VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS


District Vision: To become the nation's leader in developing successful students.

District Mission: To provide an education that enables each student to excel as a successful and responsible citizen.

School Vision: Students, parents, and the community assume responsibility for participating in and supporting our performance-based career preparation program for success in a chosen vocation.

School Mission: We will prepare students with occupational and social skills to enrich the community's quality of life.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

Brief History and Background of the School—D. W. Waters Memorial opened its doors in 1999 with Paul Durso as the site administrator in the educational building of the Highland Avenue Church of Christ with approximately 50 students. In 2002, D. W. Waters Career Center faculty and staff, under the principalship of David Best, relocated into the newly renovated former Jefferson High School building at 2704 N. Highland Avenue with a student body of 525. In 2003, Mr. Best retired and Veronica D. Knight was appointed principal. The facility offers several career technical program opportunities for at-risk youth and is also the locationi for Teen Parent West and Project Excel. The school is located on a small campus in an inner-city setting.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

Unique School Strengths for Next Year – PLCs, Best Practices, Career Academies, small classes, team meetings. We were awarded a Success Grant through Suncoast for Kids Foundation.


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year – Overall student attendance; parent and community participation; low academic levels of incoming students; low socioeconomic status (SES); and challenges with recruiting and retaining students. Since there are no SAC funds available this year, we will have to find other sources to support our students.


Student Demographics

Student Demographics – 1% Asian or Pacific Islander, 61.4% Black non-Hispanic, 23.5% Hispanic, 10.5% White non-Hispanic, and 3.6% Multiracial. Our free or reduced lunch roster is made up of 86% of our students, and 16.2% of our student population is classified ESE.


Student Attendance Rates

Student Attendance Rates – The attendance rate for 2008-2009 was 80.5%, which was an increase of 0.4% over the 2007-2008 rate of 80.1%.


Student Mobility

Mobility rate is 18.84%


Student Suspension Rates

Student Suspension Rates – For 2008-2009, there were 158 unduplicated Out-of-School suspensions and 298 duplicated Out-of-School suspensions.


Student Retention Rates

n/a


Class Size

Class Size – We meet the class size reduction law with following approximate ratio of 19-1 students in all technical classes and 22-1 in all academic classes.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern – We recruit students from Alonso HS, Blake HS, Chamberlain HS, Hillsborough HS, Jefferson HS, King HS, Leto HS, Middleton HS, Plant HS, Robinson HS, and Tampa Bay Technical HS. Their school grades over the last couple of years have been: Alonso HS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (B); Blake HS 2007-2008 (D) & 2008-2009 (D); Chamberlain HS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (D); Hillsborough HS (A) & 2008-2009 (C); Jefferson HS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (C); King HS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (D); Leto HS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (D); Middleton HS 2007-2008 (D) & 2008-2009 (D); Plant HS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (B); Robinson HS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (B); and Tampa Bay Technical HS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (B); Adams MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Davidsen MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Dowdell MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Farnell MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Ferrell MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Franklin MS 2007-2008 (D) & 2008-2009 (C); Greco MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Jennings MS (2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Madison MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); McLane MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (D); Memorial MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (B); Monroe MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (A)7 Pierce MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Progress Village MS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (A); Roland Park K-8 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Sligh MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Stewart MS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (A); Van Buren MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Webb MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Williams MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Wilson MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A).


Partnerships and Grants

We received a Project Success grant from Suncoast for Kids Foundation to provide support to help meet the educational needs of all of our students and to assist with scholarship opportunities for post secondary studies.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Veronica Knight B.A., M.A. 9 12 n/a
Assis Principal Glen Stewart B.A., M. Ed., J.D. 3 15 n/a

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
Reading Endorsed K-12
Gen. Ed. 1-6
Yvette Robitaille B.S., M. Ed. 3 4 n/a

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
Teacher Interview Day General Directors June 2009
MAP Supervisor of Teacher Recruitment July 2009
Performance Pay General Director of Federal Programs July 2009
Partnering new teachers with veteran staff Assistant Principal On-going


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
Toshimi Parker M.S. Mathematics Alternative Ed. ACP
Suzanne Gainer M.S. ESOL Students
Language Arts

Attending ESOL Classes


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
14028.635.735.7649329029


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
Anne Litzenberger Clistell Fields Same CTE Program ACP Program
Lesson Modeling
Common Planning
Barbara Meshna Toshimi Parker Guidance Counselor for Teen Parent Program ACP Program
Team Meetings



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A


Title I, Part C- Migrant


Title I, Part D


Title II


Title III


Title X- Homeless


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)


Violence Prevention Programs


Nutrition Programs


Housing Programs


Head Start


Adult Education


Career and Technical Education


Job Training


Other


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.
1. Veronica D. Knight, Principal
2. Glen Stewart, APC
3. Jena Bolasny, School Psychologist
4. Barbara Meshna, Guidance Counselor
5. Marshall Schroeder, Guidance Counselor
6. Yvette Robitaille, Reading Coach
7. Grace Hutchinson, Social Worker
8. Windell Roberson, Program Advisor
9. Kenneth Myers, SAC Chair


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

The purpose of the RtI team in our school is to provide high quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using performance and learning rate over time to make important education decisions to guide instruction. The RtI team functions to address the progress of low performing students, help meet AYP and help students stay in regular education setting and improve long term outcomes. The team uses a problem solving model and all decisions are made with data.

• We will receive training on how to implement RtI.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

• Kenneth Myers, the School Advisory Council (SAC) Chair is a member of the Problem Solving Team.
The Problem Solving Team along with the faculty and SAC were involved in School Improvement Plan
• The School Improvement Plan is the document that guides the work of the Problem Solving Team. The large part of the work of the Problem Solving Team is outlined in the Action Steps, Evaluation Process, Evaluation Too, and Professional Development of the School Improvement Plan.
• Since one of the main tasks of the Problem Solving Team is to monitor student data, it will monitor the effectiveness of the Action Steps and suggest modifications if needed.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Academic teachers are responsible for maintaining TABE pre, interim and post assessments.


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

• The RtI PowerPoint presented to Principals during School Improvement Training will be shared with staff.
• As the District’s Problem Solving Team develops resources and staff development courses on RtI, these tools and staff development sessions will be conducted with staff when they become available.
• Professional Development sessions will occur during Tuesday faculty meeting times.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


D.W. Waters Career Center 2009-2010 beginning school data based on the TABE:
Reading Average Grade Level: 5.5 Math Computation Average Grade Level: 5.0
Language Average Grade Level: 4.2 Applied Mathematics Average Grade Level: 6.2


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

• Our instructional calendar aligns with the district’s calendar to include all district and state assessments (FCAT, FAIR, CELLA, ACT/SAT, TABE and GED). We use these assessments to provide data to drive instruction.
• There are specific benchmarks that each and every student must accomplish in order for proper credit to be given. The TABE test which is given 3 times a year, drives the course assignment that each and every student is assigned based on ability and results. Teacher made tests, quizzes and lesson reviews are done through the course of the nine weeks to monitor progress.
• Each teacher monitors their individual classes and makes academic adjustments as necessary.
• Instructional calendars and curriculum pacing are altered to meet students’ needs.
• We have a pilot program (Program Excel) that serves 39 middle schools 15 soon to be 16 year olds. This is a program we have that addresses specific academic curriculum.
• Our Career Center program was designed to be a two year program in order to meet our school’s benchmarks: 11 total credits (8 academic and 3 technical), pass FCAT reading and math and pass the GED.
• We have active committees that include: 1) Best Practices for both academic and technical programs, 2) Peer teachers and peer support groups, 3) Various school improvement committees and 4) Constant communication via internal email, and walkthroughs.
• Assistance is provided to struggling teachers through peer teachers, open individual conversations, workshops and the opportunity to observe other teachers.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Reading:
o 9th grade - Main Idea, inferences…
• Math:
o 9th/10th grade – Quadratic equations …
• Science:
o 8th grade – Scientific thinking, vocabulary…


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

The process begins with teacher input, based on observations and assessments, followed by counselor evaluations and support. The administration is able to look at the student performance information in Sagebrush to get an overall picture of individual student grades given, assessment gains, and to monitor their progress and needs.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

The school’s goal is for students to become industry certified so they can go out into the workforce and be successful.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

The school’s goal is for students to become industry certified so they can go out into the workforce and be successful.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


• PLCs meet twice a month. At these meetings, teachers share best practices, as all of our teachers work with at-risk students who are at different academic levels. All teachers use 10 minutes at the beginning of each period to provide a mini-lesson based on student need.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

PLCs work together to build mini-lessons. PLCs also work together to share and build lessons for their core curriculum.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

• Administration monitors the delivery of the regular curriculum lessons and Mini-Lessons through administration walkthroughs, and monitoring of the discussion.
• PLCs discuss and implement alternative teaching strategies and lessons for students who continue to show non-mastery. These discussions build a database list of effective teaching strategies for the PLC to use with current and future students.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


Core Curriculum
• FAIR – reading assessment
• TABE – reading, math and language arts assessment
• PLATO – core courses
• FCAT
Supplemental/Intensive Instruction
• Students receiving Supplementary Services and Intensive Services will use all the assessment tools listed above.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

The TABE is used to identify students who have or have not mastered targeted skills. These students are regrouped within the classroom and given additional instruction.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

The TABE is used to identify students who have or have not mastered targeted skills. These students are regrouped within the classroom and given additional instruction.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

TABE data is discussed within PLCs. Best practices are shared to be incorporated into lessons to increase student achievement.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

• The Principal leads the leadership team meetings, attends PLC meetings and monitors overall student attendance, TABE testing, and FAIR testing.
• The APs monitor master calendar, plan and conduct PLCs, monitor and make changes to assessment calendar and intervene on a need basis anything having to do with academic progress.
• The leadership team monitors the data analysis on a quarterly basis and makes recommendations for curriculum adjustments where needed.
• The principal and APC conduct classroom walkthroughs to monitor the teaching and learning process.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


Core Curriculum
• Through Project Excel, overage middle school students are able to move to 10th grade
• Through the Teen Parent Program, students are able to continue their education during their pregnancy and return to their neighborhood schools without falling behind in their academic studies.
• Through the Career Academies Programs, students earn industry certification.
• Through core curriculum, students who pass the FCAT (or ACT), earn required academic and career credits, and pass the GED are able to receive a regular high school diploma.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Students who are experiencing difficulty in the core curriculum attend ELP during the school day.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

• Data analysis at the beginning of the school year of teacher’s past year data and current student data
• Teachers’ reflection on the Action Steps within the School Improvement Plan
• Teachers’ reflection on the Professional Development listed in the School Improvement Plan
• Teacher needs and requests through IPDPs
• Administrative walkthroughs and conferences with teachers
• Instructional Coaches conferences with teachers


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

• Students who are not successful in the core curriculum (per progress reports) are targeted for ELP services.
• Students earning high school credits who are demonstrating non-mastery through PLATO reports, receive targeted interventions and parental communication.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

• TABE is administered three times a year, teacher-made tests are administered at the end of a chapter/lesson, quizzes are done weekly on a need basis and end of course exams are administered at the end of each quarter.
• FAIR Data
• PLATO Report


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

• At all levels, classroom teachers differentiate instruction so that students who have mastered skills have the opportunity to enhance their knowledge base.
• We have a pilot group of middle school students (Project Excel) that are assigned specific courses related to those students who are in transition.
• At the middle level, the following high school courses are offered: Algebra 1, Intensive Math I, Integrated Science, Intensive Reading, American Government, Law Studies, and English I.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

• Student performance on assessments
• Student performance on class work
• Teacher recommendations
• Counselor recommendations
• When needed, one-on-one conferences with students and parents




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
Language Arts Teachers (6-12) All team members rotate responsibilities 2x month During 50-minute lunch • Establish and follow group norms
• Study and discuss application of effective classroom instructional strategies.

Career Teachers All team members rotate responsibilities Course Specific 2x per month During 50-minute lunch Same as above
Mathematics Teachers All team members rotate responsibilities 2x month During 50-minute lunch Same as above
Teen Parent Teachers All team members rotate responsibilities 2x month During 50-minute lunch Same as above
Administrative Staff Members
(Ad Hoc PLC)

Principal, Assistant Principal, reading coach, guidance counselors, program advisor and tech resource teacher 2x month 6th period (50 minutes • Establish and follow group norms
• Review the needs of the instructional PLCs to create cohesiveness within the school.
• Prepare and deliver school-wide in-service on their research.


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

No Other Goals were submitted for this school

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


Review SIP
Assist in School Improvement and parent participation analysis using collected Data.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Veronica D. Knight,   Principal
2)  Kenneth Myers,   SAC Chair
3)  Eric Mack,   SAC Chair
4)  Barbara Meshna,   Teacher
5)  Marshall Schroeder,   Teacher
6)  Carla Demming,   Teacher
7)  Henry Humbert,   Business Member
8)  David Williams,   Business Member
9)  Mark Stanhope,   Business Member
10)  Wade Watson,   Business Member
11)  Lorenzo Reed,   Business Member
12)  Stephanie Gulledge,   Business Member
13)  Lisa Estien,   Business Member
14)  Ralph Kyles,   Parent
15)  Wynelle Gilbert,   Community Member
16)  Jacki Myers,   Community Member
17)  Faith Jones,   School Support Personnel
18)  Windell Roberson,   Union Steward
19)  Glen Stewart,   Assistant Principal
 

AYP DATA

No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found