VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Bonifay Elementary School will provide a quality education to students from all backgrounds as they strive to achieve their personal best.
Bonifay Elementary will provide a safe, civil school environment, staffed by highly-qualified teachers, where excellence in student achievement is the goal.
Bonifay Elementary School believes:
*Every child is unique and has a right to learn and be treated as an individual.
*Reading is the cornerstone of education, therefore all students should become an independent life-long reader for learning as well as pleasure.
*Professional staff, as well as students, are lifelong learners.
*Home, school and community are partners in educating our students.
*A safe, civil school environment is conducive to teaching and learning.
*Character development is a vital element of the total education of the student.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Bonifay Elementary School is a Title I public school located in Bonifay, Florida, county seat of Holmes County, a small rural county in the northwest Florida panhandle. Bonifay Elementary moved to its present site in 1970 from the old building, originally Holmes County High School, built in 1902. In the late fifties, grades 7-12 moved to a new high school located behind the old school which continued to house the lower elementary grades until its closing upon completion of Bonifay Elementary at its present site in 1970.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Bonifay Elementary has an experienced faculty. We are very motivated this year because we made AYP last year and we were and A school. Our teacher morale has improved and we are ready to continue the improvement we have experienced in student achievement.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Our fourth grade must remain at 90% proficient or above in the area of writing. Our economically disadvantaged sub-group must achieve 69% proficient in the area of reading. We must achieve these 2 goals to meet AYP this year. Our grade level para-professionals are being used as substitutes. This gives teachers less support in the classroom. We do not have a reading lab this year due to staffing cuts. Teachers must remediate their own students instead of having reading support from the lab. We share a reading coach with the middle school.
Student Demographics
Bonifay Elementary is presently a Pre-K-4 school. Prior to the 2004-05 school year, we also housed 5th grade. Students now move from BES to Bonifay Middle School after completion of 4th grade. We have 54 faculty members and 32 support staff. Current enrollment is approximately 750 students. The ethnic make-up of the school includes 89.46% white students, 4% Black students, 3.33% Hispanic students, 0.66% Asian students, 0.4% Am. Indian students and 2.13% Multiracial students. Students representing ethnic and racial minorities comprise approximately 10% of our student population.
Bonifay Elementary School is located in one of the lower socio-economic areas of Florida, with 63.3% of our children living at or below poverty level. The per capita income of Holmes County is $15,398, which is 67% of the state average.
The percentage of residents below poverty level is 19.1% versus 12.5% for the State of Florida. Holmes County has the highest poverty rate in the State of Florida for female headed families with children under 5 at 72.2%. Unemployment is at 5.5% due in part to the closing of several plants and factories in surrounding areas where many of our residents were employed. The largest employer in the county is the Holmes County School Board with the second largest employer being Holmes Correctional, a state prison located in south Bonifay. Four hundred fifty-eight students, almost two-thirds of our student population, qualify for free or reduced lunches.
Students who speak English as a second language are few in Holmes County. Presently we have 2 students at Bonifay Elementary who require E.S.O.L. (English Speakers of Other Languages) services. Guidance personnel conduct the required screenings to determine the level of services needed by students whose enrollment data so indicate, and then conduct staffings to put those services in place. The district has policies and service plans to provide limited-English students with a quality education in the least restrictive environment.
Bonifay Elementary School houses the only Pre-K handicapped program in the district. Eighty-six percent of students in our Pre-K program qualify for placement by being identified as having special needs. Approximately 18% of our total student population receive services under our Exceptional Student Education program.
Student Attendance Rates
94.97
Student Mobility
Bonifay Elementary has a fairly stable population with a low mobility rate.
Student Suspension Rates
Student Retention Rates
Class Size
All classes at Bonifay Elementary meet the class size requirement.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Our students go to Bonifay Middle School for fifth through eighth grade.
Partnerships and Grants
Our school has received a grant for the past two years through the 21st Century Community Learning Centers and the Norris D. Langston Youth Scholarship Foundation in Port St. Joe, Florida. This grant provides us with an after-school program offered Monday through Thursday from 2:30-5:30. Students receive homework help, reading and math tutoring, character education, recreation and other enrichment opportunities.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Rodd Jones
|
Master of Science degree in Educational Leadership
Bachelor of Science degree in Elementary Education
|
8
|
4
|
08-09 an 'A' school and met AYP
07-08 an 'A' school but did not meet AYP requirements
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Reading
|
Pam Short
|
Bachelor's Degree in Elementary Education, certification in elementary education and middle grades English. Reading Endorsed. Noational Board Cetified.
|
|
5
|
Mrs. Short has been a coach at Bonifay Middle School for the past 4 years. Bonifay Middle School has been an 'A' school 5 out of the past 7 years.
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
The principal at BES hires teachers certified in high-need areas and provides opportunities for professional development to encourage ongoing high-quality instruction. All first and second year teachers at BES are provided with a mentor to facilitate their introduction to our policies and procedures and classroom management. Mentor teams meet weekly during grade level meetings and at other designated times as needed.
|
Rodd Jones
|
on-going
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
| No data submitted |
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 50 | 2 | 34 | 24 | 40 | 12 | 100 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
DeAnn McDuffie
|
Stacey French
|
Same grade level; same pod
|
Grade level meetings weekly; Shared lesson plans meet daily as needed
|
|
Amie Corbin
|
Kisha Stafford
|
Same grade level;classrooms across from each other
|
Grade level meetings weekly; Shared lesson plans meet daily as needed
|
|
Julie Johnson
|
Shalee Powell
|
Same grade level and planning times
|
Grade level meetings weekly; Shared lesson plans meet daily as needed
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Students with disabilities have access to the general education curriculum classrooms and the other typical school settings and activities, they receive specially designed instruction and support to meet IEP goals and succeed as learners.We also have programs at our school that coordinate with other state and federal dollars available. We have an After-school program that is funded in part through a 21st Century Community Learning Center grant. This program offers snacks through the Department of Agriculture and the program takes a four part approach to meeting the needs of our students, academics, motivation, enrichment and exposure. Title I, Part A - Title I, Part A provides funding and support for professional development activities, parent involvement activities, technology needs, SES services, etc.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part C - Migrant - addresses the issues that are common to migrant students and assists these students with their educational needs.
Title I, Part D
Title II
3. Title II - provides technology assistance plus scientifically research based materials in classrooms as well as professional development. Title II funds are also used for classroom reduction.
Title III
Title X- Homeless
Title X - Homeless provides funding to assist identified homeless students with school supplies, medical care and tutoring opportunities.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
SAI funds are used to support Summer Reading Camp.
Violence Prevention Programs
Nutrition Programs
We also work in conjuction with the Holmes county health department and CARE to provide education in nutrition and healthy lifestyle choices.
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Reading Leadership Team
|
Melissa Ward
|
Monthly
|
Tuesday afternoons
|
Economically Disadvantaged
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
In May actual school site visits are made. All Pre-K providers, including Head Start, visit the Kindergarten classrooms, eat lunch and are able to play outside. Also orientation programs are presented by the liaison, upon request. These programs allow parents to receive information regarding expectations, and supplies that are needed. They are provided with materials that may be used for summer activities and enrichment
In order to make the transition from pre-school care to Kindergarten we have an on-going process throughout the year. Kindergarten teachers share with the liaison ideas that Pre-K teachers might use to make the transition a smooth one. The liaison meets periodically with feeder schools to answer their questions and provide materials for additional info.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Our economically disadvantaged sub-group needs to increase in proficiency.
|
69% of the students in this sub-group will score proficient in the area of reading on the 2010 FCAT.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Follow the reading plan.
Use protected additional 30 min. intervention instruction block in addition to the 90 min. reading block.
|
Principal
|
Student achievement data
|
2010 FCAT
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Students in the lowest 25% in reading need to make adequate progess in reading.
|
66% of the students in the lowest 25% will make adequate progress in reading.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Identify the students to target.
Use RTI to implement effective learning strategies for these students.
|
Principal
|
Review student achievement data.
|
2010 FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
1
|
economically disadvantaged children
|
Melisssa Ward
|
Fall 2009
|
PLC forms and meetings, discussions
|
Principal
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Scott Foresman Reading |
District textbook fund |
$20,000.00 |
| Total: $20,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $20,000.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
All sub-groups met AYP goals for the 2008-2009 year.
|
The percent proficient in math will increase from the 08-09 year.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Harcourt math program for core curriculum.
Harcourt math center in the computer lab.
Use of Auto Skills for math remediation.
RTI strategies for struggling learners.
|
Principal
|
Student achievment data.
|
2010 FCAT
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
Focus website and the Differentiated accountability website
|
Progress monitoring instruments and benchmark exposure resources
|
Carmen Bush
|
Fall 2009
|
Observations, class-room walkthroughs
|
Carmen Bush
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Harcourt math |
District Textbook funds |
$25,000.00 |
| Total: $25,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $25,000.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The percent proficient increased from 85% to 93% in the 08-09 school year.
|
The percent proficient will be maintained at 90% or above in the area of writing for the 09-10 school year.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students in fourth grade will respond to 4 formal writing prompts before Feb 2010. Third grade will respond to 4 formal writing prompts before June 2010.
Use the results to guide instruction for students struggling and meeting high standards.
|
Principal
|
Student achievement data.
|
2010 FL Writes
Assessment
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Write Score |
Title I |
$4,000.00 |
| Total: $4,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $4,000.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The results from the 2008-2009 Climate Survey indicated positive parental involvement for the year.
|
Bonifay Elementary will continue to encourage parental involvement at BES.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Maintain the school website.
Communicate information about student progress, activities and events.
|
Carmen Bush
|
Evaluation of data from the climate survey.
|
2010 Climate Survey
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Communicators |
Principal's budget |
$1,300.00 |
| Total: $1,300.00 |
| Final Total: $1,300.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Scott Foresman Reading |
District textbook fund |
$20,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Harcourt math |
District Textbook funds |
$25,000.00 |
| Writing |
Write Score |
Title I |
$4,000.00 |
| Total: $49,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Parental Involvement |
Communicators |
Principal's budget |
$1,300.00 |
| Total: $1,300.00 |
| Final Total: $50,300.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
Reading, Math and Writing support
|
4000
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The school advisory council will meet at least four times during the school year. The council will review student achievement data from the previous year and discuss new strategies and ideas for this year's plan and progress that our school would like to achieve. The council will decide what the school needs to continue improvement in all areas and achieving AYP for two years in a row. The council will approve school improvement monies to be spent at BES during the 2009-2010 school year.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Rodd Jones,
Principal
|
|
2)
Jennifer Neitsch,
Teacher
|
|
3)
Terry Petty,
Teacher
|
|
4)
Deborah Goolesby,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Rachael Cooley,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Stephanie Williams,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Vicki Steverson,
Teacher
|
|
8)
Karen Newman,
Teacher
|
|
9)
Shawn Harrison,
Business Member
|
|
10)
Travis Johnson,
Business Member
|
|
11)
Mark Gilmore,
Parent
|
|
12)
Clarissa Connell,
Parent
|
|
13)
Fawn Sellers,
Parent
|
|
14)
Kathy Gardner,
Parent
|
|
15)
Mickey Hudson,
Parent
|
|
16)
Anita Coates,
Parent
|
|
17)
Thomalita Granberry,
Parent
|
|
18)
Russell Smith,
Community Member
|
|
19)
Kim Farrow,
School Support Personnel
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Holmes School District BONIFAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
80%
|
85%
|
87%
|
38%
|
290
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
73% |
69% |
|
|
142 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
63% (YES) |
67% (YES) |
|
|
130
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
562 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Holmes School District BONIFAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
74%
|
80%
|
71%
|
44%
|
269
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
68% |
75% |
|
|
143 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
68% (YES) |
83% (YES) |
|
|
151
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
563 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Holmes School District BONIFAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
77%
|
67%
|
71%
|
35%
|
250
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
56% |
63% |
|
|
119 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
34% (NO) |
68% (YES) |
|
|
102
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
471 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
C |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |