VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
Bonifay Middle School's vision is to provide a creative and exciting learning environment with high levels of achievement to a
diverse community of learners.
Bonifay Middle School's mission is to promote positive self-concepts, academic excellence, enrichment opportunities,
acceptable social behavior, and self-discipline in order for all students to become productive, contributing citizens in this
technologically oriented society.
Bonifay Middle School believes that student learning is the chief priority. Students must be actively involved in the learning
process and should demonstrate their understanding of essential knowledge and skills through ongoing assessment.
Students learn in different ways and should be provided with a variety of instructional approaches to support their learning.
Each student is a valued individual with unique physical, social, emotional, and intellectual needs. Student self-esteem is
enhanced by positive relationships and mutual respect among and between students and staff. Teachers must actively be
involved in decision-making in order to promote student achievement. Technology education is important in order to achieve
student success.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Bonifay Middle School is a public, Title I school located in Bonifay, Florida, county seat of Holmes County, a rural county in the
panhandle area of Northwest Florida. The school was established in 1986 to meet the educational needs of students in
grades seventh and eighth. Prior to the formation of Bonifay Middle School (BMS) in 1986, seventh and eighth grade were part
of Holmes County High School. In the fall of 1991, sixth grade moved from Bonifay Elementary School and became a part of
our student population. At the beginning of 2004/2005 school year, the fifth grade also moved from Bonifay Elementary School
to become part of our middle school program. BMS is one of seven schools in the district and is the only school serving grades
5-8 exclusively. We have two feeder schools, Bonifay Elementary School and Holmes County High School. The majority of our
students transfer over from Bonifay Elementary, a Pre K-4 school, and after they complete 8th grade at BMS, most of the
students attend Holmes County High, a 9-12 school. The Bank of Bonifay serves as a school community business partner.
Every year they donate money for FCAT recognition/rewards. The school facility is made up of six areas. The first area contains
the office suites, the lunchroom, the clinic, the media center, and ESE, reading, and language arts classrooms. An ESE teacher,a computer lab, and the home economics room are in the second area. The third area of our facility houses the fifth grade
building, a fifth grade portable, and a portable utilized by our after school program. The gymnasium is in the fourth area. Science
classrooms/labs, social studies classrooms, career education computer lab, and a general computer lab are in the fifth area.
The sixth area of our campus which is comprised of a portable building houses the band room. Bonifay Middle School's staff is
made up of a principal, an assistant principal, a guidance counselor, a reading coach, a media specialist, 33 instructional personnel, 4 aides, 3 office personnel, 5 lunchroom personnel, and 5 custodial
personnel.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Bonifay Middle School is thrilled to once again maintain its school grade of an "A." We feel strongly that the strengths that lead to this achievement are all connected to the sense of teamwork that is exhibited throughout our faculty. We witnessed continuous acts that showcased a willingness to cooperate for the good of our students. We will build upon this major strength in the upcoming year. Additionally, BMS has strong academic programs that are meeting the needs of the majority of our students.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Due to district decisions about personnel, BMS has lost its technology coordinator. In addition, as a result of the budget shortfall, the reading coach at BMS will be serving another school in our district. This will limit our school's ability to strengthen reading in the content areas as well as obviously limiting the coach's ability to actually coach. The school also does not have a person assigned as curriculum coordinator. These duties are assigned to other personell.
Student Demographics
BMS currently has a total of 493 students. Of this total number, 51.5% are male and 48.5% are female. The racial
composition of the school is made up of 90.87% white (non-Hispanic) students, 4.05% Black (non-Hispanic) students, 2.63%
Hispanic students, 1.21% Asian students, and 1.21% Multiracial students. BMS is a Title 1 school, and 54.4% of our students
are eligible for free and reduced lunch. The class size averages
from 6 students in a VE self-contained class to 25 students in a regular education classroom. Bonifay is located in one of the
lower socio-economic areas of Florida, with 53% of the children coming from low income families and receiving free or reduced lunches. The current population in Holmes County is 19,055. The largest employers in the county are Holmes County School
Board and Holmes Correctional Institution. With regard to religious preferences, Protestants make up 55% of the county's
population, 24% Catholic, and a variety of other religions make up 21% of the remaining population.
Student Attendance Rates
The rate of students out for 21+ days for the 2008-2009 school year was 1.2%. Our attendance rate for the school year 2007 - 2008 (% absent 21+ days) was 7.7%. BMS had an attendance rate of 94.55% during the 2008-2009 school term.
Student Mobility
The mobility rate of the school is low with most transfers occurring within our district.
Student Suspension Rates
2006-2007: in school - 138, out of school - 51; 2007-2008: in school - 20, out of school - 48; 2008-2009: in school - 4, out of school - 20. The suspension rates have decreased over the past three years.
Student Retention Rates
The retention rate for BMS is 2.2%. This reflects an increase of 1.2 percentage points from the last school year.
Class Size
The class size averages from 7 students in a VE self-contained class to 25 students in a regular education classroom.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Bonifay Elementary feeds into our middle school. BES improved to an A school grade and also achieved AYP. The high school that our middle school feeds, Holmes County High, did not achieve AYP. Additionally, the school grade of HCHS fell to a D.
Partnerships and Grants
BMS will continue to enjoy its partnership with a local business, The Bank of Bonifay. The Bank of Bonifay donates to our school to aid in the purchase of t-shirts for our students and FCAT prizes for students who make learning gains.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Donald Etheridge
|
BA - Elementary Education ME - Educational Leadership with certifications in elementary education, middle grades math education, middle grades science education, and school principal K-12
|
14
|
10
|
2005-2006: school grade of B, did not meet AYP 2006-2007: school grade of A, did not meet AYP 2007-2008: school grade of A, met AYP 2008-2009: school grade of A, did not meet AYP
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Stacey Thompson
|
BS in Physical Education; ME in Ed Leadership; certified in Physical Education (K-12)
|
5
|
1
|
2007-2008: school grade of A, met AYP 2008-2009: school grade of A, did not meet AYP
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
reading
|
Pamela Short
|
BS: Early Childhood Education; certification in early childhood education, middle grades language arts, reading endorsed, National Board Certified in Early Adolescent/ English-Language Arts
|
18
|
2.5
|
2005-2006: school grade of B, did not meet AYP 2006-2007: school grade of A, did not meet AYP 2007-2008: school grade of A, met AYP 2008-2009: school grade of A, did not meet AYP
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Regular meetings of new teachers with Principal, Guidance Counselor, &/or Reading Coach
|
principal
|
on-going
|
|
|
mentoring for new teachers provided by experienced teachers
|
principal
|
on-going
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
| No data submitted |
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 39 | 2.6 | 35.9 | 30.8 | 30.8 | 33.3 | 100 | 12.8 | 5 | 0 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Dawn Barone
|
Rhonda Roberts
|
Mrs. Barone has taught ESE science, math, and social studies for several years. She has maintained a classroom for full-time students as well as working as an inclusion teacher.
|
Mrs. Barone will aid Mrs. Roberts in creating lesson plans, instructional activities, assessments, and classroom management.
|
|
Carolyn Matthias
|
Kelley McKee
|
Mrs. Matthias is the fifth grade team leader and has many years of experience teaching fifth grade students successfully.
|
Mrs. Matthias will aid Ms. McKee in creating lesson plans, instructional activities, assessments, and classroom management.
|
|
Tami Parish
|
Miriam Beasley
|
Mrs. Parish has taught math at BMS for several years and has been very successful. She is also national board certified.
|
Mrs. Parish will aid Mrs. Beasley in creating lesson plans, instructional activities, assessments, and classroom management.
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Supplemental education services are provided through outside agencies to provide the essential additional remediation that is required for our struggling students. Funding is also utilized at our district level to provide for professional development, family involvement, and technology needs.
Title I, Part C- Migrant
BMS has a very low impact from the migrant population. However, when a need arises, we work with the district office to ensure that the needed services and support are provided to parents as well as students.
Title I, Part D
The district receives these funds and all services are coordinated through our district office.
Title II
Funding is handled at our district level to provide professional development, class size reduction,technology assistance plus materials that are scientifically research based.
Title III
Title X- Homeless
These funds are utilized to assist identified homeless students with school supplies, medical care, and tutoring opportunities.
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Violence Prevention Programs
Nutrition Programs
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
reading
|
Pam Short
|
monthly
|
after school
|
data analysis, development and implementation of FOCUS, analysis of reading program
|
|
math
|
Tami Parish
|
monthly
|
after school
|
data analysis, development and implementation of FOCUS, analysis of math program
|
|
science
|
Cheryl Harrison
|
monthly
|
after school
|
data analysis, development and implementation of FOCUS, analysis of science program
|
|
writing
|
Natalie Bomann
|
monthly
|
after school
|
data analysis, development and implementation of FOCUS, analysis of science program, and development of school-wide WOW assessments
|
|
grade level teams
|
team leaders
|
monthly
|
after school
|
data analysis, development and implementation of FOCUS, analysis of curriculum
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
not applicable
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
not applicable
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009, 72% of students met high standards in reading.
|
In 2010, 73% of students will meet high standards in reading.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Grades 7 and 8 will implement a new core program in reading, McDougal Littel.
|
reading coach
|
departmental meetings where implementation will be discussed, problems addressed, interventions suggested, data collected and analyzed
|
Baseline assessment data compared with mid-year data for progress monitoring and FCAT 2010 for outcome measure
|
| 2 |
BMS will implement the FAIR assessments to monitor student progress as well as diagnose specific areas of deficiencly.
|
reading coach
|
data analysis at departmental meetings
|
FAIR assessment reports
|
| 3 |
BMS will increase the collaboration between reading and language arts classes.
|
reading coach
|
review of lesson plans as well as observation of lessons
|
lesson plan and observation checklist
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009, the AYP subgroup, Economically Disadvantaged, did not meet the target.
|
In 2010, the Economically Disadvantaged subgroup will meet the AYP target.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
FCAT chats will be conducted after FAIR assessments and after the baseline and mid-year assessments.
|
principal, reading coach
|
Principal will review FCAT chats during walkthroughs.
|
walkthrough checklists
|
| 2 |
Language Arts teachers of grades 7 and 8 will incorporate the instruction of at least one novel before FCAT.
|
principal, reading coach
|
Principal and reading coach will observe lessons on walkthroughs.
|
walkthrough checklists
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
In 2010, 73% of students will meet high standards in reading.
|
McDougal Littel implementation
|
McDougal Littel representative
|
November 2009
|
observation of implementation in classroom walkthroughs, observation of lesson plans
|
reading coach, principal
|
|
In 2010, the Economically Disadvantaged subgroup will meet the AYP target.
|
Ruby Payne's book, "Understanding Poverty"
|
reading coach
|
November 2009
|
survey after book club is complete
|
reading coach
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
BMS has for the past two school terms utilized vocabulary as its school-wide FOCUS. We have stressed the importance and value of using vocabulary strategies normally thought of as "reading strategies" in every area of the curriculum. Through improvements in classroom achievement, we have achieved consensus from our faculty. We will continue introducing reading strategies to our content area teachers at faculty meetings each month. The reading coach will introduce, model, and be available to co-teach in classrooms to ensure the strategies are being utilized.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| McDougal Littel textbooks |
district textbook |
$20,000.00 |
| Total: $20,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| "Understanding Poverty" by Ruby Payne |
Title I |
$250.00 |
| miscellaneoous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Total: $750.00 |
| Final Total: $20,750.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The total percent proficient in math decreased from 70% in 2008 to 61% in 2009.
|
The total percent efficient will improve to 70%in 2010.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The fifth grade classes will be teamed for math instruction.
|
principal
|
The fifth grade teachers and the principal will review baseline and mid-year assessments.
|
FCAT will be used as the outcome measure.
|
| 2 |
Math teachers are using technology in their classrooms to promote instruction, student interest
and participation.
|
principal
|
The principal will review lesson plans to document use of technology. The principal will also observe the use of the technology in classroom walk-throughs.
|
lesson plans, walk-through checklists
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The subgroup, Economically Disadvantaged, did not meet the AYP target in math in 2009.
|
In 2010, the AYP subgroup, Economically Disadvantaged, will meet the target.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Hands-on activities will be incorporated into units of study.
|
principal
|
FOCUS activities (which are all hands-on) will be presented at departmental meetings, activities will be incorporated into units, documented in lesson plans, comparison of baseline and mid-year assessments
|
lesson plans, principal walk-throughs, baseline and mid-year assessments
|
| 2 |
A book study, "Understanding Poverty" by Ruby Payne will be completed by math teachers.
|
reading coach
|
comparison of baseline and midyear assessments
|
baseline and midyear assessments
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
The total percent efficient will improve to 70%in 2010.
|
use of technology
|
district personell
|
ongoing through spring 2010
|
Principal will monitor effective use of technology during classroom walkthroughs.
|
principal
|
|
In 2010, the AYP subgroup, Economically Disadvantaged, will meet the target.
|
book study
|
reading coach
|
December 2009
|
comparison of baseline and midyear data for economically disadvantaged students
|
principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| interwrite pads |
Title I |
$400.00 |
| laptop computers |
Title I |
$2,800.00 |
| LCD projectors |
Title I |
$900.00 |
| Total: $4,100.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| miscellaneous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Final Total: $4,600.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Overall, BMS improved by 4% in the percentage of students meeting high standards in science; however, in fifth grade the percentage decreased by 8%.
|
In 2010, the percentage of students meeting high standards in science will improve to 50%.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Fifth grade teachers will team teach this year to allow a greater emphasis on planning for science instruction.
|
principal
|
The principal will review lesson plans and conduct classroom walk-throughs. The principal and the science teachers will review baseline and midyear data.
|
lesson plans, classroom walk-through checklists, baseline and midyear assessment data
|
| 2 |
The eighth grade science teacher will target skills identified on baseline assessments in order to improve mastery on FCAT.
|
principal
|
The principal will review lesson plans and conduct classroom walk-throughs. The principal and the science teachers will review baseline and midyear data.
|
lesson plans, classroom walk-through checklists, baseline and midyear assessment data
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
In 2010, the percentage of students meeting high standards in science will improve to 50%.
|
vertical planning
|
district personell
|
August 2009
|
district decision
|
district personell
|
|
In 2010, the percentage of students meeting high standards in science will improve to 50%.
|
vertical planning
|
department head
|
on-going
|
The principal will meet with the science department periodically to monitor progress of planning and data analysis.
|
principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| professional books |
Title I |
$200.00 |
| Total: $200.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| miscellaneous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Final Total: $700.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In 2009, the percent scoring 3.5 or above improved from 93% to 95%.
|
In 2010, 96% of students will score 3.5 or higher on FCAT Writing.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Students will participate in the district's WOW program.
|
reading coach
|
comparison of WOW data (fall and winter) with actual FCAT data
|
WOW scores, FCAT scores
|
| 2 |
Teachers in grades 5 and 6 will continue to use Scott Foresman's "Reading Street" for instruction in writing, while grade 7 and 8 will use Holt's "Elements of Language."
|
reading coach
|
comparison of WOW data (fall and spring) with actual FCAT data
|
WOW scores, FCAT scores
|
| 3 |
Teachers in grades 7 and 8 will utilize Holt's online essay scorer.
|
reading coach
|
comparison of Holt's scores with WOW scores and FCAT data
|
Holt scores, WOW scores, FCAT scores
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
In 2010, 96% of students will score 3.5 or higher on FCAT Writing.
|
essay scoring
|
reading coach
|
September 2009
|
The language arts teachers will monitor correct scoring of essays during the WOW administrations.
|
reading coach
|
|
In 2010, 96% of students will score 3.5 or higher on FCAT Writing.
|
online essay scorer
|
Holt representative
|
October 2009
|
The language arts teachers will monitor correct scoring of essays by the online scoring tool.
|
reading coach
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Holt, "Elements of Language" |
textbook |
$20,000.00 |
| Total: $20,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| professional books |
Title I |
$100.00 |
| Total: $100.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| miscellaneous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Final Total: $20,600.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
The tenets of NCLB require an emphasis on promoting and improving parent involvement, and we at BMS also believe that parent involvement affects student achievement. For this reason, BMS began hosting a Family Night. In the fall of 2009, we hosted approxiamately 350 parents and another 25 parents at our first Family Reading Night. This year we would like to expand our Family Night to increase participation by parents.
|
BMS will expand its Family Night by in increasing
publicity and issuing invitations to families.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
The BMS Family Night will be publicized in the local newspaper.
|
Pam Short - reading coach
|
We will note the presence of the article in the newspaper.
|
observation of newspaper article
|
| 2 |
BMS will send invitations to parents to attend Family Night.
|
Pam Short - reading coach
|
We will note the response on the survey as to whether or not the parent received an invitation to attend.
|
survey
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
BMS will expand its Family Night by increasing
publicity and issuing invitations to families.
|
reading / language arts
|
reading coach
|
October 1, 2009
|
The reading coach will attend departmental meetings to ensure that the Family Night is being planned appropriately.
|
Pam Short - reading coach
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| refreshments |
Title I |
$100.00 |
| supplies for craft stations |
Title I |
$100.00 |
| door prizes |
principal's budget, Title I |
$100.00 |
| Total: $300.00 |
| Final Total: $300.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
McDougal Littel textbooks |
district textbook |
$20,000.00 |
| Writing |
Holt, "Elements of Language" |
textbook |
$20,000.00 |
| Total: $40,000.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Mathematics |
interwrite pads |
Title I |
$400.00 |
| Mathematics |
laptop computers |
Title I |
$2,800.00 |
| Mathematics |
LCD projectors |
Title I |
$900.00 |
| Total: $4,100.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Writing |
professional books |
Title I |
$100.00 |
| Science |
professional books |
Title I |
$200.00 |
| Total: $300.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
"Understanding Poverty" by Ruby Payne |
Title I |
$250.00 |
| Reading |
miscellaneoous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Mathematics |
miscellaneous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Writing |
miscellaneous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Science |
miscellaneous supplies |
principal |
$500.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
refreshments |
Title I |
$100.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
supplies for craft stations |
Title I |
$100.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
door prizes |
principal's budget, Title I |
$100.00 |
| Total: $2,550.00 |
| Final Total: $46,950.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 8/31/2009 2:25:06 PM)
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
|
technology equipment
|
1500
|
|
student recognition
|
1200
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
The School Advisory Council at Bonifay Middle School assists in the preparation and evaluation of our school improvement plan
and in the preparation and planning of the school's annual budget. The School Advisory Council is composed of a body of
members represented by all constituent groups of our school. The majority of the members are persons who are not
employed by the school. The parent representatives nominated for membership volunteered to serve on the School Advisory
Council after an announcement was made at orientation during preschool. The council will be formed from the people who
expressed an interest in becoming involved. Meetings are scheduled at least once every nine weeks and other meetings will
be planned as needed. The first meeting for the 2009-2010 school year has been scheduled for Wednesday, September 2, 2009. At this meeting the council will elect officers and make decisions on the
expenditures based on school needs.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Donald Etheridge,
Principal
|
|
2)
Brittany Jones,
Student
|
|
3)
Claire Segers,
Student
|
|
4)
Glenn Rich,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Pam Short,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Kathryn Worthing,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Deborah Jones,
Teacher
|
|
8)
Rhonda Jones,
Teacher
|
|
9)
Si Locke,
Teacher
|
|
10)
Carolyn Matthias,
Teacher
|
|
11)
Devon Miles,
Teacher
|
|
12)
Destra Moses,
Teacher
|
|
13)
Melanie Albury,
Teacher
|
|
14)
Pam Alford,
Teacher
|
|
15)
Lisa Armondi,
Business Member
|
|
16)
Todd Flanary,
Business Member
|
|
17)
Bill Parish,
Business Member
|
|
18)
Wendy Phelps,
Parent
|
|
19)
Brett Kandzer,
Parent
|
|
20)
Andy Langley,
Parent
|
|
21)
Glenda Howell,
Parent
|
|
22)
Sherry Fitzpatrick,
Parent
|
|
23)
Nikki Bowen,
Parent
|
|
24)
Anita Coates,
Parent
|
|
25)
Wendy Syfrett,
Parent
|
|
26)
Debbie Russ,
Parent
|
|
27)
Holly Segers,
Community Member
|
|
28)
Rena Welch,
School Support Personnel
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Holmes School District BONIFAY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
72%
|
61%
|
99%
|
48%
|
280
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
66% |
70% |
|
|
136 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
55% (YES) |
69% (YES) |
|
|
124
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Holmes School District BONIFAY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
71%
|
70%
|
98%
|
44%
|
283
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
65% |
80% |
|
|
145 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
63% (YES) |
76% (YES) |
|
|
139
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Holmes School District BONIFAY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
70%
|
65%
|
88%
|
35%
|
258
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
64% |
72% |
|
|
136 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
60% (YES) |
72% (YES) |
|
|
132
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
526 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |