacher grant was awarded through the Florida Humanities Council for a professional bilingual storyteller. The three day residency consisted of presentations and workshops for students in grades 2 - 5. The purpose was to bridge oral language skills with narrative writing.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Susan L. Caputo
|
BA in Psychology with a minor in Elementary Education from Newton College of the Sacred Heart
and Masters Degree in Elementary School Administration from Providence College
|
5
|
31
|
School Grade 2005 - 2006: B
School Grade 2006 - 2007: A -
School Grade 2007 - 2008: A
School Grade 2008 2009: A
% Meeting High Standards in Reading: 86%
% Meeting High Standards in Math: 82 %
% Meeting High Standards in Writing: 96%
% Meeting High Standards in Science:53%
% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 77%
% Making Learning Gains in Math: 74%
AYP: Met AMO in all subgroups in Reading and Math except SWD in Reading for 2008 - 2009.
Met AYP for 2008 - 2009, however, did not meet AYP for two previous years; therefore we are in Prevent I for the 2009 - 2010 school year.
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Denise Boring
|
Bachelors of Science in Elementary Education
Masters in Educational Leadership
|
5
|
|
No experience, this is her first year as an assistant principal.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
Reading
Math
|
Kenna Dawson
|
Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education
|
4
|
1
|
08 - 09
School Grade: A
AYP: yes
07-08
School Grade: A
AYP: No
06-07
School Grade: A
AYP: No
05-06
School Grade: B
AYP: n/a
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Regular meetings of new teachers with Assistant Principal
|
Asst. Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
Partnering new teachers or teachers with less than 3 years experience with veteran staff
|
Asst. Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
Ensuring that all teachers meet NCLB requirements and are a match to the school culture
|
Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
Strong, supportive administrative leadership
|
Principal & Assistant Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
High levels of teacher input over curriculum and instruction
|
Principal & Assistant Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Mariah Felici
|
ESE certified (does not have regular education certification)
|
Functional Skills
|
Will take Florida Certification test in September
|
|
Brian Geise
|
ESE certified (does not have regular education certification)
|
Exceptional Student Education - Supportive Behavior
|
Will take Florida Certification test in September
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 52 | 10 | 40 | 33 | 15 | 25 | 96 | 3 | 3 | 29 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Lisa Nungester
|
Jessica Drake
|
Lisa Nungester is the grade level chair with years of experience in Kindergarten.
|
The mentor and mentee meet bi-weekly in a professional learning community to discuss evidence-based strategies. The mentor is given release time to observe the mentee. Time is given for the feedback, coaching, and planning. The areas of academic, behavioral, communication and lesson plan development and delivery will be addressed.
|
|
Lisa Nungester
|
Brittany Bores
|
Lisa Nungester is the grade level chair with years of experience in Kindergarten.
|
same as above
|
|
Kenna Dawson
|
Brian Geise
|
Allison is ESE certified and a former SB teacher.
|
same as above
|
|
Lisa Nungester
|
Abby Baker
|
Lisa Nungester is the grade level chair with years of experience in Kindergarten.
|
same as above
|
|
Nancy Gibbons
|
Stephanie Riley
|
First Grade Level Chair and Intensive Reading experience
|
same as above
|
|
Francine Swickheimer
|
David Martin
|
Grade Level Chair and Intensive Reading experience
|
same as above
|
|
Jennifer Lias
|
Krista Gotwalt
|
Grade Level Chair
|
same as above
|
|
Lindsay Tomaras
|
Shannon Stahl
|
Grade Level Chair and Intensive Reading experience.
|
same as above
|
|
Andres Rodriguez
|
David Sanon
|
Grade Level Chair and Intensive Reading experience
|
same as above
|
|
Stephanie Lysiak
|
Kristen Dunne
|
Grade Level Chair
|
same as above
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I coordinates with other programs funded under NCLB through the SIP (School Improvement Plan) process.
The Foundation for Lee County Schools provides resources to teachers to enhance classroom instruction. They also are the liaison between business and community to build partnerships with schools. The Foundation sponsors a Collegium to recognize high quality instructional staff. This benefits the retention of teachers in Title I schools. The resources provided by the Foundation benefit students and teachers as well as enhancing the educational programs in the classrooms. All targeted subgroups of students benefit from these resources. These services will assist schools in increasing student achievement. Collaborative partners include Early Childhood Services (Headstart, VPK); Adult Education; Foundation for Lee County Schools; Youth Coalition; Edison College; Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part A coordinates with Title I, Part C to provide expanded academic enrichment opportunities to Migrant students. Services include after school tutorials in reading and math; health services; and literacy workshops for parents as a result of the coordination of these funds. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title I, Part D
The facilities and schools coordinate with health services (mental and physical) and other social services to meet the need of students returning back to their assigned educational facility. The district Health Services, Student Services, Title I, Title III and ESE departments are all a part of the collaborative effort. For example: social workers from student services has the process and procedures in place to assist students and their families with social services for food stamps and other health services; the ESE Department has established a memorandum of understanding for assistance with housing and counseling services through Ruth Cooper and the Lutheran Service; vocational instructors establish partnership with businesses so students will have an opportunity to continue to develop their vocational skill.
Title II
Title I coordinates with other programs funded under NCLB through the SIP (School Improvement Plan) process. Within this plan, schools complete a Professional Development Plan in collaboration with Title II. The PDP is concentrated in reading, math, science and writing to meet the needs of the targeted subgroups not making AYP. The PDP includes teachers, paraprofessionals, and administrators. As part of the School Advisory Council, parents are included in this planning process. Each school completes a needs assessment before writing goals for the year. School improvement plans are written to ensure compliance with all state and national regulations. This collaboration ensures that all programs funded under NCLB use funds to support schools, not supplant district obligations. All school improvement plans are reviewed at the district level for appropriate use of funds and effectiveness. This district level review prevents duplication of services and facilitates coordination between agencies. Each school's SIP is reviewed by all stakeholders and submitted to the Board for approval. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title III
Title I, Part A coordinates with Title III to expand academic enrichment opportunities for ELLs. These services include after school tutorials, professional development, supplemental scientifically research based resources and materials. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Title X- Homeless
Title X coordinates with Title I, Part A, to provide comparable services to homeless children who are not attending Title I schools. By providing ongoing collaboration between Title X and Title I, Part A, program staff, the same services for homeless students in non Title I schools are provided to homeless students in Title I schools. In addition to serving homeless students not enrolled in Title I schools, set-aside funds are used to provide services to homeless students who are attending Title I schools. Homeless students who attend Title I school-wide or targeted assistance schools may have unique challenges that are not addressed by the regular Title I program at these schools. These challenges may create barriers to full participation in Title I programs and defeat the overarching program goal of helping all students meet challenging state standards. For instance, students residing in shelters, motels, or other overcrowded conditions may not have a quiet place to study at the end of the day and may require extended after-school library time; tutoring and/or accessibility to tutoring as needed, school supplies, expedited evaluations, extended days/ learning opportunities, Saturday schools, summer academic camps, coordination of services with shelters or other homeless service providers, or, a student who is dealing with the stress and anxiety associated with homelessness may not be able to focus on his or her studies and may benefit from school counseling services. Through Title I, Part A, or Title I, Part A, in conjunction with Title X, McKinney-Vento funding homeless students can take part in services that enable them to benefit more from a school’s Title I program.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
SAI is used to provide unique learning programs at schools. SAI funds are also used to fund summer school programs throughout the District. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Violence Prevention Programs
The Youth Coalitions within Lee County provide opportunities for partnerships between the District and other social services. These social services assist all at-risk students through after-school programs that include academic, social, and health services. Anticipated outcomes include a safe environment for children and increased academic achievement. Bullying prevention programs are offered throughout the District. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Nutrition Programs
Food and Nutrition Services offers healthy meals to all students. This includes ensuring that families are offered free and reduced lunch applications throughout the year. Many Title I schools have also developed “Backpack Programs” in which nutritious food is sent home in a backpack each weekend to struggling families to ensure that children and families have food throughout the week. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Housing Programs
Head Start
Activities with Early Childhood include three blended VPK/Title I classrooms for four-year olds. This is a voluntary program that identifies high-risk students to receive a full year of educational opportunities. The benefits for students include readiness for Kindergarten and focusing on building literacy for early reading skills. The expected outcome is for the four-year old who participates in the programs to be able to perform at the readiness level in all areas of the kindergarten readiness screening. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Adult Education
Adult Education partners with several Title I schools to offer ESOL classes for parents to learn English. Adult Education partners with Title I, Part A to offer paraprofessional classes to prepare paraprofessionals to take the qualifying test, ParaPro. Adult Education instructors review reading, math and writing skills, as well as test administration. Title I paraprofessionals benefit by becoming highly qualified as defined by NCLB. The benefit of these classes is to help the monolingual parents learn English so that they can become more self-sufficient. Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Periodic district level meetings with managers of all programs funded under NCLB also open lines of communication and encourage cooperation between programs.
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Kindergarten
|
Grade Level Chair
|
Monthly
|
Tuesday before or after school or during common planning time.
|
Read Well small group assessments, weekly tests, Walk to Read, enrichment lessons
Increase student achievement at each grade level, provide behavior support, and analyze common assessments.
|
|
Grades 1 - 5
|
Grade Level Chairs
|
Monthly
|
Thursday's once month at grade level meetings
|
MacMillan and SRA weekly and monthly assessments and enrichment lessons
Increase student achievement at each grade level, provide behavior support, and analyze common assessments.
|
|
A+ Team: Comprised of representation from all grade levels K-5.
|
Kenna Dawson
|
Bi-Weekly
|
Every other Tuesday, 4:00 - 6:00 p.m.
|
Data Analysis of assessments and review of implementation of SIP and CNA.
|
|
PBS; Comprised of representation from all grade levels K-5
|
Allison Fortuna
|
Monthly
|
Last Wednesday of every month
|
Review of student referral data on Pinnacle Analytics. Decrease the number of referrals & provide teachers with support on classroom management and behavior.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
Orientation meetings will be held prior to the start of the school year for kindergarten students and their families in May to familiarize them with the school and expectations for the coming year.
All new students are assessed in Readingprior to or upon entering RCP.
Screening data will be collected and aggregated prior to September 10th, 2009. Data will be used for progressive placement and to plan daily social/emotional instruction for all students and for groups of students or individual students who may need intervention beyond core instruction. 0Kindergarten academic and behavioral instruction will include daily explicit instruction, modeling, guided practice and independent practice of all academic and/or social emotional skills identified by screening data. Social skills instruction will occur daily for 20 minutes using the Skills Streaming Curriculum and will be reinforced throughout the day through the use of a common language, re-teaching, and positive behavior strategies.
Rayma C. Page has one PreK/VE classroom. These students enjoy the use of our cafeteria for breakfast and lunch; thereby, becoming acclimated to the school environment. In addition, they share the kindergarten play area. They are invited to attend Open Houses, Family Nights and assemblies.
All incoming kindergarten and new students will be invited to attend the Arts, Science and Tech Fair and an orientation in the spring. Parents and students will be provided information regarding RCPE.
Screening tools will be re-administered weekly, quarterly, mid-year and at the end of the year in order to determine student learning gains in order to determine the need for changes to the instructional/intervention programs.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
1. SWD at RCP scored 61% at or above grade level in Reading (target 65%).
2. According to trend data, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged and ELL students are at risk of not meeting AYP in 2010.
|
Increase SWD from 61% to 65% at or above grade level as reported on AYP to meet Safe Harbor criteria for AYP.
Increase Hispanic students from 69% to 72% at or above grade level as reported on AYP.
Increase Economically Disadvantaged students from 77% to 79% at or above grade level according to AYP and SIP Goals
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. The school will implement the new FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
2. Continue with small group instruction and progressive grouping while addressing the targeted needs of the students. Instruction will focus on increasing vocabulary, higher leve l questioning and Five Fab.
3. Implement SRA Signature Series to instruct students who are one year or more below level.
|
1. Learning Resource Teacher, Principal, Assistant Principal, Classroom Teachers
2. Learning Resource Teacher, Principal, Assistant Principal, Classroom Teachers
3. Learning Resource Teacher, Classroom Teacher
|
1. Review FAIR data reports to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
2. Lesson plans will be reviewed during classroom walkthroughs and will be monitored monthly and submitted to Princiap and Assistant Principal.
3. Administration will be aware of the IFC’s upcoming focus and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
1. FAIR assessments
2. Classroom walkthrough chart and focused walkthroughs to determine focus of small groups and team meetings.
3.Effectiveness will be determined through FAIR assessments. In addition, monthly meetings are held with IR teachers.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
1. SWD at RCP scored 61% at or above grade level in Reading (target 65%).
|
FAIR Training
|
Denise Boring
and Francine Swickheimer
|
August 2009
|
Administration of the FAIR Test
Understanding the Results
Implementation of Strategies to improve instruction.
Meetings to be held to discuss individual student results
|
Assitant Principal and Principal
|
|
2. According to trend data, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged and ELL students are at risk of not meeting AYP in 2010.
|
Vocabulary Development
|
Kenna Dawson, Learning Resource Teacher
|
September 2009
|
Learning Resource Teacher will visit classrooms to monitor vocabulary instruction.
|
Learning Resource Teacher Assitant Principal and Principal
|
|
3. According to trend data, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged and ELL students are at risk of not meeting AYP in 2010.
|
Rapid Word Recognition
|
Denise Boring, Francine Swickheimer, Virginia Pittendreigh, Kenna Dawson, Scherli Mosberger
|
October 2009
|
Learning Resource Teacher will visit classrooms to monitor vocabulary instruction.
|
Learning Resource Teacher Assitant Principal and Principal
|
1. SWD at RCP scored 61% at or above grade level in Reading (target 65%).
2. According to trend data, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged and ELL students are at risk of not meeting AYP in 2010.
|
Setting Student Expectations to Foster Excellence
Vocabulary and Reading in the Content Areas
|
Consultants of Ron Clark Academy
|
October, 2009
|
Review and Implementation of strategies learned at Ron Clark Academy
|
Assitant Principal and Principal
|
1. SWD at RCP scored 61% at or above grade level in Reading (target 65%).
2. According to trend data, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged and ELL students are at risk of not meeting AYP in 2010.
|
Cooperative Learning throughout Content Areas
|
Kagan Consultant
|
February, 2010
|
Classroom walk-throughs and review of lesson plans to review the implementation of Kagan strategies.
|
Assitant Principal and Principal
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Saxon Phonics refills |
Textbook Funds |
$1,002.21 |
| SRA Signature |
District Funds |
$30,000.00 |
| Read Well |
Textbook Funds |
$8,414.35 |
| FCATS and Dogs |
Textbook Funds |
$1,072.50 |
| Measuring Up |
Textbook Funds |
$1,845.76 |
| Total: $42,334.82 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Vocabulary Development Activities |
Title II Funds |
$153.00 |
| Rapid Word Recognition |
Title II Funds |
$333.00 |
| Setting Student Expectations to Foster Excellence Vocabulary and Reading in the Content Areas (Kagan: Accelerating Achievement) |
Title I & II Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Cooperative Learning throughout Content Areas (Kagan WIN-WIN Discipline) |
Title I & II Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Total: $10,486.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $52,820.82 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on analysis of points earned in different strands tested on FCAT Math, we will focus on the following areas: Number sense; algebraic expressions; multi-step word problems; extended response; math vocabulary; data analysis.
|
Increase FCAT Math scores from 81% to 83% for all students at or above grade level.
Increase SWD from 74% to 76% at or above grade level according to AYP and SIP Goals
Increase ELL students from 84% to 86% at or above grade level according to AYP and SIP Goals
Increase Hispanic students from 75% to 77% at or above grade level as reported on AYP.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Rayma Page will utilize District Math Assessments to monitor student progress
2.Rayma Page's Learning Resource Teacher, Classroom Teachers and Asst. Principal will target students in subgroups and provide additional math strategies targeting the above mentioned strands.
3. First Grade will use Math Facts in a Flash to track basic fact skills.
Grades 2 - 5 will use FASTT Math which will track basic fact skills
4. Teachers will utilize the District Academic Plan
5. Teachers will utilize Scott Foresman Math Series, Voyages Math and utilize supplemental math materials to meet instructional needs.
|
Principal, Asst. Principal, Learning Resource Teacher and Classroom Teachers
|
1. Anaylsis of 08-09 Math FCAT data
2. Math Chapter Test
3. District Math Assessments
4. 09-10 FCAT Math
|
1. 09-10 FCAT Assessment
2. District Math Assessments
3. Scott Foresman, Voyages, Teacher-created Chapter Tests
4. Exam View-Standard Based Test
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
Increase FCAT Math scores from 81% to 83% for all students at or above grade level.
Increase SWD from 74% to 76% at or above grade level according to AYP and SIP Goals
Increase ELL students from 84% to 86% at or above grade level according to AYP and SIP Goals
Increase Hispanic students from 75% to 77% at or above grade level as reported on AYP meet Safe Harbor criteria for AYP.
|
Hands On Equations
|
Denise Boring, Assistant Principal and former Math Coordinator for the School District and in Orange County
|
October 2009
|
Asst. Principal will demonstrate lessons in classrooms and observe teachers implementing the strategies that address the targeted strands.
|
Asst. Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Scott Foresman |
Textbook Funds |
$11,398.45 |
| Voyages |
Textbook Funds |
$3,212.51 |
| Measuring Up |
Textbook Funds |
$174.90 |
| Calendar Math |
Supply Funds |
$1,316.70 |
| Total: $16,102.56 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Hands On Equations |
Title I Funds |
$72.00 |
| Mastering Basic Facts through Games provided by Laurene Delikat |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $72.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $16,174.56 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009, 53% of students in 5th grade achieved levels 3-5 on the FCAT Science test as reported by the School Grade Report
|
In 2009, 53% of RCP 5th grade students scored at or above grade level, which is a 33% increase over the most recent 4-year tracking period.
In 2009-2010, 5th grade students scoring in levels 3-5 will increase from 53% to 57% as reported by the School Grade Report.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Utilize hands-on laboratory experiments two times per week.
2. Provide real-world science experiences and engaging activities.
3. Provide reading material focused on the science content being studied in lab activities. In addition, instruction focused on content area reading strategies will be provided.
|
1. Principal, Asst. Principal and Science Coach
2. Principal and Science Coach
3. Teachers and Science Coach
|
1. The created lab schedule will be implemented with fidelity and monitored by the Principal.
2. Baseline and midyear tests, as well as ongoing formative assessments will be given to monitor student progress and inform continuing instruction.
3. Grade-level teams will review results of common assessment data every 6 weeks to determine progress toward benchmark (75% on common assessment).
|
1. Improvement on the science mini-assessments.
2. Improvement on the science baseline and midyear tests.
3. Common assessments tied to Florida Science Standards administered weekly
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
In 2009, 53% of students in 5th grade achieved levels 3-5 on the FCAT Science test as reported by the School Grade Report
|
Grade levels met and outlined lesson plans based on the district's academic plan objectives and goals for Science. With the guidance of the the Science Coach, teachers outlined assessments to go along with the academic plan, goals and objectives.
|
Ann Franke
|
June 2009
|
Common Grade Level Assessments
|
Science Coach, Principal and Asst. Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Houghton-Mifflin ScienceSaurus |
Textbook Funds |
$977.50 |
| Harcourt Science |
Textbook Funds |
$1,431.22 |
| Science Tradebooks |
Textbook Funds |
$443.69 |
| Total: $2,852.41 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| BrainPop and BrainPop Jr. |
PTO and Fee-Based Funds |
$1,500.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $4,352.41 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on FCAT Writing results we will continue to implement Writer's in Control that focuses on expository and narrative writing along with elaboration and sentence structure.
|
In 2008 – 2009, students scored 97%.
Sustain a minimum of 90% proficiency or above as reported on the AYP report.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Rayma C. Page will continue to implement Writer's in Control for grades K-5.
2. Fourth Grade teachers will utilize the Razzle Dazzle program written by Melissa Forney.
|
Stephanie Lysiak and Allison Fortuna
|
1. 09-10 FCAT Writes Data
2. Monthly writing prompts
3. Lesson Plans will be reviewed by Administration.
|
1. 09-10 FCAT Writes
2. Pre, Mid and Post Writing Assessments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
In 2008 – 2009, students scored 97%.
Sustain a minimum of 90% proficiency or above as reported on the AYP report.
|
Razzle Dazzle
|
Allison Fortuna and Stephanie Lysiak
|
October 2009
|
1. 09-10 FCAT Results
2. Monthly writing assessments
3. Grade Level Meetings
4. Pre, Mid and Post Writing Assessments
|
Principal and Asst. Principal
|
In 2008 – 2009, students scored 97%.
Sustain a minimum of 90% proficiency or above as reported on the AYP report.
|
Writer's in Control (for new teachers)
|
Stephanie Lysiak
|
Septemeber 2009
|
1. Monthly writing assessments
2. Grade Level Meetings
3. Pre, Mid and Post Writing Assessments
|
Principal, Asst. Principal and Classroom Teachers
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Teacher Resources for Writing |
Title II |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Writer's in Control |
Title II Funds |
$134.00 |
| Melissa Forney: Razzle Dazzle |
Fee Based Funds |
$400.00 |
| Total: $534.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $1,034.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Staff at Rayma C. Page Elementary indicated a need to strengthen and expand parental involvement in the education of our students. This will continue to increase student achievement. The 2009-2010 school year will be used to collect base-line data on parent attendance at parent academic workshops.
|
To develop base-line data of parent participation in school activities and parent workshops.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Rayma C. Page will offer a variety of interactive parent workshop trainings in the areas of Reading, Math, Writing, Science and PBS.
2. Promote attendence at Curriculum Night and parent workshops through PTO, SAC, Newsletters, Parent Link and notes home to parents in multiple languages.
3. Collection of base-line attendance data.
|
1. Administrative Team
2. Teachers
3. Parent Involvement Coordinator-Lindsay Tomaras
|
1. Parent Survey
|
1. Parent Survey
2. Agenda and Attendance Records of parent involvement
3. Monitor Parent Link usage
4. FCAT scores Reading, Writing and Math for grades 3-5
5. Sat 10 scores for K-2
6. Volunteer attendance records
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Training on Parent Link for parents
|
How to utilize the Parent Link system
|
Melissa Robinson, Technology Specialist
|
October, 2009
|
Parent Link usage
|
Melissa Robinson, Technology Specialist
|
|
Parent training on analyzing FCAT and SAT 10 data
|
How to read and understand FCAT and SAT 10 data
|
Kenna Dawson, Learning Resource Teacher and staff memebers
|
January 2009
|
Parent Survey
|
Kenna Dawson, Learning Resource Teacher
|
|
Volunteer Orientation for parent and community volunteers
|
Expectations and procedures to follow for volunteers
|
Lindsay Tomaras, Parent Involvement Coordinator
|
October, 2009
|
Agenda and attendance sign-in sheets
|
Lindsay Tomaras, Parent Involvement Coordinator
|
|
Parenting program offered by the Social Worker
|
Program Used: Nurturing Program Handbook written by: Stephen and Julian Bavolek; in addition, other resources from the District's Parent Center
|
Dorothy Lauber, Social Worker
|
November, 2009
|
Agenda and attendance sign-in sheets
|
Dorothy Lauber, Social Worker
|
|
Positive Behavior Support and implementation of Ron Clark's philosophy at RCP
|
PBS and integration of Ron Clark's Essential 55
|
PBS Team and the Ron Clark Team
|
September, 2009
|
Agenda and attendance sign-in sheets
|
PBS Team and the Ron Clark Team
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Copy Paper (3 boxes) |
School Budget |
$90.00 |
| Total: $90.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $90.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Saxon Phonics refills |
Textbook Funds |
$1,002.21 |
| Reading |
SRA Signature |
District Funds |
$30,000.00 |
| Reading |
Read Well |
Textbook Funds |
$8,414.35 |
| Reading |
FCATS and Dogs |
Textbook Funds |
$1,072.50 |
| Reading |
Measuring Up |
Textbook Funds |
$1,845.76 |
| Mathematics |
Scott Foresman |
Textbook Funds |
$11,398.45 |
| Mathematics |
Voyages |
Textbook Funds |
$3,212.51 |
| Mathematics |
Measuring Up |
Textbook Funds |
$174.90 |
| Mathematics |
Calendar Math |
Supply Funds |
$1,316.70 |
| Writing |
Teacher Resources for Writing |
Title II |
$500.00 |
| Science |
Houghton-Mifflin ScienceSaurus |
Textbook Funds |
$977.50 |
| Science |
Harcourt Science |
Textbook Funds |
$1,431.22 |
| Science |
Science Tradebooks |
Textbook Funds |
$443.69 |
| Parental Involvement |
Copy Paper (3 boxes) |
School Budget |
$90.00 |
| Total: $61,879.79 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Science |
BrainPop and BrainPop Jr. |
PTO and Fee-Based Funds |
$1,500.00 |
| Total: $1,500.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Vocabulary Development Activities |
Title II Funds |
$153.00 |
| Reading |
Rapid Word Recognition |
Title II Funds |
$333.00 |
| Reading |
Setting Student Expectations to Foster Excellence Vocabulary and Reading in the Content Areas (Kagan: Accelerating Achievement) |
Title I & II Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Reading |
Cooperative Learning throughout Content Areas (Kagan WIN-WIN Discipline) |
Title I & II Funds |
$5,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Hands On Equations |
Title I Funds |
$72.00 |
| Mathematics |
Mastering Basic Facts through Games provided by Laurene Delikat |
|
$0.00 |
| Writing |
Writer's in Control |
Title II Funds |
$134.00 |
| Writing |
Melissa Forney: Razzle Dazzle |
Fee Based Funds |
$400.00 |
| Total: $11,092.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $74,471.79 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 8/28/2009 7:11:30 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
Schools were not awarded SIP funds for the 2009-2010 school year.
|
0
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The School Advisory Council approved the SIP Plan on September 24, 2009.
The purpose of the School Advisory Council is to perform the functions that are prescribed by the regulations of the School Board. The SAC will assist in the preparation and evaluation of the School Improvement Plan, will give advice concerning the annual school budget, and will approve the use of the school improvement funds.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Susan Caputo,
Principal
|
|
2)
Orlando Evans,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Susan Griffith,
Teacher
|
|
4)
Nancy Gibbons,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Melissa Robinson,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Stephen Espinoza,
Business Member
|
|
7)
Apryl Evans,
Parent
|
|
8)
Louanne Crouse,
Parent
|
|
9)
Jacqueline Forker,
Parent
|
|
10)
Rebecca Wallace,
Parent
|
|
11)
Kimberly Scott,
Parent
|
|
12)
Miguel Azcuy,
Parent
|
|
13)
Carl Feil,
Community Member
|
|
14)
Paul Page,
Community Member
|
|
15)
William Caputo,
Community Member
|
|
16)
Maria Barillas,
School Support Personnel
|
|
17)
Jaime Arango,
School Support Personnel
|
|
18)
Denise Boring,
Assistant Principal
|
AYP DATA
| 2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Lee RAYMA C PAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0734 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
|
Read: 263 Math: 263
|
2008-2009 School Grade1: |
A
|
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
YES |
|
| This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). |
This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). |
This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students? |
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? |
68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by 1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? |
Percent of Students below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2008 |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
2009 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
81 |
Y |
81 |
Y |
|
|
Y |
|
|
NA |
24 |
19 |
NA |
27 |
19 |
NA |
81 |
NA |
82 |
NA |
| WHITE
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
89 |
Y |
88 |
Y |
|
|
Y |
|
|
NA |
17 |
11 |
NA |
18 |
12 |
NA |
85 |
NA |
87 |
NA |
| BLACK
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| HISPANIC
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
69 |
Y |
75 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
26 |
31 |
NA |
23 |
25 |
NA |
72 |
NA |
77 |
NA |
| ASIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
77 |
Y |
76 |
Y |
|
|
Y |
|
|
NA |
29 |
23 |
NA |
32 |
24 |
NA |
77 |
NA |
80 |
NA |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
70 |
Y |
84 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
30 |
NA |
|
16 |
NA |
75 |
NA |
84 |
NA |
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
61 |
N |
74 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
51 |
39 |
Y |
54 |
26 |
NA |
64 |
NA |
79 |
NA |
| 2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Lee RAYMA C PAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0734 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
|
Read: 223 Math: 223
|
2007-2008 School Grade1: |
A
|
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). |
This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). |
This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students? |
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? |
62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by 1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? |
Percent of Students below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2007 |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
2008 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
76 |
Y |
73 |
Y |
84
|
|
Y |
|
|
NA |
35 |
24 |
NA |
41 |
27 |
NA |
74 |
NA |
75 |
NA |
| WHITE
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
83 |
Y |
82 |
Y |
|
|
Y |
|
|
NA |
15 |
17 |
NA |
26 |
18 |
NA |
76 |
NA |
77 |
NA |
| BLACK
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
53 |
N |
35 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
53 |
47 |
Y |
50 |
65 |
N |
65 |
NA |
50 |
N |
| HISPANIC
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
74 |
Y |
77 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
52 |
26 |
NA |
57 |
23 |
NA |
76 |
NA |
85 |
NA |
| ASIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
71 |
Y |
68 |
Y |
83
|
|
Y |
|
|
NA |
44 |
29 |
NA |
49 |
32 |
NA |
73 |
NA |
71 |
NA |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
49 |
N |
46 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
68 |
51 |
Y |
84 |
54 |
Y |
52 |
NA |
58 |
NA |
| 2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 |
Lee RAYMA C PAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0734 |
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
|
Read: 245 Math: 245
|
2006-2007 School Grade1: |
A
|
Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? |
NO |
|
| This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). |
This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). |
This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model. |
| Group |
Reading Tested 95% of the students? |
Math Tested 95% of the students? |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? |
Improved performance in Writing by 1%? |
Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? |
Percent of Students below grade level in Reading |
Safe Harbor Reading |
Percent of Students below grade level in Math |
Safe Harbor Math |
% of students on track to be proficient in reading |
Growth model reading |
% of students on track to be proficient in math |
Growth model math |
| |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2005 |
2006 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2006 |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
2007 |
Y/N |
| TOTAL4
|
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
65 |
Y |
59 |
Y |
77
|
84 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
45 |
39 |
NA |
44 |
41 |
NA |
70 |
NA |
72 |
NA |
| WHITE
|
99 |
Y |
98 |
Y |
85 |
Y |
74 |
Y |
83
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
27 |
18 |
NA |
30 |
26 |
NA |
83 |
NA |
81 |
NA |
| BLACK
|
99 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
47 |
N |
50 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
55 |
NA |
63 |
50 |
NA |
50 |
N |
64 |
Y |
| HISPANIC
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
48 |
N |
43 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
78 |
65 |
Y |
61 |
57 |
N |
61 |
NA |
66 |
Y |
| ASIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| AMERICAN INDIAN
|
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
| ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
|
100 |
Y |
99 |
Y |
56 |
Y |
51 |
N |
76
|
83 |
Y |
|
|
NA |
61 |
51 |
NA |
56 |
49 |
Y |
62 |
NA |
66 |
NA |
| ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
|
100 |
Y |
100 |
Y |
22 |
N |
26 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
90 |
NA |
83 |
74 |
Y |
40 |
N |
64 |
NA |
| STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
|
98 |
Y |
98 |
Y |
32 |
N |
16 |
N |
|
|
NA |
|
|
NA |
|
74 |
NA |
84 |
84 |
N |
42 |
N |
48 |
N |
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Lee School District RAYMA C PAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
86%
|
82%
|
96%
|
53%
|
317
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
77% |
74% |
|
|
151 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
79% (YES) |
76% (YES) |
|
|
155
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
623 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Lee School District RAYMA C PAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
83%
|
80%
|
97%
|
49%
|
309
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
71% |
75% |
|
|
146 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
63% (YES) |
73% (YES) |
|
|
136
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
591 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Lee School District RAYMA C PAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
82%
|
75%
|
87%
|
44%
|
288
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
76% |
80% |
|
|
156 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
59% (YES) |
70% (YES) |
|
|
129
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
573 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |