VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS
School Mission Statement:
Altha Public School strives to provide every student the opportunity to excel academically, emotionally, and socially in a safe, positive environment.
Beliefs:
Altha Public School believes each student should be recognized as a unique individual who should be allowed to perform at full potential academically, emotionally, and socially – regardless of race, gender, ethnic or social background, religious beliefs, or ability.
Altha Public School believes that a caring relationship between teachers and students is vital to ensure the success of every child.
Altha Public School recognizes that a Pre-K through twelfth grade school has greatly varied age differences and needs, which provide unique opportunities and challenges. Therefore, Altha Public School believes it is crucial for teachers, parents, and community members, collaboratively, to provide students with experiences that will enable them to become productive citizens.
PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS
SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS
Brief History and Background of the School
Altha School had its beginnings over a century ago in 1906 when Martin Richards donated three acres of land, and Altha patrons donated $300 towards construction of a school. The Calhoun County School Board added $1000 and the first public school was built just south of the present day United Methodist Church. By 1919 enrollment was 276 and many students aspired to graduate from high school. At the request of several parents, the School Board granted high school status to the Altha School on June 2, 1919. The first high school diplomas were awarded in 1922 to Miss Lucille Langford and Miss Mae Peacock. By 1926, enrollment grew and classes overflowed into the adjacent Masonic Lodge and Methodist Church. Area citizens petitioned the Calhoun County School Board to have a Freeholders’ election for the purpose of bonding themselves to pay an additional two mills in taxes to raise $20,000 to build a larger school. Sixty-six freeholders voted for and only one voted against the measure. The result was the construction of a two-story red brick school built on a five-acre plot at the corner of Glisson and Main Streets (today the "white building"). In 1927, Avie Baggett, Ester Brooks, Willie B. Denham, Florence Martin, Annie Kingry, Leonard Dunlap, Otis Peacock, and James Troupe received their diplomas at the first graduation exercise to be held at the new red brick school. In 1939-1940 the building received its first renovation when Roosevelt’s Public Works Administration assisted in renovating the 1926 red brick building. A pitched roof with gabled ends replaced the flat roof which had developed bad leaks. Covered alcoves with arched portals graced the front entrances and the building gleamed with a coat of white paint. The auditorium was transformed into classrooms, restrooms were renovated, steam heat replaced the old hot air system, and the former home economics classroom became the lunchroom serving hot lunches. During the renovation, elementary students attended classes in vacant houses about town, junior high students met in the Methodist Church, and the senior high classes (except for agriculture and physical education) met in the Baptist Church. The school plant was enlarged in 1950 with the addition of the gymnasium. Altha Wildcats now had an indoor court, bleachers, and lights. The entire 1st - 12th grades shared the white building until 1985 when construction of new administrative offices and elementary classrooms was completed. In 1990, through the efforts of a group of concerned citizens, the Calhoun County School Board received a grant to restore and preserve the old white school building. In June of 1999, 27 acres of land east of the present campus were purchased. Coach Arthur Faurot promptly broke ground to turn this piece of ground into a much needed
regulation size baseball field. His efforts were rewarded in 2002 when “The Cotton Patch” was named the Florida Baseball Field of the Year. In 2007, a new weightroom facility was completed, the "white building" Building One was repainted, the front of the building was landscaped, trees were planted along Highway 71, and concrete foundations were placed for the "senior picnic area" out front. As well, tile work on the floor of the gym annex and main office area was completed. During the summer of 2008, two of our elementary classroom wings were demolished by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to clean up a recurring contamination problem. Portables were brought in to house the students that normally occupy these classroom wings. The school district has received funding from Florida DEP to build new classrooms to replace those two wings. Due to budget issues both at the State and Local levels, construction has been postponed at this time. During the summer of 2009, more renovations occurred around the campus which included extending the administration wing to accommodate a teacher work area away from the main part of the school office and painting inside the old white building. Also, the gymnasium underwent remodeling with an updated AC/Heater System, removal of the old heating pipes and the covering of the outdated windows with an insulated wall. Portables brought in during the DEP cleanup of 2008 were removed and those classes were absorbed into existing classrooms around the campus. Inside the White Building a fresh coat of paint covers all the walls and the lockers were given structural updates.
Most importantly, our students continue to excel in all areas: high academic achievement, state and national recognition in sports and extra-curricular activities, and vast numbers of hours invested in volunteer service.
Unique School Strengths for Next Year
This school year, the faculty and staff of Altha Public School has endeavored to become a Positive Behavior Support school to increase academic performance, increase safety, decrease problem behavior, and establish positive school cultures. This school year we also have both a new principal and a new assistant principal. Altha Public School continues to offer Intensive Reading Classes for Level 1 and 2 Disfluent and Fluent Readers. Level 3 9th Graders are enrolled in a Reading Class designed to incorporate reading strategies to help enhance their progress in all areas. Also incorporated into the Master Schedule was a Speech Class which incorporates higher level reading strategies for the Level 4 and Level 5 Readers in order to advance their progress. Also there is an Intensive Math Class for the 11th and 12th Graders who have not pass the FCAT Math Test and a College Prep Math Class to prepare students for entering College Mathematics. All Students With Disabilities at the Middle and High School Level continue to be placed in General Education classes with support facilitation being provided by a certified Exceptional Student Education Teacher.
Students with Disabilities Made AYP in Reading.
Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year
The unique weaknesses of Altha Public School for this school year include:
*There are new faculty members in key positions such as Intensive Reading.
*There is a new administration with both a new Principal and a new Assistant Principal.
*The main focus of attention for our administration is on the Middle School/High School for our school is a PreK to 12th Grade Campus.
*The teachers in the Middle School and High School share dual grade level teaching duties with teachers having both middle and high school classes.
*There are activities that are not appropriate for every grade level on the campus such as those appropriate for Elementary might not be appropriate for High School and vice versa.
*The scheduling of classes for Middle School/High School is difficult when trying to make a master schedule but made more so when having to add the Elementary to accomodate lunch, music, P.E. and other pertinent aspects of our students daily activities.
Student Demographics
Altha Public School serves a school population that consists of 627 students from a small, rural community in Northwest Florida. According to the 2007-2008 State Public Accountability Report 96.8% of students are White, 1.8% are Hispanic, 0.8% are American Indian, and 0.6% are Multi-racial. Economically disadvantaged students account for 43.7% of the population. Additionally, 18.2% of students are Students with Disabilities (SWD), 0.2% are classified as English Language Learners (ELL), and 1.9% of students are gifted.
Student Attendance Rates
According to the Florida School Indicators Report in 2007-2008 which is the latest data, Altha Public School had 12.2% of its school population absent 21+ days.
Student Mobility
According to the Florida School Indicators Report in 2007-2008 which is the latest data, the mobility rate of the school is 2.7%.
Student Suspension Rates
According to the Florida School Indicators Report which is the latest data, Altha Public School’s percent suspension rate in 2007-2008 was: In-school 8%, Out-of-school 3%; In 2006-2007 the data was divided into three categories (Elementary, Middle and High respectively): In-school 0%, 18.0%, 10.7%, Out-of-school 1.7%, 8.6%, 4.7%. In 2005-2006 again the data was divided into three categories (Elementary, Middle and High respectively) In-school 0%, 23.5%, 12.2%, Out-of-school 0.3%, 13.7%, 5% The suspension rates have diminished over the past three years.
Student Retention Rates
The student retention rate at Altha Public School for the past school year was 4% The district offers credit recovery during the summer and then during the school year for students who fail courses.
Class Size
The average class size at Altha Public School for 2008-2009 in general education classes in Pre-K-3 is 14.88, in Grades 6-8 it is 18.14, and in Grades 9-12 it is 11.91 students.
Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern
Altha Public School is unique for we are a PreK to 12th Grade combination school with all three grade levels housed on one campus. The school maintained high academic standards over the last several years and has been an A school for the past 3 years. However we have not met AYP status under federal guidelines since 2006.
We also receive students from Carr School (K-8) has been an A school for the last seven years. For the last six years Carr School has earned an A school grade from Florida’s A+ program and for the last five years, achieved AYP status under federal guidelines.
Partnerships and Grants
Partnerships and Grants
1. The school has an articulation agreement with Chipola College which allows our students access to Dual Enrollment courses.
2. Take Stock in Children-Role: Provide mentors and post-secondary scholarships for selected Altha Public School Students.
Altha Public School is fortunate to have strong partnerships with our local business community. They provide much needed resources and support to our school on a regular basis throughout the school year.
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA
Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.
School Grades Trend Data
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data
HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS
| Position | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as an Administrator | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Principal
|
Mrs. Ladona Kelley
|
Education:
AA Chipola Junior College
BS Elementary Education Florida State University
MS Educational Leadership FAMU
Certifications/ Endorsements:
Primary Education,
Elementary Education,
Middle Grades Integrated Curriculum,
Reading Endorsement,
ESOL,
Educational Leadership
|
2
|
2
|
2008-2009: Assitant Principal of Altha Public School; Grade A
|
|
Assis Principal
|
Mrs. Stephanie Brogden
|
Education:
AA Chipola Junior College
BS Florida State University
MS Troy State University
Certification/ Endorsements:
Educational Leadership University of West Florida
|
|
|
2008-2009: Guidance Counselor of Blountstown Middle School; Grade A
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES
| Subject Area | Name | Degree(s)/ Certification(s) | # of Years at Current School | # of Years as a Coach | Prior Performance Record * |
|
Reading
|
Wretha Webb
|
BS in Elementary Education, MS in Educational Leadership, EDS in Elementary Education with a Reading Endorsement
|
21
|
4
|
2008-2009: Grade A
|
|
Reading
|
Kay Tipton
|
Masters degree in Elementary Education and Ed. Leadership, Reading Endorsed
|
3
|
5
|
2008-2009: Grade A; 2008: Grade A.
|
|
Reading
|
Russell Baggett
|
BS in Social Science, MS in Elementary Education with a Reading Endorsement
|
19
|
|
2008-2009: Grade A
|
* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS
| Description of Strategy | Person Responsible | Projected Completion Date | Not Applicable (If not, please explain why) |
|
The district and school will recruit and retain highly qualified reading teachers by advertising for available positions, providing reading endorsement training, paying stipends for attending reading endorsement classes, paying bonuses for completion of the reading endorsement, providing reading professional development to all teachers, and providing support through reading coaches.
|
Wilson T. McClellan, Superintendent
Vicki Davis, Assistant Superintendent
Wynette Peacock, Director of Curriculum and Instruction
Kay Tipton, District Reading Coach
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
Partnering new teachers with trained, experienced mentors
|
Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
Utilize district support to assist with experienced teachers needing further support.
|
Principal
|
Ongoing
|
|
Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
| Name | Certification | Teaching Assignment | Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified |
|
Laura Sullivan
|
Varying Exceptionalities K-12
|
Middle School Reading
|
Presently in the process of completing Reading Endorsement
|
|
Christina Proctor
|
Elementary Education Grade 6-12, Exceptional Student Education Grade K-12
|
Middle School Intensive Reading
|
Presently in the process of completing Reading Endorsement
|
Staff Demographics
| Total Number of Instructional Staff | % of First-Year Teachers | % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience | % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience | % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees | % Highly Qualified | % Reading Endorsed Teachers | % National Board Certified Teachers | % ESOL Endorsed |
| 49 | 8 | 27 | 24 | 41 | 31 | 96 | 12 | 6 | 6 |
Teacher Mentoring Program
| Mentor Name | Mentee Assigned | Rationale for Pairing | Planned Mentoring Activities |
|
Cindy Alday
|
Rebekah Orama
|
Experienced, Trained mentor at the Elementary Level
|
Completing a program designed by the district for beginning teachers
|
|
Russell Baggett
|
Tyler Stoutamire
|
Experienced, Trained Mentor at the High School Level
|
Completing a program designed by the district for beginning teachers
|
|
Sherry Joyner
|
Laura Cunningham
|
Experienced, Trained Mentor at the Middle/High School Level
|
Completing a program designed by the district for beginning teachers
|
|
Alysha Edenfield
|
Nicole Tuszynski
|
Experienced, Trained Mentor at the Primary Level
|
Completing a program designed by the district for beginning teachers
|
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: For Title I schools only
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part C- Migrant
Title I, Part D
Title II
Title III
Title X- Homeless
Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
Violence Prevention Programs
Nutrition Programs
Housing Programs
Head Start
Adult Education
Career and Technical Education
Job Training
Other
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model
Professional Learning Communities
| PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.) | PLC Leader | Frequency of PLC Meetings | Schedule (when) | Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis) |
|
School Wide
|
Principal/Assistant Principal/Highly Qualified Teachers
|
Ongoing
|
Before/After school planning time
|
Lesson studies on the books "Tools for Teachers", "Training Camp", "Professional Practices of Ethnical Conduct" and "Bullying"
|
|
School Wide
|
Principal/Assistant Principal/Highly Qualified Teachers
|
Ongoing
|
Before/After school planning time
|
6 + 1 Traits of writing will be revisited for more indepth writing strategies.
|
|
K-12 Reading
|
Wretha Webb, Russell Baggett
|
Ongoing
|
Before/After school planning time
|
Analyze the effectiveness of the Reading FCIM calendars, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, progress monitoring data, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
|
|
K-12 Mathematics
|
Elementary: Dottie Wiltse Middle/High School: Debbie Griswold
|
Ongoing
|
Before/After school planning time
|
Analyze the effectiveness of the Math FCIM calendars, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, progress monitoring data, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
|
|
K-12 Social Studies
|
Elementary: Melba Adkins Middle/High School: Jackie Humphreys
|
Ongoing
|
Before/After school planning time
|
Analye progress monitoring data, effectiveness of reading strategies in the content area, and collaboration within the social studies content.
|
|
K-12 Science
|
Elementary: Cindy Alday Middle/High School: Kevin Hand
|
Ongoing
|
Before/After school planning time
|
Analyze the effectiveness of the Science FCIM calendars, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, progress monitoring data, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
|
|
K-12 Langauge Arts/English
|
Elementary: Jan Chambers Middle/High School: Sherry Joyner
|
Ongoing
|
Before/After school planning time
|
Analyze the effectiveness of the Reading FCIM calendars, mini-lessons, mini-assessments, progress monitoring data, maintenance, tutorials, and enrichments to determine any necessary revisions.
|
|
Literacy
|
Principal, Reading Coaches
|
Monthly
|
Before/After school planning time
|
Analyze the effectiveness of instruction on student achievement using progress monitoring results. Results will be utilized to implement changes in instruction.
|
|
Positive Behavior Support Team
|
Sally Sims
|
Monthly
|
Before/After school planning time
|
School-wide behavior decision making based on research, information from classroom walkthroughs, and data analysis.
|
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: For Title I schools only
Pre-School Transition
Calhoun County provides full day PK services and programs for students at Altha Public School, Blountstown Elementary School, and CARR School. The district serves children who are ages three and four in the PK Handicapped Programs and children who are four years old in the Voluntary Pre-K Program (VPK).
Eligibility for the PK Handicapped Program:
In conjunction with our FDLRS Center at PAEC, we host at least two Child Find PK screenings per year. During the screening process children are screened in the areas of motor, concepts, speech/language, vision, and hearing. The assessment tool used is the DIAL-3. If a child scores below the required criteria, he or she is referred for an in depth evaluation. Evaluations include but are not limited to: Vineland Adaptive, Developmental Profile, Goldman Fristo for articulation, PLS-4 for language, and the Stanford Binet. Our personnel responsible for the evaluations include Speech Language Pathologists, psychologist, guidance counselors, ESE teachers and other staff as needed. Personnel responsible for the implementation of the appropriate programs are our PK teachers, SLPs and support staff. If the child meets eligibility for one of our Exceptional Student Education programs, he or she may attend the PK Handicapped Program once a formal staffing is held. Individual screenings are also done on an as needed basis.
Eligibility for the Voluntary Pre-K Program:
Florida provides a Voluntary Pre-K Program for any child who turns four years old by September 1st. Calhoun County and Altha Public School provides a VPK Program in conjunction with our PK Handicapped Programs. We also host a VPK Program during the summer months as well.
Curriculum:
The PK programs in Calhoun County use quality, research based educational programs. We are currently using the Early Literacy & Learning Model Plus (ELLM Plus) in conjunction with Saxon Early Learning and Letter Land at BES.
Parent Involvement:
Parents of our PK handicapped children participate in Individual Educational Plan (IEP) meetings at least one time per year. Parent Child Connection activities are held at each school in conjunction with our parent services project. Our parent liaison plans up to two events at each school per year which target our PK students and parents.
Funding:
The funding for our PK programs comes from state and federal entitlement projects. We also receive VPK monies for each child served in our VPK classrooms.
Collaboration with Agencies:
Our local FDLRS Center at PAEC works collectively with the district to host Child Find screenings. The Early Steps Program also works closely with the school district to identify children who need special education services by their third birthday. The Technical Assistance and Training System for Programs Serving Prekindergarten Children with Disabilities (TATS) Project also supports the school district through trainings, observations, materials, etc.
Postsecondary Transition
Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
Altha Public School will focus on encouraging students to take Honors, AP, or Dual Enrollment courses by conducting more teacher discussion on these courses as well as having each student speak with the guidance counselor regarding their postsecondary plans. This will include sharing information and requirements to become eligible for Bright Futures. The guidance counselor will track graduation requirements and Bright Futures requirements and intervene as necessary. The PSAT will be given to all tenth graders and the CPT will be given to all eleventh graders. All college bound students are encouraged to take Spanish I and Spanish II. The Seniors yearly participate in local College days and the Armed Services Recruiters regularly visit our campus. All students in Grades 9-12 have developed an ePep which is reviewed yearly by students, parents, and the guidance counselor. This is a plan of high school curriculum where a major area of interest is declared and careers are explored to help students focus on post secondary preparations. An exit interview is conducted by the guidance counselor with each senior individually to discuss and assist with post secondary transitions plans. Parents meetings are conducted with 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades yearly to inform parents as well as students of the high school requirements and also to assist parents in the role of helping their children plan for the future.
PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
Reading Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on the 2008-2009 NCLB AYP Report, Altha Public School failed to make AYP in reading for the subgroup Economically Disadvantaged with 38% of the students scoring below grade level.
|
At Altha Public School at least 74% of students will score at or above grade level on the 2010 FCAT Reading Test as evidenced by the 2010 NCLB AYP school report or students will show at least 10% decrease in the number students showing below grade level.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
All students in Grade 3-10 will be administered the Florida Assessment for Instruction in Reading (FAIR) 3 times a year.
|
Reading Coach and Classroom Teachers
|
Reading Coach will review the assessment data to see if the instructional calendar is being followed.
|
Results of FAIR will be shared with Faculty and focus calendars will be revisited and updated
|
| 2 |
FCAT Reading Data will be analyzed to determine at risk students and possible weaknesses in the curriculum.
|
Teachers, Guidance Counselors, Principal, and Reading Coach
|
Review FCAT Reading data to see that teachers have identified at-risk students and strands of difficulty.
|
Print out of disaggragated data listing weak strands.
|
| 3 |
Students will be placed in the appropriate reading class according to the district reading plan.
|
Guidance Counselor, Reading Teachers, and Reading Coach.
|
FCAT Reading scores and other reading assessment scores from the 2008-2009 school year will be revisited to ensure students are appropriately placed in classes.
|
Master Schedule, Student Schedules
|
| 4 |
Use the Instructional Focus Calendar for reading provided by the state.
|
Teachers, Principal, Reading Coach
|
The Principal will be aware of the instructional focus calendar and monitor implementation through Classroom Walkthroughts.
|
Copies of Focus Calendars
|
| 5 |
Content area teachers will provide specific skill instructions in targeted areas (clusters/strands) based on the 2009 FCAT Data and FAIR
|
Content Area Teachers, Reading Teachers
|
Teacher Lesson Plans and Fidelity Checks
|
2010 FCAT Reading Data and FAIR
|
| 6 |
Fidelity checks will be conducted.
|
District Reading Coach, Principal
|
District Reading Coach/Principal will monitor.
|
District Reading Coach/Principal logs
|
| 7 |
Teachers receive monthly training in the use of strategies addressing the five areas of reading
|
Principal, Reading Coach
|
Principal will monitor
|
Reading Coach Log
|
| 8 |
All Students With Disabilities at the Middle and High School Level will continue to be placed in General Education classes with support facilitation being provided by a certified Exceptional Student Education Teacher.
|
Principal, Guidance Counselor, and teachers
|
The master schedule will reflect the classes where support facilitation is needed and teachers will be given at list of accommodations that can be used with students with disabilities.
|
Master schedule and a check for teacher accommodations folder
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
At Altha Public School at least 74% of students will score at or above grade level on the 2010 FCAT Reading Test as evidenced by the 2010 NCLB AYP school report or students will show at least 10% decrease in the number students showing below grade level.
|
Effective Implementation of the Instructional Focus Calendar
|
Dr. Oropallo, Reading Coach
|
Ongoing
|
Lesson Plans, Follow-up Visits
|
Principal, Reading Coach
|
|
At Altha Public School at least 74% of students will score at or above grade level on the 2010 FCAT Reading Test as evidenced by the 2010 NCLB AYP school report or students will show at least 10% decrease in the number students showing below grade level.
|
The school will implement the new FAIR assessments to monitor student progress.
|
Reading Coach
|
August, 2009
|
Print out of FAIR Assessment Results.
|
Principal, Reading Coach
|
For Schools with Grades 6-12, Describe the Plan to Ensure the Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
All teachers will address reading in their Individual Professional Development Plan during the 2009-2010 School Year. Reading Coaches will conduct monthly huddles where researched based reading strategies will be shared with content area teachers. Principal/Assistant Principal will conduct fidelity checks with content area teachers. Also Reading teachers have a common planning time in which to meet and share strategies as well as to plan curriculum.
.
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Jim Burke Materials |
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading Consultant: Dr. Kathy Oropallo |
|
$4,000.00 |
| Total: $4,000.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $4,000.00 |
|
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Mathematics Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or decrease? What is the percent change?
What clusters/strands, by grade level, showed decrease in proficiency?
Did all student subgroups meet AYP targets? If not, which subgroups did not meet the targets?
Did 50% or more of the lowest 25% make learning gains? What is the percent of the lowest 25% of students making learning gains?
Did 50% or more of the total number tested make learning gains? What is the percent of students making learning gains?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on 2008-2009 NCLB AYP Report, Altha Public School failed to make AYP in mathematics for the subgroups Economically Disadvantaged with 40% of the students scoring below grade level and the subgroup Students With Disabilities with 69% of students scoring below grade level.
|
At Altha Public School as evidenced by the 2010 NCLB AYP school report, the subgroups Economically Disadvantaged and Students With Disabilities will show at least a 10% decrease in the number of students scoring below grade level.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Administer the DA baseline assessments for math three times a year to monitor student progress.
|
Teachers, Reading Coach, Principal
|
Review DA Baseline assessment results to ensure teachers are assessing students according to the created schedule.
|
Print out of DA Baseline Assessment results
|
| 2 |
Use the Instructional Focus Calendar provided by the state.
|
Teachers, Principal
|
Principal will monitor through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Copies of Focus Calendar
|
| 3 |
FCAT Mathematics Data will be analyzed to determine at risk students and possible weaknesses in the curriculum.
|
Teachers, Guidance Counselors, and Principal
|
Review FCAT Mathematics data to see that teachers have identified students and strands of difficulty
|
Print out of disaggragated data listing weak strands
|
| 4 |
Continue Intensive Basic Skills classes for 9-12th Grade students who scored below Level 3 on FCAT Mathematics.
|
Guidance Counselor, Mathematics Teacher
|
FCAT Mathematics scores and other Math scores from 2009 school year will be revisited to ensure students are appropriately placed in classes.
|
Master schedule and student schedules
|
| 5 |
All students in Grades 1-8 will receive remediation during a specified time or their Wheel Class via CCC/FCAT Explorer.
|
Elementary/Math Teachers
|
Review of Mathematics data to address weak areas for students.
|
Print out of disaggragated data.
|
| 6 |
All Students With Disabilities at the Middle and High School Level will continue to be placed in General Education classes with support facilitation being provided by a certified Exceptional Student Education Teacher.
|
Principal, Guidance Counselor, and teachers
|
The master schedule will reflect the classes where support facilitation is needed and teachers will be given at list of accommodations that can be used with students with disabilities.
|
Master schedule and a check for teacher accommodations folder
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
At Altha Public School as evidenced by the 2010 NCLB AYP school report, the subgroups Economically Disadvantaged and Students With Disabilities will show at least a 10% decrease in the number of students scoring below grade level.
|
Effective implementation of the practices presented by Math consultant.
|
Linda Walker, Principal
|
Ongoing
|
Lesson plans and classroom walkthroughs
|
Principal/Assistant Principal
|
|
At Altha Public School as evidenced by the 2010 NCLB AYP school report, the subgroups Economically Disadvantaged and Students With Disabilities will show at least a 10% decrease in the number of students scoring below grade level.
|
Effective design and use of the Instructional Focus Calendar.
|
Principal, Core Teacher
|
Ongoing
|
Lesson plans and classroom walkthroughs
|
Principal/Assistant Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Mathematics Consultant: Linda Walker |
|
$3,000.00 |
| Total: $3,000.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $3,000.00 |
|
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Science Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on the 2008-2009 Altha Public School FCAT Science Data, 53% of the students scored at or above grade level which is an increase from 48% in 2007-2008.
|
At Altha Public School as evidenced by the 2010 FCAT Science Test scores, at least 50% of the students will score at or above grade level.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Science teachers will participate in science training to learn strategies for teaching science.
|
Teachers and Principal
|
The Principal will be aware of the strategies to teach science standards and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through Thinklink and classroom assessments.
|
| 2 |
Analyze FCAT Science data to determine at-risk students and possible weaknesses in the curriculum.
|
Science teachers and Principal
|
Review FCAT Reading data to see that teachers have identify at-risk students and strands of difficulty.
|
Print out of disaggregated data listing weak strands.
|
| 3 |
Science teachers will provide opportunities for students to conduct lab experiments for scientific investigation.
|
Teachers and Principal
|
The Principal will be aware of the schedule for conducting lab experiments and monitor implementation through classroom walkthroughs.
|
Effectiveness will be determined through classroom assessments.
|
| 4 |
Science teachers will continue to implement district curriculum maps developed through a collaborative effort of Science teachers and Science Consultant.
|
Teachers and Principal
|
The principal will be aware of curriculum through documentation in lesson plans
|
Documented lesson plans
|
| 5 |
All Students With Disabilities at the Middle and High School Level will continue to be placed in General Education classes with support facilitation being provided by a certified Exceptional Student Education Teacher.
|
Principal, Guidance Counselor, and teachers
|
The master schedule will reflect the classes where support facilitation is needed and teachers will be given at list of accommodations that can be used with students with disabilities.
|
Master schedule and a check for teacher accommodations folder
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
At Altha Public School as evidenced by the 2010 FCAT Science Test scores, at least 50% of the students will score at or above grade level.
|
Science teachers will learn strategies to teach science
|
Dr. Szpyrka
|
August 2009
|
Lesson plans and classroom visits
|
Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Science Consultant: Dr. Szpyrka |
|
$8,000.00 |
| Total: $8,000.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $8,000.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Writing Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on School Grade Data:
Did the total percent proficient increase or was the percent proficient maintained?
What clusters/strands showed decrease in proficiency?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on the 2008-2009 FCAT Writes, 74% of the students at Altha Public School scored a level 3.5 or above which is a drop from 79% on the 2007-2008 FCAT Writes.
|
As evidenced by the 2010 FCAT Writes, at least 76% of the students at Altha will achieve a score of 3.5 or above.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Calhoun Writes will be used to assess growth in writing.
|
Principal and English teachers
|
Data presented to administattion showing progress
|
Data reports
|
| 2 |
Teachers will follow the Curriculum Map for Writing that was developed by the district.
|
Principal
|
Students will keep writing portfolios that will be monitored by the teacher.
|
Porfolios
|
| 3 |
Revision and editing process will be taught and observed in student writing drafts.
|
Principal and English teachers
|
Administration will monitor revision and editing process by classroom walkthroughs
|
Classroom walkthroughs
|
| 4 |
All Students With Disabilities at the Middle and High School Level will continue to be placed in General Education classes with support facilitation being provided by a certified Exceptional Student Education Teacher.
|
Principal, Guidance Counselor, and teachers
|
The master schedule will reflect the classes where support facilitation is needed and teachers will be given at list of accommodations that can be used with students with disabilities.
|
Master schedule and a check for teacher accommodations folder
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
|
As evidenced by the 2010 FCAT Writes, at least 76% of the students at Altha will achieve a score of 3.5 or above.
|
Effective Implementation of Writing Program
|
Dr. Oropallo
|
Ongoing
|
Classroom Observations
|
Dr. Oropallo, Principal
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Writing Consultant: Dr. Kathy Oropallo |
|
$4,000.00 |
| Total: $4,000.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $4,000.00 |
|
| End of Science Goal |
|
Parent Involvement Goal
|
| Needs Assessment: |
Based on information from School Grade and Adequate Yearly Progress Data:
Were parent involvement activities and strategies targeted to areas of academic need?
Based on information from surveys, evaluations, agendas, or sign-ins:
Was the percent of parent participation in school activities maintained or increased from the prior year?
Generally, what strategies or activities can be employed to increase parent involvement?
|
|
| Based on the Needs Assessment, Identify Area(s) for Improvement |
Objective Linked to Area of Improvement |
|
Based on parent surveys administered at the end of the 2008-2009 school term, the percentage of parents answering negatively or with a no response to the communication sections of the parent survey increased from 19% to 24%.
|
The percentage of parents answering negatively or with a no response to the communication sections of the 2010 Parent Survey will decrease by at least 4%.
|
| |
Action Step |
Person Responsible for Monitoring the Action Step |
Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Action Step |
Evaluation Tool |
| 1 |
Update and keep current the school web page.
|
Media Productions Class, Media Productions Teacher
|
Keep website current by updating upcoming events.
|
Viewing website to make sure old dates are deleted from website.
|
| 2 |
EdLine and GradQuick will be used to offer parent portals to student data such as assignments, grades and conduct information.
|
Teachers, Principal, Assistant Principal
|
Up-to-date assignments, grades and information on the data portals.
|
Viewing EdLine and GradeQuick for current student and teacher data
|
| 3 |
The school will host a parent/family night every nine weeks.
|
Teachers, Guidance Counselors, Principal
|
Calendars with Parent Nights Scheduled, Parent Night Sign In Sheets
|
Keep Calendars and Sign In Sheets
|
| 4 |
Continue to use Connect Ed Phone Information system to notify parents of information pertinent to their child.
|
Teachers, Principal
|
Log of information that is transmitted through Connect Ed
|
Periodic parent questionaire
|
| 5 |
Purchase a new electronic school sign to inform parents and community of dates and events happening at the school.
|
Principal
|
Log of dates and events programmed onto the sign.
|
Periodic parent questionaire
|
|
| |
Professional Development Aligned with Objective:
|
| Objective Addressed | Content/Topic | Facilitator | Target Date | Strategy for Follow-up/ Monitoring | Person Responsible for Monitoring |
| No data submitted |
|
|
| |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Fred Jones "Tools For Teaching, Parent Edition" |
|
$300.00 |
| Total: $300.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $300.00 |
|
| End of Parent Involvement Goal |
|
Other Goals
No Other Goals were submitted for this school
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Jim Burke Materials |
|
$0.00 |
| Parental Involvement |
Fred Jones "Tools For Teaching, Parent Edition" |
|
$300.00 |
| Total: $300.00 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Reading Consultant: Dr. Kathy Oropallo |
|
$4,000.00 |
| Mathematics |
Mathematics Consultant: Linda Walker |
|
$3,000.00 |
| Writing |
Writing Consultant: Dr. Kathy Oropallo |
|
$4,000.00 |
| Science |
Science Consultant: Dr. Szpyrka |
|
$8,000.00 |
| Total: $19,000.00 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $19,300.00 |
Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance
No Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance
School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.
No. Disagree with the above statement.
Measures Being Taken to Comply with SAC Requirement
| Projected use of SAC Funds | Amount |
| No data submitted |
|
Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Ladona Kelley,
Principal
|
|
2)
Russell Baggett,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Catie Bruner,
Student
|
|
4)
Brett Floyd,
Student
|
|
5)
Madelyn Lytle,
Student
|
|
6)
Marie Granger,
Teacher
|
|
7)
Alice Marshall,
Teacher
|
|
8)
Maggie Sewell,
Teacher
|
|
9)
Sara Kay Waldorff,
Teacher
|
|
10)
Earl Hunt,
Business Member
|
|
11)
Shelly Sale,
Parent
|
|
12)
Melissa Boggs,
Parent
|
|
13)
Paige White,
Parent
|
|
14)
Michelle Lytle,
Parent
|
|
15)
Suzette Price,
Parent
|
|
16)
Bobby Rowe,
Parent
|
|
17)
Mark Brogdon,
Community Member
|
|
18)
Daniel Middleton,
Community Member
|
|
19)
Marcia Edenfield,
School Support Personnel
|
|
20)
Phyllis Lord,
School Support Personnel
|
|
21)
Rhonda O'Bryan,
School Support Personnel
|
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Calhoun School District ALTHA PUBLIC SCHOOL 2008-2009
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
74%
|
76%
|
74%
|
53%
|
277
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
60% |
67% |
|
|
127 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
65% (YES) |
66% (YES) |
|
|
131
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
535 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Calhoun School District ALTHA PUBLIC SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
74%
|
78%
|
79%
|
48%
|
279
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
67% |
72% |
|
|
139 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
59% (YES) |
67% (YES) |
|
|
126
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
544 |
|
| Percent Tested = 99% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Calhoun School District ALTHA PUBLIC SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
69%
|
74%
|
78%
|
45%
|
266
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
61% |
68% |
|
|
129 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
60% (YES) |
72% (YES) |
|
|
132
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
527 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |