VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Mission Statement
Mission Statement
AMIkids West Florida, Inc. is a private, non-profit residential program helping teenage boys overcome a troubled past to pave the way for a bright future.
Program Philosophy
“Kids First” is an AMIkids company value and West Florida will strive to provide an alternative educational and rehabilitative program that is structured to meet the needs of our students. We strive to provide a world-class education.
Long term Goals
1. To advance the academic skills of all students.
2. To prepare the students for success in higher education and the work force.
3. To provide our students the social and decision making skills needed to be a productive member of the community.
4. To educate our students about career choices.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
AMIkids West Florida was opened in June 1993 with 6 students. The program originally focused on scuba, kayaking, swimming, lifeguarding, cpr/first aid, saltwater fishing and boating, and marine science. The program was noted for the great attitude of the kids and the cleanliness of the program.
In 1997 AMIkids West Florida decided to shift focus from scuba and the ocean to kayaking and canoeing on the local river and hiking in the mountains of North Carolina. West Florida purchased a roto tiller, tools, a green house and top of the line landscaping equipment. African drumming was added with the help of Olumiday Gilbert, who lived at the program and taught the kids how to perform on traditional African drums. The youth performed throughout the panhandle and the old students taught the new students. Later the step-team was incorporated into the performance group and the two groups merged and became a single performance group.
West Florida's classes were now all focused on wilderness and agricultural/vocational tracks. Some swim classes were still held every spring and fall, but they were geared towards getting kids ready to canoe on the river instead of scuba.
The ropes course was also added to the program. In 2002 the new service dog training center was built with the help of Iams Dog Food. In 2003, West Florida expanded the agriculture and animal husbandry program by including 4H. The boys now went to 4H competitions and started to earn ribbons and awards for their presentations of calf and dog raising as well as showing their hand raised calves.
In 2003, West Florida started the Reptile Wrangler Program and created a wilderness classroom to house the new resident reptiles. Also in 2003, the God Squad was created and they quickly earned a reputation locally for running great church services. In 2005, West Florida started the Horse Rescue and Training Program, called the Ranch Wranglers.
Due to recent budget cuts, the horse and dog programs have been dramatically cut back. SCUBA is again being taught because it is supported by Vortex Spring dive shop. The latest addition is the new Firefighting program.
West Florida continues to grow and change as the years go by staying a dynamic and evolving program dedicated to helping troubled teens change their life’s directions.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
In 2010, West Florida will add comprehensive mental health and substance abuse counseling services on site that are integrated with the program. Efforts are being made to bring back the dog training and reptile programs.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Dramatic shortfalls in revenue when compared to expenses has forced the use of extra funding to keep staff employed instead of improving technology use in the classroom.
Student Demographics
Students come from all over Florida with the majority coming from Pensacola. Youth are ages 14-18, all boys committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice as moderate risk offenders. Maximum school capacity is 40 youth. Due to the small numbers, ethnic demographics vary widely throughout the year, with the average population being:
Caucasian-48%
African-American-45%
Hispanic-7%
Student Attendance Rates
100%
Student Mobility
All students will arrive and leave during the school year.
Student Suspension Rates
0%
Student Retention Rates
0%
Class Size
13 youth per class.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Partnerships and Grants
Title 1
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Ron Boyce
|
Working toward completing Bachelor's Degree and Master's Degree in Educational Leadership
|
6
|
13
|
WFWI is an AMI DJJ school and does not earn a school grade.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
| No data submitted |
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Hire teachers that are close to being highly qualified by offering competitive salaries and training support.
|
Ron Boyce
|
June 2010
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Bryant Nunley
|
Temorary Cert. Mid Grades Integ Curr 5-9
|
PSCD and Social Studies
|
PAEC training offerred.
|
|
Kimberly Blain
|
Professional cert in Elementary Ed k-6. ESE k-12, Mid Grades Integ Curr 5-9,
|
English, Language Arts, Reading
|
PAEC training offerred.
|
|
Jennifer Sutton
|
LOE, English 6-12.
|
Math and Science.
|
PAEC training offerred.
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Jean West
|
Kim Blain
|
Liaison
|
Classroom Observation and training.
|
|
Jean West
|
Jennifer Sutton
|
Liaison
|
Classroom observation and training.
|
|
Jean West
|
Bryant Nunley
|
Liaison
|
Classroom observation and training.
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
N/A
Title I, Part C- Migrant
N/A
Title I, Part D
Coordination with the county health department is present. Students are provided with clinics that include but are not limited to personal hygiene, physical fitness and sex education. Through the transition services team students receive assistance with applying for PELL grants, request information from various colleges and establish Florida residency, if appropriate. They complete resumes` and maintain a hard copy in addition to the Education Coordinator maintaining a CD with all students` original resumes` stored on it. They also participate in mock job interviews which are videotaped so students can critique/assess their own strengths and weaknesses.The DJJ site programs are coordinated with such programs as Workforce Development and others to bring to students credit recovery programs and career development. Funds from Title 1 Part D will help provide reading and math programs and on site vocational programs will assist students who may be interested in some of the career development classes and on-line courses
All students are eligible for services provided by the district which assure that at-risk students have an opportunity for success. The district assigns, as appropriate, Exceptional Student Education (ESE) teachers to serve ESE students. As appropriate, teachers are assigned to each institution. Limited English proficiency and migrant programs are available for students who are identified.
Coordination occurs on an ongoing basis between both administrators from the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) and administrators from the School Board of Holmes County. The GAP Principal represents School Board at Holmes County Juvenile Justice Council. Meetings are held on a continuing basis and as needed to provide appropriate programs for all youth. Representatives from private centers, Department of Juvenile Justice, Holmes County Sheriff’s office and Holmes County School Board are involved.
District staff members work with the facility case managers, mental health counselors and the student’s probation officers to provide transition services to students. All schools in the district have transition contacts to coordinate with the Juvenile Probation Officers. JPOs are provided space to work with students in the learning environment. Our transition coordinators attend meetings with the JPO to improve communication for our program. The JPOs provide a packet that helps in determining educational placements for students. Students in the district County may be returning to a regular school, a DJJ Step down program, an Alternative school, technical school, Adult Education, and home schools. They are provided with information for vocational or on the job trainings through Work Force Development. Both our district team and the JPOs are provided many opportunities to share information and data to assist in making good decisions involving our youth.
Vortex Springs Dive Center provides free access to training facilities and supports the SCUBA program by supplying all tank air fills. The youth practice reading comprehension and following written instructions as well apply knowledge in the sciences and mathematics.
Title II
N/A
Title III
N/A
Title X- Homeless
N/A
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Supplemental Academic instructional funds are used to support vocational instruction in the evenings and weekends.
Violence Prevention Programs
N/A
Nutrition Programs
USDA Provides funding for breakfast and lunch 7 days a week. Wellness programming in conjunction with USDA include nutritional counseling and education as well fitness and recreation programs that promote healthy lifestyles.
Housing Programs
N/A
Head Start
N/A
Adult Education
N/A
Career and Technical Education
All students assigned to delinquent facilities receive the services of program provided and Title I provided guidance services. Through these one-on-one contacts students are encouraged to make decisions which will support career decisions in a positive direction. Software resources are also provided to these youth in an effort to assure they have a full understanding of what is required in the pursuit of a particular job field. The software resources include the Choices Planner. All students are registered for a career portfolio upon entering the program. With the Choices Planner, student can:
Explore over 1,200 careers
Find the ones that match their interests
Connect careers to college majors
Search for schools by cost, location, programs, size, and other factors,
Search for scholarships
Start to build a career and college plan and save it to their online portfolio and go back to it frequently to view or edit their selections
Community speakers provide information on career
opportunities. Choices testing includes aptitude for different careers. Career exploration is also part of the curriculum and addressed on student’s Academic Improvement Plan.Counselors and Advisors assist students in applying.
Guidance and instructional staff have assisted students with securing loans to the student`s local junior college as well as career counseling. Instructional staff has assisted with post high school education as well as job placement and training. Teachers on assignment to perform transitional services will be required to assist students with career counseling and providing assistance with grant and loan applications. Vocational instructors will assist with job counseling. Leisure reading books and technology will expose students to opportunities that are available thru grants and loans.
Job Training
All students are offered vocational preparation courses in a number of areas that the students can choose from:
Culinary Arts in partnership with the Florida Restaurant and lodging association,
Mason’s Tender in partnership with the Florida Masonry and Apprenticeship Foundation,
Employability Skills in partnership with the Workforce Development Center.
Pro-Start:
Pro-Start is a national and state-wide culinary arts curriculum that prepares students for careers in the food service industry. The curriculum is comprehensive. The Culinary Arts Crew prepares meals at the facility but also for special events.
The Mason’s Tender course offered helps prepare the young men for careers in the construction industry. Completion of the course reduces the apprenticeship phase for entry into the Mason’s Union by 6 months!
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
West Florida
|
Lesley Perdue
|
Weekly
|
Tuesdays
|
Lesson planning, focus calenders, using technology in the classroom.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
N/A
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
For all favorably terminated students, the Treatment Team will work together to coordinate and facilitate an Exit Transition meeting prior to the student’s expected release date. The development of an educational exit transition plan will identify all services available to assist the student with reentry back to school and/or other placements. The transition meeting will establish and identify:
• Assessment Information
• ESE Information (if applicable)
• Graduation/Termination Date (from program)
• Current grade level
• Diploma option
• Proposed educational placement
• Education goals
• Job or career/technical goals/plans
• Behavioral goals
• Continuing education/academic needs
• Aftercare provider (if applicable)
The education designee will be responsible for exit testing all students that are expected to leave the program. For unexpected terminations, documentation of the termination will be placed in the academic file and only pre-test scores and grades in progress will be made available to commitment programs or next placement, upon receipt of a records request. As part of the exit transition, the Treatment Team will work with the student, the parent/guardian, the DJJ JPO and/or the designated School District personnel to develop after placement goals.
Before exiting the program, the education designee will contact the receiving districts transition coordinator to discuss post program educational plans for the exiting student. The education coordinator will then forward the exit packet which includes withdrawal form including grades in progress, IAP or IEP, EPEP, if applicable and credit printouts from Holmes District MIS system to the receiving districts transition coordinator.
The education coordinator will then forward the official transcript via the FASTER system to the student's next official educational placement.
* For students who are withdrawn without notice, the exit packet may not be forwarded until a records request is made by the youth’s next educational placement. In these cases, exit testing and a completed Exit Transition Plan may not be completed due to lack of notice.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based upon entrance and exit BASI scores, students need to focus on improving reading levels.
|
Have monthly and annual BASI score comparisons document an overall improvement in reading levels of youth that attend West Florida.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Conduct FAIR Assessments to determine area of remediation.
|
Education Coordinator
|
On-line input of FAIR scores.
|
Annual AMI Operations Report.
|
| 2 |
Assign remediation work to students who score under their grade level.
|
Reading teacher.
|
re-assessment using FAIR test.
|
FAIR re-assessment score.
|
| 3 |
Add aditional reading resources available to students after-school.
|
Education Coordinator.
|
Review of book check-out log.
|
Monthly book check-out graph.
|
| 4 |
Add Accelerated Reader program.
|
Lab aide.
|
Weekly AR summary.
|
Month to month comparison of AR summaries.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Assessing all youth using the FAIR test.
|
Reading.
|
PAEC
|
June 2010
|
Year-end perfromance evaluation
|
Education Coordinator
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
Every teacher in grades 6-12 must make reading part of their teaching. Textbooks read aloud and silently in and out of class provides practice needed for reading growth.
In addition, our Accelerated Reading Program gives students the opportunity to read novels and take comprehension tests. Autoskills reading is available as a supplemental lab activity for students that need remediation in reading.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Lap-tops to expand access to autoskills |
Title 1 part d |
$2,500.00 |
| Total: $2,500.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Accelerated Reader books |
Title 1 part d |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Final Total: $3,000.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based upon the BASI scores for 2008-2009 school year, math scores did not improve.
|
74% of students in all subgroups will be proficient as measured by the 2010 FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Professional development for teachers to improve their instructional strategies; technology training in the innovation of SMART board, and Autoskills will be utilized in the classroom; Auto Skills will be used to increase frequency and duration of mathematical activities.
|
Education Coordinator
|
BASI score improvements
|
AMIkids Operations Report
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Teachers will use national standards embedded in their mathematic programs to increase student learning.
|
SMART Board training
|
Dawn Speith
|
Feb 2010
|
Classroom observation and lesson plan review.
|
Education Coordinator.
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| SMART Board |
Title 1 part d |
$1,100.00 |
| Total: $1,100.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $1,100.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
AYP was not met based upon 2009 FCAT scores with less than 50% achieving a 3 or better score.
|
Meet state standards for percentage of youth passing the FCAT science portion in 2010.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Replace old textbooks, add SMART board to classroom.
|
education coordinator
|
Improvement in percentage of youth achieving a 3 or higher on 2010 FCAT
|
2010 FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Students in the MS and HS grades will earn a level 3 or higher on FCAT science by learning through scientific investigations.
|
Teachers learned strategies and best practices in teaching scientific vocabulary, hands-on experiments; concept comprehension, and assessement
|
education coordinator
|
May 2010
|
Review of FCAT scores in 2010.
|
education coordinator
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based upon 2009 FCAT scores, less than 50% of the students score a 3 or better,
|
Writing scores as measured by the 2010 FCAT Writes will meet the state average at all three grade levels.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Incorporate writing into the computer lab activities.
|
Lab aide
|
Review of 2010 FCAT reading scores.
|
2010 FCAT.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Teachers will learn how to teach students to incorporate creative skills in teaching prompt writing and other types of writing.
|
Structuring narrative, expository, and persuasive writing while adding creative skills such as simile and metaphor.
|
Education Coordinator
|
Apr 2010
|
Lesson plan review
|
education coordinator
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Due to the residential nature of the program and the distance that parents are from the program, face to face parental involvement is limited.
|
Increase parental involvement in student planning and progress monitoring.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Call parents for monthly progress update treatment team meeting.
|
education coordinator.
|
Create a tracking system to document parental participation percentages.
|
Tracking sheet review. Parental exit surveys.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
Treatment Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Program needs evidence based treatments and added resources for treatment.
|
Improve success rate of graduates as measured by recidivism studies. Decrease average length of stay due to improved services.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Hire Director of Treatment.
|
Executive Director
|
Director of Treatment in place and providing services.
|
Annual employee evaluation in June 2010.
|
| 2 |
Hire two Master Level counselors.
|
Executive Director
|
Two additional counselors on site and providing services.
|
Annual employee evaluation June 2010.
|
| 3 |
Apply for Residential Substance Abuse Serives License.
|
Executive Director.
|
Award of License.
|
Annual audits.
|
| 4 |
Apply for BHOS licensure.
|
Executive Director.
|
Effective billing to underwrite additional services.
|
Annual DJJ QA audit and Annual AHCA audit.
|
| 5 |
Implementation of evidence based services.
|
Director of Treatment.
|
Passing scores on Tier II audit.
|
Tier II audit.
|
| 6 |
Integrate treatment with case management, education and behavior modification using the case planning process and treatment team meetings.
|
Executive Director.
|
Improvements in success rates of graduates.
|
Recidivism study.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Evidence based treatment.
|
Substance Abuse training through CYT.
|
AMIkids Treatment Director.
|
March 2010
|
Fidelity monitoring cecklists.
|
Director of Treatment.
|
|
Evidence based treatment.
|
Journaling.
|
Change Companies trainer.
|
Dec. 2009
|
Fidelity monitoring checklists.
|
Director of Treatment.
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| CYT Training for Director of Treatment. |
DJJ |
$800.00 |
| Total: $800.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $800.00 |
|
| End of Treatment Goal |
|
Behavior Modification Goal: |
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Decrease restraints and length of stay.
|
Improve staff use and understanding of effective behavior modification strategies.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Conduct token economy training for staff.
|
Director of Operations
|
Decreased PAR restraints and CCC reports.
|
Weekly management meeting risk review and summary report from PAR report.
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Behavior Modification Goal |
|
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Treatment |
CYT Training for Director of Treatment. |
DJJ |
$800.00 |
| Total: $800.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Lap-tops to expand access to autoskills |
Title 1 part d |
$2,500.00 |
| Mathematics |
SMART Board |
Title 1 part d |
$1,100.00 |
| Total: $3,600.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Accelerated Reader books |
Title 1 part d |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Final Total: $4,900.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
| No data submitted |
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Ron Boyce,
Principal
|
|
2)
Doug Hemanes,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Sheridan Lowery,
Business Member
|
|
4)
Wayland Fulford,
Business Member
|
|
5)
Mike Michel,
Business Member
|
|
6)
John Braxton,
Community Member
|
|
7)
Tony Howard,
Community Member
|
|
8)
Jerry Sewell,
Community Member
|
|
9)
Norm Gulkis,
Community Member
|
|
10)
Woody Bollinger,
Community Member
|
|
11)
Brad Drake,
Community Member
|
|
12)
Rhonda Thomas,
Community Member
|
|
13)
Catherine Wynne,
Community Member
|
|
14)
Anthony Register,
Community Member
|
|
15)
Jean West,
School Support Personnel
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found