VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
District Vision: To become the nation's leader in developing successful students.
District Mission: To provide an education that enables each student to excel as a successful and responsible citizen.
School Vision: Students, parents, and the community assume responsibility for participating in and supporting our performance-based career preparation program for success in a chosen vocation.
School Mission: We will prepare students with occupational and social skills to enrich the community's quality of life.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Brief History and Background of the School—D. W. Waters Memorial opened its doors in 1999 with Paul Durso as the site administrator in the educational building of the Highland Avenue Church of Christ with approximately 50 students. In 2002, D. W. Waters Career Center faculty and staff, under the principalship of David Best, relocated into the newly renovated former Jefferson High School building at 2704 N. Highland Avenue with a student body of 525. In 2003, Mr. Best retired and Veronica D. Knight was appointed principal. The facility offers several career technical program opportunities for at-risk youth and is also the locationi for Teen Parent West and Project Excel. The school is located on a small campus in an inner-city setting.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
Unique School Strengths for Next Year – PLCs, Best Practices, Career Academies, small classes, team meetings. We were awarded a Success Grant through Suncoast for Kids Foundation.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year – Overall student attendance; parent and community participation; low academic levels of incoming students; low socioeconomic status (SES); and challenges with recruiting and retaining students. Since there are no SAC funds available this year, we will have to find other sources to support our students.
Student Demographics
Student Demographics – 1% Asian or Pacific Islander, 61.4% Black non-Hispanic, 23.5% Hispanic, 10.5% White non-Hispanic, and 3.6% Multiracial. Our free or reduced lunch roster is made up of 86% of our students, and 16.2% of our student population is classified ESE.
Student Attendance Rates
Student Attendance Rates – The attendance rate for 2008-2009 was 80.5%, which was an increase of 0.4% over the 2007-2008 rate of 80.1%.
Student Mobility
Mobility rate is 18.84%
Student Suspension Rates
Student Suspension Rates – For 2008-2009, there were 158 unduplicated Out-of-School suspensions and 298 duplicated Out-of-School suspensions.
Student Retention Rates
n/a
Class Size
Class Size – We meet the class size reduction law with following approximate ratio of 19-1 students in all technical classes and 22-1 in all academic classes.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern – We recruit students from Alonso HS, Blake HS, Chamberlain HS, Hillsborough HS, Jefferson HS, King HS, Leto HS, Middleton HS, Plant HS, Robinson HS, and Tampa Bay Technical HS. Their school grades over the last couple of years have been: Alonso HS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (B); Blake HS 2007-2008 (D) & 2008-2009 (D); Chamberlain HS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (D); Hillsborough HS (A) & 2008-2009 (C); Jefferson HS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (C); King HS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (D); Leto HS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (D); Middleton HS 2007-2008 (D) & 2008-2009 (D); Plant HS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (B); Robinson HS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (B); and Tampa Bay Technical HS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (B); Adams MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Davidsen MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Dowdell MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Farnell MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Ferrell MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Franklin MS 2007-2008 (D) & 2008-2009 (C); Greco MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Jennings MS (2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Madison MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); McLane MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (D); Memorial MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (B); Monroe MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (A)7 Pierce MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Progress Village MS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (A); Roland Park K-8 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Sligh MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Stewart MS 2007-2008 (B) & 2008-2009 (A); Van Buren MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Webb MS 2007-2008 (C) & 2008-2009 (C); Williams MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A); Wilson MS 2007-2008 (A) & 2008-2009 (A).
Partnerships and Grants
We received a Project Success grant from Suncoast for Kids Foundation to provide support to help meet the educational needs of all of our students and to assist with scholarship opportunities for post secondary studies.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Veronica Knight
|
B.A., M.A.
|
9
|
12
|
n/a
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Glen Stewart
|
B.A., M. Ed., J.D.
|
3
|
15
|
n/a
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
Reading Endorsed K-12
Gen. Ed. 1-6
|
Yvette Robitaille
|
B.S., M. Ed.
|
3
|
4
|
n/a
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
Teacher Interview Day
|
General Directors
|
June 2009
|
|
|
MAP
|
Supervisor of Teacher Recruitment
|
July 2009
|
|
|
Performance Pay
|
General Director of Federal Programs
|
July 2009
|
|
|
Partnering new teachers with veteran staff
|
Assistant Principal
|
On-going
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Toshimi Parker
|
M.S. Mathematics
|
Alternative Ed.
|
ACP
|
|
Suzanne Gainer
|
M.S.
|
ESOL Students
Language Arts
|
Attending ESOL Classes
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 14 | 0 | 28.6 | 35.7 | 35.7 | 64 | 93 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Anne Litzenberger
|
Clistell Fields
|
Same CTE Program
|
ACP Program
Lesson Modeling
Common Planning
|
|
Barbara Meshna
|
Toshimi Parker
|
Guidance Counselor for Teen Parent Program
|
ACP Program
Team Meetings
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part D
Title II
Title III
Title X- Homeless
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Violence Prevention Programs
Nutrition Programs
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
Language Arts Teachers (6-12)
|
All team members rotate responsibilities
|
2x month
|
During 50-minute lunch
|
• Establish and follow group norms
• Study and discuss application of effective classroom instructional strategies.
|
|
Career Teachers
|
All team members rotate responsibilities
|
Course Specific 2x per month
|
During 50-minute lunch
|
Same as above
|
|
Mathematics Teachers
|
All team members rotate responsibilities
|
2x month
|
During 50-minute lunch
|
Same as above
|
|
Teen Parent Teachers
|
All team members rotate responsibilities
|
2x month
|
During 50-minute lunch
|
Same as above
|
Administrative Staff Members
(Ad Hoc PLC)
|
Principal, Assistant Principal, reading coach, guidance counselors, program advisor and tech resource teacher
|
2x month
|
6th period (50 minutes
|
• Establish and follow group norms
• Review the needs of the instructional PLCs to create cohesiveness within the school.
• Prepare and deliver school-wide in-service on their research.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In the spring of 2009, the TABE Reading Comprehension grade level average for all students was 5.5.
|
In the spring of 2010, the
TABE Reading Comprehension grade level average will increase from 5.5 to 6.5.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Daily Mini Lessons and Assessment
|
1. Teachers
|
1. Walkthroughs and PLC Notes
|
1. Informal Assessments
|
| 2 |
2. Class Book Read
|
2. Teachers
|
2. Assessment Results
|
2.FAIR, TABE
|
| 3 |
3. Shared Inquiry
|
3. Teachers
|
3. Assessment Results
|
3. FAIR, TABE
|
| 4 |
Level 1 and 2 students are in Intensive Reading Class
|
Guidance Counselors, Teachers
APC
|
Assessment Results
|
TABE, FAIR, FCAT Reading
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
In the spring of 2010, the TABE Reading Comprehension grade level average will increase from 5.5 to 6.5.
|
FAIR
|
Reading Coach
|
Spring, 2010
|
Walkthroughs
|
Administration
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
In the spring of 2009, the TABE Math Computation grade level average for all students was 5.0
|
In the spring of 2010, the TABE Math Computation grade level average will increase from 5.0 to 6.0.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
1. Mini Lesson sand Assessments
|
1. Teachers
|
1. Walkthroughs and PLC Notes
|
1. Plato Reports
|
| 2 |
Plato Self Pace Credit Software
|
2. Teachers
|
2, Walkthroughs and PLC Notes
|
2. Plato and FCAT Practice Assessment
|
| 3 |
3. Small group instruction
|
3. Teachers
|
3. Walkthroughs and PLC Notes
|
3. Teacher-made tests and quizzes
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
| No data submitted |
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
Review SIP
Assist in School Improvement and parent participation analysis using collected Data.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Veronica D. Knight,
Principal
|
|
2)
Kenneth Myers,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Eric Mack,
SAC Chair
|
|
4)
Barbara Meshna,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Marshall Schroeder,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Carla Demming,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Henry Humbert,
Business Member
|
|
8)
David Williams,
Business Member
|
|
9)
Mark Stanhope,
Business Member
|
|
10)
Wade Watson,
Business Member
|
|
11)
Lorenzo Reed,
Business Member
|
|
12)
Stephanie Gulledge,
Business Member
|
|
13)
Lisa Estien,
Business Member
|
|
14)
Ralph Kyles,
Parent
|
|
15)
Wynelle Gilbert,
Community Member
|
|
16)
Jacki Myers,
Community Member
|
|
17)
Faith Jones,
School Support Personnel
|
|
18)
Windell Roberson,
Union Steward
|
|
19)
Glen Stewart,
Assistant Principal
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found