VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

Vision Statement:

The Marianna Middle School team joins the parents and community to assist all students to become productive members of society.


Mission Statement:

We will establish a strong educational foundation for lifelong learning by nurturing, guiding, and challenging each individual student in a safe, productive environment.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Marianna Middle School is located on a picturesque forty-acre campus and is one of the largest schools in the rural north Florida district of Jackson County. It is the only true middle school in the county serving approximately 700 students in grades 6-8. The low socioeconomic status of our population is reflected by a relatively high percentage of students qualifying for free or reduced lunch (50%).

The school was first established in 1955. In 1970 it was converted into a middle school. The campus has a unique style with each grade in separate buildings. Our gym is currently being updated with the addition of air conditioning.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

After earning a record high 559 accountability points on the 2009 FCAT Marianna Middle School earns an "A" for the ninth year in a row. Our unique scheduling allows our teachers to work in teams with each grade having a common planning time. This common planning time allows our teachers time to schedule parent conferences, plan together during lesson study groups, meet with their professional learning committees and attend professional development activities. Our school also participates in the "Positive Behavior Support" program writing a school-wide discipline plan. This progressive approach to student discipline has helped us reduce the number of referrals to the office.

Marianna Middle School also offers a wide variety of extra-curricular activities including sports, clubs, and music.

Marianna Middle School has a dedicated, professional staff with several teachers enrolled in the District's Aspiring Leadership class.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

Even though Marianna Middle School has been designated and "A" school for 9 years, we have never made adequate yearly progress. Therefore we are classified as a "Correct 1" school.


Student Demographics

Marianna Middle School serves approximately 700 students in grades 6-8.
59% of students are White, 33% are Black, and 8% are Asian, Hispanic, American Indian, or multi-racial. Economically disadvantaged students account for 50% of the population. Additionally, 14% of students are Students with Disabilities (SWD) and nearly 7% of students are gifted.


Student Attendance Rates

2006-2007 - 93.69%
2007-2008 - 92.9%
2008-2009 - 92.38%


Student Mobility

Data not available at this time.


Student Suspension Rates

Data not available at this time.


Student Retention Rates

Data not available at this time.


Class Size

Data not available at this time.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

Riverside Elementary, Marianna Middle School's feeder school, maintained its FCAT school grade of an "A" for the second year in a row. However this year they did not make adequate yearly progress meeting 95% of the criteria. Students with Disabilities (SWD) failed to make AYP in reading and math.

The high school in the school's feeder pattern, Marianna High School (MHS), fell from a "C" to a "D". MHS's AYP status fell from 85% to 82%. Only white students made AYP in math and writing. No group made AYP in reading. A new principal has been placed at MHS this year.


Partnerships and Grants

The Educational Talent Search Program at Chipola College is working with middle school students. This program assists young people who have academic potential to complete their middle and high school education and to pursue post-secondary education or training upon graduation from high school.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Assis Principal Ms. Sue Ann Tharp BS-Math/Science Education, University of West Florida

Master of Science-Educational Leadership, Troy State University at Dothan

Certification-Educational Leadership, State of Florida
5 5 AP of Marianna Middle School in 2008-2009:
Grade: A , Reading Mastery: 74 %, Math mastery: 75 %, Science mastery: 53 %. AYP: 90 %,


2007-2008:
Grade: A, Reading Mastery: 73 %, Math mastery:75 %, Science mastery: 46 %. AYP: 95 %,


2006-2007:
Grade: A Reading Mastery: 73 %, Math mastery:74 %, Science mastery: 42 %. AYP: 87 %,



Assis Principal Mr. Eddie Ellis A.A. Degree, Chipola College

B.S. Degree Physical Education (K-12), Athens State College

Master of Education Degree in Educational Leadership and Supervision , University of West Florida
8 7 AP of Marianna Middle School in 2008-2009:
Grade: A , Reading Mastery: 74 %, Math mastery: 75 %, Science mastery: 53 %. AYP: 90 %,


2007-2008:
Grade: A, Reading Mastery: 73 %, Math mastery:75 %, Science mastery: 46 %. AYP: 95 %,


2006-2007:
Grade: A Reading Mastery: 73 %, Math mastery:74 %, Science mastery: 42 %. AYP: 87 %,

Principal Dr. Gayle Westbrook B.S. in Social Studies/English Education, Florida State University

M.S. in English Education, Troy State University

Ph.D. in Educational Leadership, Florida A&M University
4 6 Principal of Marianna Middle School in 2008-2009:
Grade: A , Reading Mastery: 74 %, Math mastery: 75 %, Science mastery: 53 %. AYP: 90 %,


2007-2008:
Grade: A, Reading Mastery: 73 %, Math mastery:75 %, Science mastery: 46 %. AYP: 95 %,


2006-2007:
Grade: A Reading Mastery: 73 %, Math mastery:74 %, Science mastery: 42 %. AYP: 87 %,


* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
No data submitted

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1. Jackson County New Teacher Program Principal June 2010
2. Teachers obtaining reading endorsement will receive a one-time bonus of $2400 JC School Board on-going
3. Reimburse teachers out-of-field who pursue additional certification to become highly qualified JC School Board on-going
4. Teachers and staff will receive a bonus from the school recognition money received for being an "A" school Florida Dept. of Education on-going


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
No data submitted


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
4373719373010016250


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
Wayne Tanner Megan Wilson 24 years teaching, ESE certified Collaborate weekly; provide formal & informal observations every 9 weeks; develop long and short term goals; analyzing data; assist with paperwork
Kim Mock Kim Cianelli 19 years teaching, Elementary Certified Collaborate weekly; provide formal & informal observations every 9 weeks; develop long and short term goals; analyzing data; assist with paperwork
Mary Hinson Lorelei Nicholson 35 years teaching, accomplished Math teacher Collaborate weekly; provide formal & informal observations every 9 weeks; develop long and short term goals; analyzing data; assist with paperwork



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A


Title I, Part C- Migrant


Title I, Part D


Title II


Title III


Title X- Homeless


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)


Violence Prevention Programs


Nutrition Programs


Housing Programs


Head Start


Adult Education


Career and Technical Education


Job Training


Other


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Principal Gayle W. Westbrook: Provides a common vision for the use of data-based decision-making, ensures that the school-based team is implementing RtI, ensures implementation of intervention support and documentation ensures adequate professional development to support RtI implementation, and communicates with parents regarding school-based RtI plans and activities.

Assistant Principals - Eddie Ellis and Sue Ann Tharp: ensures that the school-based team is implementing RtI and ensures implementation of intervention support and documentation

Regular Education Teachers – Edith Whidden, Glenda Crawford, and Nichole Kleiser: Provides information about core instruction, participates in student data collection, delivers Tier 1 instruction/intervention, collaborates with other staff to implement Tier 2 interventions, and integrates Tier 1 materials/instruction with Tier 2/3 activities.

Special Education Teacher – Joyce Specht: Participates in student data collection, integrates core instructional activities/materials into Tier 3 instruction, and collaborates with general education teachers

Student Services – Laura Cullifer and Amber Tucker: Provides quality services and expertise on issues ranging from program design to assessment and intervention with individual students. Participates in collection, interpretation, and analysis of data; facilitates development and technical assistance for problem-solving activities including data collection, data analysis, and intervention planning.

Data Coach/Technology Specialist – Laurie Hamilton: Develops or brokers technology necessary to manage and display data; provides professional development and technical support to teachers and staff regarding data management and display

Reading Support – Charlene Merrifield: Provides guidance and technical assistance to teachers regarding data-based instructional planning; supports the implementation of Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 intervention plans.

Behavior Support – Tonya Gardner: Participates in student data collection; provides assistance to teachers regarding Positive Behavior Support; supports implementation of Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 intervention plans.

Parents or guardians will be invited to participate and contribute to the RtI process. If possible and when appropriate, the student will also be included.



Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

The Leadership Team will focus meetings around one question: How do we develop and maintain a problem-solving system to bring out the best in our schools, our teachers, and in our students?

The team will plan to meet regularly to engage in the following activities:
Review universal screening data and link the data to instructional decisions; review progress monitoring data at the grade level and classroom level to identify students who are meeting/exceeding benchmarks, at moderate risk or at high risk for not meeting benchmarks. The team will also collaborate regularly, problem solve, share effective practices, evaluate implementation, and make decisions. The team will function as a support and resource for the classroom teachers as they carry out the responsibility for educating each student.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

Members of the RtI Leadership Team met with the Marianna Middle School Visioning Committee to help develop the SIP. The members provided information needed to align processes and procedures regarding RtI and the SIP.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Baseline data: Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN) and ThinkLink, FAIR
Progress Monitoring: PMRN, Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM), Think Link, and Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR)
End of year: FAIR and FCAT


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

Professional development will be provided during teachers’ common planning time and small sessions will occur throughout the year.

The RtI team will also evaluate additional staff PD needs during the weekly RtI Leadership Team meetings.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


Strengths: Across all grade levels, Marianna Middle School students are performing at or above district and state averages in all areas of Reading and Math. 92% of students meet standards in writing. The number of students below grade level in Science has decreased.

Weaknesses: Across all grade levels at Marianna Middle School, the lowest content area in math is measurement. The least proficient content area in reading for 6th grade is Word/Phrases, for 7th grade is Reference/Research, and for 8th grade is Comprehension.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

The Instructional Focus Calendars were created in July 2009. The Instructional Focus Calendars will be updated in October 2009 as determined by disaggregated data results from the September ThinkLink A Test, and again in January 2010 as determined by the disaggregated data results from the November ThinkLink B Test.

The 2009 FCAT results were utilized to develop the Instructional Focus Calendars. Data from the ThinkLink A and B tests given in September and November, respectively, will also be utilized.

Teachers will be responsible for determining the instructional focus of whole group lessons, and small group/differentiated instruction.

Benchmarks were selected as indicated by students’ strengths and weaknesses, which were measured by progress on class work assignments, assessments, and data results.


The duration of instruction for each Benchmark was determined by the amount of time allotted in the Instructional Focus Calendars to ensure that students are exposed to all Benchmarks prior to FCAT testing. Within the amount of time allotted in the Instructional Focus Calendars, teachers will provide instruction on each Benchmark, allow the students an opportunity to practice, assess the students’ knowledge, and then re-teach the Benchmark as indicated by student progress, either in a whole group or small group setting.


District and School Leadership Teams will implement a continuous cycle of making classroom visitations, evaluating lesson plans, monitoring teacher data, and conducting meetings with teachers to ensure that the Instructional Focus Calendars are being utilized and implemented effectively. Mentors will be available to teachers who are demonstrating signs of struggling with implementation of the Instructional Focus Calendars.


Teachers who are struggling with implementing the Instructional Focus Calendars will be provided additional opportunities to attend professional development sessions, have a mentor available to them, and participate in the process of observing other teachers who are successful. The Team Leaders, subject area mentors will be available to provide additional assistance to the teacher. The teacher will participate in Professional Learning Communities which include Lesson Study Groups, and utilize the support of their colleagues during weekly team and grade-group meetings.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Reading: The following content areas were the lowest proficient strands and will be given priority focus: 6th grade- Words/Phrases, 7th grade-Reference and Research, 8th grade-Comprehension.
Writing: Expository writing was the least proficient across all grade levels and will be given priority focus.
Mathematics: Across all grade levels, measurement was the least proficient strand and will be given priority focus.

Science: Earth and Space strand was the least proficient and will be given priority focus.


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

Individual FCAT student data is used to determine how many students need to be served in the Intensive Reading classes. Highly qualified teachers are placed in those classes.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

Marianna Middle School offers students elective courses in business and applied technology. These courses do offer studies of job skills in these areas. The required Career Study credit is obtained in the 8th Grade History class.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

Marianna Middle School offers students elective courses in business, applied technology, music and Physical Education. Many of these courses focus on job skills.

The Algebra I Honors classes are offerred to 8th Grade students who qualify to enable them the opportunity to take more higher-level classes in high school.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


Grade level teachers will meet weekly to determine the areas of students' strengths and weaknesses as demonstrated by class work assignments and assessment results. Lesson plans will be created for differentiated instruction, which provides lessons for all levels of students, below mastery, at mastery, and above mastery.
Teachers will meet weekly for team meetings and grade-group meetings. They will also meet monthly during Professional Learning Communities which include Lesson Study Groups to share best practices and resources.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

Reading, Math, Science and Social Studies teachers will use the focus lessons developed by the Department of Education as well as teacher generated bell-ringers. Writing teachers will utilize the Six Traits of Writing lessons.
The focus lessons are aligned to the Benchmarks and standards for each subject area and cover those Benchmarks that are annually assessed on the FCAT.

Focus lessons and bell-ringers will be presented at the beginning of each class period.
Reading, math, writing, and science teachers will teach the focus lesson that correlates with their subject area. In the future, depending on the need, elective and social studies teachers may also teach focus lessons.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

Student mastery of periodic quizzes based on the focus lessons will determine if the focus lessons need to be revised and/or re-taught.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


Teachers will assess the comprehension of the focus lessons through periodic quizzes.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

Mastery will be set at 80%. Master is set at higher than the traditional score of 70% to ensure student proficiency of each benchmark.
The assessment results will be used to determine the instructional focus of whole group lessons. An Item-Analysis of the assessment will be utilized to re-teach the questions that students missed most frequently.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

Periodic assessments to determine levels of mastery will be in the Instructional Focus Calendar.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

Teachers will meet weekly to review assessment data (formative and summative). Teachers will meet by grade level and/or content area within grade level.
The meetings will be facilitated by the team leader. During team meetings, a teacher will be designated to record notes from the meeting, and the notes will be submitted along with the weekly agenda to the administrative staff.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

The Principal and Leadership Team will meet with teachers either during weekly meetings, or one-on-one to discuss assessment results and student progress. During these meetings, lesson plans and data binders will be utilized to provide evidence of instruction, assessment, and differentiation to address individual student needs.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


Core: State-adopted subject area texts and resource materials
Supplemental: Classworks, ThinkLink Probes, FCAT Explorer, Accelerated Reader

Intensive Instruction & Intervention: Jamestown Reading Navigator, MMS After-school program


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Resources from the state adopted textbooks which are designed for intensive instruction will be utilized. Computerized programs or instructional software (Jamestown Reading Navigator, Classworks, etc.), in addition to Internet instructional Websites such as FCAT Explorer, will also be utilized. Teachers will utilize instructional strategies or best practices discussed in Professional Learning Communities which include Lesson Study Groups to provide different methods of providing instruction to students in non-mastered areas. Resources and strategies provided at professional development workshops will also be utilized. Students consistently demonstrating non-mastery may participate in tutorial sessions after school.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

Common areas of concern in the area of instructional delivery, classroom management, etc. as evidenced by administrators' observations, teacher surveys, teachers' Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) and student performance/data analysis, will determine the need for professional development sessions.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

As a result of progress monitoring (class work assignments and assessment results) and observations (classroom teacher, administrators, counselors, etc.) students who consistently demonstrate academic difficulty will be referred to the RtI Team and offerred after-school assistance.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

All personnel providing services to a student not making mastery will meet to discuss their evidence and/or documentation of strategies and interventions that have previously been utilized. Factors hindering implementation of a strategy (attendance, behavior, etc.) will be addressed and resolved. Strategies that are unsuccessful will be discontinued and replaced with alternative interventions. Focus assessments through FCAT Explorer, ThinkLink Probes, Classworks, etc. will also be utilized to determine the effectiveness of supplemental instruction.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

Students identified as Gifted may attend an off-campus program once a week.

8th Grade students meeting criteria are eligible to participate in Algebra I Honors.
Teachers offer enrichment activities to all students using various software programs available at the school.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

Gifted students are identified by teachers and/or parents. Guidance administers the SIT-R test to determine eligibility for further testing by the county psychologist to be placed in the district gifted program.
All 7th grade students, at the end of their 7th grade academic year, are given the opportunity to participate in the Algebra Prognosis test. Those results, in addition to core subject area grades and FCAT results, are used to place students into the 8th Grade Algebra I Honors classes.

Parents can request that their child be tested for the gifted program. Parents must also sign a form granting permission for their 7th grade child to take the Algebra Prognosis Test.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
Grade Level Teams Team Leaders Once a week During Planning Data Analysis,
School Information,
Planning
Subject Area Teams Department Chair Once a nine weeks During Planning Instructional focus calendars, data analysis, planning


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

No Other Goals were submitted for this school

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 8/18/2009 3:03:44 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No funds will be available this year. 0



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


The School Advisory Council (SAC) has an important function for the success of Marianna Middle School. Listed below are some of the functions of the SAC.
*Approve certain financial expenditures.
*Assist the school to create and analyze school climate surveys
*Participate in the development of the School Improvement Plan.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Dr. Gayle Westbrook,   Principal
2)  Charlene Merrifield,   SAC Chair
3)  Jeb Bruner,   Student
4)  Mary Katherine Pittman,   Student
5)  Alexus Jones,   Student
6)  Johnny Touchton,   Student
7)  Garrison Melzer,   Student
8)  Martha Godwin,   Teacher
9)  Rochelle Summerwell,   Teacher
10)  Mary Hinson,   Teacher
11)  Amber Tucker,   Teacher
12)  Angela Roberts,   Business Member
13)  Pam Bimberg,   Parent
14)  Cathy Pereda,   Parent
15)  Jane Michels,   Parent
16)  Susie Rodenbach,   Parent
17)  Sandra Baker,   Parent
18)  Carol Marks,   Parent
19)  Cephus Granberry,   Community Member
20)  Sonjia Barkley,   School Support Personnel
 

AYP DATA

No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Jackson School District
MARIANNA MIDDLE SCHOOL
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 74%  75%  92%  53%  294   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 69%  66%      135  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 71% (YES)  59% (YES)      130  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         559   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Jackson School District
    MARIANNA MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 73%  75%  86%  46%  280   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 68%  71%      139  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 65% (YES)  66% (YES)      131  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         550   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Jackson School District
    MARIANNA MIDDLE SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 73%  74%  84%  42%  273   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 61%  70%      131  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 59% (YES)  62% (YES)      121  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         525   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested