VISION/MISSION/BELIEF STATEMENTS

Note: Required for Title I

Vision:
“It is our vision that we nurture and expose children to the love of learning, facilitate a desire to continue their education, and maintain a successful level of achievement at each grade level.”

Mission:
The mission of Medart Elementary is to provide a child-centered atmosphere where students are given the opportunity to excel. Our commitment is to provide experiences for personal growth and achievement for all members of the learning community through an enjoyment of learning. We encourage a lasting enthusiasm for learning while stressing moral standards, responsibility, and respect toward others.

We believe that all members of the Medart Elementary School community can learn. We take responsibility for our own learning and for fostering a learning environment that is continual, endless, and is ever changing to meet the developing needs of our society. We strive to instill confident autonomies and positive mental attitudes in our students that will insure life long learners.

Beliefs:
• Teachers, administrators, parents, and community members share in the responsibility of student learning and make this a chief priority.
• Students need to not only demonstrate their understanding of essential knowledge and skills, but also be actively involved in solving problems and producing quality work through developing the capacity to apply their learning and reasoning skills.
• Each student is a valued individual with unique physical, social, emotional, and intellectual needs. Meeting those needs is the primary focus of all decisions affecting the work, structure, and operation of the school providing students with a variety of opportunities and social mobility.
• A student’s self-esteem is enhanced by positive relationships and mutual respect among and between students and staff in a safe and physically comfortable environment that promotes student learning.
• Curriculum and instructional practices, based on the Sunshine State Standards, incorporate a variety of learning activities to accommodate differences in learning styles.
• Students with exceptionalities are provided with special services and resources to meet their individual needs.

Our Vision, Mission, and Belief Statements were revisited by the faculty and staff in the spring of the 2008 SY. Adjustments were made on the compilation of the data by one of our SAC Team members, Belinda McElroy. The following information shares the findings and the responses of Medart's stakeholders which shares our commitment to continually focus on student improvement.
VISION/MISSION/BELIEFSTATEMENTS

Vision: (No change)
“It is our vision that we nurture and expose children to the love of learning, facilitate a desire to continue their education, and maintain a successful level of achievement at each grade level.”

Mission: (1 change)
The mission of Medart Elementary is to provide a child-centered atmosphere where students are given the opportunity to excel. Our commitment is to provide experiences for personal growth and achievement for all members of the learning community through an enjoyment of learning. We encourage a lasting enthusiasm for learning while stressing moral standards, responsibility, and respect toward others.

We believe that all members of the Medart Elementary School community can learn. We take responsibility for our own learning and for fostering a learning environment that is continual, endless, and ever changing to meet the developing needs of our society. (This was reworded: We strive to instill confident autonomies and positive mental attitudes in our students that will insure life long learners.) We assist students in becoming self-directed, lifelong learners, confident in their ability to learn independently.
Beliefs: (1) (No change)
• Teachers, administrators, parents, and community members share in the responsibility of student learning and make this a chief priority.
• Students demonstrate their understanding of essential knowledge and skills while being actively involved in solving problems and producing quality work through developing the capacity to apply their reasoning skills.
• Each student is a valued individual with unique physical, social, emotional, and intellectual needs. Meeting those needs is the primary focus of all decisions impacting the work, structure, and operation of the school providing students with a variety of opportunities and social mobility.
• Each student’s self-esteem is enhanced by positive relationships and mutual respect among and between students and staff in a safe and physically comfortable environment that promotes student learning.
• Curriculum and instructional practices, based on the Sunshine State Standards, incorporate a variety of learning activities to accommodate differences in learning styles.
• Students with exceptionalities are provided with special services and resources to meet their individual needs.

(1) 2002, 2005, 2008 NSSE School Belief Inventory
Review of Vision/Mission/Beliefs
Medart Elementary has a common instructional framework, which guides curriculum, teaching, assessment, and learning climate. The vision statement and mission have assimilated into our culture, and this is proven by the manner in which they are demonstrated in the programs, practices, and working conditions at our school. Staff members worked in cross curricular multi grade level groups during a faculty meeting to reassess our mission statement, consider whether each statement shared our movement in the direction of achieving our school’s vision, and to determine if changes were needed. Each group was asked to write down any examples that they could think of to demonstrate how our school supports our beliefs through allocation of resources, instructional strategies, materials, actions, and programs.
The mission statement of Medart Elementary begins by stating our commitment to providing a child-centered atmosphere where students are given the opportunity to excel. Medart shows that it is child centered in many ways. We have several student driven organizations including a student council, a media club that does a daily-televised news program, a student generated newspaper, and an annual student directed talent show. One teacher noted that, “It would be much easier and time efficient if these activities were organized by teachers, but then the kids wouldn’t be learning how to do it.” We also provide many opportunities for artistically or athletically talented students to excel outside the regular classroom in the Art club, the Orff band, and the special area classes.
Our commitment is to provide experiences for personal growth and achievement for all members of the learning community through an enjoyment of learning. At Medart we are continually searching for ways to take the standards and make them relevant and fun. For example, someone found an on-line template for Jeopardy that allows us to adapt the game board to fit our categories and use our questions. Our AP created a folder on our server so that we can save and share teacher created game boards. Students and teachers feel like Jeopardy is an enjoyable way to take a quiz. During one of our annual parent workshops, we review the scientific method and give parents the basic information they need to assist their children with the students’ projects for the Annual Science Fair. It is all “hands-on” experimentation and the parents love it!
We encourage a lasting enthusiasm for learning while stressing moral standards, responsibility, and respect toward others. Compared to other schools of our size and demographic make-up, our school has a very low incidence of behavior problems, as measured by office referrals and suspensions. (SAC Report) Administrators, teachers, and staff members of our school communicate this aspect of our mission regularly to all stakeholders and serve as role models by embodying this belief. Everyone at Medart Elementary is given the same degree of respect by co-workers and students. Our philosophy has always been that everyone in our school has a role to play and all roles are important. One weak link, whether it be with a custodian, a teacher, or a lunchroom supervisor can affect the outcome of student learning, which is our ultimate goal. When there is a problem, we address it. Surveys administered by the School Advisory Council last year indicated a problem with behavior in the lunchroom. Students were getting too loud and getting out of their seats too often. Faculty representatives researched a Positive Behavior Support program and presented it to the faculty. We adapted the program to fit our needs and implemented it this year.
We believe that all members of the Medart Elementary School community can learn. This is evidenced in our implementation of ESE Inclusion classes and our practice of providing the least restrictive environment for all students. Students with severe disabilities are involved in the regular operation of the school. All students attend special area classes daily, participate in extracurricular activities, share the same playground, participate in fieldtrips, and attend assemblies with the entire student population. Although many of these activities are not academic, students are using these opportunities to learn social skills that will help them navigate in other contexts. We also feel that it is important for our general education students to learn to accept that people are all different, and that all students, regardless of differences, are of equal worth as human beings and as members of our school community. There are no ESE resource pull out programs in 2nd through 5th grades, except for Gifted and Speech Language. Our school has committed a great deal of resources to include students with specific learning disabilities into the mainstream classrooms. Inclusion teachers and paraprofessionals have attended several in-services, conferences, and workshops to learn methods for making inclusion work. The school has purchased addition materials such as individual whiteboards and classroom sets of math manipulatives for the Inclusion classes. Periodically, Inclusion teachers are given release time so that they can plan and share with other Inclusion teachers in our school.
We take responsibility for our own learning and for fostering a learning environment that is continual, endless, and ever changing to meet the developing needs of our society. Evidence that faculty and staff members at Medart take responsibility for their own continual learning is abundant. The administrators at our school ask faculty members to construct their own personal goals compatible with those of the school improvement plan, as they develop Individualized Professional Development Plans each year. An IPDP includes professional reflection, identification of resources for development, and documenting achievement. Twelve of or 45 member instructional staff have achieved Master’s or Specialist’s degrees, and four others are in the process of attaining advanced degrees. Three staff members are pursuing Bachelor’s Degrees in Elementary Education. Six of our faculty members are certified by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. This year, groups of teachers formed Book Study Groups, which meet weekly to reflect on and discuss professional literature selections. Faculty and staff members attend conferences, in-services, and workshops whenever they are made available.
Medart Elementary faculty members realize that pencils, paper, and textbooks are not enough to prepare students for the future. Technology is becoming more sophisticated and more all encompassing at an exponential rate. We are preparing our students for the future by integrating technology into all parts of the curriculum through the use of computer interactive whiteboards. Our commitment to preparing students for the future is also demonstrated in our efforts to persuade them to be good stewards of our delicate environmental resources. During our annual Project Learning Tree Week, students enjoy five days of nature hikes, interaction with live animals, and lessons taught by practicing biologists, naturalists, and environmentalists.
We assist students in becoming self-directed, lifelong learners, confident in their ability to learn independently. The faculty and staff of Medart Elementary believe that by helping too much, we can inadvertently, create students that are helpless. Scaffolding instruction so that students are given only the amount of accommodation and assistance that is necessary is an important component of our teaching strategies. We teach students how to learn by using resources such as libraries, the Internet, peer supports, and by giving them explicit instruction in problem solving strategies.
Conclusion:
The curriculum, strategies, materials, programs, beliefs and learning environment at Medart Elementary model excellence in instructional program coherence. The administration operates and manages the school with methods aligned to the mission statement. Medart Elementary is making great strides toward obtaining our vision, “to nurture and expose children to the love of learning, facilitate a desire to continue their education, and maintain a successful level of achievement at each grade level.”




2002, 2005, AND 2008 NSSE School Belief Inventory


SCHOOL PROFILE DEMOGRAPHICS

SCHOOL PROFILE DEMOGRAPHICS
In the 2007-2008 SY, the enrollment for Medart Elementary School was 676 students based on the February 08 FTE report. Medart Elementary faculty took a stand in the 2006-2007 SY, and through discussion, decided morale was a stronger issue than having five teachers recognized in the category of Outstanding. All teachers above a satisfactory in their personal evaluation will be High Performing teachers. A discussion forum was held this year with the faculty, and the faculty unanimously decided to continue this practice. Medart Elementary has always been proud of having a faculty that works together in a cohesive manner. We exhibit this through actions, consideration, and respect towards each other with the focus being on the welfare of the school and its students. We take pride in our team spirit.
Medart Elementary boasts several National Board Certified Teachers - Beth Brown, Margaret Callaghan, Belinda McElroy, Brooke Mohr, Diane Perez, and Virginia Tillman. Charlotte Hoover, fifth grade teacher, was selected by her co-workers as Medart’s Teacher of the Year. Medart Elementary recognized Dana Hicks as Teacher of the Month in January, and Lori McNally in July. The Wakulla County School Board gave these teachers special recognition during their monthly meetings. Medart’s faculty and staff attended many workshops during the 2007-2008 SY. All of our teachers and paraprofessionals are highly qualified with all teachers in field.
The faculty and staff continue to create student incentive programs to increase interest in reading and encourage good behavior. Within the school, we have a Terrific Kids program, which recognizes and rewards those students who excel in citizenship and work habits. Students are nominated by their teachers and receive recognition and rewards during a televised program via the school’s closed circuit TV system. Students read books checked out from the media center and earn points in the Accelerated Reader Program by correctly responding to questions on AR quizzes taken on our Internet hosted Renaissance Place. We also recognize students who achieve honor roll status, excellent citizenship, and perfect attendance each nine-week term by presenting ribbons with their report cards. At the end of the school year, we have a special assembly for these students where their parents are invited. Trophies, pins, and certificates are awarded for citizenship, academics, the arts, and physical fitness.
This year there were several academic programs offered to Medart Elementary students. These included Title I, which encompasses the entire school population, and Camp TEAM, which is an after school remediation and enrichment program for third, fourth, and fifth grades. These programs were funded with SAI, Title I, and School Recognition funds.
Student assessment is an on-going process in every school district. In Wakulla County this was accomplished through the administration of SAT 10 in Kindergarten through second grades in the 2007-2008 SY. Third, fourth, and fifth graders took FCAT SSS and NRT in Math and Reading. In addition, fourth graders took FCAT Writing and fifth graders took FCAT Science. Test scores by Wakulla County Schools show that our students excel. Medart continues to do its part in helping our district to achieve high rankings. For the 2007-2008 SY, Medart Elementary made its seventh A in a row with our highest score ever – 594. We were awarded Provisional Adequate Yearly Progress.
This year Medart Elementary School worked closely with several Flagler College students through internships and practicum activities. Their fresh knowledge was absorbed by some of our veteran teachers, which generated a positive experience for teachers and students alike.
Medart has an exciting and active volunteer program. Many parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and community members provide our faculty, staff, and students with help and assistance in enriching activities and educational opportunities. These volunteers have willingly given 4,461 hours of their time to help Medart in its drive to succeed. Our hard working volunteer coordinator, Candace Lowe continues to manage a successful Volunteer Program.
Medart is also proud of its outstanding P.T.O. and the projects undertaken by this group. A landscaping project, which began in the fall of 2002, has continued with the planting of many more trees and shrubs around the school campus. This has helped provide new environmental experiences for our students. Another big project, the annual Carnival, rose over $19,000 gross. Each year, the P.T.O. gives money to teachers for purchasing additional classroom materials. For the 2008-2009 SY, each teacher will receive $100.00 to be spent in the summer of 2008 for consumable supplies. The faculty and staff are treated several times a year to lunches and breakfasts as a ‘Welcome Back’ or ‘Thank You’ from this wonderful parent group. We are supportive and appreciative of our P.T.O. and look forward to another dynamic year.
The school’s Mission and Beliefs were assessed by all stakeholders in the school setting in the 2007-2008 SY. The 2007-2008 SAC and faculty agreed that the Beliefs and Vision needed to be updated to match our high expectations for students to perform at a higher level. Just as the Missions and Beliefs were reestablished for the SACS Report for the Peer Review Team in October 2002, the Mission and Belief statements were updated in the spring of 2008. We feel our Mission and Beliefs are well defined within the focus and boundaries of our expectations.


SCHOOL MATCH

Note: Required for all Assistance Plus Schools

School Match:

N/A


QUALITY STAFF

Highly Qualified Administrators

Note: Required for Title I

Robert Pearce, Principal

• Native of Wakulla County; graduated from Wakulla High School; received BS degree in
Physical Education in 1987 from Florida State University; received MS degree in
Educational Leadership from Florida State University in 1997.
• Twelve years of teaching experience and seven years of administrative experience
• 2004 and 2007 Administrator of the Year for Wakulla County Schools
• Completed Florida Principal Leadership Development Program for High Quality Schools
in 2003
• ESOL Certified
• Philosophy for Administrative Duties: “It is important to recognize the individualism of
every person that an administrator serves, whether they are a teacher, a student, or
a member of the support staff. Their needs must be met whenever possible. The happiness of all those
within a school community leads toward a successful school. An administrator must
always be facilitative in nature and the best listener possible with the willingness to
make tough and sometimes unpopular decisions. To the best of my ability, I provide
opportunities for all stakeholders to be recognized for the successes and
accomplishments of the school with the intent of shared leadership and a feeling of
ownership for all parties”.

Sharon Kemp, Assistant Principal

• Native of Wakulla County; graduated from Wakulla High School; received BS degree in
Elementary Education in 1976 from Florida State University; received MS degree in
Educational Leadership from Florida State University in 1997
• 30+ years teaching experience including 3rd – 5th grades and guidance at Sopchoppy
Elementary and Medart Elementary School
• Served as School Advisory Council Chairperson and Technology Resource Teacher for
Sopchoppy Elementary and Medart Elementary for 10+ years
• ESOL Certified
• Five years administrative experience as Assistant Principal
• 2007 Administrator of the Year for Wakulla County Schools; selected 2007 District AP to represent Wakulla County in the state competition
• Philosophy of Teaching: “All children have an innate desire to learn. As a teacher and
now as an administrator, I must provide the most informative, age appropriate lessons
possible in an encouraging learning environment.”

Recruitment/Retention of Highly Qualified Teachers

Note: Required for Title I

Medart Elementary has consistently had a low turnover of teachers. We employed forty-six teachers for the 2007-2008 SY. Due to the addition of a new elementary school, and the cuts from state funding, we lost six teachers, and our art teacher will be shared with another elementary school. We had one kindergarten teacher leave due to illness, so there will be one new kindergarten teacher. For the 2008-2009 SY, we have forty-five teachers (3 of these are shared with other schools). Based on this data, 93.8% of the teachers returned. Our administration strives to select new teachers that fit our vision, philosophy, and mission of the school.
Medart Elementary had 14.5% of our teachers with a Master's Degree or higher in the 2007-2008 SY. Several of our teachers are currently working on advanced degrees. One hundred percent of Medart’s teachers are teaching in-field and teaching appropriate level content. Our data is proof; Medart Elementary was an A school for 2007-2008 SY.

 

Show Attached Staff List 


ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Coordination and Integration

Note: Required for Title I

Services provided through the following programs:
Title I - Above and beyond equipment and supplies.
Title II - Teacher inservice and staff development.
Title IV - PBS and Guidance
SAVE Program
Volunteer Program
Are coordinated in order to enhance the services and instruction provided to the students at Medart Elementary.

School Wide Improvement Model

Note: Required for Title I

NEEDS ASSESSMENT TOOLS USED:

A. Results from School and District Climate Surveys completed by parents, students, faculty, and staff during the 2007-08 SY were reviewed.
B. Results from the 2007-2008 SY Stanford 10 results (kindergarten, 1st, and 2nd grades) and FCAT NRT Math and Reading (3rd – 5th grades) were reviewed.
C. Results from 2007-2008 SY fourth grade FCAT Writing and fifth grade FCAT Science were reviewed.
D. Results from 2007-2008 SY FCAT Reading and FCAT Math (3rd, 4th, and 5th grades) were reviewed.
E. Diagnostic results/Disaggrated data
F. Teacher observed behaviors and performances
G. All programs are research based with school-wide use of Harcourt Reading Series and
other research based programs.

NCLB Public School Choice

Note: Required for Title I

Communication with Parents
Communication is an ongoing concern at Medart Elementary. As a Title I School, parental involvement is a major component of our communication process. Listed are ways we strive to communicate with parents: • End of Nine Week Report Cards and Mid Term Progress Reports • Weekly posting of grades on Edline • Field Trip newsletters • Monthly calendar/menu • Telephone recorded messages • Notes as needed • Disciplinary referrals • Upcoming events • Fundraisers • Graded papers with parent signatures • Folders with graded papers • Parental requests met • Marquee with upcoming events • Open House • PTO • School and District Web Sites • Teacher email • Parent participation form • Hubache Report – FDLRS • IEP’s • Daily notes as needed • Telephone calls – logs • Title I and Parent Nights to help parents help their children • Harcourt online link • Grade level packets including FCAT materials• Student Handbook • Volunteer handbook/opportunities Link to Website www.wakullaschooldistrict.org/mes/

No Attached Public School Choice Notice to Parents file

No Attached Notification of SINI Status file

Pre-School Transition

Note: Required for Title I

Pre-School Transition
Medart Elementary Assistant Principal, Sharon Kemp visits Wakulla Educational Center (WEC) and Sopchoppy Educational Center (SEC) in the spring during a Parent (Lapsit) meeting to meet with parents and explain registration requirements. In the spring, Pre-K students from WEC, SEC, and Trinity Lutheran Preschool, come to Medart Elementary for a Kindergarten Orientation. Children visit the kindergarten classrooms and tour the school with the Principal or Assistant Principal. Coordination of services and discussions between administrators and teachers from WEC, SEC, and MES make for a smooth transition to kindergarten for the Pre-K students. At Open House, the Friday proceeding the first day of school, Kindergarten Orientation is provided for students and parents. On the first day of school, Medart encourages parents to come to the Boo-Hoo Breakfast after they take their child to class. This gives parents the opportunity to express their feelings and to be comforted.


MENTORING AND EXTENDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Teacher Mentoring

Note: Required for Title I

Medart Elementary is a caring environment where all teachers, administrators, and staff work together. We work as a collaborative TEAM and share resources, materials, and time. We have six National Board Certified Teachers, one NBPTS Candidate, and within three years, 3-5 more teachers will become candidates. Some of the ways we mentor beginning teachers, new teachers to our school, and veteran teachers are:
• Establish regular grade level meetings
• Assign mentor if needed
• Plan together
• Grade Level Chairs
• Checklists
• Elicit help when needed
• Share Goals for Evaluations
• Ask upper grades what students need to know
• List of tests and timelines
• Internet and Technology resources
• Invite teachers to join different organizations
• Local, State, and National In-services, Workshops, and Conferences
• Grade Level Chairs meet with other teachers as needed
• Writing measurable goals for IEPs
• District level assistance
• Updates on State requirements
• Loan class library books
• Help with scheduling and pacing
• Notify teachers of school policies
• Encouragement
• Video taping for NBPTS
• Procedural awareness written and verbal
• Location of materials and resources
• New ideas from other school and innovated ideas from interns and graduates
• Participation in activities, events and socializing
• Shared responsibilities such as, i.e. Brain Bowl, SAVE, Spelling Bee, Science Fair, etc.
• Orientation
• Handbook
• Schedules
• School Board Policies
• Cover each other’s classes when needed, i.e. performances, grants, and etc.
• Cross curriculum collaboration with basic skills – interdisciplinary

Show Attached Teacher Mentoring List

Extended Learning Opportunities

Note: Required for Title I

Extended Learning Opportunities
Medart Elementary provides learning opportunities for students who have been identified through Camp TEAM (an after school program), and for third grade students scoring level 1 on FCAT Reading through remediation during our Summer Reading Camp.
• Plan together
• Grade Level Chairs
• Checklists
• Elicit help when needed
• Share Goals for Evaluations
• Coordinate efforts between intermediate and primary grades
• List of tests and timelines
• Internet and Technology resources
• Invite teachers to join different organizations
• Local, State, and National In-services, Workshops, and Conferences
• Grade Level Chairs meet with other teachers as needed
• Writing measurable goals for IEP’s
• District level assistance
• Updates on State requirements
• Loan class library books
• Help with scheduling and pacing
• Notify teachers of school policies
• Encouragement
• Video taping for NBPTS
• Procedural awareness written and verbal
• Location of materials and resources
• New ideas from other school and innovated ideas from interns and graduates
• Participation in activities, events, and socializing
• Shared responsibilities such as, Brain Bowl, SAVE, Spelling Bee, Science Fair, etc.
• Orientation
• Handbook
• Schedules
• School Board Policies
• Cover each other’s classes when needed, i.e. performances, grants, and etc.
• Cross curriculum collaboration with basic skills – interdisciplinary


SCHOOLS GRADED C OR BELOW

Professional Development

Disaggregated Data

Informal and Formal Assessments

Alternative Instructional Delivery Methods


SCHOOLS OFFERING PRIMARILY GRADES 6 THROUGH 12

Different Innovative Approaches to Instruction

Responsibility of Teaching Reading for Every Teacher

Quality Professional Development for Teachers and Leaders

Small Learning Communities (SLC)

Intensive Intervention in Reading and Mathematics

Parental Access and Support

Applied and Integrated Courses

Course Choice Based on Student Goals / Interests / Talent

Master Schedules Based on Student Needs

Academic and Career Planning



 

GOALS

 

ADDITIONAL GOALS

 

FINAL BUDGET

SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL

School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance

The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of teachers, education support employees, students (for middle, junior high and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school.

Yes. Agree with the above statement.

SAC Involvement

1. By-Laws were discussed and ratified at the September 5, 2008 SAC Team meeting.
2. The dates and topics for the year were discussed and planned for 2008-2009 SY.
3. On September 5,2008, Mr. Pearce discussed A+ monies with the SAC Team. On September 12, 2008 A+ monies were budgeted and recommended by Medart Elementary School Faculty. Budget consisted of bonuses for all last year’s employees. Additional funds were allocated for after school programs. All remaining available funds would be approved later.
4.The School Advisory Council, faculty, and staff looked at the current expectations produced in the School Improvement Plan 2007-2008 SY to see if these were still applicable for the present. The expectations were discussed at several Faculty Meetings and were the foundation for the Goals, Objectives, and Strategies for the School Improvement Plan 2008-2009 SY. The Goals were in direct relationship to the District, and the Objectives and Strategies had minor revisions to help the students at Medart Elementary improve their academic performance. The SAC, faculty, and staff agreed upon all revisions and strategies in May 2008.
5. The school’s SAC routinely collected data about the school’s instructional and organizational effectiveness as it prepared to develop the School Improvement Plan. This included a consistent review of student performance data, the instructional practices occurring in the school, and any changes occurring in the school and community. This process was completed in May 2008 with consensus from all stakeholders.
6. The SAC met monthly and more as needed starting in September 2007 to formulate the School Improvement Plan for 2008-2009 SY. The SAC reviewed the progress of the School Improvement Plan for 2007-2008 SY mid-year and at the end of the year.
The SAC and the faculty agreed that the Goals were in alignment with the District’s Comprehensive Research-Based Reading Plan and District Accreditation. The faculty and staff met several times to improve the plan for the school year 2008-2009.
In 2002-03 SY, we implemented a Professional Development Committee and Plan, based on a Needs Assessment. This four year plan and will return to the beginning of the rotation in 2008-2009 SY. This is to insure all faculty members have the opportunity to participate in local, regional, and state workshops/conferences. The plan is on a rotational cycle and will help keep our teachers abreast of new techniques to help improve student academic performance. Additional teachers outside the rotation are also sent to state conferences, regional, and local workshops as needs emerge. The professional development opportunities have given our educators breadth and depth to improve student performance.


SAC Members

Members
1)  Robert Pearce,   Principal
2)  Diane Perez,   SAC Chair
3)  Charlotte Hoover,   Teacher
4)  Beth Brown,   Teacher
5)  Belinda McElroy,   Teacher
6)  Mary Green,   Teacher
7)  Amy Anderson,   Teacher
8)  Amy Geiger,   Parent
9)  Kim Russell,   Parent
10)  Karen Perkins,   Parent
11)  Mary Katherine Westmark,   Parent
12)  Sue Bruce,   Parent
13)  Ray Johnson,   Parent
14)  Jackie Lawhon,   Parent
15)  Bhaveshri Patel,   Parent
16)  Sandy Barnes,   Parent
17)  Tammie Barfield,   Parent
18)  Jay Westmark,   Community Member
19)  Kristi Thomas,   School Support Personnel

IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION

Adequate Progress Statement

There will be a mid-year report (formative), and an end-of-the-year report (summative) that will check our progress and growth. The end of the year is based on Appendix F which shows adequate progress:


Appendix F

WAKULLA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
YEAR END REVIEW OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS

SCHOOL: Medart Elementary DATE: 6/1/09

Reading Goal Statement: All students will make annual learning gains and demonstrate mastery level of State Standards.

Objectives:
1. By June 2009, 42% or more of second, third, fourth and fifth grade students will make a year's growth, or score at or above grade level in reading as evidenced by an appropriate skills lab report including ESE students. (2007-2008 SY 77%)
2. By June 2009, 57% or more of first through fifth grade students will have an average score of 52% or above in reading as measured by the Stanford 10 for second grade and a score of level 3 as measured by the FCAT SSS for third, fourth, and fifth grades. (2007-2008 SY, SAT 10 - 85%, 73.6% FCAT NRT – 83.3% FCAT SSS)

Math Goal Statement: All students will make a learning gain in math.

Objectives:
1. By June 2009, at least 54% or higher of second, third, fourth, and fifth grade students will achieve a ten point gain using grade level Harcourt Math End of Year Test at the beginning and at the end of the year to measure growth including ESE students. (2007-2008 SY 96.3%)
2. By June 2009, at least 60% or higher of fourth and fifth grade students will score a Level 3 or above in math as measured by FCAT SSS. (2007-2008 SY 76%)

Writing Goal Statement: To continue to excel as an ‘A’ school, all students will improve their writing skills.

Objective: By June 2009, 59% or higher of the fourth grade students will score in Levels 3.5 or above on the Fourth Grade Writing Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. (2007-2008 SY 66% )

Science Goal Statement: Improve the overall academic performance in Science.

Objective: The 5th grade FCAT Science SSS average will be at or above the 2009 state mean scale score. (2007-2008 SY School-325, District-314, State-310)

Parental Involvement Goal Statement: Parents will be active partners in the education of their children by taking advantage of opportunities to learn methods for helping their children achieve success in school.

Objective: By June 2009, 8% of our students’ parents will participate in training opportunities provided by the school. (2006-2007 SY 12%)

School Safety and Discipline Strategies Goal Statement: School Safety and Discipline will be ongoing processes.

Objective: By June 2009, 86% of our students, parents, and teachers will agree Medart Elementary has a safe environment. (2007-2008 SY 96.7%)

Medart will achieve adequate progress if six of the eight Goals are met.


 

REPORTING

Baseline Data Report

Note: Baseline Data Report is required for all Repeating F, F schools and D schools that were F in 2005-2008 and all Schools in Need of Improvement (SINI).

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 3
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 4
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 5
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 6
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 7
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 8
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 9
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 10
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 11
  Reading Baseline Data Mathematics Baseline Data Writing Baseline Data Science Baseline Data Baseline Data
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Name of Assessment Used


Baseline data aggregated at school level

 
 
Reading
Baseline Data
Mathematics
Baseline Data
Writing
Baseline Data
Science
Baseline Data

Baseline Data
No data submitted

End of Baseline Data Report



Mid-Year Report

 

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 3
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 4
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 5
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

 
FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 6
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 7
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 8
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 9
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

 
FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 10
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FCAT Assessed Grade Level: 11
  Reading Mathematics Writing Science
  % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery % Mastery %Non- Mastery
Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mid-Year Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
% Change from Baseline Data 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

 

Empty data from baseline data aggregated for your school.




Reading Data Analysis

1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.


2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.


3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.


4. What specific strategies will be used to improve the achievement of non-AYP subgroups?




Mathematics Data Analysis

1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.


2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.


3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.


4. What specific strategies will be used to improve the achievement of non-AYP subgroups?




Writing Data Analysis

1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.


2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.


3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.




Science Data Analysis

1. Describe the gains and/or decreases in mastery that have occurred since the baseline assessment. Include specific information about the grade levels or subgroups where improvements or declines have occurred.


2. Describe the specific strategies or school improvement activities that have contributed to increases in student mastery. Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup.


3. What changes to instruction, strategies, and/or school improvement activities will be made prior to the administration of the FCAT to ensure that students reach mastery? Please be specific for each grade level and/or subgroup that saw declines.




Extended Learning Programs for Students

Describe the activities (e.g. after school, pull-outs, etc) that have taken place to date.

SUBJECT AREAFREQUENCYDURATIONTOTAL # OF LEVEL 1 AND 2 STUDENTS IN THE SCHOOLAVERAGE # OF LEVEL 1 AND 2 STUDENTS PARTICIPATINGAVERAGE % OF LEVEL 1 AND 2 STUDENTS PARTICIPATING
No data submitted



Please describe the academic improvement that has occurred for participating students (please refer to specific data points).




Research-based Professional Development Activities for Teachers

Describe the professional development activities to date that are aligned with the school’s instructional needs.

NAME OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITYDATE
(MM/DD/YYYY)
INSTRUCTIONAL NEEDS ADDRESSED# OF TEACHERS PARTICIPATING
No data submitted



Based on the baseline and mid-year data, what additional professional development will be offered before the FCAT to help teachers increase student performance?




Parent Involvement Activities

Describe the parent involvement activities to date that are aligned with the school’s student achievement needs.

ACTIVITYDATE
(MM/DD/YYYY)
ACHIEVEMENT NEED ADDRESSED# OF PARENTS PARTICIPATING
No data submitted



Based on the baseline and mid-year data, what additional parent involvement activities will be offered before the FCAT to address student achievement needs?




End of Mid-Year Report

 

AYP DATA

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Wakulla MEDART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0011
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 329
Math: 329  
2007-2008
School Grade1:
A   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N
TOTAL4  100  100  84  81    82      NA  17  16  NA 23  19  NA 74  NA  79  NA 
WHITE  100  100  85  82    82      NA  15  15  NA 21  18  NA 74  NA  78  NA 
BLACK    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  100  100  80  77    79      NA  24  20  NA 27  23  NA 73  NA  75  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  100  100    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Wakulla MEDART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0011
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 296
Math: 296  
2006-2007
School Grade1:
A   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? YES   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
% of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  99  83  77  87         NA  24  19  NA 19  23  NA 81  NA  67  NA 
WHITE  99  99  85  79  88         NA  19  17  NA 16  21  NA 82  NA  71  NA 
BLACK    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  98  76  73  87         NA  34  26  NA 26  27  NA 76  NA  69  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  98  97  62  66      NA      NA  50  41  NA 37  34  NA 65  NA  62  NA 

2005-2006 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Wakulla MEDART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 0011
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
Read: 286
Math: 286  
2005-2006
School Grade1:
A   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? 5 PRO 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students?
Math
Tested 95% of the students?
44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading
Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
  2006 Y/N 2006 Y/N 2006 Y/N 2006 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2004 2005 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N
TOTAL4  100  100  81  81  93   87      NA  18  19  NA 20  19  NA
WHITE  100  100  83  84  91   88  NA      NA  16  17  NA 18  16  NA
BLACK  100  100  68  NA  65  NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  100  100  73  74  94   87  NA      NA  26  27  NA 28  26  NA
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  100  100  57  63      NA      NA  43  43  NA 42  37  NA


SCHOOL GRADE DATA

Wakulla School District
MEDART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
2007-2008
  Reading
  
Math
  
Writing
  
Science
  
Grade
Points
Earned
 
% Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 87%  83%  66%  59%  295   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
% of Students Making Learning Gains 70%  74%      144  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 67% (YES)  88% (YES)      155  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         594   
    Percent Tested = 100%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Wakulla School District
    MEDART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    2006-2007
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Science
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 88%  79%  84%  52%  303   Writing and Science: Takes into account the % scoring 3.5 and above on Writing and the % scoring 3 and above on Science. Sometimes the District writing and/or science average is substituted for the writing and/or science component.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 82%  58%      140  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 75% (YES)  53% (YES)      128  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students in reading and math. Yes, if 50% or more make gains in both reading and math.
    Points Earned         571   
    Percent Tested = 98%           Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade         A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested


    Wakulla School District
    MEDART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    2005-2006
      Reading
      
    Math
      
    Writing
      
    Grade
    Points
    Earned
     
    % Meeting High Standards (FCAT Level 3 and Above) 86%  84%  78%  248   Writing: Takes into account % scoring 3.5 and above. Sometimes the District writing average is substituted for the writing average.
    % of Students Making Learning Gains 63%  68%    131  3 ways to make gains:
  • Improve FCAT Levels
  • Maintain Level 3, 4, or 5
  • Improve more than one year within Level 1 or 2
  • Adequate Progress of Lowest 25% in the School? 58% (YES)      58  Adequate Progress based on gains of lowest 25% of students . Yes, if 50% or more make gains .
    Points Earned       437   
    Percent Tested = 100%         Percent of eligible students tested
    School Grade       A  Grade based on total points, adequate progress, and % of students tested