VISION and MISSION STATEMENTS

The vision of Springfield Elementary is that all students are precious individuals with unique social, emotional, and intellectual needs. The students learn in different ways and at different rates. Our students will be given a variety of instructional strategies and support based upon their learning style while learning the Florida Sunshine State Standards. Students will be actively engaged in the learning process and have opportunities to apply their knowledge in a safe environment. Our school is committed to continuous improvement enabling our students to become confident, lifelong learners. The highly-qualified faculty and staff at Springfield believe that all students can learn. We value each student as an individual with different needs.
Our mission is to build a strong foundation for learning by guiding and challenging all of our students to achieve their greatest potential through mastery of the Florida Sunshine State Standards. We will accomplish this by providing every student with a positive, safe, and secure environment to apply their knowledge.


PART I: CURRENT SCHOOL STATUS

SCHOOL PROFILE/DEMOGRAPHICS


Brief History and Background of the School

The community in which Springfield Elementary is located has a mix of businesses including: a paper mill, a chemical plant, fast-food restaurants, lounges, bingo halls, and small independent businesses. Housing consists of: mobile home parks, apartment buildings, public housing projects, single family homes, and small rental houses. Included in our community are many small to medium-sized churches of various denominations. There are numerous after-school and early-intervention programs within the community including: a Head Start Center, Boys’ Club, Youth in Action, Bay BASE (Before and After School Education), ASAP (After School Assistance Program) provided by the Public Housing Authority, Bay in Action, numerous church day cares, Boy Scouts, and recreational sports activities. Supplemental Educational Services, as mandated by the Federal Government through Title I, are provided two to three afternoons on site. There are several companies that provide these tutorial services employing school board employees as tutors. The majority of the community’s adult population has a high school education or less. A large segment of the population is on public assistance. There are also many single-parent (or grandparent) families. A number of our students are
in Foster Homes as a result of abuse, neglect, or criminal activities of parents/guardians. There are pre-kindergarten classes available which are intended to provide early intervention for children that qualify by specific screenings. The 2008-2009 school year, Springfield received a new principal, Harriet Taylor. Prior to Springfield Elementary, she had 10 successful years as an instructional leader. To promote student achievement, parent involvement, and to improve school climate, Mrs. Taylor implemented a variety of instructional strategies and motivational activities such as after school clubs, school wide assemblies, yearbook, and faculty social activities. She has set high expectations and job responsibilities for all stake holders.
Springfield is in a Correct II Differentiated Accountability Status and a Title II School in Restructuring. Due to a small school near our community closing, our student enrollment has increased from 432 to 516 students. We have been fortunate to hire the following experienced employees to our school: an Administrative Assistant, Guidance Counselor, RTI Coach, Reading Coach, Math/Science Coach, two regular education teachers, two ESE teachers and five paraprofessionals. Currently there are 21 regular education teachers, 13 ESE teachers, and 41 paraprofessionals.


Unique School Strengths for Next Year

• After- School Clubs
• Departmentalizing of 5th grade
• RtI Team and Model
• Positive Behavior Support Model (PBS)


Unique School Weaknesses for Next Year

• Rezoning of the District
• Budget Cuts
• High Mobility Rate


Student Demographics

Springfield Elementary School served a varied population of 435 students in 2008-2009 school year with 85% from predominantly economically disadvantaged homes. The student population included 167 White, 177 Black, 19 Hispanic, 25 Asian, 4 Indian, 43 Multiracial, 135 Students with disabilities, 354 Economically Disadvantage, and 15 English Language Learners.


Student Attendance Rates

Springfield Elementary average daily attendance rate for 2008-2009 school year was 94.81%. This has been the consistent rate for the past several years.
District 05 - 92.5 Spgfld 05 - 92.5
06 - 92.6 06 - 92.4
07 - 92.3 07 - 92.6
08 - 95.2 08 - 96.0
09 - 93.64 09 - 94.81


Student Mobility

N/A


Student Suspension Rates

During the 2007-2008 school year, Springfield Elementary had 47 students who were suspended out-of-school to include 14 females and 33 males. The in-school suspension included 11 students.

During the 2006-2007 school year, Springfield Elementary had 6 students who were out-of-school suspended. There were no students in in-school suspension.


Student Retention Rates

Springfield Elementary retained 19 students in the 2008-2009 school year. In 2007-2008, 26 students were retained. In 2006-2007, 23 students were retained.


Class Size

Springfield Elementary continues to meet No Child Left Behind guidelines of lower teacher to student ratio.

Currently in the 2009-2010 school year, the class size average is the following: Kindergarten, First grade, Second, and Third grade is 18 students per class. Fourth grade is 19 students per class. Fifth grade currently have 22 students per class.

In 2008-2009, the class size average was the following: Kindergarten was 18 students, First grade was 16 students, and Second grade was 18 students. Third grade and Fourth grade had 19 students per class. Fifth grade was 18 students per class.


Academic Performance of Feeder Pattern

Springfield Elementary School feeds into Everritt Middle School. Everritt Middle School has a school grade of a “C” and has the same demographics as Springfield Elementary.


Partnerships and Grants

Springfield Elementary has formed partnerships with community businesses such as: Arizona Chemical, Chick-fil-A, Silver Circle East, McDonald's, Applebees, East Bay Rotary, and the Wal-Mart Super Center, which provide monetary and in-kind support. We are pursuing additional partnerships with TRANE, Gulf Power, Winn Dixie, Arby's, Smurfitt-Stone Container, First United Methodist church, and Po-Folks.


STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA

Note: The following links will open in a separate browser window.

School Grades Trend Data

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data

HIGHLY QUALIFIED ADMINISTRATORS

PositionNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as an AdministratorPrior Performance Record *
Principal Harriet Taylor BS in Elementary Education

Masters in Educational Leadership
and Administration

Certification for school principal for all levels

Certification in Early Childhood (Pre-K and Kdg)

ESOL Endorsement
2 13 2007-2008: Assistant Principal at Parker Elementary School Grade C, Reading Mastery: 80%, Math Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 29%. The Black and FRPL subgroups did not make AYP in math.

2006-2007:Assistant Principal at Parker Elementary School Grade A, Reading Mastery: 77%, Math Mastery: 77%, Science Mastery: 41%. AYP: 97%, The SWD subgroup did not make AYP in math.

2005-2006: Assistant Principal at Parker Elementary School Grade C, Reading Mastery: 77%, Math Mastery: 71%. AYP: 92%, The Black and SWD subgroups did not make AYP in Math.

2004-2005: Assistant Principal at Parker Elementary School Grade B, Reading Mastery: 75%, Math Mastery: 63%. AYP: 97%, The Black subgroup did not make AYP in math.
Assis Principal Joseph (Ivan) Beach BS Interdisciplinary Social Science,
Master of Science- Psychology and Counseling,
Certification- Guidance K-12
1 1 Guidance Counselor at Surfside Middle School for 2008-2009: Grade: A, Meeting High Standards- Reading: 82%, Math: 78%, Writing: 91%, Science: 60%, 68% of students made learning gains in Reading, 77% of students made learning gains in Math, 65% demonstrated adequate progress in reading, 78% demonstrated adequate progress in math, all categories met AYP.

2007-2008: Grade A, Meeting High Standards- Reading: 79%, Math: 78%, Writing: 91%, Science 50%, 69% of students made learning gains in reading, 78% of students made learning gains in Math, 68% demonstrated adequate progress in reading, 72% demonstrated adequate progress in math, Students with disabilities did not meet math proficiency, AYP- No.

2006-2007: Grade A, Meeting High Standards- Reading: 73%, Math: 71%, Writing: 91%. Science 49%, 62% demonstrated adequate progress in reading, 76% demonstrated adequate progress in math, Student’s with disabilities did not meet proficiency in reading or math, AYP- No.

2005-2006: Grade A, Meeting high Standards- Reading: 71%, Math: 67%, Writing: 86%, 68% of students demonstrated adequate progress in reading, 70% demonstrated adequate progress in math, Economically disadvantaged students did not meet proficiency in math, Student’s with disabilities did not meet proficiency in math or reading, AYP- No

* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)

HIGHLY QUALIFIED INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES

Subject AreaNameDegree(s)/ Certification(s)# of Years at Current School# of Years as a CoachPrior Performance Record *
AYP Intervention Teacher Nell Burdette BS in Elementary Education

Masters in Exceptional Student Education (ESE)

Emotional Handicap Endorsement

Certification in Elementary (K-6)
2 2 2007-2008: Grade C, Reading Mastery: 80%, Math Mastery: 71%, Science Mastery: 29%. The Black and FRPL subgroups did not make AYP in math.

2006-2007: Grade A, Reading Mastery: 77%, Math Mastery: 77%, Science Mastery: 41%. AYP: 97%, The SWD subgroup did not make AYP in math.

2005-2006: Grade C, Reading Mastery: 77%, Math Mastery: 71%. AYP: 92%, The Black and SWD subgroups did not make AYP in Math.

2004-2005: Grade B, Reading Mastery: 75%, Math Mastery: 63%. AYP: 97%, The Black subgroup did not make AYP in math.
Reading Coach Linda Pitts BS in Elementary and Primary Education

Certification in Elementary and Primary Education

ESOL Endorsement
1 1 2008-2009
Grade A
Reading Mastery: 67%
Learning Gains: 65%
Lowest 25% Gains: 57%
Black and Economically Disadvantaged Groups did not make AYP. All other groups made AYP.

2007-2008
Grade C
Reading Mastery: 72%
Learning Gains: 55%
Lowest 25% Gains: 47%
Black and SWD Groups did not make AYP. All other groups made AYP.
RtI Coach Leah Margulies BS in Elementary Education

Certification in Primary Education

Reading Endorsement
1 1 2005-2009
Served as a Regional Sales Consultant for Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Specialized in reading, early childhood, science, and social studies curriculum.
Math/Science Coach Marica Brady BS in Elementary Education

Master of Education with Highest Honors; academic concentration Life Sciences and Science Education

Certifications, K-6 Elementary, Middle Grades Science, Biology, and Chemistry
2 2 1993-2009
Served during tenure as resource teacher in the areas of science, Tech Prep, and mathematics. Served in the area of science for the duration of employment.


* Note: Prior Performance Record (including prior School Grades and AYP information along with the associated school year)


HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS

Description of StrategyPerson ResponsibleProjected Completion DateNot Applicable (If not, please explain why)
1. To be in compliance of No Child Left Behind guidelines, principal will network with Bay District Human Resource department to screen all applicants. Harriet Taylor August 2009 All teachers at Springfield Elementary are Highly Qualified


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors

NameCertificationTeaching AssignmentProfessional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
No Data Submitted No Data Submitted No Data Submitted No Data Submitted


Staff Demographics

Total Number of Instructional Staff % of First-Year Teachers % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees % Highly Qualified % Reading Endorsed Teachers % National Board Certified Teachers % ESOL Endorsed
4102231.746.336.6100212.249


Teacher Mentoring Program

Mentor NameMentee AssignedRationale for PairingPlanned Mentoring Activities
N/A N/A N/A N/A



ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration


Note: For Title I schools only

Title I, Part A

Allocated $438,162 to support school wide program. In addition, the District Title I department is providing computers to upgrade the labs, SMART centers, remediation programs, instructional technology, professional development, SES with transportation, RtI coach, AYP Intervention teacher, SES leader, and District Resource teachers for support.


Title I, Part C- Migrant

Springfield will continue to network with the district and various agencies to support families in need of services.


Title I, Part D

N/A


Title II

Due to Springfield’s Corrective Status, a Math/Science Coach was assigned during this year in order to support student achievement. Title II provides staff development opportunities for all schools.


Title III

District provides services for academic support for immigrant and English Language Learners.


Title X- Homeless

District Homeless Social Worker provides resources(social services referrals, school supplies,clothing) for students identified as homeless. The school’s guidance department will work closely with all stakeholders to provide needed resources and support.


Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

SAI funds will be coordinated with Title 1 funds to provide after-school tutorial.


Violence Prevention Programs

Springfield Elementary will be implementing the Positive Behavior System Model(PBS). The Guidance department will work with the necessary agencies to provide services, resources, and support to families.


Nutrition Programs

N/A


Housing Programs

N/A


Head Start

N/A


Adult Education

N/A


Career and Technical Education

N/A


Job Training

Students in grades third, fourth, and fifth have the opportunity to participate in school-to-work jobs such as; ITV Crew, Safety Patrol, and Student Council.


Other


Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)


School-based RtI Team

Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Harriet Taylor, Principal
Ivan Beach, Administrative Assistant
Leah Margulies, RtI Coach
Nicole Montgomery, Guidance Counselor
Susan Sanders, ESE Representative
Carissa English, Regular Education Representative
Linda Pitts, Reading Coach
CeCe Brown, Behavioral Specialist
Nell Burdette, AYP Intervention Teacher

Principal and Administrative Assistant: Provides a common vision for making decisions based on data, ensures the school is implementing RtI, intervention support and documentation, and communicates with parents regarding the RtI process.

AYP Intervention Teacher: Assist in disaggregating data to determine AYP needs, evaluate and report disaggregated data to the instructional staff, provide assessment support to teachers through collaborative analysis of student work and formal and informal assessments, monitor the progress of students in AYP deficit areas and offer suggestions for interventions to meet the students’ needs, assist the classroom teacher in diagnosing difficulties and creating prescriptions for those identified students, assist in the planning of sustained professional development based on AYP needs and in alignment with goals in the School Improvement Plan, collaborate with other schools/districts to acquire successful and innovative strategies. work with the district departments to promote district initiatives, model scientifically research based instructional strategies for teachers, implement staff development activities to acquaint teachers with scientifically research based instructional strategies in the areas not making AYP, provide, as needed, intensive intervention instruction for students in areas not making AYP, administer individual student assessments as needed and appropriate to AYP status, perform other related duties that will promote AYP success as needed.

Exceptional Student Education (ESE): Provides information about instruction strategies and implementation of interventions to teachers, and collaborates with general education teachers through team teaching.

Regular Education Representative: Provides information about instruction strategies and implementation of interventions to teachers, and collaborates with general education teachers.

Response To Intervention (RtI) Coach: Works cooperatively under the leadership of the district’s RtI administrator, assists teachers to implement the four steps of the problem-solving process and facilitates this process with a school-based team, assists teachers to ensure the implementation of universal screening and progress monitoring data collection in primary content areas of reading/literacy, mathematics, and behavior, assists teachers in using school-based data to determine the effectiveness of academic and behavior instruction at the core and supplemental instruction/intervention levels, assists the classroom teacher to use screening and progress monitoring data both to inform the development of interventions and the evaluation of those interventions, facilitates the development of school-based instruction and intervention maps at the core, supplemental (targeted) and intensive levels of instruction/intervention, ensures that all academic and academic support services have a place in the RtI triangle and that supplemental (targeted) and intensive interventions are integrated with core instruction, assists teachers in the evaluation of the fidelity of core instruction and skills to provide the technical support to ensure fidelity of supplemental (targeted) and intensive interventions, assists teachers in developing a documentation system to ensure sufficiency of supplemental (targeted) and intensive interventions, assists teachers in evaluating the types (positive, questionable, poor) of response to instruction/intervention for large groups, small groups and individual students, assists teachers in involving students and families in the development and evaluation of and engagement with supplemental and intensive interventions, builds and sustains relationships with educators from various disciplines that result in a shared vision of high academic and behavioral performance for all students, creates an environment in which educators trust that their input is respected, facilitates group consensus through listening, questioning, paraphrasing, summarizing, synthesizing information, displaying empathy, and provides assertive but tactful feedback, provides approved RtI workshops and in-service trainings for teachers at various times throughout the year, performs other related duties as assigned and approved by the District RtI administrator.

Reading Instructional Specialist (Reading Coach): Provides guidance on K-12 reading plan; facilitates and supports data collection activities; assists in data analysis; provides professional development and technical assistance to teachers regarding data-based instructional planning; supports the implementation of Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 intervention plans.

Guidance Counselor and Behavior Specialist: Provides quality services and expertise on issues ranging from program design to assessment and intervention with individual students. In addition to providing interventions, school social workers continue to link child-serving and community agencies to the schools and families to support the child's academic, emotional, behavioral, and social success.


Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions).

Springfield RtI team will hold meetings every 3 weeks to identify students in need of RtI services, define and adapt strategies for students, review and track progress monitoring, and to provide staff development and teacher support for the implementation of the RtI process.


Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan

The RtI team met with the School Advisory Council (SAC) and administration to help develop the school improvement plan.




RtI Implementation

Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data.

Baseline Date: Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR), Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Scores, SuccessMaker, Snap Shot, Positive Behavior Support Model (PBS), ThinkLink, and Progress Monitoring and Reporting Network (PMRN)

Progress Monitoring: PMRN, FCAT Simulations, and ThinkLink

Midyear: FAIR and ThinkLink

End of year: FAIR, FCAT, and ThinkLink


Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

Professional Development of the RtI implementation and process will be given to the teachers during their planning time throughout the 2009-2010 school year.



School Wide Florida’s Continuous Improvement Model

Plan

Data Disaggregation 2008-2009 FCAT Data


What strengths and weaknesses were identified in the 2009 data by grade level, subject area, and clusters/strands?


• In 3rd grade Reading, the students matched the state at 67% in Words and Phrases, Comparisons, and Reference/Research. In Words and Phrases, a 4% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. In Comparisons and Reference/Research, an 7% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. In Third grade Math, the students matched the state of 67% in Algebraic Thinking. A 14% gain was made in Geometry and Data Analysis. In Algebraic Thinking, a 17% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. In area of Math, the weakness are Measurement, Geometry, Number Sense, and Data Analysis.

• In 4th grade Reading, the students matched the state of 75% in Reference/Research. In Reference/Research, a 25% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. In the area of Reading, the weakness are Words and Phrases, Main Idea and Comparisons. In 4th grade Math, a 10% gain was made in 2009 from 2008 in Number Sense and a 13% gain in Measurement. In Algebraic Thinking, a 14% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. The students matched the state of 63% in Measurement. In 4th grade Writing, students who made a 3.0 and 3.5 or higher scored higher in narrative writing than expository writing. Combined scores were below the district and state’s scores.

• In 5th grade Reading, the students matched the state of 67% in Comparisons and Reference/Research. In Comparisons, a 3% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. In Reference/Research, a 7% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. In 5th grade Math, the students matched the state of 55% in Measurement. The students made gains in 2009 from 2008 in Number Sense, Geometry, and Algebraic Thinking. In 5th grade Science, the students matched the state of 62% in Life and Environmental. In Earth and Space a 112% gain was made in 2009 from 2008. In Life and Environmental, a 16% gain was made in 2009 from 2008.


Instructional Calendar Development


What is the process for developing, implementing, and monitoring an Instructional Focus Calendar for reading, writing, mathematics, and science?

The Instructional Focus Calendar was created in July and August of 2009 by teachers and administrators while reviewing FCAT data. This calendar will focus on benchmarks that were selected according to students’ strengths and weaknesses measured by progress on class work assignments, assessments, and data results. Administration will do classroom visitations, evaluating lesson plans, monitoring teacher data, and conducting meetings with teachers to ensure that the instructional calendar is being implemented effectively. Coaches will also be assigned to teachers who need additional assistance and support. For monitoring, we will use FAIR test results to discuss and adjust the instructional calendar.


Which instructional Benchmarks will be given priority focus, based on need, for each content area (reading, writing, mathematics, and science)?

Reading: Main Idea, Words and Phrases, and Comparisons
Math: Number Sense, Measurement, Geometry, Data Analysis, and Algebraic Thinking
Writing: Both Expository and Narrative writing
Science: Physical/Chemical, Earth and Space, and Scientific Thinking


What is the process to ensure instruction is based on individual students’ needs, as opposed to the master schedule?

Quarterly Mini-assessment/RtI strategy meetings will be conducted to discuss strategies for low-performing students. Teachers will analyze student data spread sheets. During “Meeting Strand” sessions with Title I Resource teacher for Restructuring, teachers will be given staff development time to assess, analyze, and implement new strategies and lessons.

Based on those needs, we will utilize ESE services, mentoring, SES tutoring, Enrichment classes, RtI strategies, and AYP services. In addition, we have the services of reading, math, and science coaches.


How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?

Parents will be encouraged to participate in Family Reading/Math night that will occur throughout the school year. In addition, students will participate in a school wide science fair. Teachers will integrate science and social studies into reading curriculum. In addition, art and physical education teachers will integrate those skills into their curriculum. The PBS Model will be implemented.


How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

The PBS Model will be implemented. Teachers introduce a variety of careers by discussing community helpers and having classroom visitation from community members. 5th grade is departmentalized in subject areas.




DO

Direct the Instructional Focus


How are lesson plans and instructional delivery aligned across grade levels and subject areas?


Teachers will meet bi-monthly to discuss standards and lesson planning. Lessons will be created for differentiated instruction to provide lessons for all students at various academic levels. Teachers can share best practices and resources at faculty meetings. Teachers will also have meetings and staff development with the AYP Intervention teacher, RtI coach and reading coach to review data and progress monitoring. Teachers will be involved in cross grade level meetings.


How are instructional focus lessons developed and delivered?

Teachers will develop and deliver standards based instructional strategies utilizing learning centers, Enrichment classes, SMILE Writing, CRISS strategies, and SMART Strategies. Coaches will be available to give support for lessons and assessments. Teachers will use the first 5 to 10 minutes of each core lesson to explain topic, standard, and purpose for said lesson.


How will instructional focus lessons be revised and monitored?

Instructional focus lessons will be revised and monitored based upon on-going student assessments to include both formative and summative assessments, FAIR, SuccessMaker, and tutorial assessments. Lessons will be monitored and revised based on the need of students.




CHECK

Assessment


Describe the types of ongoing formative assessments to be used during the school year to measure student progress in core, supplemental, and intensive instruction/intervention.


Formative assessments will include running records, classroom assignments, teacher observations and assessments.


How are assessments used to identify students reaching mastery and those not reaching mastery?

Teacher analyzes on-going Pre and Post assessments, teacher developed assessments, and unit assessments. Mastery is set at 80% to ensure student proficiency of each benchmark. Teachers will differentiate their instruction as indicated by assessment results to provide intensive instruction to those students earning less than 50% accuracy, additional instruction and practice for those students earning between 50-70%, and enrichment instruction to students earning 80-100%.


Maintenance


How is ongoing assessment and maintenance of Benchmark mastery for each grade level and content area built into the Instructional Focus Calendar?

On-going assessments results are analyzed to determined the focus for teaching and the time allotment for benchmark mastery through the use of the Instructional Focus Calendar.


Describe the process and schedule for teams to review progress monitoring data (summative and mini assessments) to identify the required instructional modifications that are needed to increase student achievement.

Teachers will be involved in meetings such as RtI strategy meetings, Mini-assessment meetings, meetings with the principal, Leadership team meetings, bi-monthly grade level meetings, and staff development with District Resource teachers. The documentation of said meetings will include a sign in sheet and minutes from the meeting.


Monitoring


Describe the Principal’s and Leadership Team’s roles as instructional leaders and how they will be continuously involved in the teaching and learning process.

Classroom Walk Through (CWT), staff development, IPDP planning, and monthly Leadership team meetings will assist with the monitoring and on-going implementation of strategies. Instructional coaches will offer support to the teachers through staff development, providing resources, and modeling whole group instruction.




ACT

Supplemental and Intensive Instruction/Interventions


Identify the core, supplemental, and intensive instruction and interventions.


State adopted programs to include Harcourt Story Town Reading, Harcourt and SRA Science. The supplemental programs are Saxon Math, Write Source, Times For Kids, Social Studies Weekly, Orchard, Waterford, EdMark, FCAT Explorer and Test Maker, Accelerated Reader, SuccessMaker for reading, science, and math. The interventions are SRA Reading Mastery, Harcourt Reading Intervention Program, and Center Stage.


How are supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions and tutorials structured to re-teach non-mastered target areas?

Teachers will provide RtI individual/small group remediation 30 minutes during SME time. Teachers will also pull students for small group instruction during the 90 minute Reading block. Paraprofessionals will offer additional support through tutorials.


How does the school identify staff’s professional development needs to improve their instructional strategies?

Staff development will be identified by teacher input, surveys, CWT, and FCAT data.


Which students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions?

All subgroups which include blacks, low-socio economically disadvantaged, SWD, and Lowest 25%,Level 1 and Level 2, and previously retained students will be targeted for supplemental and intensive instruction/interventions.


How will the effectiveness of the interventions be measured throughout the year?

Effectiveness will be measured throughout the year by progress monitoring, pre/post test, teacher observations and assessments.


Enrichment


Describe alternative instructional delivery methods to support acceleration and enrichment activities.

We have enrichment classes that include 2nd through 5th grade. Lessons pertain to academic standards and benchmarks for reading, math, science, and writing. Enrichment through differentiated instruction is also provided.


Describe how students are identified for enrichment strategies.

Students are identified from the highest academic level of students and the lowest 25% of students. These students are identified from previous and current assessments. Teacher recommendation is also taken into consideration.




Professional Learning Communities

PLC Organization (grade level, subject, etc.)PLC LeaderFrequency of PLC MeetingsSchedule (when)Primary Focus of PLC (include Lesson Study and Data Analysis)
Kindergarten through Fifth grade Reading team Linda Pitts, Reading Coach

Leah Margulies,
RtI Coach
Monthly First Thursday of the month Analyzing effectiveness of curriculum calendar and reading strategies and analysis FAIR
Kindergarten through Fifth grade Math team Maricia Brady, Science and Math Coach Monthly First Thursday of the month Analyzing effectiveness of curriculum calendar, math strategies, analysis data, and revision to the IFC
Kindergarten through Fifth grade Science team Maricia Brady, Science and Math Coach Monthly First Thursday of the month Analyzing effectiveness of curriculum calendar, science strategies, analysis data, revision to the IFC
Kindergarten through Fifth grade Writing team Nell Burdette, AYP Intervention Teacher Monthly First Thursday of the month Analyzing effectiveness of curriculum calendar, writing strategies, analysis data, and revision to the IFC
Grade level team Team Leader Bi-Monthly During daily planning time Lesson planning, Analyzing effectiveness of curriculum calendar, strategies, and other specific grade level issues


NCLB Public School Choice

Note: For Title I schools only


Pre-School Transition

Our transition plan starts in the spring when children are invited to the school to participate in activities such as visits to classrooms, playgrounds, and lunchroom areas. Parents receive information on how to enroll their child in the school and how to prepare their child for Kindergarten.

An Orientation Day is provided prior to school starting. Students are introduced to the teachers and an optional tour of the campus is available.

Title I schools send surveys and newsletters to inform parents of transitional events.


Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.



 

PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS

 

Other Goals

 

FINAL BUDGET



Differentiated Accountability


School-level Differentiated Accountability Compliance



Show Attached school’s Differentiated Accountability Checklist of Compliance (Uploaded on 9/11/2009 4:38:51 PM)



School Advisory Council



School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.



Projected use of SAC FundsAmount
No data submitted



Describe the Activities of the School Advisory Council for the Upcoming Year


SAC Team will participate in the approval of the School Improvement Plan. The team will assist with budgets and curriculum development. SAC Team will participate in on-going data review and progress monitoring. The team will recruit new members and adjust rooster as needed.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Harriet Taylor,   Principal
2)  Renee Warren,   SAC Chair
3)  Susan Sanders,   Teacher
4)  Linda Pitts,   Teacher
5)  Eva Abrams,   Teacher
6)  Karen Doak,   Teacher
7)  Dr. David Rosier,   Business Member
8)  Anthony Everidge,   Parent
9)  Susie Everidge,   Parent
10)  Joe Koonce,   Parent
11)  Sarah Koonce,   Parent
12)  Erica Lester,   Parent
13)  Lashunda Maye,   Parent
14)  Lekisha McElroy,   Parent
15)  Amanda Odom,   Parent
16)  Tarika Polk,   Parent
17)  Eddie Taylor,   Parent
18)  Jawanda Perryman,   Parent
19)  Terry Rigdon,   Parent
20)  Elijah Smiley,   Parent
21)  Michael Warren,   Parent
22)  Marganita Boggess,   Parent
23)  Giesala Bryan,   Parent
24)  Jamie Burton,   Parent
25)  Amanda Climer,   Parent
26)  Daisy Crider,   Parent
27)  Gerry Lowther,   Parent
28)  Liz Stephens,   School Support Personnel
29)  Jana Connelly,   School Support Personnel
30)  Virginia McDaniel ,   Union Steward
 

AYP DATA

No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Bay School District
SPRINGFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
2008-2009
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 69%  60%  41%  24%  194   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 56%  69%      125  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 50% (YES)  60% (YES)      110  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         429   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         D  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Bay School District
    SPRINGFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    2007-2008
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 75%  62%  56%  23%  216   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 72%  71%      143  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 63% (YES)  67% (YES)      130  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         489   
    Percent Tested = 99%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         C  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Bay School District
    SPRINGFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 77%  72%  87%  32%  268   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 78%  71%      149  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 73% (YES)  60% (YES)      133  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         550   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested