VISION/MISSION/BELIEF STATEMENTS
Note: Required for Title I
Vision Statement: Surfside Elementary School provides a safe and positive environment where high quality education occurs for all students.
Mission Statement: Surfside Elementary School will create a challenging, positive learning environment that promotes individual excellence and group achievement. Staff, students, and parents will work together to encourage children to realize their maximum potential for learning, problem solving, and responsible citizenship.
SCHOOL PROFILE DEMOGRAPHICS
Surfside Elementary is located in Satellite Beach, Florida. The school opened in 1964 when Kennedy Space Center was at the height of the new "space age." The school began with over 1,100 students in double sessions and has had a steady decline especially over the last ten years. The student population is now at 405 students.
The east/west boundaries extend from the Atlantic Ocean to the Banana River. The north/south boundaries extend approximately one mile each way. The school is considered a "neighborhood school" and has no school buses. The majority of students ride their bikes, walk or are driven to school by their parents. The school has 117 students coming on an Out of Area Assignment and 22 going out to other schools. The school is located in the heart of Satellite Beach which is near the local police station, the fire station and City Hall. Many community members take pride in the school as they once attended school at Surfside themselves. Community members either have children or grandchildren at the school. Surfside feeds into DeLaura Middle School and Satellite High School.
Surfside's population is predominantly white with a middle socioeconomic level. The school's free and reduced lunch has increased over the past five years; rising from less than 5% to approximately 16%. It is noted that thus far the free and reduced rate is about 15% for the 2008-09 school year. The minority rate is 8.39%. The Exceptional Student Education rate (not gifted) is 11.35% and the gifted rate is 6.66%%. The ELL population is .73%
All sub-groups of students perform in a proficient range on the FCAT assessment. Currently there are seven Level 1 students in reading and three in mathematics. There are six Level 2 students in reading and eleven Level 2 students in mathematics. All sub-groups made learning gains with 73% of the lowest 25% making learning gains in reading and 79% in mathematics. Seventy-seven (77%) of the students were 3.5 and above in FCAT Writing+ and 87% were Level 3 and above in science. Attendance continues to be above the 95% rate. For 2007-08, attendance was 96.49% with a 99.8% promotion rate.
The instructional staff has thirty-one teachers with twenty percent (20%) being female and ten percent (10%) male. One hundred percent (100%) of the teachers are white. There are zero (0) vacancies. Surfside teachers work together as Professional Learning Communities. Surfside Elementary was recognized by ALLTHINGSPLC for their efforts, planning and teaming. One hundred percent (100%) of the teachers are considered "highly qualified" as they are certified in the areas they teach. Four (4) teachers have ELL (English Language Learner) students. Three of the four English Language Learners (ELL) teachers are not certified in ESOL, however, they will be taking appropriate course work in the required timeline. Class sizes all meet the required averages of the Class Size Amendment. K-3 classes are required to have an average of 18:1 and 4th-6th at 22:1. Surfside's averages for K-3 classes are 17.01 and for 4th-6th classes are 21.18.
The parental involvement is very high at Surfside Elementary. The parents are active in all school events and parent/community leaders give input through the Parent Teacher Organization and School Advisory Council. Surfside has a large number of parent volunteers who donate a great deal of time to the school. The volunteers logged in 7,273 hours for the 2007-08 school year. Parent attendance is high at parent nights and school events. The parent groups are also instrumental in raising needed funds for items such as computers, playground equipment, and other school necessities. Outside agencies such as Big Brothers and Big Sisters provide valuable mentoring hours to the students at Surfside. The school also receives benefits from many varied business partners. The Satellite Beach Fire Chief, Police Commander, and School Resource Officer, and local business woman serve on the School Advisory Council.
Surfside is considered a safe school with two incidents to reports for violent incidents and behaviors in 2007-08. Discipline referrals to the office are typically for minor infractions and usually result in conferencing with students. All efforts are made to keep students at school and more severe infractions result in an "in-school" suspension. However, if necessary, "out of school" suspension is used. Ninety-seven point fifty-three percent (97.53%) strongly agree or agree on the Client Survey to "Safe, orderly environment."
Surfside Elementary has been ranked an "A" school for the past seven years. The school has received Adequately Yearly Progress for the first two years and Provisional Adequate Yearly Progress for the third year of No Child Left Behind. The school received Adequately Yearly Progress for the 2007-08 school year.
The school facility has been updated to meet the needs of the 21st century classrooms in the area of technology. Wiring and cabling have recently been upgraded so that every computer in the school has Internet access. New servers and hardware were installed to meet the demands of current technology. Document cameras, projectors, DVD/VCRS, and audio amplification systems have been installed in all classrooms and throughout the facility. The Brevard Public Schools' Educational Technology Department is responsible for the upgrade and equipment. Training and support has also been provided to assist with successful implementation. One hundred percent (100%) of the faculty have received a laptop computer. School technology funds are matched by the Parent Teacher Organization (PTO). Teacher leaders assist with training in technology.
Overall, Surfside is considered a high-performing school. Client Survey results indicate that the school community is pleased with all aspects of the school. Every question but one increased by approximately ten percent (10%) from "Agree" to "Strongly Agree." The total number of points for the school grade dropped for he 2007-08 school year; however scale scores and percentage of students at or above grade level continue to be well above the district and state level. Goals and strategies will be implemented for continuous improvement.
SCHOOL MATCH
Note: Required for all Assistance Plus Schools
QUALITY STAFF
Highly Qualified Administrators
Note: Required for Title I
Susan B. Murray is the principal at Surfside Elementary. She has been the principal for the past nine years at the school. Mrs. Murray has a bachelor's degree from University of Central Florida in Elementary Education. She received her master's in 1992 from Nova University in Educational Leadership. Mrs. Murray is certified in Elementary Education (K-6), Early Childhood (Primary - 3rd) and School Principalship (all levels). This is her thirtith year in Brevard Public Schools. She taught at Mila and Sherwood Elementary in both primary and intermediate classes. Mrs. Murray was a Primary Specialist and then an Elementary Specialist at Sherwood and Suntree Elementary for seven years. She was an Assistant Principal for five years at Suntree Elementary. In her twenty-nine years, she has had varied experiences with all ability levels. Mrs. Murray has had extensive training and experience in the School Improvement Process. She has been involved with school improvement from the beginning in 1990.
Mrs. Murray has high expectations for her teachers, staff and students. The schools has received an "A" for the past seven years and a "B" for the first two years while she has been principal at Surfside. The school has received Adequate Yearly Progress for the past three years with Provisional Adequate Yearly Progress for 2005-06. Adequate Yearly Progress was obtained for 2007-08. There have been many improvements to the facility and upgrades in technology under her direction. Mrs. Murray monitors student performance on a regular basis and communicates regularly with teachers and parents. She is an instructional leader who is considered hands-on and serves on a variety of school committees such as the reading committee, School Advisory Council, and the Child Study Team. Mrs. Murray also stays current on educational trends through educational internet research, and participates in staff development opportunities.
Mrs. Jill E. Keane is the Assistant Principal at Surfside Elementary. She began in March of 2004 and has been at Surfside for approximately four and a half years. She has a bachelor's degree that she received in 1987 in Elementary Education from University of Central Florida. She has her master's degree from Nova University. She received the degree in Educational Leadership in 1999. She is certified in Elementary Education (K-6), and School Leadership (all levels). This is Mrs. Keane's twentieth year in Brevard Public Schools. She taught at Endeavor and Fairglen Elementary in grades second through fifth. Mrs. Keane looped with groups of students as their teacher for three years. She was also the Elementary Specialist at the West Melbourne School of Science. She transferred to Freedom 7 Elementary and taught fourth grade before coming to Surfside in March of 2004. Mrs. Keane also brings a variety of experiences with many ability levels to Surfside. She is considered an instructional leader and works diligently to provide textbooks, materials and updated expectations for all faculty and students. Mrs. Keane also serves on a variety of school committees such as writing, English Language Learners (ELL) and science. She is also involved in the school improvement process.
Recruitment/Retention of Highly Qualified Teachers
Note: Required for Title I
There are thirty-one employees in the instructional staff at Surfside Elementary. One hundred percent (100%) are certified in the area for which they are teaching. Three (3) teachers are considered out of field for ELL (English Language Learners). These teachers have an ELL student and will begin course work within the required timeframe. Fifty-six percent (56%) have a bachelor's degree with forty-two percent (42%) having a master's degree. The teachers at Surfside have an average of twenty (20) years of teaching experience. Most of the years are at Surfside. Retaining high-quality teachers is successful at Surfside. The teachers like the atmosphere provided by the administrators and work in a collaborative fashion with each other. The teachers have high expectations and enjoy the caliber of students and parents at the school.
There are rarely any openings at Surfside as teachers do not request to transfer to other schools. A few teachers are beginning to retire, but have not been replaced, due to the declining enrollment. If there is an opening, the administration allows input from the faculty for characteristics and traits necessary to fill the position. Applicants with varied backgrounds who are highly qualified are the only ones accepted for the position. The administration ensures that all qualifications are met. Job references are a must and always used to verify information. The principal also works closely with the district certification office to ensure appropriate areas of certification.
Show Attached Staff List
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Coordination and Integration
Note: Required for Title I
School Wide Improvement Model
Note: Required for Title I
Components of the Florida's Continuous Model are used at Surfside Elementary:
1. Disaggregation of Test Scores - The administration disaggregates the FCAT data in the spring and summer as the data is received. The data is shared with the instructional staff at pre-planning and with the School Advisory Council. Small group meetings are also held with the teachers in grades 3rd-6th that test students. Individual and class group data is shared. The teachers and administrators analyze how the past groups have done and analyze the present year's group. The administration take an extensive look at the learning gains of all students and the lowest 25% in reading and math to set goals for the school year. All teachers write Progress Monitoring Plans for the Level 1 and 2 students and set goals for their Professional Development Plans in reading based on the data that was provided. Data is reviewed and progress is monitored throughout the year.
2. Instructional Time-Line - The individual grade levels meet on a regular basis to establish time lines and set instructional goals. The district pacing guides are followed as well. Documentation of the Sunshine State Standards are required in all lesson plans.
3. Instructional Focus - The district pacing guides are followed. Regular grade level meetings are conducted to discuss instructional focus and to monitor student progress. Benchmark assessments in reading and math are conducted in accordance with district guidelines. Results are analyzed to monitor student progress and to make instructional decisions.
4. Assessment - District benchmarks are followed. Results are monitored by the principal through regular meetings with each grade level. Through the frequent monitoring, strategies and support are identified. Teachers also use on-going, mini-assessments to monitor student performance. They use running records, DIBELS, DAR (Diagnostic Assessment of Reading) and fluency checks. Reading lexiles are determined through Scholastic Reading Inventories. Rubrics are also used to assist students with expectations and self-assessment.
5. Appropriate Review and Maintenance - Students are monitored on a regular basis. Administrators and teachers meet on a regular basis to discuss assessments and student progress. The principal maintains data sheets on each student who has an PMP (Progress Monitoring Plan) or IEP (Individual Education Plan), 504, and/or lowest 25% in reading and math. Additional assessments are given as necessary. Parents are kept well informed of progress.
6. In-school Tutorial and Remediation - Students who need additional support are provided with support from the classroom teacher in small group and one-on-one instruction. One hundred percent (100%) of all exceptional education students are mainstreamed into the basic classroom. A before school Academic Support Program is offered to students who have scored a Level 1 or 2 on the FCAT reading and/or mathematics. Students who scored below a 300 in science are offered an Academic Support Program for science. Enrichment activities are provided for students who are performing above grade level in reading, math and science. The enrichment is provided by the classroom teacher as an extension of the concepts that have been taught. The computer labs are also used for projects such as power point presentations and book publishing for additional enrichment. There are a variety of extracurricular activities offered for students after school, such as Spanish, Dance Team, Strings, Chorus, Bridge Club, Book Bash, Math Team and Lego/Robotics. Classworks, Scholastic Reading Iventory and FCAT Explorer are also used in the computer lab for additional support and enrichment according to student need.
7. Systematic Monitoring - Classroom Walkthroughs are conducted by the principal and assistant principal. Informal and formal observations are completed in the classrooms by the administrators. Regular meetings are held to monitor student performance. The Professional Development plans are monitored through the year by the assistant principal. The school counselor assists with student observations and serves as the Exceptional Education Contact. She participates in grade level meetings to offer valuable input and suggestions.
NCLB Public School Choice
Note: Required for Title I
Surfside Elementary is not required to offer school choice options. Information about the school grade, assessment information, etc. is sent to the parents in a variety of methods. There is a school newsletter that goes home two times per month. There is a school web-page. One hundred percent (100%) of the instructional staff have a web page with information about their class. Interim and progress reports go home four times per year. If necessary, letters from the student progression plan are sent to families of individual students. The principal requires that these individual letters be done in a face-to-face conference with parents. The letter, requirements and support can be explained in a level that is better understood by the parents. Teachers meet with parents on a regular basis to discuss student performance. The school also uses the synervoice system to call all parents with special announcements. Parents of third through sixth grade students can register for Edline. Grades are posted by the teachers.
No Attached Public School Choice Notice to Parents file
No Attached Notification of SINI Status file
Pre-School Transition
Note: Required for Title I
A pre-registration is held each spring for upcoming Kindergarten students. Information about the school is provided during the pre-registration. Two meetings are held in the spring. One meeting is for the parents to provide information about school expectations and procedures. The second meeting is held for the new students and their parents. A school tour of the Kindergarten classrooms is provided. Local pre-schools and day care centers may bring their studnets for a tour as well. Kindergarten students do not begin the first three days of school in August. Instead, they come for a one-on-one appointment with their teacher for one hour. The teacher meets with the child to get to know them and to administer a screening. The FLKRS (Florida Kindergarten Readiness Screener) is administered within the first month of school.
MENTORING AND EXTENDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES
Teacher Mentoring
Note: Required for Title I
New teachers become part of Brevard Public School's Teacher Induction Program. The assistant principal facilitates the process and assigns a mentor teacher to assist the new teacher. Regular meetings are held to ensure the new teacher is familiar with all school procedures and expectations. Experienced teachers who are new to the school are also assigned a mentor for support. The counselor assists with mentoring and supporting teachers who are new to the school. She assists by aquainting the new teachers with the learning enviroment, staff, facilities, and school procedures. Sixteen percent (16%) of the instructional staff are National Board Certified. They all work toward their mentoring hours by providing valuable mentoring hours to new teachers and others. Their schedules vary depending on need and teaching assignment. Teachers are encouraged to obtain National Board Certification and /or their master's degree. A support group of NBC teachers hold information meetings and offer assistance. The counselor holds regular support groups and work sessions for those who are working on their National Board Certification. The school is looking to increase the number of National Board Certified teachers from sixteen percent (16%) in 2008 to twenty percent (20%) in 2009.
Administrators monitor teacher performance through formal and informal observations. Input is also considered from parents and students. If a teacher appears to be having difficulties, support is offered. All procedures of the Brevard Public Schools Appraisal System are followed. The teacher is informed of deficiencies through conferences before an Interim Evaluation. A Professional Development Assistant Plan (PDAP) is written to identify deficiencies and strategies for assistance. The Brevard Public Schools does assist with mentor teachers who can offer support. Once there has been time to implement the Professional Development Assistance Plans (PDAP), a final evaluation is written.
Show Attached Teacher Mentoring List
Extended Learning Opportunities
Note: Required for Title I
The Academic Support Program is offered, before school, to students who scored Level 1 or Level 2 on the FCAT 2008 in reading or mathematics, for the lowest 25% in reading and math, or students who were recommended by their teacher because they were working below grade level. Students are offered twenty sessions of reading for one hour each session, which occurs one day a week from October through March. They are also provided math support for fifteen sessions, which occurs two days a week from October through February. The Classworks program is used in the computer lab for additional support in both reading and mathematics during the school year and for the Academic Support Program. The reading teachers also utilize the Voyager Passports Intensive Intervention Program and the SOAR Scholastic Reading kits as supplemental materials.
A Science Club is offered to sixth grade students who scored below 300 on the 2008 FCAT Science and to fifth grade students who need additional science support. The Club is also open to fifth grade students that are higher achievers in order to form a heterogeneous group. Many of the teachers offer their own time by staying after school to offer individual assistance and tutoring after school as well. The science support will occur once a week for a period of sixteen weeks (for one hour). The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide eligible students and low performing students with additional support in core curriculum areas and work with them in a small group setting.
There is one student in third grade who received a Level 1 on FCAT reading. He is also an exceptional education student. He receives iii intervention during the school day in his basic classroom as well as in the resource Varying Exceptionalities classroom. He receives small group instruction with a variety of remedial materials including the Voyager Passport Program. He is eligible to attend the before school Academic Support Program.
Students in third through sixth grade, who scored at Level 1 or 2 in FCAT 2008 reading or mathematics, are offered the opportunity to attend the Academic Support Program in a small group setting to receive one on one intensive reading and/ or math remediation. For reading, this occurs one day a week for twenty sessions from October through March. For math this occurs for fifteen sessions, two days per week, from October through February. In addition, third grade students are provided a summer camp for intensive reading remediation. Due to budget restraints it is expected that the summer program may be greatly reduced. Plans have not been finalized. A Science Enrichment Camp and Lego/Robotics Camp are also offered to incoming 4th and 5th graders for an inquiry based program.
SCHOOLS GRADED C OR BELOW
Professional Development
Disaggregated Data
Informal and Formal Assessments
Alternative Instructional Delivery Methods
SCHOOLS OFFERING PRIMARILY GRADES 6 THROUGH 12
Different Innovative Approaches to Instruction
Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher
Quality Professional Development for Teachers and Leaders
Small Learning Communities (SLC)
Intensive Intervention in Reading and Mathematics
Parental Access and Support
Applied and Integrated Courses
Course Choice Based on Student Goals / Interests / Talent
Master Schedules Based on Student Needs
Academic and Career Planning
GOALS
Goal: Reading
*Note: Required for Title I Scroll down for school data
|
| *Needs Assessment: |
Ninety-three percent (93%) met high standards in reading in grades 3rd-6th for the 2007-08 school year. Ninety-four percent (94%) met high standards in reading for the 2006-07 school year. The school decreased one (1) percentage point in 2007-08 from last year's reading goal of 94%. Ninety-four percent (94%) of grades 3 - 6 met high standards in 2005-06.
Seventy percent (70%) of the students made learning gains in reading in 2007-08. Eighty-seven percent (87%) made learning gains in reading for the 2006-07 school year. This is a decrease of seventeen (17) percentage points from 2006-07. Seventy-three percent (73%) made learning gains for the 2005-06 school year.
Seventy-three percent (73%) of the lowest 25% made learning gains in reading in 2007-08. Eighty-eight percent (88%) of the lowest 25% made learning gains in reading in 2006-07. This is a decrease of fifteen (15) percentage points from 2006-07. Seventy-seven percent (77%) of the lowest 25% percent made learning gains in reading.
Eighty-six percent (86%) of the third grade students scored at levels 3 - 5 in reading 2007-08, ranking Surfside twelfth in the district. The third grade also ranked fifteenth in the district in reading by a scale score of 334 in 2007-08.
The school received AYP for 2007-08. All student subgroups met AYP targets.
After disaggregating data, it has been found that many students who dropped in learning gains were in levels 3-5. Thirty-nine (39%) dropped from level five (5) to level four (4) and thirty-nine percent (39%) dropped from level four(4) to level three (3). Most of the lowest 25% scored at level 3. The data has been shared with classroom teachers during preplanning of 2008. More than 50% of the students made learning gains in reading. One hundred percent (100%) of exceptional education students are included. The exceptional education students at Surfside score at or better than the average of the basic education students. Strategies and activities will be written to address student needs.
|
| *Objective: |
Objective #2: Increase the level of students making learning gains in reading from 70% (2008) to 80% in 2009. |
| *Strategies: |
(A) Assist teachers with analyzing data regarding learning gains and implementing effective reading strategies to be used for selected students. Provide teachers with data for 2007-08 FCAT for their current students and FCAT data for students from last year.
(B) Target students that need reading improvement to raise FCAT reading level. Provide additional intervention time during small group instruction.
(C) Plan for ways to meet the needs of intensive intervention instruction students (iii) through the use of Voyager Passport Intervention Program and participation in the Academic Support Program.
(D) Provide reading instruction in the computer lab through the use of Classworks, FCAT Explorer and SRI software.
(E) Provide professional development training opportunities for teachers in reading to assist with intervention strategies and best practices.
(F) Conduct regular grade level meetings to support what needs to be done to assist identified students.
(G) Communicate information about student progress between administration and teachers, as well as parents.
(H) Provide opportunities for students to improve reference/research and literacy skills through the media center. Activity wheel will be adjusted each nine weeks to accommodate all classes.
(I) Provide additional reading strategies through the use of A-Z reading and vocabulary software for grades K - 2.
(J) Provide extended learning opportunities for those students scoring Level 1 and 2 on FCAT reading and below grade level students 3rd through 6th.
(K) Utilize a .2 reading coach to assist teachers with intervention strategies.
(L) Monitor progress of Level 4 and Level 5 students. Provide enrichment activities for these students. |
| *Evaluation: |
Results of students making learning gains from the 2009 FCAT SSS Reading. Progress monitoring will take place by analyzing DIBELS data for K - 5 and the Florida Oral Reading Fluency (FORF) data for sixth grade. Diagnostic Assessments in Reading (DAR) is also used for selected students in grades K-5. District required assessment results and the MacMillan McGraw-Hill core reading program for grades 1-6 will be used to track progress. Also Scholastic Reading Inventory lexile level data for grades 2nd - 6th will be analyzed, monitored and discussed quarterly. Periodic classroom walk-through data is also used to make instructional decisions. |
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
MacMillan McGraw-Hill Florida Treasures is the district adopted K-6 reading/ language arts textbook series. The program is a systematic, balanced, research-based and aligned with the new reading standards. The five essential instructional components of reading are integrated into a coherent instructional design that focuses on instructional sequence, instructional routines, explicit instruction, and ample practice. Four sets of leveled reader collections are utilized for small group, guided reading instruction: English Language Learners (ELL), approaching level, on level and beyond level are a part of the program for grades K - 6. In addition, the Classworks computer program and MacMillan online student activities technology piece are available for remediation and practice programs. |
| *Professional Development: |
Analysis of FCAT Reading results and other assessments such as DIBELS, FORF (Florida Oral Reading Fluency) and Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI)
Developing fluency in reading
Technology software to support reading such as Classworks/FCAT Explorer/SRI
Running records K-6
Effective small group guided reading instruction
District Workshops and Instructional Support
Reading Coach Training
MacMillan Treasures Reading training on the new reading series and the use of the Intervention piece-Triumphs
Best Practices and Quality Indicators Information
Professional Conferences and Workshops
District training for media specialists
District training for English Language Learners (ELL) out of field teachers
|
| *Objective: |
Objective #3: Increase the percentage of the lowest 25% making learning gains in reading from 73% (2008) to a 80% in 2009. |
| *Strategies: |
(A) Identify and monitor Level 1 and Level 2 students below grade level, ESE, ELL, minority, retained and lowest 25 % of FCAT reading students.
(B) Update and monitor progress of the Progress Monitoring Plan for the lowest 25% in reading.
(C) Conduct grade level meetings to discuss appropriate intervention strategies for the lowest 25%. Monitor assessments and student progress.
(D) Discuss reading strategies at the Reading Leadership Team meetings and share at Professional Learning Community Meetings.
(E) Utilize the computer lab to focus on reading skills through the use of Classworks, FCAT Explorer and Scholatic Reading Inventory.
(F) Communicate progress of lower 25% to parents through conferences and email to assist them with interventions at home.
(G) Provide extended learning opportuinities through the Academic Support Program services (before school) to those students scoring in the lowest 25% in reading. (ASP)
(H) Increase reading instruction during the 90-minute uninterrupted reading block to include intensive reading intervention strategies such as CRISS and emphasis the five elements of reading as this relates to phonemic awareness and the phonics continuum.
(I) Increase inclusion opportunities for all exceptional education students. Utilize the co-teach model for fourth grade.
(J) Follow English Language Learners (ELL) guidelines to ensure teachers have ELL certification or required hours towards certification to provide appropriate strategies for our English Language Learners (ELL's).
|
| *Evaluation: |
Results for the lowest 25% from the 2009 FCAT SSS Reading and Annual Yearly Progress. Progress monitoring will take place by analyzing DIBELS data for K - 5 and the Florida Oral Reading Fluency (FORF) data for sixth grade. Diagnostic Assessments in Reading (DAR) is also used for selected students in grades K-5. District required assessment results and the McMillan McGraw-Hill core reading program for grades 1-6 will be used to track progress. Also Scholastic Reading Inventory lexile level data for grades 2nd - 6th will be analyzed, monitored and discussed quarterly. Periodic classroom walk-through data is also used to make instructional decisions. |
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
MacMillan McGraw-Hill Florida Treasures is the district adopted K-6 language arts textbook series. The program is a systematic, balanced, research-based and aligned with the new reading standards. The five essential instructional components of reading are integrated into a coherent instructional design that focuses on instructional sequence, instructional routines, explicit instruction, and ample practice. Four sets of leveled reader collections are utilized for small group, guided reading instruction: English Language Learners (ELL), approaching level, on level and beyond level are a part of the program for grades K - 6. In addition, the Classworks computer program and MacMillan online student activities technology piece have been very successful remediation and practice programs for our students. |
| *Professional Development: |
Analysis of FCAT Reading results and other assessments such as DIBELS, FORF (Florida Oral Reading Fluency) and Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI)
Developing fluency in reading
Technology software to support reading such as Classworks/FCAT Explorer/SRI
Running records K-6
Effective small group guided reading instruction
District Workshops and Instructional Support
Reading Coach Training
MacMillan Treasures Reading training on the new reading series and the use of the Intervention piece-Triumphs
Best Practices and Quality Indicators Information
Professional Conferences and Workshops
District training for media specialists
District training for English Language Learners (ELL) out of field teachers
|
| *Objective: |
Objective #1: Increase the number of level 3-5 students meeting high standards in reading from 93% (2008) to 95% in 2009.
Increase the number of level 3 - 5 third grade students meeting high standards in reading from 86% (2008) to 90% in 2009.
Increase the number of level 4 and level 5 students for grade 4-6 from 61% (2008) to 65 % in 2009. |
| *Strategies: |
(A) Review specific reading assessment results during pre-planning and analyze data such as FCAT reading results, AYP data, and NRT reading results.
(B) Implement the 90-minute uninterrupted reading block for all K-6 students. In addition, include a daily 20 minute reading intervention time.
(C) Compose Reading Professional Development Plans for all instructional staff. Provide staff development at the school level in order to improve instruction.
(D) Provide opportunities for Reading Coach to articulate and disseminate reading strategies and staff development activities in Professional Learning Communities.
(E) Administer the DIBELS (K-2) and Oral Reading Fluency to grades 3-6 in September of 2008. Students that score at high or moderate risk will be assessed and monitored for the remainder of the year or until they score at low risk or above average.
(F) Create an electronic Progress Monitoring Plan (PMP) and provide differentiated instruction for targeted students scoring Level 1 or 2 in reading, as well as those students working below grade level.
(G) Update instructional staff in the use of the Desktop Reporting and Monitoring Network.
(H) Monitor actions and interventions taking place to decrease the achievement gap between minority and majority students, ESE students, and English Language Learners (ELL).
(I) Increase guided reading instruction (small group and literature circles) in grades 3-6 to emphasize the five elements of reading.
(J) Emphasize Best Practices and Quality Indicators of Reading and monitor through Reading Classroom Walk-Throughs.
(K) Implement strategies provided in the school's Fail Safe Literacy Plan. Non-negotiables and exemplars are included in the plan.
(L) Purchase Reading A-Z and Vocabulary A-Z software for primary grades.
(M) Implement Scholastic REading Inventory (SRI) in grades 2 - 6 to determine lexile reading level. Analyze and disseminate data at grade level meetings.
(N) Provide academic support for Level 1, Level 2 and low Level 3's readers.
(O) Implement Voyager Passport reading intervention program with eligible third grade students for intensive reading intervention.
(P) Provide staff development for implementation of the new reading series MacMillan Treasures.
(Q) Purchase textbooks and ancillary materials needed to support new reading program.
(R) Review and begin implementation of the new reading and language arts Sunshine State Standards. Provide staff development opportunities.
(S) Share best practices through professional learning communities. Incorporate instructional technology.
(T) Provide enrichment opportunities for Level 4 and Level 5 students.
|
| *Evaluation: |
Results from the 2009 FCAT SSS Reading and the Annual Yearly Progress report. Progress monitoring will take place by analyzing DIBELS data for K - 5 and the Florida Oral Reading Fluency (FORF) data for sixth grade. Diagnostic Assessments in Reading (DAR) is also used for selected students in grades K-5. District required assessment results and the McMillan McGraw-Hill core reading program for grades 1-6 will be used to track progress. Also Scholastic Reading Inventory lexile level data for grades 2nd - 6th will be analyzed, monitored and discussed quarterly. Periodic classroom walk-through data is also used to make instructional decisions. |
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
MacMillan McGraw-Hill Florida Treasures is the district adopted K-6 language arts textbook series. The program is a systematic, balanced, research-based and aligned with the new reading standards. The five essential instructional components of reading are integrated into a coherent instructional design that focuses on instructional sequence, instructional routines, explicit instruction, and ample practice. Four sets of leveled reader collections are utilized for small group, guided reading instruction: English Language Learners (ELL), approaching level, on level and beyond level are a part of the program for grades K - 6. In addition, the Classworks computer program and MacMillan online student activities technology piece will be used for remediation and practice programs for our students. |
| *Professional Development: |
Analysis of FCAT Reading results, DIBELS, FORF (Florida Oral Reading Fluency) and Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI)
Developing fluency in reading
Technology software to support reading such as Classworks/FCAT Explorer/SRI
Running records K-6
Effective small group guided reading instruction
District Workshops and Instructional Support
Reading Coach Training
MacMillan Treasures Reading training on the new reading series and the use of the Intervention piece-Triumphs
The 90-minute uninterrupted reading block
Best Practices and Quality Indicators Information
Professional Conferences and Workshops
District training for media specialists
District training for English Language Learners (ELL) out of field teachers
|
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Macmillan McGraw-Hill Treasures and Triumphs |
District |
$33,910.86 |
| Textbook Replenishment |
District |
$3,860.00 |
| Additional Textbook Allocation |
District |
$1,545.00 |
| Total: $39,315.86 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| A - Z Reading Computer Software |
SAC |
$200.00 |
| Total: $200.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Conferences, workshops and substitutes |
SAC |
$200.00 |
| Total: $200.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Academic Support Program for Extended Learning |
District |
$2,645.00 |
| Voyager Passport Interventions |
District |
$1,075.84 |
| Total: $3,720.84 |
| Final Total: $43,436.70 |
|
|
*Non-Highly Qualified Instructors:
|
All teachers on Surfside's instructional staff are considered Highly Qualified, Certified, In-field teachers in reading except for one teacher. This first grade teacher holds a two-year temporary teaching certificate. She is working on her Alternative Certification by taking courses offered by the district. Three teachers are considered out-of-field as they have an English Language Learner (ELL) student. These three teachers are currently working towards completing their course work offered by the district within the required timeline. |
| End of Reading Goal |
|
Goal: Mathematics
*Note: Required for Title I Scroll down for school data
|
| *Needs Assessment: |
Ninety-one percent (91%) met high standards in mathematics in grades 3rd-6th for the 2007-08 school year. Ninety-one percent (91%) met high standards in mathematics for the 2006-07 school year. Surfside maintained the level of students meeting high standards in math.
Seventy-six percent (76%) made learning gains in mathematics for the 2007-08 school year. Eighty-two percent (82%) made learning gains for the 2006-07 school year. There was a drop of six perecentage points from last year. There was an increase of three percentage points of the lowest 25% making learning gains from last year.
The school maintained the same percentage in the area of mathematics and will continue to monitor student progress especially for those in the lowest 25%. Many of the lowest 25% are also in Levels 2 and 3. There are three (3) Level 1 students and eleven (11) Level 2 students in mathematics grades 3 - 6 for 2007-08. The data has been shared with classroom teachers at pre-planning and will be monitored. Teachers were also given the FCAT data through the Desktop Student Reporting Network so that they could see how to access data. Strategies and activities will be written to address these needs. Surfside students made Adequate Yearly Progress for 2007-08. |
| *Objective: |
Objective #2 Increase the level of students making learning gains in math from 76% (2008) to 82% in 2009 and increase the number of students in the lowest 25% making learning gains from 79% (2008) to 81% in 2009.
|
| *Strategies: |
(A) Identify and monitor FCAT Level 1 & Level 2 students, below grade level, ESE, ELL, minority, retained and lowest 25% on FCAT mathematics assessment.
(B) Update electronic PMP's (Progress Monitoring Plans) and provide differentiated instruction for targeted students.
(C) Offer extended learning opportunities through the Academic Support Program (before school) to Level 1 and Level 2 students, as well as below grade level students, in mathematics for grades 3-6.(ASP)
(D) Conduct grade level meetings to discuss lowest 25 % students and their progress.
(E) Provide small group instruction for basic students in grades K-6 who are working below grade level and/or are the lowest 25% in mathematics.
(F) Provide additional resources to teachers for math enrichment.
(G) Provide an after school math program for struggling students first semester and math team practice for the math tournament the second semester.
(H) Provide hands-on algebraic equations and problem-solving activities.
|
| *Evaluation: |
Results for the lowest 25% from the 2009 FCAT SSS Mathematics and Annual Yearly Progress. Progress monitoring will take place quarterly by analyzing the MacMillan Math core program assessments as well as the district required assessments in math. Classroom walkthrough information will be used to discuss on-going progress as well.
|
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
The district adopted elementary mathematics program is MacMillan McGraw-Hill (2004). The math program places a great deal of emphasis on problem-solving and provides an adequate amount of practice on the skills. The program design allows for grade levels to build upon one another in such a way that concepts are introduced and developed, then tied to other mathematical strands throughout the year. Setting Our Sights On Mathematics provides instructional pedagogy based on NCTM standards. It includes a pacing guide to help guide math instruction and provide logical order and sequence of skills. Skill development begins with the concrete through the use of manipulatives and moves to the abstract level.
The VandeWalle resource book provides child-centered activities and are referenced in Setting Our Sights On Mathematics. Item Specifications, Task Performance, and curriculum guides are used to assist with effective planning and implementation.
|
| *Professional Development: |
Training by the school Math Point of Contact for all grade levels (share information with staff at Professional Learning Community Meetings
Utilization of the AIMS materials and activities in order to help develop problem-solving strategies
FCTM annual conferences
Items Specifications and Task Performance Training
Setting Our Sights On Mathematics district math handbook |
| *Objective: |
Objective #1 Increase the number of Level 3-5 students from 91% (2008) to 93% in 2009. |
| *Strategies: |
(A) Establish a Math Point of Contact (POC). The Math Point of Contact will attend district leadership meetings and the school will join professional organizations such as FCTM & BCTM. In addition, the POC will attend Item Specifications/Performance Task training provided by the district.
(B) Provide staff development opportunities for teachers in math. The Math Point of Contact will implement training for staff such as Item Specifications, Task Performance, etc. through Professional Learning Community Meetings.
(C) Train the instructional staff in the use of the Desktop Reporting and Monitoring Network in order to analyze data effectively.
(D) Utilize the "Setting Our Sights On Mathematics" pacing guide, in order to plan more effectively.
(E) Implement the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards in Mathematics. Grades(K-2) new standards only and Grades(3-6) incorporating old standards aligned with FCAT testing through 2010; while utilizing the new standards.
(F) Utilize activities provided in the "Teaching Tools" notebook (K-6).
(G) Monitor actions and interventions taking place to decrease the achievement gap between minority and majority students ESE and English Language Learners (ELL).
(H) Identify and monitor the lowest 25% in mathematics. Provide strategies and interventions for those students.
(I) Provide mathematics instruction in the computer lab through the use of Classworks, FCAT Explorer, Florida Math Challenge and other educational software.
|
| *Evaluation: |
Results from the 2009 FCAT SSS Math and the Annual Yearly Progress report. Progress monitoring will take place quarterly by analyzing the MacMillan Math core program assessments as well as the district required assessments in math. Classroom walkthrough information will be used to discuss on-going progress as well.
|
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
The district adopted elementary mathematics program is MacMillan McGraw-Hill (2004). The math program places a great deal of emphasis on problem-solving and provides an adequate amount of practice on the skills. The program design allows for grade levels to build upon one another in such a way that concepts are introduced and developed, then tied to other mathematical strands throughout the year. Setting Our Sights On Mathematics provides instructional pedagogy based on NCTM standards. It includes a pacing guide to help guide math instruction and provide logical order and sequence of skills. Skill development begins with the concrete through the use of manipulatives and moves to the abstract level.
The VandeWalle resource book provides child-centered activities and are referenced in Setting Our Sights On Mathematics. Item Specifications, Task Performance, and curriculum guides are used to assist with effective planning and implementation.
|
| *Professional Development: |
Training by the school Math Point of Contact for all grade levels (share information with staff)
Utilization of AIMS resource materials and activities to help develop problem-solving strategies
FCTM annual conferences
Math Bowl Competition Training
Florida Solves resource CD
Setting Our Sights On Mathematics district math handbook |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Macmillan McGraw-Hill Mathematics Textbooks 2004 |
|
$0.00 |
| Math resource book - Teaching Student Centered Strategies |
Non-state budget provided by the district |
$215.94 |
| AIMS resource materials - Solve It |
Non-state budget provided by the district |
$169.01 |
| Total: $384.95 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| FCTM and BCTM membership |
SAC |
$25.00 |
| Conferences, workshops and substitutes |
SAC |
$179.00 |
| Total: $204.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Academic Support Program for Extended Learning |
District |
$2,645.00 |
| Total: $2,645.00 |
| Final Total: $3,233.95 |
|
|
*Non-Highly Qualified Instructors:
|
All teachers on Surfside's instructional staff are considered Highly Qualified, Certified, In-field teachers in math, except for one teacher. This first grade teacher holds a two-year temporary teaching certificate. She is working on her Alternative Certification by taking courses offered by the district. |
| End of Mathematics Goal |
|
Goal: Writing
*Note: Required for Title I Scroll down for school data
|
| *Needs Assessment: |
Seventy-seven percent (77%) met high standards in writing in fourth grade for the 2007-08 school year.
Ninety-eight percent (98%) met high standards in writing in fourth grade for the 2006-07 school year.
Eighty-five percent (85%) met high standards in writing in fourth grade for the 2005-06 school year.
The school decreased the percentage meeting high standards by twenty-one (21) percentage points for 2007-08 from last year.
Surfside Elementary received a 3.9 in Expository Writing, a 3.8 in Narrative Writing, with an overall score of 3.8 for 2007-08.
Surfside Elementary received a 4.4 in Expository Writing, a 4.3 in Narrative Writing, with an overall score of 4.3 for 2006-07.
Surfside Elementary received a 4.1 in Expository Writing, a 3.9 in Narrative Writing, with an overall score of 4.0 for 2005-06.
There will be no assessment in writing for the multiple choice section of the FCAT Writes in 2009.
|
| *Objective: |
To increase the percentage of 4th grade students scoring 3.5 and above on the FCAT Writing from 77% (2008) to 85% in 2009. |
| *Strategies: |
(A) Implement the district writing plan for improvement using FCAT data.
(B) Utilize the "Piece by Piece" component in conjunction with the resource guides, "Developing the Craft", and "Developing Ideas & Developing + Writing Skills", "Elaborating Ideas", "Extreme Makeover" for grades 3 and 4.
(C) Implement FCAT scoring procedures by using the grade level scoring rubric.
(D) Provide staff development training (Six Traits, FCAT Writes rubric training and professional learning communities involving writing).
(E) Establish a writing committee, facilitated by a writing contact, to review current grade level strategies and implement the district writing program for grades K-6.
(F) Establish base-line data for 4th graders for use in district wide writing assessments / prompts. Implement district writing assessments in grades K-6th.
(G) Review the previous FCAT writing assessment prompts to assist teachers and students with the writing / scoring process.
(H) Utilize administrators, faculty and instructional assistants as volunteer writing coaches, specifically for the improvement of 4th grade writing scores. 100% of the fourth grade students will have a writing coach to work one on one.
(I) Increase writing instructional time by writing across all areas of the curriculum. Students will write daily during the writing block.
(J) Identify students that scored a 3.0 or below on district writing assessment and implement a Progress Monitoring Plan (PMP) for those students. Identify students who scored a 4.0 - 6.0 and provide enrichment writing activities.
(K) Include exceptional education students in regular classroom for writing instruction. Students will also receive additional writing support in the VE classroom.
(L) Participate in district "Quality Literature Day" and host a Young Authors' Conference.
(M) Coordinate with other schools that consistently raise scores for ideas and methodology.
(N) Provide staff development training for scoring using anchor papers.
(O) Provide extra-curricular activities in writing (after school writing club for third and fourth grade students).
(P) Provide enrichment writing opportunities through Future Problem Solving activities.
(Q) Utilize district writing resource teacher to assist with data analysis and staff development. |
| *Evaluation: |
Results from 2009 FCAT Writes results. Teachers will progress monitor students quarterly by analyzing the four required district writing assessments for grades K-6. |
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
Sunshine State Standards for Writing
Grade Level Expectations in Writing
Piece by Piece district writing plan and rubrics
Developing the Craft district writing resource guide
Developing Ideas Resource Guide
Quality Indicators for a Writing Program
|
| *Professional Development: |
School-based training on Piece by Piece (K - 6th)
Training for the utilization of Developing The Craft and Elaborating Ideas lesson guides
School wide training for FCAT Writes scoring procedures, Six Traits Writing
Writing Point of Contact teacher will share information with the staff on writing techniques and procedures that are successful during Professional Learning Communities
District writing resource teacher will assist with staff development for writing |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| supplies, writing curriculum night, after school writing club |
SAC |
$100.00 |
| Total: $100.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Conferences, workshops, substitutes, Writing Contact substitutes when not provided by the county |
SAC |
$200.00 |
| Total: $200.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Future Problem Solving registration for writing competition |
SAC |
$255.00 |
| Total: $255.00 |
| Final Total: $555.00 |
|
| End of Writing Goal |
|
Goal: Science
*Note: Required for Title I Scroll down for school data
|
| *Needs Assessment: |
Surfside Elementary had a scale score of 354 for the 2007-08 school year. This is a decrease of nineteen (19) points. Eighty-seven percent (87%) of the students scored at level 3 and above on the science FCAT in 2007 - 08. This is a decrease of six (6) percentage points. Surfside averaged a 3.71 in science in 2006 and 5.5 in 2007 on performance task items. There was a decrease in 2008 to 4.73 on the performance task items. |
| *Objective: |
Increase the scale score on FCAT Science from 354 (2008) to 360 in 2009.
Increase the percentage points of students scoring at Level 3 and above from 87% (2008) to 90% in 2009.
Increase the percentage points of students scoring at Level 4 through 5 from 28% (2008) to 32% in 2009.
|
| *Strategies: |
(A) Establish a science Point of Contact to disseminate information to the staff.
(B) Provide quality professional development opportunities through Point of Contact and National Board Science teacher.
(C) Provide extended learning opportunities through Academic Support Program services (after school) “Science Club" once a week for sixteen weeks beginning in October. This group includes a heterogeneous grouping of higher performing students, 6th grade students scoring below a 300 on the science FCAT 2008, and targeted 5th grade students. (ASP)
(D) Provide hands-on science materials and equipment in a science storage area accessible to teachers.
(E) Utilize “Lab Rats” (students who gather lab materials, assist with set up and clean up for teachers in grades K-5).
(F) Purchase new materials and replenish consumable supplies.
(G) Establish a science fair committee for implementing new science curriculum guides and standards, purchasing materials, organizing curriculum night and coordinating the school science fair.
(H) Examine and implement spiraling curriculum among grade levels through vertical teaming.
(I) Require third through sixth classes to produce an individual science fair project. Include a class project from K-2 in school science fair.
(J) Place emphasis on writing in science. (logs, journals, data collection, writing about lab experiences, etc.)
(K) Place emphasis on performance task items for 3rd-6th grade students.
(L) Begin school year with labs that focus on safety and proper use of materials and equipment.
(M) Utilize FCAT specifications, the “Big 11” and “Dynamic Dozen” task force guide (from the annually assessed FCAT science benchmarks) in grades third through sixth.
(N) Utilize “science buddies.”
(O) Increase hands-on science experiences in grades K-4. Utilize textbook as a tool. Focus on inquiry.
(P) Facilitate discussions using “science language.”
(Q) Emphasize scientific thinking in all grades.
(R) Conduct “Mad Science Night” for a curriculum night to assist parents with the understanding of the scientific process using materials found in the home.
(S) Monitor science progress and lessons through Classroom Walk Throughs.
(T) Provide summer enrichment opportunities through a fee-supported science camp.
(U) Provide science links for parents and students through staff web pages.
(V) Explore possibilities of acquiring a science classroom by 2012.
(W) Provide staff development and support to teachers for implementation of the next generation Sunshine State Standards in Science.
|
| *Evaluation: |
Results from the 2009 FCAT Science
Best Practices and Quality Indicators Checklist in Science will be used by instructors and administrators to evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies used in the classroom
Classroom Walk Through Observations will help monitor progress
Results of the district pre and post tests will be analyzed to measure progress towards the objective
Body of Knowledge tests required by the district will be analyzed and shared
The number of 3 - 6 students successfully completing science fair projects will determine whether the objective was met
Teacher-made tests will be used to monitor student progress
Grade 5 progress in each content cluster and in performance task writing will be measured using FCAT Science scores |
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
Scott Foresman Science Text and Hands-on Experiments
CSI Brevard Guide
Next generation Sunshine State Standards and Benchmarks for Florida
AIMS/GEMS/FOSS Programs
Inquiry based lessons with hands-on labs
Task Force Guides grades third through sixth
|
| *Professional Development: |
Brevard mini grants and aerospace grants will be written, by exemplary teachers, for science field trips, experiments and materials
Science Point of Contact representative for the school will disseminate appropriate information to the staff after attending monthly meetings and facilitate necessary training for the staff especially regarding the next generation Sunshine State Standards and requirements for each grade level
Faculty inservices through Professional Learning Communities
Professional conferences and workshops such as FAST and NSTA |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Scott Foresman Science Textbook |
|
$0.00 |
| (8) Science Court Programs |
District |
$640.00 |
| Science Consumable and replenishment materials |
District |
$1,351.29 |
| Total: $1,991.29 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
|
|
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Conferences, workshops and substitutes |
SAC |
$200.56 |
| Total: $200.56 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| After school Academic Support Science Club |
District |
$685.00 |
| Mad Science Night hand-on materials and equipment |
SAC |
$446.00 |
| Total: $1,131.00 |
| Final Total: $3,322.85 |
|
|
*Non-Highly Qualified Instructors:
|
All teachers on Surfside's instructional staff are considered Highly Qualified, Certified, In-field teachers in science, except for one teacher. This first grade teacher holds a two-year temporary teaching certificate. She is working on her Alternative Certification by taking courses offered by the district. |
| End of Science Goal |
|
Goal: Parental Involvement
*Note: Required for Title I
|
| *Needs Assessment: |
Overall the parental involvement at Surfside Elementary is high. The district goal for Volunteer Hours at Surfside Elementary for 2007-2008 school year was 6,868.22. The school surpassed this goal with a total of 7,273.47 hours, which is equal to 18.4 hours per student. According to current student numbers (405), the district goal has increased by 2% raising our 2008-2009 goal to 7,364.25 hours.
Based on 2007-2008 parent surveys, 97% of the parents at Surfside Elementary, either strongly agreed (69.55), or agreed (27.57) that Surfside provides sufficient parental involvement opportunities. The goal of Surfside for 2008-2009 academic school year is to yield the same,or a higher percentage of positive results as reflected on current client survey.
|
| *Objective: |
Increase the number of volunteer hours from 7,273.47 in 2007-08 to 7,364.25 hours in 2008-09. This is a difference of 90.78 hours which is an increase of 1.25%. Increase the number of "strongly agree" responses from 69.55% in (2008) to 75% in 2009 on the Client Survey under Sufficient Parental Involvement Opportunities. Increase the number of signed business partnerships from three (3) in 2007-08 to four (4) in 2008-09. |
| *Strategies: |
(A) Provide orientation meeting (volunteer breakfast) in August to provide information about volunteer procedures and opportunities.
(B) Provide a variety of volunteer opportunities for parental involvement through PTO and SAC events, tutoring, reading moms, media center and office work.
(C) Provide parents with a Parent Orientation Night on two separate evenings to provide opportunities to become informed of the grade level expectations and new curriculum standards.
(D) Expand communication to keep parents informed through homework folders, e-mail, web pages, synervoice, and Edline for grades 3-6.
(E) Provide communication through the bi-monthly school and guidance newsletter.
(F) Assign a Parent Volunteer Coordinator to help with logging in of volunteer hours that have been done at home by other volunteers.
(G) Provide parental involvement opportunities through special music programs in the evening for grade levels each month.
(H) Conduct special grade level and school events such as: Kindergarten's Nursery Rhyme Time, Mother's Day Tea, TK-1's Camp Skeeter, Fifth grade Luau, Jog-a-thon, Make a Difference Day, Field Day, Mad Science Night, Fine Arts Night, Book Fair Luncheon, Spring Fling, and Volunteer Appreciation Breakfast.
(I) Utilize school marquee and PTO bulletin board as an effective communication tool.
(J) Provide teachers and students with assistance from the Big Brothers Big Sisters Mentoring Program.
(K) Implement the "Be There Campaign" to meet the needs of the school by encouraging parents to "be there" for their children.
(L) Provide opportunities for seniors as well as youths to acquire volunteer hours for the school.
(M) Increase number of business partners to four for the 2008-2009 academic school year.
(N) Provide a forum for parent feedback from District Parent Leadership Team meetings (PTO).
(O) Establish volunteer appreciation committee for volunteer recognition and to review parental involvement opportunities.
|
| *Evaluation: |
District computerized record of school volunteer hours (VIPS)
PTO membership
SAC participation
School sign in sheets
Client Survey
Big Brothers Big Sisters Mentoring Hours
Number of business partners and contrbutions
|
| *Evidence-based Program(s): |
School Improvement Research Series (SIRS)
Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program (CSRD) - Parent and Community Involvement
Be There Campaign |
| *Professional Development: |
Surfside Parent Orientation Program in August
Surfside Volunteer Breakfast and informational meeting discussing ways to volunteer
School personnel will attend required in-service and training sessions for using volunteers
Mentors will be trained to work with students in academic areas
A volunteer coordinator, who is VIPS trained, will be assigned to assist with logging volunteer hours
Volunteers will attend school level training sessions to learn about volunteer rules and procedures |
| Budget: |
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Parental Involvement Goal |
|
Goal: Return on Investment
|
| Needs Assessment: |
|
| End of Return on Investment Goal |
|
ADDITIONAL GOALS
Additional Goal: Technology |
| Needs Assessment: |
The School Advisory Council provides input to make improvements to the learning environment to enhance all other goals. Test data and Client Surveys are also reviewed. Great improvements have been made in the area of technology at Surfside and the school has successfully met the 21st century classroom requirements. The district has completed a technology renovation and upgrade in wiring and cabling for the entire school. Document cameras, projectors, DVD/VCRs and audio amplification systems were installed and are utilized in each classroom. School Recognition dollars and contributions from PTO as well as Technology Incentive Funds have allowed the school to reach the goal of 5:1 or better student to computer ratio in every classroom. The school has purchased a laptop computer for each teacher. Eighteen (18) additional laptops were purchased to meet this goal.
One hundred percent (100%) of the instructional staff completed the Florida Innovates School Survey in 2008. Sub tests scores: 1. Basic Operations - 94%; 2. Productivity - 92%; 3. Communication - 96%; 4. Research - 91%; 5. Planning, Management and Instruction - 96% and 6. Social, Ethical Legal and Human Issues - 94%. One hundred percent (100%) of the third third through sixth grade teachers are implementing Edline. |
| Objective: |
To maintain modern computer to student ratio from 5:1 (2008) to 5:1 or better in 2009 in each individual classroom. |
| Strategies: |
(A) Increase the use of the computer lab to improve technology instruction (Power Point, imovies, publishing, FCAT Explorer, Classworks and Scholastic Reading Inventory). All classes will be scheduled for computer time in the lab at a minimum of one time per week (40 minute slot).
(B) Maintain modern computer to student ratio within the classrooms. Conduct a refresh cycle annually.
(C) Maintain and update technology equipment for the school computer lab and in the classrooms.
(D) Provide staff development opportunities for teachers to effectively use the computer lab. (Classwork, Desktop Monitoring and Reporting Network, PMRN and A3 PMP training, Edline, Gradequick, RMeasiteach)
(E) Maintain and update school web-pages by all faculty members.
(F) Utilize new equipment and technology for the 21st classrooms.
(G) Provide training for new technology and programs/software.
(H) Utilize the "Inventory of Teacher Technology Skills" in order to assess teacher proficiency.
(I) Replenish our student wireless lab.
(J) Utilize technology integrators for professional development.
(K) Apply for Excellence in Technology Award.
(L) Train all students and adults on age-appropriate internet safety.
(M) Train all 3rd though 6th grade teachers on the use of Edline. Implement Edline for effective parent communication.
(N) Utilize teacher leaders to share best practices using technology as an instructional tool in all curriculum areas. |
| Evaluation: |
Inventory computer to student ratio.
Florida Innovates School Survey
Staff webpages |
| Evidence-based Program(s): |
Sunshine Standard - Technology Classrooms of the 21st Century
Excellence in Technology Award |
| Professional Development: |
Technology training and workshop opportunities provided to all teachers.
RMeasiteach
Edline
Technology Integrators
Teacher Leaders - Professional Learning Communities |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Workstation Replenishment Program |
District |
$20,470.15 |
| District Technology Funds based on number of students |
District |
$1,620.00 |
| Technology equipment, software and hardware as needed |
Parent Teacher Organization |
$5,000.00 |
| Total: $27,090.15 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $27,090.15 |
|
| End of Technology Goal |
|
Additional Goal: Attendance |
| Needs Assessment: |
Surfside Elementary has had a high attendance rate for many years. The attendance rate for the school has exceeded the district goal of 95% for the past several years. In 2006, the attendance rate was 95.71% for the school year. In 2007, the attendance rate was 96.21%. The attendance rate was 96.49% in 2008. |
| Objective: |
Increase student attendance rate from 96.49% (2008) to 97% in 2009. |
| Strategies: |
(A) Provide periodic reminders in monthly school newsletter.
(B) Implement Brevard Public Schools' attendance policy found on in Elementary Handbook on
pages 8-12.
(C) Utilize "synervoice" to contact parents of absent students on daily basis.
(D) Make personal calls for students absent more than 3 days and/or chronic attendance issues.
(E) Monitor student attendance through reports on TERMS. (Excessive Absence Warning Letter report) Send letters for students with excessive absences.
(F) Send reminders with interim and progress reports.
(G) Report excessive absences to Attendance Resource Officer.
(H) Discuss the importance of attendance and attendance policies with new Kindergarten parents at spring registration.
(I) Involve school counselor for students with attendance issues. Conference with students and/or parents.
(J) Refer students to Child Study Team and/or Health Department Supervisor for chronic absenteesim and health issues.
(K) Provide appeals packets for students who exceed nine days within a semester.
(L) Establish an Appeals Committee to review appeals.
(M) Monitor tardies through reports on TERMS. (Excessive Tardy Warning Letter) Send letters and reminders for students with excessive tardies. |
| Evaluation: |
2008-09 Attendance rate - District reports are sent quarterly.
Reports from TERMS. |
| Evidence-based Program(s): |
Students miss valuable instruction when absent. |
| Professional Development: |
Inform parents and teachers of attendance policies and procedures. |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $0.00 |
|
| End of Attendance Goal |
|
Additional Goal: Support Secondary Schools of National Prominence. |
| Needs Assessment: |
Surfside Elementary sixth graders ranked 4th in the district in reading with ninety-five percent (95%) at or above grade level and 3rd in mathematics with ninety-one percent (91%) scoring at or above grade level. Sixth grade students performed well above the district and state average on the scale score FCAT reading scoring 357 compared to an average district score of 333 and the state score of 310. The sixth graders also did well in the area of mathematics scoring a 361 compared to an average district score of 341 and the state score of 313. The Satellite High feeder chain has had a long, lasting relationship through many years. Surfside staff also communicates with the middle school for effective transitions from sixth grade into seventh grade.
One hundred percent (100%) of the sixth grade students in 2008 completed their middle school registration. |
| Objective: |
Rigor and Relevance - Maintain the number of students completing their middle school registration from 100% (2008) to 100% in 2009. Increase the number of sixth grade students who are at or above grade level from 95% (2008) to 97% in 2009 in reading and 91% (2008) to 94% in 2009 in mathematics.
|
| Strategies: |
(A) Assist parents of 6th grade students, 6th grade teachers and 6th grade students with the middle school registration process. The school counselor will be the contact for this process.
(B) Organize presentations by middle school counselors and administrators for 6th grade students.
(C) Communicate with parents about 7th grade registration and Secondary Schools of National Prominence (SSNP) through newsletters, district letters, web pages, etc.
(D) Coordinate with basic education 6th grade teachers and exceptional education teachers for appropriate placement of exceptional education students in middle school.
(E) Provide counseling for individual students and parents, as needed for making appropriate class choices. Make recommendations to parents/students for advanced courses such as Algebra I, Spanish and Science Research.
(F) Conduct an informational meeting for 6th grade parents about middle school registration and Secondary Schools of National Prominence.
(G) Coordinate with other middle schools for students who live outside of attendance boundary or who may be moving to other middle schools.
(H) Provide a variety of enrichment opportunities to maintain and/or improve students at Level 3 or above in reading and mathematics.
(I) Provide extra-curricular activities for students. (strings, chorus, chess club, Lego Team, dance team, Bridge Club, Book Bash, and Future Problem Solvers).
(J) Extend opportunities for students offered through the Academic Support Classes in reading and math offered once a week for twenty sessions each morning from October through February. Also Academic Support for science is offered once a week for sixteen sessions from October through February.
(K) Extend opportunities for students to act as “Lab Rats” to assist teachers and students with lab and science activities.
(L) Extend reading opportunities for the Gifted Student program (GSP). Implement Junior Great Book program for 90-minute reading block during GSP. Implement Hands-On Equations for mathematics. Focus on problem solving.
(M) Departmentalize 6th grade into three 90-minute blocks for intensive instruction (reading – use of literature circles and In a Word Vocabulary, mathematics-algebraic equations and problem solving, and in science-use of hands-on inquiry methods.)
(N) Require all 6th-grade students to complete a science fair project.
(O) Monitor student performance through the Desktop Student Data and Reporting Network and at regularly scheduled grade level meetings.
(P) Use data to conference with students about improving FCAT performance. Assist students with setting goals for learning gains.
(Q) Utilize technology of the 21st Century to enhance instruction in all curriculum areas.
(R) Include specials teachers (PE, music, art, media) and exceptional education teachers to integrate curriculum standards into their lessons and activities.
(S) Provide training and coaching for Future Problem Solving teams.
(T) Conduct classroom and school geography and spelling bees. Participate in district competitions. |
| Evaluation: |
Percent of students completeing registration process for middle school in 2009.
Results from the 6th grade FCAT SSS reading and mathematics scores for 2009. |
| Evidence-based Program(s): |
Brevard Public Schools Secondary Schools of National Prominence Plan |
| Professional Development: |
School based professional learning community opportunities in reading, mathematics, writing, and science Utilize the school Point of Contacts to disseminate important curriculum changes, updates, and new standards |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Lego/Robotics |
District |
$500.00 |
| Total: $500.00 |
| Final Total: $500.00 |
|
| End of Support Secondary Schools of National Prominence. Goal |
|
Additional Goal: Safe and Orderly Learning Environment |
| Needs Assessment: |
2006 Client Surveys indicate that 83% of parents surveyed responded "Excellent" or "Good" for "Provisions of a safe learning environment. The 2006-07 plan set a goal to have 85% respond "Excellent" or "Good." In 2007, the goal was exceeded as 88% responded "Strongly Agree" or "Agree." (survey changed in 2007) In 2008, 97.53% responded "Strongly Agree" or "Agree."
Surfside Elementary is forunate to have an excellent working relationship with both the Satellite Beach Police and the Fire Department. Members from both departments serve on the School Improvement Committee. They provide safety recommendations and assistance. The Gold Key Award was received for School Age Child Care for 2007-08. |
| Objective: |
Increase the number of "A" Strongly Agree and "B" Agree responses on the 2009 Client Survey from 97.53% (2008) to 98% in 2009 for Safe Orderly Environment. |
| Strategies: |
(A) Train Crisis Response Team/School Safety Committee. Safety Committee will examine and review safety issues.
(B) Update Crisis Manual annually.
(C) Train new employees and substitute teachers regarding emergency plans and procedures.
(D) Update Substitute Manual annually.
(E) Update Emergency Packets and train/update all employees annually.
(F) Purchase and update necessary safety equipment.
(G) Utlilize School Rescource Officer one day per week.
(H) Conduct K-6 classroom lessons on teasing, bullying, getting along, bike safety, anti-tobacco, drugs, etc.
(I) Comply with fire and safety codes.
(J) Update CPR and AED certifications.
(K) Comply with all safety requirements for Gold Key Assessment for School Age Child Care.
|
| Evaluation: |
2009 Client Survey
Safety Inspections |
| Evidence-based Program(s): |
Brevard Public Schools Safety Requirements
Florida Department of Education Safety Requirements and Statutes |
| Professional Development: |
Training for Crisis Response Team
Emergency Training for all employees and substitute teachers
CPR and AED updates and training |
| Budget:
|
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Technology |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Professional Development |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| CPR/AED cerification |
SAC |
$150.00 |
| Total: $150.00 |
| Other |
| Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| No Data |
No Data |
$0.00 |
| Total: $0.00 |
| Final Total: $150.00 |
|
| End of Safe and Orderly Learning Environment Goal |
|
FINAL BUDGET
| Evidence-based Program(s)/Material(s) |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Macmillan McGraw-Hill Treasures and Triumphs |
District |
$33,910.86 |
| Reading |
Textbook Replenishment |
District |
$3,860.00 |
| Reading |
Additional Textbook Allocation |
District |
$1,545.00 |
| Mathematics |
Macmillan McGraw-Hill Mathematics Textbooks 2004 |
|
$0.00 |
| Mathematics |
Math resource book - Teaching Student Centered Strategies |
Non-state budget provided by the district |
$215.94 |
| Mathematics |
AIMS resource materials - Solve It |
Non-state budget provided by the district |
$169.01 |
| Writing |
supplies, writing curriculum night, after school writing club |
SAC |
$100.00 |
| Science |
Scott Foresman Science Textbook |
|
$0.00 |
| Science |
(8) Science Court Programs |
District |
$640.00 |
| Science |
Science Consumable and replenishment materials |
District |
$1,351.29 |
| Total: $41,792.10 |
| Technology |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
A - Z Reading Computer Software |
SAC |
$200.00 |
| Science |
|
|
$0.00 |
| Technology |
Workstation Replenishment Program |
District |
$20,470.15 |
| Technology |
District Technology Funds based on number of students |
District |
$1,620.00 |
| Technology |
Technology equipment, software and hardware as needed |
Parent Teacher Organization |
$5,000.00 |
| Total: $27,290.15 |
| Professional Development |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Conferences, workshops and substitutes |
SAC |
$200.00 |
| Mathematics |
FCTM and BCTM membership |
SAC |
$25.00 |
| Mathematics |
Conferences, workshops and substitutes |
SAC |
$179.00 |
| Writing |
Conferences, workshops, substitutes, Writing Contact substitutes when not provided by the county |
SAC |
$200.00 |
| Science |
Conferences, workshops and substitutes |
SAC |
$200.56 |
| Safe and Orderly Learning Environment |
CPR/AED cerification |
SAC |
$150.00 |
| Total: $954.56 |
| Other |
| Goal |
Description of Resources |
Funding Source |
Available Amount |
| Reading |
Academic Support Program for Extended Learning |
District |
$2,645.00 |
| Reading |
Voyager Passport Interventions |
District |
$1,075.84 |
| Mathematics |
Academic Support Program for Extended Learning |
District |
$2,645.00 |
| Writing |
Future Problem Solving registration for writing competition |
SAC |
$255.00 |
| Science |
After school Academic Support Science Club |
District |
$685.00 |
| Science |
Mad Science Night hand-on materials and equipment |
SAC |
$446.00 |
| Support Secondary Schools of National Prominence. |
Lego/Robotics |
District |
$500.00 |
| Total: $8,251.84 |
| Final Total: $78,288.65 |
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district.
The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers,
education support employees, students (for middle, junior high and high school only),
parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic,
racial, and economic community served by the school.
Yes. Agree with the above statement.
SAC Involvement
Surfside's School Advisory Council is in compliance with state law regulations. The principal serves as the administrator. Teachers are elected by teachers, support staff elected by support staff, and parents elected by parents. Parent ballots are distributed at Parent Orientation Night. Fifty-three percent (53%) are non-school personnel. Forty-seven percent (47%) are school employees. There are also three community members and one business member.
The School Advisory Council meets on the first and third Wednesday of each month. The group meets to analyze data and to write goals, objectives and strategies for reading, writing, mathematics, science, attendance, technology, Secondary Schools of National Prominence, Parental Involvement and safety. Once the plan is written, the group meets to implement the school improvement plan. Past accomplishments include helping the school to achieve a school grade of an "A" for the past seven years. The school has also received Adequate Yearly Progress for the past three years and provisional AYP for 2005-06. AYP was obtained for 2006-07 and 2007-08. The SAC budget and plan has allowed teachers to attend professional conferences and workshops in the areas of reading, writing, mathematics and science for effective staff development. Necessary safety equipment has been purchased as well. As the budget has been reduced, some training opportunities may be limited. The School Advisory Council is the sole body responsible for final decision making at the school relating to the implementation of the school improvement plan.
SAC Members
| Members |
|
1)
Susan Murray,
Principal
|
|
2)
Dianne Peterson,
SAC Chair
|
|
3)
Jayne Mosher,
Teacher
|
|
4)
Nancy Rehwoldt,
Teacher
|
|
5)
Jayna Snyder,
Teacher
|
|
6)
Elva Rella,
Business Member
|
|
7)
Chris Carter,
Parent
|
|
8)
Bridgette Eells,
Parent
|
|
9)
Jennifer Mench,
Parent
|
|
10)
Rose Marie Hilliard,
Parent
|
|
11)
Tara Forcier,
Parent
|
|
12)
Jeff Pearson,
Community Member
|
|
13)
Daniel Rocque,
Community Member
|
|
14)
Gretta Valiente,
Community Member
|
|
15)
Marcia Roberts,
School Support Personnel
|
IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION
A timeline has been established with each SMART objective. The School Advisory Council (SAC) meets on the first and third Wednesday of each month to monitor the implementation of the plan. Information about the school improvement plan is shared with the faculty during the school year. Once FCAT data and Client Survey results are received the group will meet to determine the final evaluation and extent of successful implementation.
Reading Professional Development:
Analysis of FCAT Reading results, DIBELS, FORF (Florida Oral Reading Fluency) and Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI)
Developing fluency in reading
Technology software to support reading such as Classworks/FCAT Explorer/SRI
Running records K-6
Effective small group guided reading instruction
District Workshops and Instructional Support
Reading Coach Training
MacMillan Treasures Reading training on the new reading series and the use of the Intervention piece-Triumphs
The 90-minute uninterrupted reading block
Best Practices and Quality Indicators Information
Professional Conferences and Workshops
District training for media specialists
District training for English Language Learners (ELL) out of field teachers
Math Professional Development
Training by the school Math Point of Contact for all grade levels (share information with staff)
Utilization of AIMS resource materials and activities to help develop problem-solving strategies
FCTM annual conferences
Math Bowl Competition Training
Florida Solves resource CD
Setting Our Sights On Mathematics district math handbook
Writing Professional Development:
School-based training on Piece by Piece (K - 6th)
Training for the utilization of Developing The Craft and Elaborating Ideas lesson guides
School wide training for FCAT Writes scoring procedures, Six Traits Writing
Writing Point of Contact teacher will share information with the staff on writing techniques and procedures that are successful during Professional Learning Communities
District writing resource teacher will assist with staff development for writing.
Science Professional Development:
Brevard mini grants and aerospace grants will be written, by exemplary teachers, for science field trips, experiments and materials
Science Point of Contact representative for the school will disseminate appropriate information to the staff after attending monthly meetings and facilitate necessary training for the staff especially regarding the next generation Sunshine State Standards and requirements for each grade level
Faculty inservices through Professional Learning Communities
Professional conferences and workshops such as FAST and NSTA
Parental Involvement Training:
Surfside Parent Orientation Program in August
Surfside Volunteer Breakfast and informational meeting discussing ways to volunteer
School personnel will attend required in-service and training sessions for using volunteers
Mentors will be trained to work with students in academic areas
A volunteer coordinator, who is VIPS trained, will be assigned to assist with logging volunteer hours
Volunteers will attend school level training sessions to learn about volunteer rules and procedures
Technology Professional Development:
Technology training and workshop opportunities provided to all teachers.
RMeasiteach
Edline
Technology Integrators
Teachers Leaders - Professional Learning Communities
Secondary School of National Prominence:
Staff development training to help implement the new reading series
Training for the new math standards and science Next Generation Standards
School based professional learning community opportunities in reading, mathematics, writing, and science Utilize the school Point of Contacts to disseminate important curriculum changes and updates
REPORTING
Baseline Data Report
Note: Baseline Data Report is required for all Repeating F, F schools and D schools that were F in 2005-2008
and all Schools in Need of Improvement (SINI).
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 3 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 4 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 5 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 6 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 7 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 8 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 9 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 10 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 11 |
| |
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Name of Assessment Used |
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline data aggregated at school level
|
Reading Baseline Data |
Mathematics Baseline Data |
Writing Baseline Data |
Science Baseline Data |
Baseline Data
|
End of Baseline Data Report
Mid-Year Report
2008 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT MID-YEAR REPORT
Differentiated Accountability Status:
|
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 3 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 4 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 5 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 6 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 7 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 8 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 9 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 10 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 11 |
| |
Reading |
Mathematics |
Writing |
Science |
| |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
% Mastery |
%Non- Mastery |
| Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Mid-Year Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| % Change from Baseline Data |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Empty data from baseline data aggregated for your school.
Reading Data Analysis
1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.
2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.
3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.
4. What specific strategies will be used to improve the achievement of non-AYP subgroups?
Mathematics Data Analysis
1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.
2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.
3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.
4. What specific strategies will be used to improve the achievement of non-AYP subgroups?
Writing Data Analysis
1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.
2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.
3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.
Science Data Analysis
1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.
2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.
3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.
Extended Learning Programs for Students
Describe the activities (e.g. after school, pull-outs, etc) that have taken place to date.
| SUBJECT AREA | FREQUENCY | DURATION | TOTAL # OF LEVEL 1 AND 2 STUDENTS IN THE SCHOOL | AVERAGE # OF LEVEL 1 AND 2 STUDENTS PARTICIPATING | AVERAGE % OF LEVEL 1 AND 2 STUDENTS PARTICIPATING |
| No data submitted |
|
Please describe the academic improvement that has occurred for participating students (please refer to specific data points).
Research-based Professional Development Activities for Teachers
Describe the professional development activities to date that are aligned with the school’s instructional needs.
| NAME OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY | DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) | INSTRUCTIONAL NEEDS ADDRESSED | # OF TEACHERS PARTICIPATING |
| No data submitted |
|
Based on the baseline and mid-year data, what additional professional development will be offered before the FCAT to help teachers increase student performance?
Parent Involvement Activities
Describe the parent involvement activities to date that are aligned with the school’s student achievement needs.
| ACTIVITY | DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) | ACHIEVEMENT NEED ADDRESSED | # OF PARENTS PARTICIPATING |
| No data submitted |
|
Based on the baseline and mid-year data, what additional parent involvement activities will be offered before the FCAT to address student achievement needs?
End of Mid-Year Report
AYP DATA
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
SCHOOL GRADE DATA
Brevard School District SURFSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2007-2008
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
93%
|
91%
|
77%
|
87%
|
348
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
70% |
76% |
|
|
146 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
73% (YES) |
79% (YES) |
|
|
152
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Brevard School District SURFSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2006-2007
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Science |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
94%
|
91%
|
98%
|
93%
|
376
|
Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
87% |
82% |
|
|
169 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
88% (YES) |
76% (YES) |
|
|
164
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
|
709 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |
Brevard School District SURFSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2005-2006
|
| |
Reading |
Math |
Writing |
Grade Points Earned |
|
| % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) |
94%
|
91%
|
85%
|
270
|
Writing: Takes into account % scoring 3.5 and above. Sometimes the District writing average is substituted for the writing average.
|
| % of Students Making Learning Gains |
73% |
83% |
|
156 |
3 ways to make gains:Improve FCAT LevelsMaintain Level 3, 4, or 5Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2 |
| Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? |
77% (YES) |
|
|
77
|
Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students . Yes, if 50% or more make gains .
|
| Points Earned |
|
|
|
503 |
|
| Percent Tested = 100% |
|
|
|
|
Percent of eligible students tested |
| School Grade |
|
|
|
A |
Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested |